I would like to hereby nominate Korvin Szanto to the CC.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups
1. Woody Gilk
2. Matthew Weier O'Phinney
3. Beau Simensen
4. Adam Englander
5. Larry Garfield
6. Matteo Beccati
7. Benni Mack
Regards,
Adam Culp
IBMi Toolkit Rep
On Sunday, May 5, 2019 at 5:48:35 PM UTC-4, Alessandro Lai wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
> a
+1 from IBMiToolkit
On Monday, November 11, 2019 at 4:49:12 AM UTC-5, Alessandro Lai wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
> after a long review phase of my PR and multiple fixes and amendments, I
> think it's now ready:
>
> https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/pull/1195
>
> The PR adds a new document
From: IBMiToolkit
1. Korvin Szanto
2. Chris Tankersley
3. Enrico Zimuel
4. Ben Edmunds
5. Massimiliano Arione
Thanks,
Adam
On Friday, January 10, 2020 at 3:42:17 AM UTC-5, Alessandro Lai wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
> as specified in the previous thread (
> https://groups
Brad,
I see nothing in that thread that would prompt me to think that was a
negative experience. The conversation was very well thought out and helpful.
On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 5:02:40 AM UTC-4, Brad Ito wrote:
>
> Speaking towards open source leaders needing to foster community, I had a
>
Larry,
I see nothing in the posts you reference that would lead me to the line of
thinking you are outlining. In all cases Paul spoke very frank,
non-confrontational, and in a very well thought out manor to facilitate the
subjects at hand.
On Thursday, June 23, 2016 at 4:16:39 PM UTC-4, Lar
simply join the pitchfork mob, but
weigh the accusations and evidence from a non-emotional point of view.
Thank you for reading.
I will self-throttle now and not post on this thread unless addressed
personally.
-- Adam Culp
On Thursday, June 23, 2016 at 3:53:03 PM UTC-4, Michael Cullum wrote:
>
Too bad. Perhaps once things settle down, or you find yourself more able to
cope with drama without taking it too personal, you might return. See you
around.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 4:05:49 PM UTC-4, Mike van Riel wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> In these last few
Thanks for your service Kris. Hope to see you back if something interesting
comes up later. See you around.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Saturday, June 25, 2016 at 10:18:09 AM UTC-4, Kris Wallsmith wrote:
>
> Hello group,
>
> I am writing to withdraw my membership from PHP FIG. I do n
Woody,
This is not appropriate. Please wait for the current drama to subside, and
then evaluate proper measures to be taken. All this will do at the moment
is cause more drama and stress.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Monday, June 27, 2016 at 12:11:01 AM UTC-4, Woody Gilk wrote:
>
> In li
Woody,
Same as with PSR-17, this is not appropriate. Please wait for the current
drama to subside, and then evaluate proper measures to be taken. All this
will do at the moment is cause more drama and stress.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Monday, June 27, 2016 at 12:09:43 AM UTC-4, Woody Gilk wrote
scope. Too bad.
Communication will suffer.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Monday, June 27, 2016 at 12:05:24 PM UTC-4, Jordi Boggiano wrote:
>
> Adam if you don't have anything to add please refrain from posting.
> Especially if you are just going to post exactly the kind of
> cond
+1
On Monday, June 27, 2016 at 1:29:01 PM UTC-4, Andreas Heigl wrote:
>
> Hey Woody.
> Am 27.06.16 um 17:23 schrieb Woody Gilk:
> > My interest is ensuring that PSR-17 and PSR-15 continue to move
> > forward while the other issue is resolved. I am not asking for this to
> > be dramatic, and t
alidated in his
strong stance.
At some future time, if Woody's fears become reality, my feelings may
change in this matter. But that is to be seen.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 at 4:08:38 AM UTC-4, Rafael Dohms wrote:
>
>
>> What precedent leads you to bel
process, and one individual should not be thought of as more important
than another. It takes all parties to get this done.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 at 7:54:59 AM UTC-4, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>
>
> On 28 Jun 2016, at 13:47, Adam Culp >
> wrote:
>
> O
Rafael,
Your words to Paul said it clearly, "...picking apart simple english..."
also applies to how you interpreted what I said when asking why one person
should step down over another. There was ZERO implications, it was an
example used in a question.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Tue
of cowardice or
weakness. In fact it is proper to seek council.
This is not a time for extremes on either side, but rather understanding
and learning.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 at 1:20:19 PM UTC-4, Joshua Drake wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am an outsider to this group but
Sorry to see you go, but it is for an excellent cause. I'm sure I'll see
you around.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Wednesday, June 29, 2016 at 12:29:26 PM UTC-4, Joe Ferguson wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I would like to announce my resignation from my current Secretary role
&
Please stop adding conjecture and breeding more drama?
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Thursday, June 30, 2016 at 2:30:24 PM UTC-4, pedrofr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Even in the middle of such heated argument, Paul refuses to have a private
> conversation with the secretaries and Woody, to se
+1 IBMiToolkit
On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 10:01:00 AM UTC-4, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>
> Aloha,
>
> So given that there didn’t see to be any opposition (then again also no
> support by-side me) for the adoption of pimcore in the original thread
> requesting for addition to the member list, I
the issue
and continue communication/coaching in a more constructive way, such as
Pedro (I assume that is his name since the email address, and not a
signature, carries that name) shared in this thoughtful reply to Paul's
request.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Friday, July 22, 2016 at 4:22:
+1 IBMiToolkit
On Monday, June 13, 2016 at 5:51:10 PM UTC-4, Michael Cullum wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> It’s been over two weeks so it’s time to put this to a vote. Pull
> request/bylaw changes:
> https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/pull/765/files (I recommend you
> view rendered).
>
> The tl;
-1
--Adam Culp, IBMiToolkit
On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 7:56:52 PM UTC-4, Samantha Quiñones wrote:
>
> All,
>
> The discussion period having concluded, I am now opening a vote on the
> matter of the proposal to require the Aura project to name a new voting
> repres
n the
Core Committee accepts the PSR there will be much wider adoption and
acceptance.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Adam Culp
IBMiToolkit
On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 3:01:09 PM UTC-4, Michael Cullum wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> A vote for FIG 3.0 is [potentially/hopefully] getting closer and one
as present", which by it's definition is vague. I think
current activity, as well as these posts, by secretaries, is already
bordering on being "too much". Please be cautious of "cheering" versus
aiding members understanding of issues at hand.
Regards,
Adam Culp, IBM
.
Regards,
Adam Culp, IBMiToolkit
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to
opportunity...pending nomination and voting.
Regards,
Adam Culp, IBMiToolkit
On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 6:28:11 PM UTC-4, Christopher Pitt wrote:
>
> secretaries taking an active role in a discussion threads, versus aiding
>> members in understanding content
>
>
> I don't
Thanks Chris. Taking this topic to a new thread. Sorry for diverting from
the original thread topic, it was not my intent.
Regards,
Adam Culp, IBMiToolkit
On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 6:49:15 PM UTC-4, Christopher Pitt wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> I apologise, that was not meant condes
e aware of something they should be concerned about until it is too late.
However, as a member of the interoperability group it would be somewhat
expected for them to comply by the outside community.
Regards,
Adam Culp, IBMiToolkit
On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 6:58:16 PM UTC-4, Larry Garfield wrote:
&g
type of leadership that is needed amongst
the secretaries, to ensure they are aiding the members in a constructive
way.
Having Paul as a secretary will facilitate allowing members to focus on
important things, and help remove the political distractions from the work
at hand.
Regards,
Adam
is important, this new body should work WITH the
> FIG. Not above it and not as a subordinate. But hand-in-hand to create
> standards that work both for the projects AND for the community.
>
Regards,
Adam Culp
IBMiToolkit
On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 11:38:23 AM UTC-4, Joe Fergus
+1 IBMiToolkit
Samantha has done a tremendous job remaining on task, and not over-stepping
the duties asked of her. She has been available, and I'm sure spent a
significant amount of time in her contribution.
Regards,
Adam Culp
IBMiToolkit
On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 10:58:47 AM
heir given task and randomly
decide bias, it hurts the FIG and prevents the secretaries from doing what
they were voted on to do.
Therefore I am calling that we enhance the eligibility criteria to
eliminate this bias and confusion of duties in the secretary role.
Regards,
Adam Culp
IBMiToolkit
-
Oh +1, what a great nominee. Matt would be an amazing secretary.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 3:25:40 PM UTC-4, grey...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I hereby nominate Matthew Trask for the position of Secretary.
>
> Matt reached out to me with an interest to serve
the moment do you see any reason why you would not remain for the
full term?
5. Will you be able to keep a level head?
Regards,
Adam Culp
IBMiToolkit
On Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 4:18:42 AM UTC-4, Jordi Boggiano wrote:
>
> Hey figistas,
>
> (I'm on mobile so will try and ke
reason why you would not remain for the
full term?
5. Will you be able to keep a level head?
Regards,
Adam Culp
IBMiToolkit
On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 9:01:13 PM UTC-4, Matt Trask wrote:
>
> Thanks for the kind words Adam, that means a lot to hear from you.
>
> On Wednesday, Aug
reason why you would not remain for the
full term?
5. Will you be able to keep a level head?
Regards,
Adam Culp
IBMiToolkit
On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 11:48:49 PM UTC-4, Amanda Folson wrote:
>
> Thanks for the nomination, Larry! I accept.
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:42 PM, La
reason why you would not remain for the
full term?
5. Will you be able to keep a level head?
Regards,
Adam Culp
IBMiToolkit
On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 3:36:32 PM UTC-4, pmjones wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 10, 2016, at 13:27, Nate Abele >
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
Thanks for the question. I will return to this with a full idea and
supporting facts. A little distracted for a day or so.
Regards,
Adam Culp
IBMiToolkit
On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 6:56:07 PM UTC-4, grey...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> What are the proposed changes to the eligibility, exact
all"
solution...and maybe that's OK. I do feel that overall it is a step in the
right direction.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 5:29:45 PM UTC-4, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> Hi Adam. There seems to be two different threads in your comment, so I am
> goi
ss of role.
There are many out there smarter than me who can really help this become
better. Please contribute.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 6:56:07 PM UTC-4, grey...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> What are the proposed changes to the eligibility, exactly? Do you have
> wo
, what do you hope to accomplish as secretary?
4. At the moment do you see any reason why you would not remain for the
full term?
5. Will you be able to keep a level head?
Regards,
Adam Culp
IBMiToolkit
On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 at 10:55:19 AM UTC-4, Jonathan Reinink wrote:
>
> Yes, I
Oh my, would this extend to personal relationship, which could
theoretically also carry influence?
How complex should we delve?
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 12:33:01 PM UTC-4, Woody Gilk wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Hari K T > wrote:
> >
ence in the Beau/Silex vote and as
> such that same concern should be just as relevant now.
>
> If we start delving further we might get to "they can't be a secretary
> because they stayed on their sofa one time" levels and we don't need to do
> that. :)
>
>
Votes for IBMiToolkit
Amanda Folson
Matthew 'Matt' Trask
Samantha Quiñones
Jonathan Reinink
Paul 'PMJ' Jones
Phil Sturgeon
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 6:24:40 PM UTC-4, Michael Cullum wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> So for those unaware, it
Votes for IBMiToolkit
1. Samantha Quiñones
2. Amanda Folson
3. Matthew 'Matt' Trask
4. Jonathan Reinink
5. Paul 'PMJ' Jones
6. Phil Sturgeon
Regards,
Adam Culp
IBMiToolkit
On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 6:24:40 PM UTC-4, Michael Cullum wrote:
>
>
-1 IBMiToolkit
On Friday, August 19, 2016 at 2:39:19 PM UTC-4, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> A few days later than planned, but I am hereby opening a vote for the
> following bylaw changes, colloquially known as "FIG 3.0".
>
> https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/pull/752
>
> The vote will be
-1 IBMiToolkit
On Sunday, September 4, 2016 at 12:26:50 PM UTC-4, Michael Cullum wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are
> unable to do so not being voting members.
>
> *Status Quo:* The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published by
For some reason I didn't even see this vote until the closing post and
Larry's follow-up. Very sorry, I've been busy. Thought I was keeping up
better. :-(
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 11:39:50 AM UTC-4, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> Hm. Well, I had been
Samantha,
I think you and Michael are applying a certain "tone", and taking offense,
with Paul's question of whether the group was aware and involved in what
could have been a decision making discussion, or if it was only the
secretaries. This is a voting members right to ask. Paul, and others,
I will carry over my comments from another thread
at https://groups.google.com/d/msg/php-fig/YvHARo5G1w4/WhYbT0gNAgAJ
The topic of PSR-8 has come up many times over the past couple years. It
> was cute, but we need to move on. We should be able to shrug it off as the
> joke it was. Let's stop a
isplayed by Samantha earlier in this thread). Two wrongs do not make a
right. Openly attacking someone with verbal rhetoric is not warranted
simply because we feel they are doing something wrong.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Monday, September 12, 2016 at 8:56:20 AM UTC-4, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
>
-1 IBMiToolkit
On Friday, September 16, 2016 at 7:14:08 PM UTC-4, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> I hereby open a vote for the following bylaw changes, colloquially known
> as "FIG 3.0". I'm fairly certain anything that needs to be said has
> been said by now by all parties.
>
> https://github.com
along for the ride, and contribute, in hopes of continuing the
march forward. We are in!
Adam Culp
IBM i Toolkit
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiv
+1 IBMiToolkit
On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 5:15:59 PM UTC-4, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
wrote:
>
> Per the by-laws, the required review period has passed for the
> proposed standard PSR-13 (Link Definition Interfaces). No changes have
> been made in the past two weeks since re-opening the revie
arity.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Thursday, November 3, 2016 at 1:47:04 PM UTC-4, Michael Cullum wrote:
>
> Just a few of clarifications:
>
> - You can nominate multiple people, in fact, this is to be encouraged so
> we have a good number of CC candidates (15-20).
> - You can nominat
ue to make exceptions.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Saturday, November 5, 2016 at 3:45:36 PM UTC-4, Samantha Quiñones wrote:
>
> Marc, thank you very much. I happily accept.
>
> To address Chris's point, I'm not sure why my relationship with Graham
> would preclude us both from serv
p-fig/jFNMb6ykn1k/yLec0XvFCAAJ
I think Graham can contribute a great deal, but should do so as an outside
contributor rather than in a leadership role due to this conflict of
interests.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Thursday, November 3, 2016 at 8:21:37 PM UTC-4, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
wrote:
>
Agreed, Brian. And since I am a voter, that is why I bring it up here. ;-)
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Sunday, November 6, 2016 at 2:53:01 AM UTC-5, Brian Teeman wrote:
>
> Surely that is a decision for the voters
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr
Brian,
See https://groups.google.com/d/msg/php-fig/jFNMb6ykn1k/FMoT9XrrCAAJ
On Sunday, November 6, 2016 at 2:52:37 AM UTC-5, Brian Teeman wrote:
>
> Surely that is a decision for the voters.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interope
Brian,
See https://groups.google.com/d/msg/php-fig/jFNMb6ykn1k/FMoT9XrrCAAJ
On Sunday, November 6, 2016 at 2:53:01 AM UTC-5, Brian Teeman wrote:
>
> Surely that is a decision for the voters
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoper
Thus the spiral of more and more conflict of interests continues, condoned.
I will discontinue because others appear not to care, or do not see the
problem. I have better things to do than tilting windmills. Moving on.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Sunday, November 6, 2016 at 12:25:36 PM UTC-5
Yes, I know. There have been a few brought up over these past months, but
we condoned them all. We even have a pinned thread for those in relation to
Secretaries. I'd rather not get into it again. Our membership has made it
clear that conflicts of interest are acceptable.
Regards,
Adam
Sorry about that. Appears that in my posting to multiple similar threads I
pasted the link to a thread I'd previously deleted because I wanted to
rephase it. (we can't edit posts here)
I will remove the post with the cross link, it is no longer relevant.
Regards,
Adam Culp
there would be less opinions, and fewer ideas or alternatives to solving a
problem.
My post in another thread was also meant along these lines, but I poorly
relayed this. (see
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/php-fig/jFNMb6ykn1k/yLec0XvFCAAJ)
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Tuesday, November 8, 2016
Unfortunately, while others were rebuking my conflict opinion, there is
still a relevant unanswered question from Dracony. (I apologize to Roman
for causing it's oversight by speaking up.)
(See https://groups.google.com/d/msg/php-fig/mlzQXgOUKkw/oockaY5sCAAJ)
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Tu
by the meaningful content of the thread.
Don't worry, you missed nothing by it being removed.
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 7:51:14 PM UTC-5, Korvin Szanto wrote:
>
> Errm we can delete posts on google groups at our own discretion? Is there
> a way to disabl
to.
Regards,
Adam Culp
IBMiToolkit
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To po
Matthew Weier O’Phinney
Beau Simensen
Chris Tankersley
Gary Hockin
Samantha Quiñones
Sara Golemon
David Négrier
Korvin Szanto
Lukas Kahwe Smith
Michael Heap
Jason Coward
Regards,
Adam Culp
IBMiToolkit
On Friday, December 9, 2016 at 11:47:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Cullum wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
-1
IBMiToolkit
Regards,
Adam Culp
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Does it use
other frameworks or libraries? I'm trying to see where making it a member
project (representative aside) brings value to the processes here.
Regards,
Adam Culp
IBMiToolkit
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interop
I raise a motion that we get PSR-15 going again. The time for politics and
emotion have passed, and we need to get stuff done.
We are past the date when pre-existing recommendations could slide in under
the old FIG bylaws, and so we must get PSR-15 into FIG 3.0 shape.
Also, Paul M. Jones has el
While I don't feel there is a "need" to wait, we should follow the
expectation of the 2-week discussion. Something good could come from it,
you never know. J
Regards,
Adam Culp
On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 9:41:48 PM UTC-4, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> Normally there would b
73 matches
Mail list logo
