Hi,
Apologies if this has moved on, I've not read all my mail from the last
day and a half.
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Tedd Sperling wrote:
Let's consider this -- you are in a different time zone than me, right?
You said UTC and mine is America New York. As such you claim is that
your strtotime()
On 11/22/2011 7:15 AM, Judson Vaughn wrote:
Isn't Eastern time zone minus 5 not plus 5 hours of GMT?
Jud
It depends upon your point of view. ;-)
It's generally understood that EST5EDT is GMT (UTC) -5 because eastern
time is 5 hours behind.
+5 puts you in India somewhere.
Cheers,
Curtis
-
Isn't Eastern time zone minus 5 not plus 5 hours of GMT?
Jud
Sent from my iPad
Jud at bizville.com
Phone 703-303-4271
On Nov 21, 2011, at 11:34 PM, Tedd Sperling wrote:
> Why is that? By what you said, shouldn't the reports be offset (+5 hours) by
> the local timezone differences?
--
PHP Ge
On Nov 20, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Geoff Shang wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2011, Tedd Sperling wrote:
>
>> I appreciate your time and comments. However, you missed the point I was
>> trying to make, which does not have anything to do with timezones. If you
>> copy my code and place it on any server in th
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011, Tedd Sperling wrote:
I appreciate your time and comments. However, you missed the point I was
trying to make, which does not have anything to do with timezones. If
you copy my code and place it on any server in the world, you'll observe
the same results as I did.
NO I wo
On Nov 20, 2011, at 4:00 PM, Geoff Shang wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Tedd Sperling wrote:
>
>> Now, where are my observations wrong? The code is shown in the demo.
>
> To summarise, your observations are wrong because they do not take timezone
> into account and do not show the time, only the
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Tedd Sperling wrote:
My observations are demonstrated here:
http://www.webbytedd.com//strtotime/index.php
this code would IMHO be more useful if it also displayed time, not just
date. It's also not clear what timezone you're using, as it's not set as
far as I can s
On Nov 19, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> On 19 Nov 2011, at 16:48, Tedd Sperling wrote:
>> For example, if you push '-1' though strtotime(-1), you'll get Wednesday
>> only one day a week -- whereas 'null' works every time.
> Technically I see that as a bug. I believe strtot
On 19 Nov 2011, at 16:48, Tedd Sperling wrote:
> For example, if you push '-1' though strtotime(-1), you'll get Wednesday
> only one day a week -- whereas 'null' works every time.
Technically I see that as a bug. I believe strtotime(null) should return
null, but due to the way
On Nov 18, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> By you're reasoning since I did not exist before 1974 then time itself could
> not possibly have existed before then either since I was not in existence to
> perceive it. That's as ludicrous as suggesting time did not exist before the
> big
On Nov 17, 2011, at 7:59 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> On 17 Nov 2011, at 20:17, Tedd Sperling wrote:
>> On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
>>> "defined as the number of seconds elapsed since midnight Coordinated
>>> Universal Time (UTC) of Thursday, January 1, 1970 (Unix times are de
On 11-11-19 03:14 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
It's Friday... traditionally content anal-ness has been somewhat disregarded on
this day. Need one go through the archives to see if you're being a tad
hypocritical?
Although it only seems to be this latest thread that seems to h
Robert Cummings wrote:
It's Friday... traditionally content anal-ness has been somewhat disregarded on
this day. Need one go through the archives to see if you're being a tad
hypocritical?
Although it only seems to be this latest thread that seems to have got totally
OTT even for a Friday. And
On 11-11-18 10:03 AM, Curtis Maurand wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Given the discussion, I think the following is in order: BAZINGA * 2
And what does any of this have to do with PHP? It's time to
end this thread.
It's Friday... traditionally content anal-ness ha
rc> Thus before the big bang is perfectly
rc> valid whether we could perceive it or not.
ts> Not really. It's as meaningless as asking
ts> what's north of the North Pole.
That's an interesting point. If you stand at the North Pole where all
lines of reference converge, there is still Galactic Nort
rc> However, what is valid is to take a point of
rc> reference in time and infer a period before
rc> it. Thus before the big bang is perfectly valid
rc> whether we could perceive it or not.
It's a question of asking what existed before anything existed, though.
The answer is not even "nothing" sin
>> It's another nail in the coffin of deity constructors.
> Not even slightly.
Totally since deity constructors only started to exist after the second
generation of stars formed since the advent of hadronic life.
> But none of this has anything even vaguely related to PHP.
Sure it does, the orig
Robert Cummings wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
>
>
Given the discussion, I think the following is in order: BAZINGA * 2
And what does any of this have to do with PHP? It's time to
end this thread.
--Curtis
On 11-11-18 05:15 AM, Tim Streater wrote:
On 18 Nov 2011 at 05:40, Robert Cummings wrote:
without a proof it's just farts in the wind :) No more valid than a
theory of creation or the big ass spaghetti thingy majingy dude. Folded
The "theory" of creation is not a theory. It's a hypothesis, a
> -Original Message-
> From: Fredric L. Rice [mailto:fr...@sonic.net]
> Sent: November 17, 2011 6:25 PM
> To: Stuart Dallas
> Cc: Tedd Sperling; PHP List
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Sniping on the List
>
> >> Consider this -- do you think the second before
>
On 18 Nov 2011 at 05:40, Robert Cummings wrote:
> without a proof it's just farts in the wind :) No more valid than a
> theory of creation or the big ass spaghetti thingy majingy dude. Folded
The "theory" of creation is not a theory. It's a hypothesis, as is "scientific
creationism".
> Thus b
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> http://shorl.com/tebrakefesahe
>
ROFLMAO!!! Thanks Robert for starting off a good Friday for me :D
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 11-11-18 12:40 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
On 11-11-17 06:24 PM, Fredric L. Rice wrote:
Consider this -- do you think the second before
the "Big Bang" was negative or null?
I don't know. There's no point concerning ourselves
with unanswerable questions.
The question itself is a logical absu
On 11-11-17 06:24 PM, Fredric L. Rice wrote:
Consider this -- do you think the second before
the "Big Bang" was negative or null?
I don't know. There's no point concerning ourselves
with unanswerable questions.
The question itself is a logical absurdity since there was no time prior
to the Big
On 17 Nov 2011, at 20:17, Tedd Sperling wrote:
> On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
>> The epoch specifies the exact time that 0 represents. It makes no claims as
>> far as that being the start of anything...
>>
>> "defined as the number of seconds elapsed since midnight Coordinat
>
>> It's another nail in the coffin of deity constructors.
-
And just as this thread was getting boringly OT! ;-{)]
George Langley
Interactive Developer
www.georgelangley.ca
On 17 Nov 2011, at 23:24, Fredric L. Rice wrote:
>>> Consider this -- do you think the second before
>>> the "Big Bang" was negative or null?
>> I don't know. There's no point concerning ourselves
>> with unanswerable questions.
>
> The question itself is a logical absurdity since there was no ti
>> Consider this -- do you think the second before
>> the "Big Bang" was negative or null?
> I don't know. There's no point concerning ourselves
> with unanswerable questions.
The question itself is a logical absurdity since there was no time prior
to the Big Bang. The advent of time began when th
> What if we were to throw in quantum duality in here?
> Null and !Null at the same time
Please no, our company is trying to outsource to India and they're
constantly trying to shove things through narrow slits and the effect has
been costly.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
T
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Tedd Sperling wrote:
On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
The epoch specifies the exact time that 0 represents. It makes no claims as far
as that being the start of anything...
"defined as the number of seconds elapsed since midnight Coordinated Universal Ti
On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> The epoch specifies the exact time that 0 represents. It makes no claims as
> far as that being the start of anything...
>
> "defined as the number of seconds elapsed since midnight Coordinated
> Universal Time (UTC) of Thursday, January 1, 19
On Nov 17, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Tedd Sperling
wrote:
On Nov 15, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Steven Staples wrote:
sent:
wrote:
PS: I know it's not Friday, but this question came up in class
yesterday and I thought maybe all of you might like to guess why
null is Wednesday?
Wait.. What??
$ php
On Nov 17, 2011, at 10:33 AM, Tedd Sperling
wrote:
On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
On 17 Nov 2011, at 16:01, Tedd Sperling wrote:
To all:
Okay, so now that we have had people reply, here's my take.
The Unix timestamp started on 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 + -- and
tha
On 11-11-17 11:33 AM, HallMarc Websites wrote:
To all:
Okay, so now that we have had people reply, here's my take.
The Unix timestamp started on 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 + -- and that was
a
Thursday.
The second before (i.e., 31 December, 1969 23:59:59:59 + ) was null,
which was Wedne
On 17 Nov 2011, at 16:33, Tedd Sperling wrote:
> On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
>> On 17 Nov 2011, at 16:01, Tedd Sperling wrote:
>> To all:
>>>
>>> Okay, so now that we have had people reply, here's my take.
>>>
>>> The Unix timestamp started on 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 + --
>
> > To all:
> >
> > Okay, so now that we have had people reply, here's my take.
> >
> > The Unix timestamp started on 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 + -- and that was
a
> Thursday.
> >
> > The second before (i.e., 31 December, 1969 23:59:59:59 + ) was null,
> which was Wednesday.
>
> I take issue
On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> On 17 Nov 2011, at 16:01, Tedd Sperling wrote:
> To all:
>>
>> Okay, so now that we have had people reply, here's my take.
>>
>> The Unix timestamp started on 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 + -- and that was a
>> Thursday.
>>
>> The second before (
On 17 Nov 2011, at 16:01, Tedd Sperling wrote:
> To all:
>
> Okay, so now that we have had people reply, here's my take.
>
> The Unix timestamp started on 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 + -- and that was a
> Thursday.
>
> The second before (i.e., 31 December, 1969 23:59:59:59 + ) was null,
> w
On Nov 15, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Steven Staples wrote:
>> sent:
>>> wrote:
PS: I know it's not Friday, but this question came up in class
yesterday and I thought maybe all of you might like to guess why
null is Wednesday?
>>>
>>> Wait.. What??
>>>
>>> $ php -r 'echo date("l",NULL),"\
>
> You should have seen some of the lambasting that used to pass as
> discourse back when this list had traffic. :]
I have to (humbly) admit that I for one like it that this list has less traffic
now because it gives the illusion that I am keeping up ;-)
-Govinda
--
PHP General Mail
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:51 PM, George Langley wrote:
> Am concerned over the number of posts that appear to be from people
> trying to over-inflate their self-importance.
> If you are the world's best coder, then help those of us who aren't.
> If you happen to know a better way
> -Original Message-
> From: Tamara Temple [mailto:tamouse.li...@tamaratemple.com]
> Sent: November 15, 2011 1:33 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Sniping on the List
>
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:24:17 -0600, tamouse mailing lists
> sent:
>
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:24:17 -0600, tamouse mailing lists
sent:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Tedd Sperling
wrote:
PS: I know it's not Friday, but this question came up in class
yesterday and I thought maybe all of you might like to guess why
null is Wednesday?
Wait.. What??
$ p
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Tedd Sperling wrote:
> PS: I know it's not Friday, but this question came up in class yesterday and
> I thought maybe all of you might like to guess why null is Wednesday?
Wait.. What??
$ php -r 'echo date("l",NULL),"\n";'
Wednesday
Cos:
$ php -r 'echo date("
On Nov 14, 2011, at 12:51 PM, George Langley wrote:
> Am concerned over the number of posts that appear to be from people
> trying to over-inflate their self-importance.
> If you are the world's best coder, then help those of us who aren't. If
> you happen to know a better way to do
> If you are the world's best coder
That would be me. :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Am concerned over the number of posts that appear to be from people
trying to over-inflate their self-importance.
If you are the world's best coder, then help those of us who aren't. If
you happen to know a better way to do something that I'm struggling with, then
please share it
47 matches
Mail list logo
