Hello,
on 08/05/2006 11:47 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
This is necessary to escape wildcards characters that should be taken
literally in patterns. It is needed to implement the auto-complete
feature using SQL conditions of type field LIKE 'typed-text%'. If
typed-text contains % or
Hello,
on 08/06/2006 09:52 PM Martin Alterisio said the following:
Anyway, you may want to read this more in depth reflection of the
state
of the PHP framework world and recommendations on how to pick what
suits
best for you:
2006/8/4, Manuel Lemos [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 05:18 PM Martin Alterisio said the following:
Anyway, you may want to read this more in depth reflection of the state
of the PHP framework world and recommendations on how to pick what
suits
best for you:
Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 17:23 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:53 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
place was :
Imagine
Hello,
on 08/04/2006 05:47 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
The point of the post is that there is no framework in particular to
recommend. I use my own packages for my needs. They suit me well. It
does not mean they will suit everybody.
How would you know that there is no framework to
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 15:36 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
on 08/04/2006 05:47 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
The point of the post is that there is no framework in particular to
recommend. I use my own packages for my needs. They suit me well. It
does not mean they will suit
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:49 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
The point of the post is that there is no framework in particular to
recommend. I use my own packages for my needs. They suit me well. It
does not mean they will suit everybody.
How would you know that there is no framework to
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 17:15 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:49 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
The point of the post is that there is no framework in particular to
recommend. I use my own packages for my needs. They suit me well. It
does not mean they will suit
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:53 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
place was :
Imagine if there would be only one PDBC (JDBC for PHP). Instead of that
we have a never ending choice of PHP database abstraction layers that
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:52 PM Kilbride, James P. said the following:
I admit I have not expressed myself clearly. What I meant is
not that people should be disallowed to implement alternative
APIs, but rather that they should not feel the need to do it.
In the Java world, JDBC is the de
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 17:23 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:53 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
place was :
Imagine if there would be only one PDBC (JDBC for PHP). Instead of that
we have a
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 05:18 PM Martin Alterisio said the following:
Anyway, you may want to read this more in depth reflection of the state
of the PHP framework world and recommendations on how to pick what suits
best for you:
PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
:-)
Paul Scott wrote:
You mean we should all be happy that so much choice is available!
I agree with Rob! I am a botanist. I have never been trained in Computer
Science, as far as industry is concerned, I am not qualified to turn
on a PC. Fortunately for me, I
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 August 2006 12:37
To: Paul Scott
Cc: Robert Cummings; Manuel Lemos; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks - Opinion
PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
:-)
Paul Scott wrote:
You mean we should all be happy that so much choice is available!
I
@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks - Opinion
PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
:-)
Paul Scott wrote:
You mean we should all be happy that so much choice is available!
I agree with Rob! I am a botanist. I have never been trained in Computer
Science, as far as industry
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 13:43 +0200, Arno Kuhl wrote:
I'm not so sure if the botanist wasn't saying in a rather confused way that
he was playing on the same side as PHPClasses, even if he did profess to be
in the other team. Did he say he was rolling his own (in a way only
botanists can do) or
On Wed, August 2, 2006 9:50 am, Gabe wrote:
Gabe wrote:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out
there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively
developed,
secure, etc etc.
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:01 AM Robert Cummings said the following:
Anyway, you may want to read this more in depth reflection of the state
of the PHP framework world and recommendations on how to pick what suits
best for you:
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 07:37 AM Jochem Maas said the following:
PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
:-)
Erm
Paul Scott is a good contributor of the PHPClasses site:
http://www.phpclasses.org/browse/author/145758.html
Several of his classes have been nominated to the PHP Programming
Innovation
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 09:17 AM Jochem Maas said the following:
Arno Kuhl wrote:
I'm not so sure if the botanist wasn't saying in a rather confused way that
he was playing on the same side as PHPClasses, even if he did profess to be
in the other team. Did he say he was rolling his own (in a way
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 09:25 AM Paul Scott said the following:
The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
place was :
Imagine if there would be only one PDBC (JDBC for PHP). Instead of that
we have a never ending choice of PHP database abstraction layers that
does
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 13:32 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:01 AM Robert Cummings said the following:
Anyway, you may want to read this more in depth reflection of the state
of the PHP framework world and recommendations on how to pick what suits
best for you:
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 14:42 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 09:25 AM Paul Scott said the following:
The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
place was :
Imagine if there would be only one PDBC (JDBC for PHP). Instead of that
we have a
-Original Message-
From: Manuel Lemos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:43 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks - Opinion
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 09:25 AM Paul Scott said the following:
The main thing in Manual's
2006/8/3, Manuel Lemos [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
on 08/01/2006 01:35 PM Gabe said the following:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust,
In my experience with the other frameworks (primarily Wasp, CakePHP,
Symfony, eZ Components, and Zend Framework), I've found that I was not
satisfied with the quantity of low-quality code they advocate. I have
a high standard for code quality, readability, maintainability, and
(more generally)
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Jens Kleikamp wrote:
Matt Todd wrote:
Because of this, I determined to build my own framework. This was a
few months ago, and Canvas[1] was the result of my labor. I produced
this framework while working on numerous projects at the university I
work at. This allowed me to
karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
Tony Marston wrote:
Gabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out
there, but I'm not sure which one's are
Jochem Maas wrote:
Stut wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:
I'll have it ready for you next week, what kind of license do you want?
One license to kill to go please.
006.5 your lic is in the post. and while I'm at it can I port an obscure
OS to the hardware of your choice
Jochem Maas wrote:
I'll have it ready for you next week, what kind of license do you want?
One license to kill to go please.
-Stut
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Stut wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:
I'll have it ready for you next week, what kind of license do you want?
One license to kill to go please.
006.5 your lic is in the post. and while I'm at it can I port an obscure
OS to the hardware of your choice during my lunch break?
-Stut
--
PHP
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:51 +0300, karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
Speaking about framework. Anybody is aware there is a very popular
framework in Java called Spring which has pretty cool features like
Inversion of Control, Dependency Injection etc.
Sounds similar to the service system
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 10:50 -0400, Gabe wrote:
Gabe wrote:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
secure, etc etc.
Too bad there isn't a skeleton sort-of system that you essentially then
just plug in the modules that you want/need to flesh it out. Then
you'd have your own customized framework for each app that is developed
and keeps *all* of the modules relevant to that app. Nothing extra
would be
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 18:08 +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:51 +0300, karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
Speaking about framework. Anybody is aware there is a very popular
framework in Java called Spring which has pretty cool features like
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 10:50 -0400, Gabe wrote:
Gabe wrote:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 18:08 +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:51 +0300, karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
Speaking about framework. Anybody is aware there is a very popular
framework in Java called Spring which has pretty cool
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:51 +0300, karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
Speaking about framework. Anybody is aware there is a very popular
framework in Java called Spring which has pretty cool features like
Inversion of Control, Dependency Injection etc.
Sounds similar
Paul Scott wrote:
Too bad there isn't a skeleton sort-of system that you essentially then
just plug in the modules that you want/need to flesh it out. Then
you'd have your own customized framework for each app that is developed
and keeps *all* of the modules relevant to that app. Nothing
I see that there are a few different Universities in Africa supporting
that framework. How active is the developer community? How long has
KINKY/Chisimba been around?
The AVOIR Project has been going for about 2 years now. KINKY and
KEWL.NextGen were the first products of that project.
I'm not going to comment on the rest of the stuff that was said, which
is why I snipped it. I'm not a purist when it comes to OO at all. But I
do have to say that while iterators in ruby are amazingly powerful that
leave me going wow.. that is so cool.. The thought of how they could be
abused and
Kilbride, James P. wrote:
I'm not going to comment on the rest of the stuff that was said, which
is why I snipped it. I'm not a purist when it comes to OO at all. But I
do have to say that while iterators in ruby are amazingly powerful that
leave me going wow.. that is so cool.. The thought of
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 00:29 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
on 08/01/2006 01:35 PM Gabe said the following:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 01:24 AM Robert Cummings said the following:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
secure, etc etc.
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 01:47 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 01:24 AM Robert Cummings said the following:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's
You mean we should all be happy that so much choice is available!
I agree with Rob! I am a botanist. I have never been trained in Computer
Science, as far as industry is concerned, I am not qualified to turn
on a PC. Fortunately for me, I am also a geek. My PHP experiences
started when
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 18:17 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 10:46 PM +0100 8/1/06, Colin Guthrie wrote:
I'm surprised no-one has mentioned the Zend Framework yet.
I'm looking to do a bit of a rewrite of a large PHP application in
the near future and would like to think Zend would be a good horse
Colin Guthrie wrote:
Satyam wrote:
There is no 'common consensus' but I am sure you'll be getting lots
and lots, I would even say LOTS, of sugestions.
I'm surprised no-one has mentioned the Zend Framework yet.
I'm looking to do a bit of a rewrite of a large PHP application in the
48 matches
Mail list logo
