Re: Why won't the LED flash?

sorry if you already said this but what platform are you using? also a schematic of your circuit would be interesting even being so simple On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 3:18 AM, Josh wrote: > Thought it might be a firmware problem or something, so I just re-flashed > the

subscribe

-- Andrés *~ La mejor manera de librarse de la tentación es caer en ella**. ~ Oscar Wilde* ~

Re: Extending the wiki markup syntax

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi Erik, > > > be the right choice there. For the others, couldn't it expand into a > > 'class=' or 'id=' within the tag? So, > > > >x{myStyle > > /{This is the text} > >} > > > > would expand to, > >

Re: (NIL) vs Nothing

The reason for this difference is let behaviour: let binds a symbol to a value *inside* let expression but first saves values of binding symbols and once evaluated the expression it restores previous symbols values saved. So, when you wrap a expression in a let binding you are protecting the

Re: binding free symbols in a lambda definition

Thanks for your replies, I think your "subst" is exactly the same to newlisp "expand" But picolisp curry function doesn't do that, it simply returns a lambda > with 1 parameter having the other one properly substituted with its value > thus making impossible to partially apply the returned

Re: binding free symbols in a lambda definition

Hi Alex > The classical curry in picolisp is what Alex has defined a few emails > > before ;-) > > I never saw a use for the classical curry, so I (ab)used this catchy name > :) > > Can you give an example where it is useful in PicoLisp? > I'm a newbie to picolisp I don't know enough picolisp to

Re: a bunch of questions about syntax

thanks for your answers, Alex On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Alexander Burger wrote: > > > >(if (testSomething) (doSomething1) (doSomething2) (doSomething3)) > > ... > > but this also means the only way to indicate several executable > expressions > > in the

Re: binding free symbols in a lambda definition

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Lindsay John Lawrence < lawrence.lindsayj...@gmail.com> wrote: > 'fill' (http://software-lab.de/doc/refF.html#fill) does the job in some > cases as well and is a bit easier to read... > > : (de adder (N) (let @X N (fill '((x) (+ x @X) > -> adder > > this is a

Re: binding free symbols in a lambda definition

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Erik Gustafson wrote: > I think 'curry' is what you're looking for. Your 'adder' example could be > written as: > >: (de adder (@N) (curry (@N) (X) (+ X @N))) >-> adder >: (adder 3) >-> ((X) (+ X 3)) >: (doc 'curry)

Re: binding free symbols in a lambda definition

Hi Alex > The key there is the back-quote (`) before the L to force evaluation > > See the doc section on 'Read-Macros' > > http://software-lab.de/doc/ref.html#macro-io > > Exactly. So the whole 'let' expression is read, *then* evaluated. 'L' is > what it > was globally at the time this

Re: (NIL) vs Nothing

I think this is not the use you intent In *my* opinion: On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:44 PM, dean wrote: > >(setq Ln_no 0) >(in Epic_txt_fl_pth > (until (eof) > (setq Ln_no (inc 'Ln_no) ) > this is redudant since you're simply incrementing the value

a bunch of questions about syntax

I was reading the picolip documents ref, tutorial and function reference and I'm afraid I misunderstand some concepts, so I'm asking a bunch of questions in the hope you can help to achieve a better picolisp understanding 1- In the ref document it's said talking about types in picolisp: -

Re: a bunch of questions about syntax

Thanks again for your explanations Alex, still some comments... On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Alexander Burger wrote: > > > BTW, I thought again about the terminology of "list" versus "cons pairs" > and > plain "cells". "list" is a rather unprecise term, I feel it is

Re: a bunch of questions about syntax

sorry, I accidentally sent an incomplete message, here's the complete one On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:51 AM, pd <eukel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks again for your explanations Alex, still some comments... > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Alexander Burger <a...@softwa

Re: a bunch of questions about syntax

Thank you Alex for your patience, I see I have a severe confussion about how picolisp manages lists let's start by the begining... as far as I know (f a b 4) is just a list equivalent to (f . (a . (b . (4 . NIL and the fact being also a function call to function f applying parameters a b

Re: a bunch of questions about syntax

Alex, thanks a lot for your very clarifier reply (specially the procedural way of thinking which makes a lot of sense to me), I'm still confusing in a couple of things... I've read in docs that the ' prefix in a name of formal parameter when describing a funcion indicates it's a evaluated

Re: Future of PicoLisp?

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:14 AM, Erik Gustafson wrote: > > > 'Learn PicoLisp the Hard Way' > > What do you think? > I think it's a terrific idea and I'm volunteer to work on it > > > Let's build picolisp.com from scratch. Still in written in PicoLisp, duh! > Make

Re: binding free symbols in a lambda definition

picolisp a pretty good design with very smart decisions. What I trying to do is speaking out loud spreading out my thoughts to see if my understanding is right and also to see if my ideas may be useful somehow or must be considered as nonsenses On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:17 AM, pd <eukel...@gmail.

Re: box? on address

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Christopher Howard wrote: > Hi, I was just trying to understand... > > : (box? (box (4 5 6))) > -> $384375304 > : (box? $384375304) > -> NIL > : (car $384375304) > -> 4 > > Shouldn't (box? $384375304) be non-NIL? > As Danilo said box?

Re: conc: unexpected results

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Lindsay John Lawrence < lawrence.lindsayj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Apologies for bothering everyone with this. It took some research (there > is surprising little discussion of the function online or even in most > books), but I at least understand how it works

Re: PilMCU status

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Joh-Tob Schäg wrote: > If you are still searching an FPGA board you might want to get in contact > with j-core.org > They build an open source processor and are developing an RasPi form > factor compatible FPGA board. > > you may be also

Re: building picolisp in mobaxterm (cygwin)

emporarily unavailable On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Joe Bogner <joebog...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi pd, yes, this is a common issue with cygwin and fork. > > Are you on a 64-bit bit PC? If so, I have an experimental version of > PicoLisp on 64-bit that might be useful - https://github.c

Re: Announce: PilBox - Building Android Apps in PicoLisp

should be possible to interface with native android code? I suppose it would be similar to interface with java in common picolisp. The goal would be to have native app rather than web apps inside an html content On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:22 AM, O.Hamann wrote: > Hello, > >

Re: Announce: PilBox - Building Android Apps in PicoLisp

I've created a github repository in https://github.com/pepdiz/pilbox and I can keep it synchronized to PilBox.tgz versions if you want regards On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Alexander Burger wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:43:02PM +0200, Richard Z wrote: > >

Re: Announce: PilBox - Building Android Apps in PicoLisp

wrote: > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 08:06:44AM +0200, pd wrote: > > I've created a github repository in https://github.com/pepdiz/pilbox > and I > > can keep it synchronized to PilBox.tgz versions if you want > > Yes, that would be nice! > > The next task would be to publ

Re: GitHub sold out to Microsoft

sp developed without using github nor gitlab. > > > > If you care about freedom use only self-hosted solutions(I'm using just a > > ssh-server and user named git with simple diy repo creating tool). > > > > 2018-06-05 9:52 GMT+03:00 pd : > > > >> Best

Re: GitHub sold out to Microsoft

d solutions(I'm using just a > ssh-server and user named git with simple diy repo creating tool). > > 2018-06-05 9:52 GMT+03:00 pd : > >> Best alternative probably is gitlab which is free and git based >> >> Anyway there's no reason to change right now because github al

Re: GitHub sold out to Microsoft

Best alternative probably is gitlab which is free and git based Anyway there's no reason to change right now because github already was non-free and closed so there's nothing new with MS, just a closed company swapping. If github was good before it could be good now. Just sit down to see what MS

Re: Unsubscribe

if the problem is you cannot run picolisp in linux maybe you can try flinux (https://github.com/wishstudio/flinux), whith it you can run linux software without recompiling or porting to linux. if that doesn't work you can still recompile picolisp using mingw or cygwin On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at

Re: Why does the below code return NIL instead of 2nd & 1st list element?

El 14/01/2018 03:30, "PositronPro" escribió: > > > Hi, all > > I want the below code to return > 2nd & 1st list element from the argument provided to the describe-path function but it returns NIL in their place. Do you want your function to return just 2nd &

Re: Why does the below code return NIL instead of 2nd & 1st list element?

El 14/01/2018 09:53, "pd" <eukel...@gmail.com> escribió: > > So if you want to achieve the behavior of last function you should define it that way: > > (de describe-path (Path) > `(1st text ,(cadr Path) 2nd text ,(car Path) 3rd text.) ) > The problem with this de

Re: Why does the below code return NIL instead of 2nd & 1st list element?

El 14/01/2018 10:02, "Alexander Burger" escribió: > > Then the equivalent of a backquote in other Lisp is 'fill': > > (de describe-path (Path) >(fill > '(1st text ^(list (cadr Path)) 2nd text ^(list (car Path)) 3rd text.) ) ) > If fill and ^ are the equivalent of

Re: pgint.l

Thanks for your great job In my opinion: > 1) should I use PostgreSQL error codes and throw exceptions based on them? So you could probably write: > > (catch 'PGintegrityError ...) > (catch 'PGconstraintError ...) You should. It's a good practice to handle exceptions and this allow developers

Re: PicoLisp for 9-11 years' kids

On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 8:08 PM cilz wrote: > Hello folks, > > I guess it's microAlg which you can find here: > > http://microalg.info/ > > I' dont know if there is an english translation of the website which is > french. > > yes, that it is. A very interesting project specially for education

Re: PicoLisp for 9-11 years' kids

Hi Christophe, lot of thanks for your work it's awesome On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 6:50 PM Christophe Gragnic < christophegrag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 11:20 AM pd wrote: > > > > yes, that it is. A very interesting project specially for ed

Re: PicoLisp for 9-11 years' kids

I'm aware of the existence of a project based in picolisp and focused on education and learning children, I remember it was developed by french people but can't remember any name That Project had a web, a web based editor to type code and execute it and also graphic capabilities I cannot

Re: freemint in Tokyo

nice picture, nice message and nice Tshirt! On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 6:26 AM George-Phillip Orais < orais.georgephil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Just want to share this picture taken last night. > > From left to right: Anna (freemint's girlfriend), freemint, me, Jeff > Dionne (founder

accessing list items and other structures

Hello, I'd like to know if there's in picolisp the common lisp concept of places, I mean, is it possible to do this: (setq L (1 2 3)) (set (car L) 'x) L -> (1 x 3) (set (cdr L) '(a b)) L -> (1 a b) I'd say it is not places in picolisp, but reference manual says: : (set 'L '(a b c) (cdr L)

Re: Proposal: PilCon 2020

I'd like to go there but I cannot tell nowadays. Anyway I join to the recording proposal ;-) greets On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 11:04 AM Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi all, > > a merry Christmas to everybody! o/ > > > Since a few weeks we were discussing in the #picolisp IRC channel about > holding

Re: Do free Open Source Foundation's Software Stacks fall under US Export Law?

Thanks Alex for your absolute amazing and beautiful work and dedication. Fortunately noise is over and list returns to pure signal. El vie., 8 may. 2020 0:15, David Bloom escribió: > FWIW I have been enjoying a fantastic feature of e-mail, FILTERS! > > Thanks Alex and community for your work,

Re: Do free Open Source Foundation's Software Stacks fall under US Export Law?

:47, Alexander Burger escribió: > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 04:06:47PM +0200, pd wrote: > > Thanks Alex for your absolute amazing and beautiful work and dedication

Re: Pil21 can bootstrap

terrific! great news! :-) On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 1:13 PM Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi all, > > a short note about the Pil21 status: > > It can now bootstrap by itself, meaning that it does no longer need another > PicoLisp to build the *.ll and *.bc files from the sources. > > ☺/ A!ex > > --

Re: PilCon tomorrow

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 7:30 AM Alexander Burger wrote: > > > Any proposals? From my side, I could report a little about the state of > pil21 > > that's good for me. Also we can continue talking about pendent proposals in proposals list regards

Re: PilCon tomorrow

it would be great if someone attending the meeting could record the event, just capturing sound and video while attending it. This way the meeting could be uploaded to youtube or another video streaming repository for public access (If A. Burger agrees, of course). I try to plan and reserve time

PilCon

Hi all, Sadly I couldn't attend PilCon so I'd like to know if it is recorded in any way and publicly available Thanks for making all this happening regards

Re: PilCon tomorrow

it should be great talking about any of these themes: - compilation process in picolisp (sources are mainly based in lisp itself and a kind of lisp-assembler, rather than C) to make the picolisp executable - how to include common technologies and frameworks in picolisp applications (such as CSS

Re: Next PilCon tomorrow

I'm logged into the meet room but see nobody there. I think I'm in time (16:00 UTC) does anybody know if there's any problem? On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 8:43 AM Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi all, > > tomorrow we have our next PilCon. > > As every third Friday of a month, we start at 16:00 UTC on >

Re: PilCon tomorrow

El mar., 20 oct. 2020 14:13, Laurent A > > Though I agree that without at least a table of content — meaning more > time > spent on the thing — it wouldn’t be as useful: the ability to skip a > subject one > isn’t interested in is the big advantage I find to the list! :-) > TOC can be made in

Re: Licence Dilemma

my vote to go for GPL and readline. As you said compatibility is guaranteed and everybody knows it. On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 9:23 AM Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi all, > > at yesterday's PilCon it turned out that pil21 has a serious licence > problem. > > A major design decision of pil21 was to

Re: PilCon Friday

About best date and time for PilCon I think keeping two different times, one in the morning and another in the afternoon is a good compromise for people from different timezones over the world. Since I'm european and thus in a european continental timeline, I really don't care about keep with the

Re: Pil21 is now in Debian Unstable

great news! thanks! On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 4:26 PM r cs wrote: > Alex: > > Congratulations and thank you! > > ☺ / rcs > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 6:01 AM Alexander Burger > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> pil21 is now available in Debian unstable. >> >> This means we are now "officially" on pil21!

Re: FEXPRs / PilCon

That's true but with comments ;) Composing strings (packing) have two main advantages: 1. Strings may be inmutable (you can return a new different string, maybe a copy) 2. Strings can be passed as parameter The fexpr writing directly to stdout with print and running a program does not returns a

Re: FEXPRs / PilCon

On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 2:05 PM Alexander Burger wrote: > > Yes. (And strings are always immutable in PicoLisp anyway) > this is pretty interesting to be rembered, good for newbies to discover why it is that way ;-) > > : (de pp P (prin "") (run P) (prin "") (pack "" (run P) > "") ) > > This

Re: FEXPRs / PilCon

On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 10:19 PM Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi pd, > > > They're are not intended to be right implementations, too bad for that > ;-) > > No no, I did not say that :) > :) ok but *I* say that, it's really not a code to show, only intended to show out

Re: Picolisp Outlook

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:06 PM Davide BERTOLOTTO < davide.bertolo...@gmail.com> wrote: > After all these years I am still wondering how people like complicated > sintaxes full of special forms more than the simplicity of lisp. After all, > the parentheses and the prefix notation do not look so

Re: Picolisp Outlook

> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021, 21:03 pd wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> > This is complete rubbish (IMHO)!! You are not even a normie, but an > NPC!! > Maybe if you explain your arguments we can build a little discussion, I'm not a normie but kinda opposite,

Re: Picolisp Outlook

El lun., 22 feb. 2021 9:31, Alexander Burger escribió: > ... and immune to temporary hypes. > What a nice desire being rejected by history of humankind again and again ;) Specially in computer science >

Re: Picolisp Outlook

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 5:00 PM Danilo Kordic wrote: > 'float' could be implemented as a lib. > yes, but the point here it is not at core and even having a float lib or whatever science lib, python is plenty of them and a nicer syntax it's not about me neither talking about (pico)lisp

Re: PilCon tomorrow (Anatomy of Vip)

Hello all, I'm recorded the PilCon session but sadly I couldn't attend the whole session and thus set up a quick and dirty recording session, anyway I include the video to show what can be done. Next time will be better styled and fully recorded. I include a link to the video in vimeo as an

Re: PilCon tomorrow (Anatomy of Vip)

this time I will try to record the session if you all agree (and if I can attend) regards On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 9:44 AM Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi all, > > let's have a PilCon tomorrow (10th of Aqril, 8:00 UTC)! > As ever, at https://meeting.itship.ch/PilCon > > If no questions, I might

Re: PilCon yesterday - the screen share hassle

Hello, I don't have a stablished opinion because don't know so much about current platforms and services. So I really don't care while enjoying good service during the meeting. As far as I know, twitch deletes video recordings after a while and this may be an advantage or an inconvenient I

picolisp package in debian

I've just installed picolisp in debian 10.10 (buster) using apt and got picolisp 18.12-1 i386 picolisp tells version is 18.12.27 C but when running picolisp as: pil @lib/vip.l + I get this error: [/usr/lib/picolisp/lib/vip.l:4] !? (symbols 'vip 'pico) symbols -- Undefined ? and there's no

Re: PilCon yesterday - the screen share hassle

Hello All, Please don't misunderstand me, I am *NOT* recording pilCon's at all. I strongly believe in the right for privacy and recording anything without permision is absolutely out of my mind. I've done one and only one attempt to record a PilCon, and obviously it was previously asked in this

Re: quote form in picolisp

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 5:18 PM Alexander Burger wrote: > > It is all explained in this article from 2011: > >https://picolisp.com/wiki/?ArticleQuote > > So I consider 'quote' in PicoLisp a big improvement over other lisps ;) > > interesting point of view but I consider this introduces

Re: Feature request - 'fill'

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 3:15 AM Erik Gustafson wrote: > > I think Alex has shown that ',' and ',@' can be rolled into one - '^' > > : (let X (1 2) (macro (1 (^ X) 2))) > -> (1 (1 2) 2) > : (let X (1 2) (macro (1 ^ X 2))) > -> (1 1 2 2) > : (let X (1 2) (macro (1 ^ (apply + X) 2))) > -> (1 3 2) >

Re: quote form in picolisp

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:20 AM pd wrote: > This way the syntax and behaviour in picolist is not internally > coherent, every function application must be a list but for quote, which > can be not a list but an improper list. > > Maybe I'm misunderstanding something. > &g

Re: quote form in picolisp

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 11:51 AM wrote: > > In which practical use case do you ever need such an abhorrent nesting of > quotes? > it's not a question of practical use but compatibility and tradition, also a question of semantics > But I'm having doubts about this being not just a superficial

Re: quote form in picolisp

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 6:35 AM Danilo Kordic wrote: > Hi pd > > It seems You are looking for Wikipedia/Currying . What are Your further > thoughts? > No I don't > > What do You think about Wikipedia/De_Bruijn_index ? > I think it's an interesting propos

Re: quote form in picolisp

Thanks for your explanation, Alex On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:24 AM Alexander Burger wrote: > > First of all, forget other Lisps! I always say it is best if you start with > PicoLisp without knowing "Lisp". > :) That's a nice advice but sadly I feel I can't do that ;-) > The term "improper

quote form in picolisp

Hello, this message is somehow related to the one with subject "Feature request - 'fill'" After playing with fill and quote in picolisp I've found picolisp implmentation of quote is a bit "strange" in terms of lisp tradition. In lisp quote is usually a special form than returns the form passed

Re: Feature request - 'fill'

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 6:27 PM Alexander Burger wrote: > > So I went ahead and implemented the extended 'fill' behavior. > >: (fill (1 ^(+ 1 1) 3)) >-> (1 2 3) > > To make it more consistent, I also changed the '~' read macro in the same > way. > Now this works: > >: (~(- 4 3) (2

Re: some questions relating pilog

Hi Alex, On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 9:53 PM Alexander Burger wrote: > > > > > : (? (factorial @X 120)) > > > > -> NIL > > > > > > How should be declared factorial primitive to be compatible with reverse > > lookup? > > I have not tried. How is it in real Prolog? > In modern prolog you use this

Re: some questions relating pilog

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 6:27 PM Alexander Burger wrote: > > Could not resist. I elaborated a little :) > > If we define '+' as > >(be + (@A @B @C) > (^ @C (+ @A @B)) T ) > >(be + (@A @B @C) > (^ @B (- @C @A)) T ) > >(be + (@A @B @C) > (^ @A (- @C @B))

error making pil21

Hello, I'm trying to build pil21 in a amd64 debian linux, I've tried pil21-12 and pil21.tgz, both fails when making (cd src; make) with the error message "error: expected relocatable expression .quad (SymTab+8)" in different lines, for example: picolisp.s:152966:8 error: expected relocatable

Re: penti keyboard

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 7:03 AM Alexander Burger wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:43:57PM +0100, pd wrote: > > - I'm not able to place all circles inside the screen > > - my little finger is useless > > Really? So is the screen too small? But note that the circles do no

Re: penti keyboard

> How can I change the size of circles? and even better how can I > recalibrate again to change circle positions? > > Ok I see after a while not touching the phone the "Pent" letters appear again and I have to calibrate it in order to use it, so it's easy to recalibrate, just wait until "Pent"

penti keyboard

Hello, In today Pilcon I had an interest in penti keyboard and decided to test it , so I've installed it from Android Store into my android 7.1.1 phone. I had to activate it as a virtual keyboard and select it as default keyboard, but when try to use it something is wrong, I see a word "Pent" in

Re: penti keyboard

for bothering you with my questions, I should RTFM before asking. On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:58 PM Alexander Burger wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 08:46:29PM +0100, pd wrote: > > Ok I see after a while not touching the phone the "Pent" letters appear > > again and I have

Re: some questions relating pilog

On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 8:37 AM Alexander Burger wrote: > > > >(be + (@A @B @C) > > > (^ @C (+ @A @B)) > > > T ) > > > > > >(be + (@A @B @C) > > > (^ @B (- @C @A)) > > > T ) > > I suppose pilog search for rules in order, so the goal (? (+ 3 @X 7)) > > always

Re: PicoLisp Matrix Room

I'm in! @reboludo:matrix.org On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 3:21 PM Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi all, > > Matrix (https://matrix.org) is an open, decentralized communicatio > network. I > like it, because it is federated and does not depend on a single server or > provider. > > My user id is: > >

Re: PicoLisp Matrix Room

der Burger wrote: > Hi pd, > > > I'm in! @reboludo:matrix.org > > Cool! Can you try to join #picolisp:7fach.de ? > > ☺/ A!ex > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe >

some questions relating pilog

Hello, I'm using picolisp version 18.12.27 C in a debian 10.10 based distro, installed as package picolisp 18.12-1 I'm playing with pilog and there're some examples that does not run: 1- the example in doc reference for repeat/0 [1] : : (be integer (@I) # Generate unlimited supply of

Re: some questions relating pilog

Hi Alex, thanks for quick reply On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 8:13 AM Alexander Burger wrote: > > > Is the reference documentation incorrect? > > No, but it seems that you looked at the reference for pil21. > > The syntax for calling Lisp expressions in Pilog was made a little > friendlier in > pil21,

Re: PicoLisp REPL on Twitter

Nice! On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 7:36 AM Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi all, > > I started a new Twitter account @picolispRepl > >https://twitter.com/picolispRepl > > >From time to time I will post tips and tricks as short code snippets. > > ☺/ A!ex > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE:

Re: PicoLisp-22.6

great! On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 8:30 AM Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi all, > > PicoLisp-22.6 was released, and is now available in Debian Testing. > > ☺/ A!ex > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe >