RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

2009-03-23 Thread Olga Natkovich 
+1 for the same reason.

Olga 

> -Original Message-
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:nda...@yahoo-inc.com] 
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 1:53 PM
> To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> 
> BTW, at this point I'm more concerned that we get a release 
> out than what it is called.  I do think Pig is stable enough 
> for 1.0 but I'm not willing to let version numbering get in 
> the way of getting a release out.  More frequent releases is 
> better for the community.
> 
> Nige
> 
> On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
> 
> > +1.
> >
> > On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
> >
> >> To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an 
> appropriate release 
> >> number, I propose that we release the same code under the 
> name 0.2.0.
> >>
> >> Alan.
> >>
> >> On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> >>
> >>> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not 
> >>> quite there. I would prefer 0.2.0
> >>>
> >>> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will 
> >>> require a little bit more work.
> >>> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using 
> grunt 3. 
> >>> There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store 
> interfaces
> >>>
> >>> Santhosh
> >>>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> >>> To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> >>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> >>>
> >>> Pig Committers,
> >>>
> >>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
> >>>
> >>> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the 
> parser down. 
> >>> It also introduced type system into Pig and greatly 
> improved system 
> >>> performance.
> >>>
> >>> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files 
> >>> listed as being without a license header. All these files are 
> >>> generated by javacc.
> >>>
> >>> Keys used to sign the release are available at 
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
> >>>
> >>> Please download, test, and try it out:
> >>>
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> >>> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
> >>>
> >>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
> >>>
> >>> Olga
> >>
> >
> 
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

2009-03-23 Thread Nigel Daley 
BTW, at this point I'm more concerned that we get a release out than  
what it is called.  I do think Pig is stable enough for 1.0 but I'm  
not willing to let version numbering get in the way of getting a  
release out.  More frequent releases is better for the community.


Nige

On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:


+1.

On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Alan Gates wrote:

To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an appropriate  
release number, I propose that we release the same code under the  
name 0.2.0.


Alan.

On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:

-1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not  
quite

there. I would prefer 0.2.0

1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will  
require

a little bit more work.
2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store  
interfaces


Santhosh

-Original Message-
From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

Pig Committers,

I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.

This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser  
down. It

also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
performance.

The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files  
listed

as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
javacc.

Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.

Please download, test, and try it out:

http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
<http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>

Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.

Olga

RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

2009-03-23 Thread Pradeep Kamath 
+1

-Original Message-
From: Alan Gates [mailto:ga...@yahoo-inc.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 1:26 PM
To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an appropriate release  
number, I propose that we release the same code under the name 0.2.0.

Alan.

On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:

> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
>
> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will  
> require
> a little bit more work.
> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
>
> Santhosh
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.  
> It
> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
> performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
> javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga

RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

2009-03-23 Thread Olga Natkovich 
I would like to understand what it will take to release 1.0.0 before I
cast my vote.

Olga 

> -Original Message-
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:nda...@yahoo-inc.com] 
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 1:30 PM
> To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> 
> +1.
> 
> On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
> 
> > To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an 
> appropriate release 
> > number, I propose that we release the same code under the 
> name 0.2.0.
> >
> > Alan.
> >
> > On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> >> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable 
> but not quite 
> >> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
> >>
> >> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will 
> >> require a little bit more work.
> >> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt 3. 
> >> There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
> >>
> >> Santhosh
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> >> To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> >>
> >> Pig Committers,
> >>
> >> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
> >>
> >> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the 
> parser down. 
> >> It also introduced type system into Pig and greatly 
> improved system 
> >> performance.
> >>
> >> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files 
> >> listed as being without a license header. All these files are 
> >> generated by javacc.
> >>
> >> Keys used to sign the release are available at 
> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
> >>
> >> Please download, test, and try it out:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> >> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
> >>
> >> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
> >>
> >> Olga
> >
> 
>

RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

2009-03-23 Thread Olga Natkovich 
"Not quite stable" does not seem quantifiable. My understanding is that
more common criteria is backward compatibility as it has more serious
impact to the users and is easier to quantify.

Are we sure that changes to any of the components you mention as "in
progress" will have to break backward compatibility? (Addition of new
APIs does not have to be.) 

Finally, I agree with Nigel. This -1 vote is 2 weeks after the
discussions is called and seems a little late to me as well especially
given the fact that we put an effort into building the release.

Olga

> -Original Message-
> From: Santhosh Srinivasan [mailto:s...@yahoo-inc.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 4:04 PM
> To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> 
> I am doing it now.
> 
> Santhosh 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:nda...@yahoo-inc.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 3:32 PM
> To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> 
> Not every decision is done by calling for a formal vote.  No 
> one -1'd Olga's proposal.
> 
> nige.
> 
> On Mar 20, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> 
> > Nigel,
> >
> > It was a discussion without the call for a vote. I am attaching the 
> > email that was sent out back then.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Santhosh
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Nigel Daley [mailto:nda...@yahoo-inc.com]
> > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:41 PM
> > To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> >
> > Santhosh, the version numbering was discussed on this list almost 2 
> > weeks ago.  Why didn't you participate then?
> >
> > Nige
> >
> > On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> >> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable 
> but not quite 
> >> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
> >>
> >> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will 
> >> require a little bit more work.
> >> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt 3. 
> >> There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
> >>
> >> Santhosh
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> >> To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> >>
> >> Pig Committers,
> >>
> >> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
> >>
> >> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the 
> parser down.
> >> It
> >> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system 
> >> performance.
> >>
> >> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files 
> >> listed as being without a license header. All these files are 
> >> generated by javacc.
> >>
> >> Keys used to sign the release are available at 
> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
> >>
> >> Please download, test, and try it out:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> >> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
> >>
> >> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
> >>
> >> Olga
> >
> >
> > From: "Olga Natkovich" 
> > Date: March 6, 2009 5:28:36 PM PST
> > To: 
> > Subject: Next pig release
> > Reply-To: 
> >
> >
> > Pig Developers and Committers,
> >
> > Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I 
> > propose that it is time for the next release.
> >
> > I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this 
> is a major 
> > rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable 
> > interfaces.
> >
> > Olga
> >
> >
> 
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

2009-03-23 Thread Nigel Daley 

+1.

On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Alan Gates wrote:

To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an appropriate  
release number, I propose that we release the same code under the  
name 0.2.0.


Alan.

On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:


-1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
there. I would prefer 0.2.0

1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will  
require

a little bit more work.
2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store  
interfaces


Santhosh

-Original Message-
From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

Pig Committers,

I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.

This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser  
down. It

also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
performance.

The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files  
listed

as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
javacc.

Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.

Please download, test, and try it out:

http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
<http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>

Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.

Olga

Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

2009-03-23 Thread Alan Gates 
To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an appropriate release  
number, I propose that we release the same code under the name 0.2.0.


Alan.

On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:


-1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
there. I would prefer 0.2.0

1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will  
require

a little bit more work.
2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces

Santhosh

-Original Message-
From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

Pig Committers,

I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.

This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.  
It

also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
performance.

The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
javacc.

Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.

Please download, test, and try it out:

http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
<http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>

Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.

Olga

RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

2009-03-22 Thread Santhosh Srinivasan 
I am doing it now.

Santhosh 

-Original Message-
From: Nigel Daley [mailto:nda...@yahoo-inc.com] 
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 3:32 PM
To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

Not every decision is done by calling for a formal vote.  No one -1'd  
Olga's proposal.

nige.

On Mar 20, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:

> Nigel,
>
> It was a discussion without the call for a vote. I am attaching the
> email that was sent out back then.
>
> Thanks,
> Santhosh
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:nda...@yahoo-inc.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:41 PM
> To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Santhosh, the version numbering was discussed on this list almost 2
> weeks ago.  Why didn't you participate then?
>
> Nige
>
> On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
>
>> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
>> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
>>
>> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
>> require
>> a little bit more work.
>> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
>> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store  
>> interfaces
>>
>> Santhosh
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
>> To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>>
>> Pig Committers,
>>
>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>>
>> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.
>> It
>> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
>> performance.
>>
>> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files  
>> listed
>> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
>> javacc.
>>
>> Keys used to sign the release are available at
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>>
>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
>> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>>
>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>>
>> Olga
>
>
> From: "Olga Natkovich" 
> Date: March 6, 2009 5:28:36 PM PST
> To: 
> Subject: Next pig release
> Reply-To: 
>
>
> Pig Developers and Committers,
>
> Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I
> propose that it is time for the next release.
>
> I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this is a major
> rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable
> interfaces.
>
> Olga
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

2009-03-21 Thread Nigel Daley 
Not every decision is done by calling for a formal vote.  No one -1'd  
Olga's proposal.


nige.

On Mar 20, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:


Nigel,

It was a discussion without the call for a vote. I am attaching the
email that was sent out back then.

Thanks,
Santhosh

-Original Message-
From: Nigel Daley [mailto:nda...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:41 PM
To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

Santhosh, the version numbering was discussed on this list almost 2
weeks ago.  Why didn't you participate then?

Nige

On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:


-1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
there. I would prefer 0.2.0

1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
require
a little bit more work.
2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store  
interfaces


Santhosh

-Original Message-
From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

Pig Committers,

I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.

This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.
It
also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
performance.

The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files  
listed

as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
javacc.

Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.

Please download, test, and try it out:

http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
<http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>

Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.

Olga



From: "Olga Natkovich" 
Date: March 6, 2009 5:28:36 PM PST
To: 
Subject: Next pig release
Reply-To: 


Pig Developers and Committers,

Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I
propose that it is time for the next release.

I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this is a major
rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable
interfaces.

Olga

RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

2009-03-20 Thread Santhosh Srinivasan 
Nigel,

It was a discussion without the call for a vote. I am attaching the
email that was sent out back then.

Thanks,
Santhosh

-Original Message-
From: Nigel Daley [mailto:nda...@yahoo-inc.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:41 PM
To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

Santhosh, the version numbering was discussed on this list almost 2  
weeks ago.  Why didn't you participate then?

Nige

On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:

> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
>
> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will  
> require
> a little bit more work.
> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
>
> Santhosh
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
>
> Pig Committers,
>
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
>
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.  
> It
> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
> performance.
>
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
> javacc.
>
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
>
> Please download, test, and try it out:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>
>
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
>
> Olga

--- Begin Message ---
Pig Developers and Committers,
 
Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I
propose that it is time for the next release.
 
I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this is a major
rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable
interfaces.
 
Olga
--- End Message ---

Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

2009-03-20 Thread Nigel Daley 
Santhosh, the version numbering was discussed on this list almost 2  
weeks ago.  Why didn't you participate then?


Nige

On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:


-1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
there. I would prefer 0.2.0

1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will  
require

a little bit more work.
2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces

Santhosh

-Original Message-
From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

Pig Committers,

I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.

This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.  
It

also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
performance.

The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
javacc.

Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.

Please download, test, and try it out:

http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
<http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0>

Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.

Olga

RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

2009-03-20 Thread Santhosh Srinivasan 
-1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
there. I would prefer 0.2.0

1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will require
a little bit more work.
2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces

Santhosh

-Original Message-
From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

Pig Committers,

I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0. 
 
This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down. It
also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
performance.

The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
javacc.

Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.

Please download, test, and try it out:

http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
<http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0> 

Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.

Olga

Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

2009-03-20 Thread Alan Gates 
README.txt  still has the incubator text in it.  This needs to be  
removed.  I'll roll a new package and call a new vote.


Alan.

On Mar 17, 2009, at 3:21 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:


Pig Committers,

I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.

This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.  
It

also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
performance.

The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
javacc.

Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.

Please download, test, and try it out:

http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0


Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.

Olga

RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

2009-03-17 Thread Santhosh Srinivasan 
I am attaching the report with this reply. Hopefully, we should see it.

Thanks,
Santhosh 

-Original Message-
From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:37 PM
To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

Hmm, does not look like the attachment made it through again. One more
try.

Olga 

> -Original Message-
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> 
> Pig Committers,
> 
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0. 
>  
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the 
> parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and 
> greatly improved system performance.
> 
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java 
> files listed as being without a license header. All these 
> files are generated by javacc.
> 
> Keys used to sign the release are available at 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
> 
> Please download, test, and try it out:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0> 
> 
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
> 
> Olga
>

RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

2009-03-17 Thread Olga Natkovich 
Hmm, does not look like the attachment made it through again. One more
try.

Olga 

> -Original Message-
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> 
> Pig Committers,
> 
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0. 
>  
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the 
> parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and 
> greatly improved system performance.
> 
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java 
> files listed as being without a license header. All these 
> files are generated by javacc.
> 
> Keys used to sign the release are available at 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
> 
> Please download, test, and try it out:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0> 
> 
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
> 
> Olga
>

RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

2009-03-17 Thread Olga Natkovich 
And now with attached report.

Olga 

> -Original Message-
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> 
> Pig Committers,
> 
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0. 
>  
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the 
> parser down. It also introduced type system into Pig and 
> greatly improved system performance.
> 
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java 
> files listed as being without a license header. All these 
> files are generated by javacc.
> 
> Keys used to sign the release are available at 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.
> 
> Please download, test, and try it out:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0> 
> 
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
> 
> Olga
>

[VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)

2009-03-17 Thread Olga Natkovich 
Pig Committers,

I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0. 
 
This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down. It
also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
performance.

The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
javacc.

Keys used to sign the release are available at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup.

Please download, test, and try it out:

http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0
 

Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.

Olga