e solution should be discuss with
them. Therefore, I'm CC-ing the release team.
In any case, once Stretch is released, we must make sure such an
important package gets better maintenance, and follow upstream closely.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javasc
that generates
the fuel-web-static that depends on it.
I'd like to fix this in a better way so that Fuel can be fully uploaded
to Debian main. How to make this all in a Debian policy compliant way?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
P.S: I'm not afraid of packaging all individual libjs-* and nodejs-*
(build
On 02/12/2016 05:23 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Thomas Goirand (2016-02-12 08:27:12)
>> I would like to package a web app which contains Javascript stuff,
>> which are using npm + gulp (to disclose everything: I am packaging
>> fuel-web).
>
> [details on di
On 11/16/2015 03:57 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Quoting Thomas Goirand (2015-11-16 14:24:09)
>> Severity: important
>
> Normal severity is "wishlist" for requests of newer upstream release.
>
> If you believe this needs special treatment,
Hi,
I'd like to also tell that I need a higher version of libjs-backbone. I
need at least vesrion 1.2.1, which is needed by OpenStack Fuel.
Can I do the work, and upload a new version to Experimental?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
___
Pkg-javascript
Source: less.js
Version: 1.6.3~dfsg-2
Severity: important
Hi,
I need version 2.4.0 of libjs-less for OpenStack Fuel. Please package
it. Please let me know if it is ok that I do the work in Experimental
first, then you can review the package and upload to Sid.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo
know.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
On 10/29/2015 04:34 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>
>
> 2015-10-29 16:24 GMT+01:00 Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org
> <mailto:z...@debian.org>>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm worried that this bug is left undressed. It affects *a lot* of
> packages, including:
>
Hi,
I'm worried that this bug is left undressed. It affects *a lot* of
packages, including:
- nodejs
- openstack-dashboard
And also, upstream seems to not care about it, as per the github issue
set in the forwarded-to-url.
Laszlo, will you work on this?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo
This starts to become a very old bug, and it needs to be addressed. We
can't keep this ancient version. At the same time, #680282 also needs to
be addressed.
Any news on this? Shall I bring this topic to debian-devel@?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo
On 12/04/2014 12:00 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I am afraid this package needs a reject.
The license of
example/www/jquery.js
example/www/text.js
is missing in your debian/copyright.
Maybe you can also take care of some lintian warnings:
W: libjs-require-css:
On 12/02/2014 07:16 AM, Brian May wrote:
On 2 December 2014 at 09:46, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org
mailto:z...@debian.org wrote:
if [ $1 = configure ] ; then
some-other-stuff
/usr/share/openstack-dashboard/manage.py compress --force
some-other-stuff
fi
On 11/29/2014 06:10 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
Le vendredi 28 novembre 2014 à 20:46 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
Quoting Thorsten Glaser (2014-11-28 13:20:36)
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
It's been a long time I've been thinking about it, and I believe that
the only way to do
On 12/01/2014 04:26 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
2/ in debian/openstack-dashboard.postinst, implement something like:
if [ $1 = triggered ] ; then
/usr/share/openstack-dashboard/manage.py compress --force
fi
Is it *that* simple
).
Except ruby-raemon, for which I'm still waiting for upstream response
(he already fixed it, but didn't add a git tag in github), I believe
that I have almost done all dependencies for OpenStack Fuel. So it's
taking shape! :)
Thanks again for your reviews,
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo
On 11/28/2014 08:20 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
It's been a long time I've been thinking about it, and I believe that
the only way to do this, would be to use triggers. Though I have never
Look at libjs-protoaculous which combines prototype
, because it depends on node-utilities, which
isn't build.
This cycle has to be broken, otherwise it makes it very hard for porters
to bootstrap the rebuild of node-utilities node-jake.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
this:
override_dh_auto_test:
ifeq (,$(findstring nocheck, $(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
some-tests
endif
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin
Package: npm
Version: 1.4.21+ds-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please downgrade the required version of node-ansi to be:
= 0.3.0-2~
and not just:
= 0.3.0-2
so that one can do/use a backported version of node-ansi.
Thanks.
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
___
Pkg
Package: node-should
Version: 4.0.4+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
As per the title of this bug, node-mocha should be packaged, or should.js
should not build-depend on it.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg
were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Well spotted.
Fixed accordingly and reuploaded.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
: libjs-jquery-quicksearch (to follow a Debian standard)
Please voice your opinion. I'm not even sure there's a standard here...
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
considering, because
it's simply too big (though yui-compressor seems to depend on on java,
which isn't great either). Anything in wheezy-backport would be
acceptable too.
Advice welcome!
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg
On 07/07/2013 05:14 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Hi,
debian/copyright contains
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software
Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at
Hi,
I have heard twice that someone wants to take over maintainership of
libextjs. Dapal asked me on IRC, but I'm not sure about his email (if
he's not reading this list, can someone forward to his email address,
which I don't know?).
If so, please go ahead! I am the maintainer of too many
On 07/25/2012 01:06 AM, Beresford, Tom wrote:
Hi,
Have attached a tar of git patches
This is also a first for me so apologies if it's not correct
Thanks
Tom
Hi Tom,
Here's a few comments.
1/ Sending patches
You don't need to send me the *full* git history, but only since the
last
26 matches
Mail list logo
