[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#742178: node-express: Please update node-express to the latest release

Package: node-express Version: 2.5.9-2 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, According with github, there are many release during last years you have not packaged. https://github.com/visionmedia/express/releases (and moreover your watch file seems broken). Can you please consider to update your

[Pkg-javascript-devel] npm2deb - a script to make faster and easier packaging nodejs modules

Hi all! This is Leo (from Italy), a long time Ubuntu/Debian contributor. I have recently worked with nodejs and developed an interface for Deb-o-Matic. I found it easy to learn and (thanks to npm) a really complete framework. Anyway ... while I was starting to use some node_module locally I

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#742726: ejs.js: New upstream release 1.0.0

Source: ejs.js Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, can you please consider to update ejs.js to 1.0.0 version? Thanks in advance. Leo. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers trusty-updates APT policy: (500, 'trusty-updates'), (500, 'trusty'), (500, 'saucy-updates'),

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#742178:

Hi Jérémy, I'm going to start working on this. Is there some workflow in javascript maintainers you prefer I would follow ? Or just pull my packages in the mentors sponsors queue ? All the best, Leo. -- Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com GPG Key

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#744728: node-express 4.0 released

Package: node-express Version: 2.5.9-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, a new version of node-express has been released. The new release 4.0 brings new important changes. Now express no longer depens on connect framework, which has been splitted in different projects. Eeach middleware now is

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Call for review: should.js packages

Hi all, someone could sponsor me this package: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/should.js.git ? Thanks in advance. -- Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com GPG Key Id - 0xD282FC25 ___

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#745687:

We need some new dependency get packaged for Debian: $ npm2deb depends -r uglify-js Module uglify-js has no build dependencies. Dependencies: NPM Debian source-map (~0.1.33)None - amdefine (=0.0.4) None async (~0.2.6)

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Debian Maintainer Dashboard rss2emails

Hi all, I have setup a rss2emails service for my own Debian Maintainer Dashboard. rss2emails is a kind of service which triggers an email for each new-entry in a rss feed. If you like this, I could send also emails to this mailing list about pkg-javascript dashboard:

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Debian node-express

On 29 April 2014 12:20, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Sorry if that was not obvious: The reason I prefer that you revert is indeed because I am still interested in helping maintain that package. Great!. I reverted package to cdbs. Since I do not really know it, can you please take a

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Socket.io and node-ws, node-options module

About the packages' name. Would you use 'node-socket.io' or 'node-socketio' ?? ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Socket.io and node-ws, node-options module

On 29 April 2014 23:39, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: Would you use 'node-socket.io' or 'node-socketio' ?? No need to remove the dot, per https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Source Thanks Jeremy!.. -- Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on Home Page

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Socket.io and node-ws, node-options module

After some investigation, I discovered upstream is developing a new release major 1.0.0. I guess it is better wait for it. Dependencies are deeply changing in the master branch: https://github.com/LearnBoost/socket.io/blob/master/package.json Best, Leo. -- Ubuntu Member -

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Debian node-express

On 30 April 2014 02:39, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: Interesting. Really, which tools do you use to inspect files covered by some copyright in a software? It's now accessible (thank you Leo) from the Nodejs page, as best practice manual:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian

Hi all, I would like to make mocha available in debian: https://github.com/visionmedia/mocha To do that, we need jade, which is required by mocha as dependency. If you want help, here the task page about packaging jade: https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/Tasks/Jade Regards, Leo. --

[Pkg-javascript-devel] About node browserify

Node browserify is a kind of software which makes node modules compatible and runnable for browsers. It seems many modules use it, so it would be nice package it. I have taken a look, and it madly depends on dozens of packages/modules[0]. My question is: do you know if exist something else

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Socket.io and node-ws, node-options module

Hi Mike! On 30 April 2014 10:27, Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de wrote: you could start with preparing packages for the new dependencies... I will start with the devDependencies: devDependencies: { mocha: 1.16.2, expect.js: 0.3.1, supertest: 0.8.2, superagent:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#745687: Bug#745687: Bug#745687: new upstream version (2.x series)

Hi Jonas, On 30 April 2014 02:10, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Status of packaging is that these libraries needs packaging first: node-source-map node-uglify-to-browserify About node-uglify-to-browserify: You do not really need to package it, since it's only related to uglify2.x

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#745687: Bug#745687: Bug#745687: Bug#745687: new upstream version (2.x series)

On 30 April 2014 12:53, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: About node-source-map: It build-depends on dryice (=0.4.8). You can find a pre-release package in pkg-javascript/node-dryice.git repository. Once it done/uploaded to unstable, we will be able to build source-map. I can help about

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian

node-character-parser is ready here: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-character-parser.git On 30 April 2014 21:48, Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com wrote: node-css-parse is ready here: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-css-parse.git -- Ubuntu

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian

On 30 April 2014 22:20, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 21:48 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit : node-css-parse is ready here: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-css-parse.git * upstream is actually https://github.com/reworkcss/css-parse

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian

On 30 April 2014 22:25, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 à 22:11 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit : node-character-parser is ready here: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/node-character-parser.git The long description is not clear enough. Also

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian

On 1 May 2014 02:10, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: Le jeudi 01 mai 2014 à 01:11 +0200, Jérémy Lal a écrit : Le jeudi 01 mai 2014 à 00:18 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-04-30 23:26:44) On 30 April 2014 23:11, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: It's

[Pkg-javascript-devel] npm2deb in debian

Hello there, I'm looking for a sponsor for npm2deb: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/npm2deb.git some python developer around? Leo. -- Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com GPG Key Id - 0xD282FC25

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] npm2deb in debian

On 3 May 2014 17:40, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: If acceptable to use CDBS, I can review and help maintain the packaging. Fine for me. Absolutely no problem for me :) Thank you Jonas! -- Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com GPG Key Id -

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Call for review: should.js packages

Let's back on discussing should.js... :) Is someone working on? :) L. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-iconv-2.1.0 done

On 5 May 2014 12:34, Matthew Pideil matthew.pid...@teledetection.fr wrote: * install lib directory instead of lib/iconv.js * if not, fix the main path in package.json * or add debian/links with usr/lib/nodejs/iconv/iconv.js usr/lib/nodejs/iconv/index.js I don't understand what you suggest:

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian

Hi all, about source-map module, I have found the following in lib/source-map/base64-vlq.js /* * Copyright 2011 Mozilla Foundation and contributors * Licensed under the New BSD license. See LICENSE or: * http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause * * Based on the Base 64 VLQ

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian

On 5 May 2014 23:20, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: The note says: Based on the Base 64 VLQ implementation in Closure Compiler, should I report this in debian/copryright ? Yes, the file has two copyright holders (and two licenses which happen to be identical). Good! (locally done, I

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian

On 6 May 2014 08:01, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: I worked on it - and then stopped because we're missing component.js :( Am I missing something? Why should we care about component ? ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian

On 6 May 2014 08:01, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: I worked on it - and then stopped because we're missing component.js :( Am I missing something? Why should we care about component ? -- Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com GPG Key Id -

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Mocha in Debian

On 6 May 2014 08:01, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: I worked on it - and then stopped because we're missing component.js :( Am I missing something? Why should we care about component ? ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-commander 2.2.0

Hi Mike! // adding cc JavaScript ML 'cause I'm adding some info on my work. On 6 May 2014 16:57, Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de wrote: On Di 06 Mai 2014 16:46:15 CEST, Leo Iannacone wrote: could I work on node-commander importing latest release? That's great! :) I will work

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#747277: Bug#747277: cannot start app: no method createServer

Hi, now in debian we have express 4.x. .createServer() has been deprecated since express 3.x, so you need to update your app to the latest version (4.x) of express. To achieve this purpose you way want to read this docs: * https://github.com/visionmedia/express/wiki/Migrating-from-2.x-to-3.x

[Pkg-javascript-devel] npm2deb - populating database

Hi all, npm2deb uses a centralized sort-of database to trace some information about tough node modules. In details, at runtime, npm2deb downloads and parses this wiki page [0], trying to get info from the JSON nestled in '{{{ }}}'. For instance, try to run this: $ npm2deb depends wsend

[Pkg-javascript-devel] About node-expect.js (ITP)

Hi all, I have prepared node-expect.js[0]. But I have some doubt about .. This module is not only for node.js module, but can be used also as simple javascript in a browser (tested and it works). So... should we provide also a libjs-expect.js package ? If yes.. in this package should I make a

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] About node-expect.js (ITP)

On 8 May 2014 16:00, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-05-08 15:44:45) I have prepared node-expect.js[0]. But I have some doubt about .. This module is not only for node.js module, but can be used also as simple javascript in a browser (tested and it works

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Naming node packages with binaries

Hi all, AFAIK.. when a binary is present in a package, the package should have the be named as the binary. But.. this is not so clear for node modules. For instance, for mocha, according with javascript policy, I should ship a package called `node-mocha' rather than one simply called `mocha'.

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] JS policy: repackaging upstream tarball when minified js files are present (was: Call for review: should.js packages)

On 7 May 2014 13:41, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: I guess I understand my confusion now: In the debate last 2 months, there were some pretty strong arguments advanced why keeping the minified files was breaking the social contract (and thus RC-worthy) I looks like now that it is not

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#747654: Error: Cannot find module 'iscroll'

Source: node-iscroll Severity: important Dear Maintainer, ting your module as: nodejs -e require('iscroll'); It fails and return: module.js:340 throw err; ^ Error: Cannot find module 'iscroll' at Function.Module._resolveFilename (module.js:338:15) at

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#747656: Error: Cannot find module 'uglify-js'

Package: node-mirror Severity: important Dear Maintainer, testing your module as: nodejs -e require('mirror'); It fails and returns: module.js:340 throw err; ^ Error: Cannot find module 'uglify-js' at Function.Module._resolveFilename (module.js:338:15) at

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Updating wrong debian watch files

On 14 May 2014 11:48, Emilien Klein emilien+deb...@klein.st wrote: 2014-05-14 9:28 GMT+02:00 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-05-14 09:18:09) in DMD[0] we have 53 packages with a broken watch file. I wrote a script[1] able to fix most of them. Nice work! Please

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Updating wrong debian watch files

Hi Jonas, On 14 May 2014 09:28, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-05-14 09:18:09) in DMD[0] we have 53 packages with a broken watch file. I wrote a script[1] able to fix most of them. Nice work! Please beware that not all JavaScript packages are maintained

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Updating wrong debian watch files

On 14 May 2014 09:18, Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com wrote: I will forward new debian watch files to sepwatch[2] ASAP (about sepwatch[3]) in the meantime I updated the repository with wrong files. I can't do this. Only DDs can push sepwatch repository. Someone of you can do it for me

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Updating wrong debian watch files

On 14 May 2014 14:03, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-05-14 13:12:31) On 14 May 2014 09:28, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-05-14 09:18:09) in DMD[0] we have 53 packages with a broken watch file. I wrote a script[1] able

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Updating wrong debian watch files

Hi David! On 14 May 2014 14:22, David Prévot da...@tilapin.org wrote: Hi Leo, Thanks for your QA work! You welcome! :) Le 14/05/2014 03:18, Leo Iannacone a écrit : = Already fixed or false positives = These ones: * OR have already a suggested debian/watch in sepwatch * OR the debian

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Updating wrong debian watch files

On 14 May 2014 14:22, David Prévot da...@tilapin.org wrote: Hi Leo, Thanks for your QA work! Le 14/05/2014 03:18, Leo Iannacone a écrit : = Already fixed or false positives = These ones: * OR have already a suggested debian/watch in sepwatch * OR the debian/watch is already fixed

[Pkg-javascript-devel] new release of coffeescript

Hi, is there some reason why coffeescript is not updated to the last release? Jonas, can I help in case? L. -- Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com GPG Key Id - 0xD282FC25 ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#750714: leaflet: FTBFS against uglify 2.x series - Cannot call method 'parse' of undefined

Source: leaflet Severity: important Dear maintainer, your package fails to build from source with uglify version 2.4.13-1, which is now in experimental and will be soon migrated to unstable. Here a snip of buildlog: mkdir -p . Scanning upstream source for new/changed copyright notices...

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#750716: coffeescript: FTBFS against uglify 2.x series - Cannot call method 'parse' of undefined

Source: coffeescript Severity: important Dear maintainer, your package fails to build from source with uglify version 2.4.13-1, which is now in experimental and will be soon migrated to unstable. Here a snip of buildlog: chmod +x bin/cake bin/cake build bin/cake build bin/cake build:browser

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#750720: python-livereload is not compatible with uglifyjs 2.x series

Source: python-livereload Severity: important Dear Maintainer, uglifyjs 2.x series is now in experimental and will be soon migrated to unstable. Your package depends on uglifyjs, but from seeems be not compatible. It uses '-nc' option which is deprecated in 2.x. A simple patch like this could

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#750715: ipython: FTBFS against uglify 2.x series - uglifyjs -nc is not a supported option

On 9 June 2014 16:29, Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote: tags 750715 + help thanks As far as I understand uglify 1 and 2 are two different projects. Why must the version 2 package replace the version 1 pakage? that is not a viable strategy for hard to test javascript code.

[Pkg-javascript-devel] What's the best section for JS packages?

Hello, all of my packages (most of them are node modules) have Section: web in debian/control. Do you think is not a happy choice? is `misc' better? and what about JavaScript packages? L. -- Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com GPG Key Id -

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] What's the best section for JS packages?

On 27 June 2014 15:50, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-06-27 10:25:17) all of my packages (most of them are node modules) have Section: web in debian/control. Do you think is not a happy choice? is `misc' better? and what about JavaScript packages

[Pkg-javascript-devel] About mime-types module

Hi, I would like to package mime-types for Debian. https://github.com/expressjs/mime-types Now.. during build, upstream makes HTTP requests to get mime information externally and stores that in local files (already present in git repository) - see build.js file in the repository. As far as I

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#753480: ftp.debian.org: Please add a section for JavaScript packages

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi, currenlty there are around 350 packages provinding JavaScript libraries and the number is quickly increasing whit the arrival of Node.js server-side modules. Most of these packages are now in section web, but not all of them are really related to

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] About mime-types module

On 2 July 2014 11:18, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: Le mercredi 02 juillet 2014 à 10:13 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit : Hi, I would like to package mime-types for Debian. https://github.com/expressjs/mime-types Now.. during build, upstream makes HTTP requests to get mime

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] About mime-types module

On 2 July 2014 14:51, Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com wrote: On 2 July 2014 11:18, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: Le mercredi 02 juillet 2014 à 10:13 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit : Hi, I would like to package mime-types for Debian. https://github.com/expressjs/mime-types Now.. during

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] About mime-types module

On 4 July 2014 01:25, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: Le jeudi 03 juillet 2014 à 22:11 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit : On 2 July 2014 14:51, Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com wrote: On 2 July 2014 11:18, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: Le mercredi 02 juillet 2014 à 10:13 +0200, Leo

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#750715: ipython: FTBFS against uglify 2.x series - uglifyjs -nc is not a supported option

Hi Julian, please consider to test this patch. Thanks! Index: debian/patches/packaged-js.patch === --- debian/patches/packaged-js.patch(revision 29613) +++ debian/patches/packaged-js.patch(working copy) @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ mkdir -p

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Node modules and autopkgtest

Hi! FYI: Autopkgtest support was added to npm2deb, now it automatically creates files and directories needed to run test suite properly. I edited to Node.js Policy wikipage [0], suggesting that package 'should' support autopkgtest. In that page I also provided and example and a bash script to

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] can we upload node-uuid instead of node-node-uuid?

On 5 July 2014 00:16, Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com wrote: Le vendredi 04 juillet 2014 à 12:14 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit : I'd rather patch upstream sources that incorrectly do require('node-uuid') instead

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] can we upload node-uuid instead of node-node-uuid?

On 5 July 2014 02:23, Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com wrote: As an upstream author I'm happy to switch to using uid-safe. I don't know what you're referring to with 'mz'. See this issue: https://github.com/crypto-utils/uid-safe/issues/1 I will patch (for Debian) that module and remove

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Ugifyjs 2.x - fix for twitter-bootstrap

Hello, since twitter-bootstrap has been orphaned, can someone of you update the package with the attached debdiff in order to close #750717 ? It's really simple, it only removes the `-nc' option from the Makefile. Ciao! Leo. twitter-bootstrap.debdiff Description: Binary data

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Regrouping some modules ? [Was Re: Comments regarding node-uid-safe_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes]

On 22 August 2014 16:31, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: While maintaining a buch of unrelated packages seems difficult, would it make sense to regroup all competing packages that bring similar functions ? Sometimes one module is clearly better than others and we try to patch less

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Regrouping some modules ? [Was Re: Comments regarding node-uid-safe_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes]

On 23 August 2014 10:55, Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com wrote: On 23 August 2014 10:12, Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com wrote: Why not try to identify some categories (as suggested for node-ms: time, or email or filesystem ...) to regroup those small modules ? Another approach could be to group

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] What's the best section for JS packages?

On 2 July 2014 11:20, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-07-02 10:05:36) On 27 June 2014 15:50, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Quoting Leo Iannacone (2014-06-27 10:25:17) all of my packages (most of them are node modules) have Section: web in debian

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Regrouping some modules ? [Was Re: Comments regarding node-uid-safe_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes]

On 23 August 2014 21:23, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: Le samedi 23 août 2014 à 16:52 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit : On 23 August 2014 12:08, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: I prefer the first idea from Thorsten: time, email, fs packages bundling utilities by category. Let's

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Regrouping some modules ? [Was Re: Comments regarding node-uid-safe_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes]

On 26 August 2014 11:15, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: All of these packages (IMHO) should be named as node-${CATEGORY}utils, i.e.: * node-httputils To avoid the case where one upstream module gets called 'httputils', i suggest a different name scheme: nodemodules- +1 The

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] please push all node-postgres gbp branches

On 6 September 2014 14:30, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Quoting Jérémy Lal (2014-09-06 14:16:21) Le samedi 06 septembre 2014 à 12:59 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : Quoting Jérémy Lal (2014-09-06 08:07:46) i just noticed that there was something missing to the gbp repo. Right -

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] packages rejected

On 12 September 2014 10:28, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: This bundling story is tricky and poses more problems than it solves. What does it solve, again ? The biggest objection (as far as I remember) came out from d-devel ML and was: Hey, these too small libraries have more

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Questions about packaging node-htmlparser2 and dependencies

On 14 September 2014 14:50, W. Martin Borgert deba...@debian.org wrote: Hi, to solve #644767: ITP: tilemill -- map design studio and #761328: RFP: python-mpld3 -- a D3 viewer for matplotlib node-htmlparser2 needs to be packaged: #761433: RFP: node-htmlparser2 -- fast forgiving

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] how to build jsondiffpatch?

On 15 September 2014 20:19, Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com wrote: I am working on packaging jsondiffpatch: https://github.com/benjamine/jsondiffpatch This would be: Source package: jsondiffpatch.js Node package: node-jsondiffpatch libjs package: libjs-jsondiffpatch Node package part

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#761681: Bug#761681: should.js build-depends on node-mocha which isn't in Debian

On 15 September 2014 19:42, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: Hi, As per the title of this bug, node-mocha should be packaged, or should.js should not build-depend on it. Hi Thomas, node-mocha is provided by mocha package: Package: mocha Source: node-mocha ... Provides: node-mocha

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#761681: Bug#761681: should.js build-depends on node-mocha which isn't in Debian

On 15 September 2014 19:42, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: Hi, As per the title of this bug, node-mocha should be packaged, or should.js should not build-depend on it. Hi Thomas, node-mocha is provided by mocha, see: $ apt-cache show mocha | grep ^Provides

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-highlight: incompatible with nodejs module name: highlight.js

On 19 September 2014 00:07, Cédric Boutillier bou...@debian.org wrote: Thanks for your report. I packaged highlight.js as a dependency of another tool, and I am not completely familiar with the JavaScript world. Excuse my naive questions below. No problem. I understand that because the

[Pkg-javascript-devel] NPM: Cannot find module installed globally

Hi, with npm 1.4.21+ds-2 I'm not able to require module installed globally... See this: $ sudo npm install -g coffee-script /usr/local/bin/coffee - /usr/local/lib/node_modules/coffee-script/bin/coffee /usr/local/bin/cake - /usr/local/lib/node_modules/coffee-script/bin/cake coffee-script@1.8.0

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Providing node-ms with node-debug

Hi, I'm going to update node-debug to version 2.0.0, which depends on module 'ms'. I would like to add that module as patch and then install it in /usr/lib/nodejs/ms.. I other words, I would like to provide 'ms' with 'debug'. Objections or better ideas?

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding node-express-session_1.7.0-1_amd64.changes

On 4 October 2014 14:04, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: Le samedi 04 octobre 2014 à 10:49 +0200, Leo Iannacone a écrit : On 3 October 2014 23:14, Thorsten Alteholz ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote: Hi Leo, Hi Thorsten, will there be a package node-uid-safe? Yes

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#763988: node-growl: New upstream version

Package: node-growl Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, please consider to update growl, currently upstream has released 1.8.1 https://github.com/visionmedia/node-growl I need this to update mocha. Thanks. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] patching away readable-stream might not be right

On 15 October 2014 09:35, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: Le mardi 14 octobre 2014 à 19:44 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit : See https://github.com/andrewrk/node-multiparty/commit/11780f4a6e3e8c6d439639794c795bb5fdaefe97#commitcomment-8163898 According to this, if a package depends on

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-serve-static in danger of getting removed

Please, Feel free to upload the package. I do not have enough time to test it in these busy days... Thank you all... L. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Help on RC bug

Hello there, how are you? Can someone of you help on this bug, please? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775843 I am full busy in these days with University and I fear to do not have enough time to inspect what to do (if import the single patch or update the whole express

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Help on RC bug

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com wrote: Can someone of you help on this bug, please? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775843 Upstream reference: https://github.com/expressjs/serve-static/issues/26

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-tar_1.0.3-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 2:29 AM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: Did you just hijack node-tar that was already in the archive ? Please contact pkg-javascript and try to coordinate your uploads with this team. Check its wiki, read what npm2deb says about the modules you're packaging. For

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Small Node.js packages in NEW

On 26 June 2015 at 22:57, Thorsten Alteholz alteh...@debian.org wrote: Hi Bas, I'm reluctantly looking into this issue further, but I need to know what requirements an Node.js module must meet to be eligible for its own source package. What are your requirements for this? from my point

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#787924: Bug#787924: node-crc: test failure Error: Use CoffeeScript.register()

On 6 June 2015 at 14:02, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: Package: node-crc Version: 3.0.0-2 Severity: important Hello, while rebuilding node-crc in a clean sid sbuild chroot, this error happens: dh build dh_testdir dh_auto_configure debian/rules override_dh_auto_build

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Updating Mocha

Hi all, FYI: I'm going to update mocha at version 2.2.5 Cheers, L. -- Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com GPG Key Id - 0xD282FC25 ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Updating Mocha

I just figured out that to update node-mocha we need node-diff upgrade. Jonas, any plan to do that? L. On 30 May 2015 at 17:55, Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com wrote: Hi all, FYI: I'm going to update mocha at version 2.2.5 Cheers, L. -- Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on Home

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Small Node.js packages in NEW

On 28 June 2015 at 12:38, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: 2015-06-28 12:02 GMT+02:00 Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com: On 27 June 2015 at 16:43, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: 2015-06-27 15:24 GMT+02:00 Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com: On 26 June 2015 at 22:57, Thorsten

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Small Node.js packages in NEW

On 27 June 2015 at 16:43, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: 2015-06-27 15:24 GMT+02:00 Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com: On 26 June 2015 at 22:57, Thorsten Alteholz alteh...@debian.org wrote: Hi Bas, I'm reluctantly looking into this issue further, but I need to know what

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#802224: Upstream is now up to 0.5.6

Can you plase ask someone else in #debian-js for the ACK?.. I'm a bit busy these weeks. Sorry for this! L. On 18 May 2016 at 15:02, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi L3on, > > > What do you think of the current package? Is it worth an upload? [If so, > > notice I