Op 12-11-2009 om 21:35 is door Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
geschreven:
Noel Jones:
On 11/12/2009 12:28 PM, Arjan Melein wrote:
Yea I just found that out when I just tried to sed the queue file :-)
Any way to limit it to only take out the line on domain X Y and Z ?
On a sidenote,
Hi,
Victor Duchovni a écrit :
2009-11-12T10:59:33-0500 amnesiac postfix/qmgr[1706]: A323688C523:
removed
2009-11-12T10:59:33-0500 amnesiac postfix/smtp[29704]: 71FDF88C221:
to=jlu...@example.com, relay=mail.example.com[192.168.0.1]:25,
delay=0.15, delays=0.01/0/0.03/0.12,
Hello There,
I am just trying to configure my postfix to send only mail server.
presently used parameters in main.cf configuration file is as
follows:
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
config_directory = /etc/postfix
Alex put forth on 11/12/2009 10:09 PM:
Perhaps the reject_invalid_helo_hostname doesn't work with postfix-v1?
Postfix 1.1 was released sometime around Jan 2002. Patch 1.1.13, the
last patch for Postfix 1.1, was released July 2003. So, you're
running 6-7 year old code _at best_, there Alex.
2009/11/13 Manoj Burande manoj.bura...@artificialmachines.com:
presently used parameters in main.cf configuration file is as
follows:
No, please show the output of `postconf -n` when describing your
configuration. The contents of main.cf is less useful as it doesn't
accurately describe the
Hi Barney,
Here I just wanted to explain you that what exactly I am trying to do is,
1] I am trying to configure postfix mail server that can only send mails.
It receives no mail from the network.
2] The MX records tell the world which server will accept inbound mail for
your domain. They
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:06:32 -0200 (BRST)
Von: lis...@hidrautronica.ind.br
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: quota.txt file
Hi,
Where I get the quota.txt file?
Not found in http://puuhis.net/vhcs/quota.txt
And what does VHCS have to do
Op 12-11-2009 om 21:35 is door Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
geschreven:
Noel Jones:
On 11/12/2009 12:28 PM, Arjan Melein wrote:
Yea I just found that out when I just tried to sed the queue file :-)
Any way to limit it to only take out the line on domain X Y and Z ?
On a sidenote,
2009/11/13 Manoj Burande manoj.bura...@artificialmachines.com:
Here I just wanted to explain you that what exactly I am trying to do is,
1] I am trying to configure postfix mail server that can only send mails.
It receives no mail from the network.
2] The MX records tell the world which
For the last couple of days I'm now experimenting with the
2.7-20091105-nonprod with the new speed_adjust experimental feature
turned on at the MX port, along with the postscreen. Seems to work
as advertised: timing reports by a pre-queue proxy content filter confirm
that the content filter is
Hi,
Wietse Venema a écrit :
St�phane MERLE:
I just saw that those mail are sent to n...@localhost :
8652C2E741C6: to=n...@localhost, orig_to=john@distdomain.com,
relay=local, delay=0.02, delays=0.01/0/0/0.01, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced
(unknown user: null)
surely because I set :
Hello
as far as i know Postfix does not alter a Message-ID beside when it
creates a missing one. Is there some way one could find out later in
the logfile if Postfix has created one? Is it sufficient if the
Message-ID looks like some-long-numbar@my-mailrelay-hostname or
is there some
Mark Martinec:
For the last couple of days I'm now experimenting with the
2.7-20091105-nonprod with the new speed_adjust experimental feature
turned on at the MX port, along with the postscreen. Seems to work
as advertised: timing reports by a pre-queue proxy content filter confirm
that the
St??phane MERLE:
Hi,
Wietse Venema a ?crit :
St?phane MERLE:
I just saw that those mail are sent to n...@localhost :
8652C2E741C6: to=n...@localhost, orig_to=john@distdomain.com,
relay=local, delay=0.02, delays=0.01/0/0/0.01, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced
(unknown user:
Wietse Venema a écrit :
Sorry, that is NOT a good reason to throw away rejected mail.
When non-spam mail is rejected, the sender needs to know. It is
up to the sender to deal with this, not the MTA operator.
When people are sending real spam to hotmail, then silencing Postfix
is not the proper
St?phane MERLE:
Wietse Venema a ?crit :
Sorry, that is NOT a good reason to throw away rejected mail.
When non-spam mail is rejected, the sender needs to know. It is
up to the sender to deal with this, not the MTA operator.
When people are sending real spam to hotmail, then silencing
I will not post instructions to throw away non-delivery notices.
I know that people would mis-use this to cover up their mistakes
so that their users don't find out that mail was mis-handled.
If you have a specialized need that never needs to deliver NDRs,
then it is easy enough to edit the
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:06:09AM +0100, St?phane MERLE wrote:
This logs the delivery of a bounce message that is returned to the
sender.
I just saw that those mail are sent to n...@localhost :
8652C2E741C6: to=n...@localhost, orig_to=john@distdomain.com,
relay=local, delay=0.02,
Can you send the result of grep sieve /etc/imapd.conf, I wonder if your
sieve configuration in /etc/imapd.conf is correct...
maybe the path of sievedir leads to a directory that's not writable...
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:30:23 +0100, nunatarsuaq nunatars...@gmail.com
wrote:
Same thing.
I logged
On 11/12/2009 11:56 PM, Manoj Burande wrote:
Hello Noel,
As I checked with http://www.postfix.org/announcements.html; I
found the following current stable version of postfix mail server.
But I do not find any RPM for the same.
# August 28, 2009: Stable release Postfix 2.6.5.
On 11/12/2009 10:09 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
If you don't want to whitelist the IP address completely but instead just
want to allow it to bypass your HELO checks, then check_helo_access will
work. However, you should first understand that the type of lookup performed
depends on the name of the
On Friday 13 November 2009 14:48:27 Wietse Venema wrote:
20091105-nonprod has a known problem when the temp file
can't be written for some reason (fixed in 20091109).
As for the second problem, it would help if you could add
a missing sanity check here:
Thanks. Done both: upgraded to 20091109
On 11/13/2009 10:57 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
maps_rbl_domains =
zen.spamhaus.org
cbl.abuseat.org
sbl.spamhaus.org
pbl.spamhaus.org
zen.spamhaus.org already includes both sbl.spamhaus.org and
pbl.spamhaus.org.
Oops, zen also includes cbl.abuseat.org. So you're doing 1
lookup for the price of
Hi,
I have a specific requirement. I have been searching for an appropriate
tool for my purpose for the past 2 days but have found none. I hope
someone in this list can help. Here is my requirement.
I have a client who often calls up and asks me if a particular mail has
been sent or that
On 2009-11-13 Manoj Burande wrote:
Here I just wanted to explain you that what exactly I am trying to do
is,
1] I am trying to configure postfix mail server that can only send
mails. It receives no mail from the network.
2] The MX records tell the world which server will accept inbound
Thanks for the logging. If you have time, can you change the code
to print information about the non-zero size? This could be a
filesystem feature where ftruncate() does not reset st_size until
the file is rewritten or closed (in which case my attempt to force
easly release of disk blocks are in
Dear Sir,
I have noticed a bug in the 2.6 version of postfix where it says that cannot
find /postmulti folder. Wondering if this is a bug or a installation error
on my part. This error happens when i start postfix on centos.
Rgds
Dhiraj
On Friday 13 November 2009 18:52:03 Wietse Venema wrote:
Thanks for the logging. If you have time, can you change the code
to print information about the non-zero size? This could be a
filesystem feature where ftruncate() does not reset st_size until
the file is rewritten or closed (in which
Mark Martinec:
On Friday 13 November 2009 18:52:03 Wietse Venema wrote:
Thanks for the logging. If you have time, can you change the code
to print information about the non-zero size? This could be a
filesystem feature where ftruncate() does not reset st_size until
the file is rewritten
Dhiraj Chatpar:
Dear Sir,
I have noticed a bug in the 2.6 version of postfix where it says that cannot
find /postmulti folder. Wondering if this is a bug or a installation error
on my part. This error happens when i start postfix on centos.
Wasn't this fixed recently?
Wietse
Sir, I just did a fresh installation yesterday. and fresh complied the new
version of postfix 2.6 on a centos machine and i got this error. I dont know
why it came. but it did.
Rgds
Dhiraj
Charles de
Gaullehttp://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/c/charles_de_gaulle.html
- The better I get to
Dhiraj Chatpar:
Sir, I just did a fresh installation yesterday. and fresh complied the new
version of postfix 2.6 on a centos machine and i got this error. I dont know
why it came. but it did.
This was fixed 20091026, and will be part of Postfix 2.6.6.
Wietse
On Friday 13 November 2009 19:17:07 Wietse Venema wrote:
Victor found it (missing fflush before ftruncate).
If you can back out the changes and apply the patch below.
*** ./smtpd_proxy.c.orig Mon Nov 9 19:41:50 2009
--- ./smtpd_proxy.c Fri Nov 13 13:15:25 2009
Thanks, done. So far so
Wietse Venema:
Mark Martinec:
On Friday 13 November 2009 18:52:03 Wietse Venema wrote:
Thanks for the logging. If you have time, can you change the code
to print information about the non-zero size? This could be a
filesystem feature where ftruncate() does not reset st_size until
Hi,
At any rate, you miss the point.
The smtpd_{client, helo, sender, recipient}_restrictions are about *when* a
check takes place, corresponding to the {client connection, HELO, MAIL FROM,
RCPT TO} stage of the SMTP transaction.
It works now, thanks so much.
I understand much more clearly
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 01:17:07PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Mark Martinec:
On Friday 13 November 2009 18:52:03 Wietse Venema wrote:
Thanks for the logging. If you have time, can you change the code
to print information about the non-zero size? This could be a
filesystem feature
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 01:27:30PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Dhiraj Chatpar:
Sir, I just did a fresh installation yesterday. and fresh complied the new
version of postfix 2.6 on a centos machine and i got this error. I dont know
why it came. but it did.
This was fixed 20091026, and
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 06:27:59PM +0100, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2009-11-13 Manoj Burande wrote:
Here I just wanted to explain you that what exactly I am trying to do
is,
1] I am trying to configure postfix mail server that can only send
mails. It receives no mail from the
Hello,
At present my Postfix is configured to do virus and spam filtering on
all E-Mails it receives, whether for local delivery or relay. My goal
is to scrub the E-Mails only on local delivery; I don't want any virus
or spam filtering on relay. Here is how I am currently scrubbing all
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 02:10:11PM -0500, Lou Duchez wrote:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=mycustomfilter
This service fills the Postfix queue with new mail, content filtering
is done on input, so this setting makes sense.
local unix -
help!!!
i am continually getting deferalls from yahoo, rediffmail which are 2 ISPs
in our country. We are a big organization and we send a good number of
emails in a day. But this deferral problem is a pain. I have implemented,
feedbackloop, PTR, Domainkeys, DKIM, etc.. but still face the same
Dhiraj,
First off, if Wietse said how to do it then it’s the right way. The question I
have is how many emails are you sending to these two organizations? Can you
quantify “a good number”?
Gary Smith
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf
Dear Mr. Smith,
Thank you for your reply, hmm there is no fixed number per say. but
sometimes the users in our organization send emails in good numbers.
Fortunately or unfortunately they sometimes send more emails to these
domains than others. as most of our clients or others are hosted on these
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Dhiraj Chatpar wrote:
All looks good.. just this temp deferrals from these ISP and
sometimes others based on the kind of emails that are send from my org email
servers.
Please advice a way to get thru this issue.
And how long are they deferred for? My experience is Yahoo
Thanks larry will remember that
Mike Ditka http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/mike_ditka.html -
If God had wanted man to play soccer, he wouldn't have given us arms.
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 01:29, Larry Stone lston...@stonejongleux.comwrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Dhiraj Chatpar
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 01:11:18AM +0530, Dhiraj Chatpar wrote:
i am continually getting deferalls from yahoo, rediffmail which are 2 ISPs
in our country. We are a big organization and we send a good number of
emails in a day. But this deferral problem is a pain. I have implemented,
Dear Mr. Viktor,
1. Most of the emails get through on the first try,
2. The mails is on an average retried 2-3 times
3. 1/3 of the messages bounce
4. the feedback loop looks clean as the employees of my org only send to
people they know.. thus if you are referring to spam like activity then that
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 01:48:34AM +0530, Dhiraj Chatpar wrote:
1. Most of the emails get through on the first try,
Quantify most. What fraction is that? Out of what overall volume
(msgs/day)?
2. The mails is on an average retried 2-3 times
What is the average time before deferred mail is
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
as far as i know Postfix does not alter a Message-ID beside when it
creates a missing one.
There is more to it since the release of 2.6. From RELEASE_NOTES:
Major changes - header rewriting
[Incompat
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Lou Duchez wrote:
At present my Postfix is configured to do virus and spam filtering
on all E-Mails it receives, whether for local delivery or relay. My
goal is to scrub the E-Mails only on local delivery; I don't want
any virus or spam filtering on relay. Here is how I
50 matches
Mail list logo
