Viktor Dukhovni:
> > The Postfix master creates as many sockets as needed for an inet
> > service, and sets the socket option SO_REUSEADDR on each socket,
> > and bind()s them to the desired addresses.
> >
> > With that, it may be possible for the Postfix master to create new
> > sockets, set SO_R
Demi Marie Obenour:
Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On 1/6/23 07:15, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Peter Wienemann:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> is there a way to dump the effective postfix configuration rather than
> >&g
On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 03:28:23PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > The documentation of inet_interfaces says otherwise, my recollection is
> > that master(8) does not attempt to rebind inet sockets on "reload":
>
> I see. Yes, that could be dififcult. Or maybe not.
>
> The Postfix master create
Le 06/01/2023 à 21:03, Demi Marie Obenour a écrit :
On 1/6/23 07:15, Wietse Venema wrote:
Peter Wienemann:
Hi,
is there a way to dump the effective postfix configuration rather than
the one specified in main.cf/master.cf? It seems that changes to
main.cf/master.cf have an immediate impact on
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 01:45:48PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > > Most changes in main.cf require a reload to become effective but there
> > > are some exceptions requiring a restart, e. g. a change of
> > > inet_interfaces.
> >
> > That is incorrect. If inet_interfaces
On 1/6/23 07:15, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Peter Wienemann:
>> Hi,
>>
>> is there a way to dump the effective postfix configuration rather than
>> the one specified in main.cf/master.cf? It seems that changes to
>> main.cf/master.cf have an immediate impact on the
On 06.01.23 20:02, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 01:45:48PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Most changes in main.cf require a reload to become effective but there
are some exceptions requiring a restart, e. g. a change of
inet_interfaces.
That is incorrect. If inet_interfaces is
On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 01:45:48PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Most changes in main.cf require a reload to become effective but there
> > are some exceptions requiring a restart, e. g. a change of
> > inet_interfaces.
>
> That is incorrect. If inet_interfaces is changed, then a "postfix
>
Peter Wienemann:
> Most changes in main.cf require a reload to become effective but there
> are some exceptions requiring a restart, e. g. a change of
> inet_interfaces.
That is incorrect. If inet_interfaces is changed, then a "postfix
reload" (not restart) is required because the master daemon
On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 06:42:18PM +0100, Peter Wienemann wrote:
> Most changes in main.cf require a reload to become effective
No. In most cases they merely require the passage of time, and typical
changes are not that time-sensitive.
> I am trying to put main.cf under configuration
> manageme
On 06.01.23 17:33, Wietse Venema wrote:
Peter Wienemann:
On 06.01.23 13:15, Wietse Venema wrote:
is there a way to dump the effective postfix configuration rather than
the one specified in main.cf/master.cf? It seems that changes to
main.cf/master.cf have an immediate impact on the output of
d an
> different times and they will produce different dumps if you change
> Postfix configuration without "postfix reload".
+1. It makes little sense to ask a distributed (over multiple
dynamically spawned processes) system about its "current" state.
The age in seconds
Peter Wienemann:
> On 06.01.23 13:15, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >> is there a way to dump the effective postfix configuration rather than
> >> the one specified in main.cf/master.cf? It seems that changes to
> >> main.cf/master.cf have an immediate impact on the output
On 06.01.23 13:15, Wietse Venema wrote:
is there a way to dump the effective postfix configuration rather than
the one specified in main.cf/master.cf? It seems that changes to
main.cf/master.cf have an immediate impact on the output of postconf
regardless of whether a reload/restart of the
Peter Wienemann:
> Hi,
>
> is there a way to dump the effective postfix configuration rather than
> the one specified in main.cf/master.cf? It seems that changes to
> main.cf/master.cf have an immediate impact on the output of postconf
> regardless of whether a reload/rest
Hi,
is there a way to dump the effective postfix configuration rather than
the one specified in main.cf/master.cf? It seems that changes to
main.cf/master.cf have an immediate impact on the output of postconf
regardless of whether a reload/restart of the service was performed.
Peter
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 01:16:34PM -0600, Scott Mutter wrote:
> I'm just beginning to look at Postfix configurations (at a very leisurely
> pace I might add).
You reall should read the Postfix book by Ralf and Patrick, despite its
age, it substantially applies to all Postfix releases since.
The
Dnia 8.12.2022 o godz. 13:16:34 Scott Mutter pisze:
> In an SMTP transaction there are certain commands that pertain to certain
> areas of the SMTP message, specifically:
>
> MAIL FROM
> RCPT TO
> DATA
>
> In Exim, there is an ACL configuration block - acl_smtp_mail - that can be
> used to parse
On 08.12.22 13:16, Scott Mutter wrote:
In Exim, there is an ACL configuration block - acl_smtp_mail - that can be
used to parse the information presented in the MAIL FROM command and this
determines if the connection should be allowed to proceed.
Likewise, there is an ACL configuration block - a
I'm just beginning to look at Postfix configurations (at a very leisurely
pace I might add).
I come from a mostly Exim background, so the configuration of Postfix is
really somewhat foreign to me.
In an SMTP transaction there are certain commands that pertain to certain
areas of the SMTP message,
Hi Richard,
Op 12-04-2022 om 14:07 schreef Richard Rasker:
Op 11-04-22 om 18:34 schreef Paul van der Vlis:
Hi Richard, ...
Eventually you could use my mailserver as a relayhost.
That is a very friendly offer, but if I do, that would of course only
be temporary, so that I can send e-mail
Dnia 12.04.2022 o godz. 15:03:40 Richard Rasker pisze:
>
> Sorry, I wasn't being clear here. What I mean to ask is if (and how)
> using a mail relay for sending mail could solve the problem that at
> the receiving end, reverse DNS does not match the originating
> domain.
Reverse DNS doesn't have
Op 12-04-22 om 14:20 schreef Jaroslaw Rafa:
Dnia 12.04.2022 o godz. 14:07:13 Richard Rasker pisze:
But according to the information supplied, I should also be able to
use smtp.xs4all.nl as a relay host, see
https://www.xs4all.nl/eigenmailserver/ (in Dutch -- and I already
took care of the Spamha
On 2022-04-12 14:20, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
Probably not, because smtp.xs4all.nl has IP address 195.121.65.191, and
reverse DNS for 195.121.65.191 is 195-121-65-191.dc.kpn.net. So it is
also a
"generic" hostname which may cause some systems to reject mail sent
from
this address. The ISP has conf
On 2022-04-12 14:07, Richard Rasker wrote:
Op 11-04-22 om 18:34 schreef Paul van der Vlis:
Hi Richard, ...
But according to the information supplied, I should also be able to
use smtp.xs4all.nl as a relay host, see
https://www.xs4all.nl/eigenmailserver/ (in Dutch -- and I already took
care of
Dnia 12.04.2022 o godz. 14:20:11 Jaroslaw Rafa pisze:
> Dnia 12.04.2022 o godz. 14:07:13 Richard Rasker pisze:
> >
> > But according to the information supplied, I should also be able to
> > use smtp.xs4all.nl as a relay host, see
> > https://www.xs4all.nl/eigenmailserver/ (in Dutch -- and I alrea
Dnia 12.04.2022 o godz. 14:07:13 Richard Rasker pisze:
>
> But according to the information supplied, I should also be able to
> use smtp.xs4all.nl as a relay host, see
> https://www.xs4all.nl/eigenmailserver/ (in Dutch -- and I already
> took care of the Spamhaus delisting).
>
> Question: does t
Op 11-04-22 om 18:34 schreef Paul van der Vlis:
Hi Richard,
...
Eventually you could use my mailserver as a relayhost.
That is a very friendly offer, but if I do, that would of course only
be temporary, so that I can send e-mail again, and I'd contact you in
advance.
You need a usernam
Hi Richard,
Op 11-04-2022 om 18:20 schreef Richard Rasker:
Hi Paul,
Op 11-04-22 om 17:40 schreef Paul van der Vlis:
[snip]
Maybe switch to freedom.nl, they give you a good reverse DNS.
Also IPv6.
Thanks for the tip; I think that may be a good idea. They're a lot
cheaper as well than XS4Al
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 06:20:46PM +0200, Richard Rasker wrote:
> That is a very friendly offer, but if I do, that would of course only be
> temporary, so that I can send e-mail again, and I'd contact you in advance.
>
> Just to make sure: I guess I need to change my MX record for this to
> wor
Hi Paul,
Op 11-04-22 om 17:40 schreef Paul van der Vlis:
[snip]
Maybe switch to freedom.nl, they give you a good reverse DNS.
Also IPv6.
Thanks for the tip; I think that may be a good idea. They're a lot
cheaper as well than XS4All/KPN -- I think I'll contact them first thing
tomorrow morn
On 11.04.22 08:21, lists wrote:
FWIW my VPS only allows one reverse pointer. I host multiple domains so
only one reverse pointer will match. My mail does not get bounced for
that.
this is not about multiple PTRs records, this is about changing the PTR.
And before someone posts you can have
lists wrote:
FWIW my VPS only allows one reverse pointer. I host multiple domains so only
one reverse pointer will match. My mail does not get bounced for that.
And before someone posts you can have more than one reverse pointer per IP the
VPS (Digital Ocean) says it can't be done.
Multiple
Op 11-04-2022 om 17:19 schreef Paul van der Vlis:
Hi Richard and others,
Op 11-04-2022 om 16:52 schreef Richard Rasker:
#Set Username and Password
smtp_sasl_password_maps = static:Chosen-Username:Chosen-Password
What I use is this:
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/saslpasswd
ginal Message
From: m...@junc.eu
Sent: April 11, 2022 7:43 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?
On 2022-04-11 15:38, Richard Rasker wrote:
> Could I solve this by setting smtp_helo_name in main.cf to
> 77-172-184-9.fi
Hi Richard and others,
Op 11-04-2022 om 16:52 schreef Richard Rasker:
#Set Username and Password
smtp_sasl_password_maps = static:Chosen-Username:Chosen-Password
What I use is this:
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/saslpasswd
And in that file something like:
smtp_sasl_password_m
On 2022-04-11 17:00, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 11.04.22 15:38, Richard Rasker wrote:
I've been using Postfix for many years without significant problems.
However, due to a forced change in ISP, I can no longer have a
correct PTR record pointing to mail.linetec.nl, causing a lot of
ISP'
On 11.04.22 15:38, Richard Rasker wrote:
I've been using Postfix for many years without significant problems.
However, due to a forced change in ISP, I can no longer have a
correct PTR record pointing to mail.linetec.nl, causing a lot of
ISP's to reject e-mail from my server.
Reverse DNS for
Hello Matus, and others,
Op 11-04-22 om 16:17 schreef Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 11.04.22 15:38, Richard Rasker wrote:
I've been using Postfix for many years without significant problems.
However, due to a forced change in ISP, I can no longer have a
correct PTR record pointing to mail.linete
Could I solve this by setting smtp_helo_name in main.cf to
77-172-184-9.fixed.kpn.net ?
Or is this a bad idea?
On 11.04.22 10:20, post...@ptld.com wrote:
Yes you can set the helo name to match but this wont have much effect.
Some servers are looking at domain -> IP -> domain which in your case
On 2022-04-11 15:38, Richard Rasker wrote:
Could I solve this by setting smtp_helo_name in main.cf to
77-172-184-9.fixed.kpn.net ? Or is this a bad idea?
no this will not solve it, you have to talk to isp kindly ask for change
of ptr, if thay are unvilling it most cases not a problem to chang
> Could I solve this by setting smtp_helo_name in main.cf to
> 77-172-184-9.fixed.kpn.net ?
> Or is this a bad idea?
Yes you can set the helo name to match but this wont have much effect.
Some servers are looking at domain -> IP -> domain which in your case is:
mail.linetec.nl -> 77.172.184
On 11.04.22 15:38, Richard Rasker wrote:
I've been using Postfix for many years without significant problems.
However, due to a forced change in ISP, I can no longer have a correct
PTR record pointing to mail.linetec.nl, causing a lot of ISP's to
reject e-mail from my server.
Reverse DNS for
Hello,
I've been using Postfix for many years without significant problems.
However, due to a forced change in ISP, I can no longer have a correct
PTR record pointing to mail.linetec.nl, causing a lot of ISP's to reject
e-mail from my server.
Reverse DNS for my IP address now points to the I
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 09:44:35AM +0200, TTM wrote:
> raf wrote:
> >> main.cf
> >> -
> >> [...]
> >> receive_override_options = no_address_mappings
> >
> >I could be wrong, but I don't think you want the above setting.
> >Yo
raf wrote:
>> main.cf
>> -
>> [...]
>> receive_override_options = no_address_mappings
>
>I could be wrong, but I don't think you want the above setting.
>You have canonical address maps and virtual alias maps, and
>this setting
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 03:33:05PM +0200, fo...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hello together,
> I have "Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS" on a raspberry pi 4, and I'm trying to config
> postfix to rewrite local-addresses and use then sender-dependent relayhosts.
>
> Postfix is mail_version = 3.4.13 and i have a dynamic IP.
Bernardo:
>You canonical map has:
>
>Local_User_A@local.homenet us...@gmx.de
>Local_User_B@local.homenet us...@gmail.com
>
>but according to the log your "from" is "ttm@ttmsacer.homenet".
>
>Your map doesn't contain/match anything related to "ttmsacer.homenet" (it only
>has entries for "local.hom
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021, TTM wrote:
Wietse:
Without further information I can't say what mistake you made. Maybe
you're looking at an old message that is already in the queue.
What would be needed?
After each test, I clear thee queue with "postsuper -d ALL".
I'm wondering why postfix tries to del
Wietse:
>Without further information I can't say what mistake you made. Maybe
>you're looking at an old message that is already in the queue.
What would be needed?
After each test, I clear thee queue with "postsuper -d ALL".
I'm wondering why postfix tries to deliver the message directly to the
r
TTM:
>
> Wietse:
> >The Postfix cleanup daemon applies canonical mapping before it
> >writes a message to a queue file.
>
> Ok, I misunderstood this note in the postfix docu:
> "Note: $sender_canonical_maps is processed before $canonical_maps. "
>
>
> Ok, but can I achieve it by setting in main
Wietse:
>The Postfix cleanup daemon applies canonical mapping before it
>writes a message to a queue file.
Ok, I misunderstood this note in the postfix docu:
"Note: $sender_canonical_maps is processed before $canonical_maps. "
Ok, but can I achieve it by setting in main.cf:
---
fo...@gmx.de:
> For point 1) an 2) i have a file sender_canonical created:
> -
> Local_User_A@local.homenet us...@gmx.de
> Local_User_B@local.homenet us...@gmail.com
> ---
Hello together,
I have "Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS" on a raspberry pi 4, and I'm trying to config
postfix to rewrite local-addresses and use then sender-dependent relayhosts.
Postfix is mail_version = 3.4.13 and i have a dynamic IP.
The setup looks /should be like this:
1) local user sends email to po
On 07/12/2020 14:58, Chris Green wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 02:34:14PM +, Dominic Raferd wrote:
On 07/12/2020 13:11, Chris Green wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 01:01:16PM +, Chris Green wrote:
[snip]
While I'm about it why am I getting identical mail.log and mail.info
files crea
Chris Green wrote:
While I'm about it why am I getting identical mail.log and mail.info
files created in /var/log on the Pi?
It's not inherently Pi-specific.
The root cause is some wise-guy upstream package maintainer who has
(mis?)configured (r)syslog to output multiple log files for differe
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 02:34:14PM +, Dominic Raferd wrote:
> On 07/12/2020 13:11, Chris Green wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 01:01:16PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > >
> > > While I'm about it why am I getting identical mail.log and mail.info
> > > files created in /var/lo
On 07/12/2020 13:11, Chris Green wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 01:01:16PM +, Chris Green wrote:
[snip]
While I'm about it why am I getting identical mail.log and mail.info
files created in /var/log on the Pi?
I could still do with an answer to this.
Check contents of /etc/rsyslog.d (e.g.
Chris Green:
> > While I'm about it why am I getting identical mail.log and mail.info
> > files created in /var/log on the Pi?
> >
> I could still do with an answer to this.
Postfix does not write those files. They are written by diffferent
programs: rsyslog, syslogd, or the like.
Wietse
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 01:01:16PM +, Chris Green wrote:
[snip]
>
> Presumably this means there's a SASL/TLS library I need to install on
> the Pi, can anyone tell me what it is please. Oh, I have run 'postmap
> /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd' on both systems.
>
Typical! Almost immediately after p
I am setting up a 'send only' Postfix configuration on a number of
machines so that they can send error messages to me on my desktop
machine.
The main.cf file is:-
compatibility_level = 2
#
#
# TLS parameters
#
smtpd_tls_cert_file=/etc/ssl/certs/ssl-cert-sn
Gerard E. Seibert:
> I am considering running 'mlmmj' on my FreeBSD system. There is a
> document that shows how to configure Postfix with 'mlmmj' available.
> http://mlmmj.org/docs/readme-postfix/ That document is dated 1/28/2012.
> I tend to think it is outdated.
It uses stable Postfix interface
On 2020-05-13 19:09, Gerard E. Seibert wrote:
Does anyone here use this application and have any suggestions on how
to
configure it and/or Postfix to work happily together?
its dokumented imho on that page how to make it work
I am considering running 'mlmmj' on my FreeBSD system. There is a
document that shows how to configure Postfix with 'mlmmj' available.
http://mlmmj.org/docs/readme-postfix/ That document is dated 1/28/2012.
I tend to think it is outdated.
Does anyone here use this application and have any suggesti
Hi,
Sorry for my english, I'm french.
I have some doubts about my Postfix configuration.
I have a private mail server, at my home, allowing me to have my
personal e-mails ( @my_domain.fr )
My architecture is the following one (on Raspberry Pi with Raspbian):
- 1 mail server with Po
Hi LuKreme,
> On Mar 4, 2018, at 8:44 AM, LuKreme wrote:
>
> Isn't ETRN a good thing? What's the benefit from disabling it?
> --
> My main job is trying to come up with new and innovative and effective ways
> to reject even more mail. I'm up to about 97% now.
>
It’s a good thing in that it i
LuKreme:
> On Feb 27, 2018, at 18:29, J Doe wrote:
> > postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords
> >smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords
>
> Isn't ETRN a good thing? What's the benefit from disabling it?
Good if used by the right client (who needs this nowadays?), otherwise
ERTN it is a waste of scheduler res
On Feb 27, 2018, at 18:29, J Doe wrote:
> postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords
>smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords
Isn't ETRN a good thing? What's the benefit from disabling it?
--
My main job is trying to come up with new and innovative and effective ways to
reject even more mail. I'm up to about 97%
Hi Noel,
> On Feb 27, 2018, at 10:18 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>> ** Is Postfix logging that ETRN is disabled on the first, unencrypted SMTP
>> session and then logging this again for the encrypted session (ie: Postfix
>> is just logging I disabled this and Google is not attempting to issue ETRN
>
On 2/27/2018 8:29 PM, J Doe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I read the “Postfix ETRN Howto” [1] as well as man 5 postconf with regards to:
>
> postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords
> smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords
>
> ... and disabled the announcement of ETRN via:
>
> postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords =
Hello,
I read the “Postfix ETRN Howto” [1] as well as man 5 postconf with regards to:
postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords
smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords
... and disabled the announcement of ETRN via:
postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords = ETRN
smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords = ETRN
I then re
Surprisingly, I found that I had only six items that were duplicated.
One, a file location which I left as is following Wietse's advice. The
remainder I left in place as book marks for the future.
Thanks to both Wietse and Ben for their input.
--
John Allen
KLaM
--
> On Feb 08, 2015, at 05.55, John wrote:
>
> Is there a way of checking for unnecessary entries in the Postfix main or
> master config files.
> I was looking through the mailing list and noticed the point that Victor made
> about "smtpd_tls_session_cache_database" being "mostly unnecessary".
John:
> > "postconf -n" or "postconf -d" is not working for you?
> >
> > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.1.html
> They work very well. But they do not tell me when and what options I may
> have added to my config which duplicate a default option. While such
> duplications are not disasters they m
On 2/8/2015 7:06 AM, Koko Wijatmoko wrote:
On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 05:55:47 -0500
John wrote:
Is there a way of checking for /unnecessary/ entries in the Postfix
main or master config files.
I was looking through the mailing list and noticed the point that
Victor made about "smtpd_tls_session_cache
On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 05:55:47 -0500
John wrote:
> Is there a way of checking for /unnecessary/ entries in the Postfix
> main or master config files.
> I was looking through the mailing list and noticed the point that
> Victor made about "smtpd_tls_session_cache_database" being "mostly
> unnecessary
Is there a way of checking for /unnecessary/ entries in the Postfix main
or master config files.
I was looking through the mailing list and noticed the point that Victor
made about "smtpd_tls_session_cache_database" being "mostly unnecessary".
This made me wonder if I have entries in the config f
Igor Zinovik:
> I'd like to ask how configuration directives are applied to
> additional services that are specified in master.cf.
See http://www.postfix.org/master.5.html
-o name=value
Override the named main.cf configuration parameter. The
parameter value can refer to othe
Hello.
I'd like to ask how configuration directives are applied to
additional services that are specified in master.cf.
If main.cf contains:
...
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth
smtpd_sasl_local_domain = example.com
smtpd_helo_restrictions
On 10/9/2013 3:03 PM, Stefano Gatto wrote:
> Hi all
> I'm trying to configure postfix 2.7.1 to protect internal mailing list with
> the restriction classes as per
> http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html#internal
> Example
> /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
On 10/09/2013 10:03 PM, Stefano Gatto wrote:
Hi all
I'm trying to configure postfix 2.7.1 to protect internal mailing list with
the restriction classes as per
http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html#internal
Example
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
.
Hi all
I'm trying to configure postfix 2.7.1 to protect internal mailing list with
the restriction classes as per
http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html#internal
Example
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/post
On Saturday, September 21, 2013 23:50:00 DTNX Postmaster wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2013, at 21:29, David Benfell wrote:
> > At least within postfix, there is a very nice command to just fix the
> > permissions. (Did Wietse get tired of seeing that particular problem?)
> > I have no idea what they should
On Sep 21, 2013, at 21:29, David Benfell wrote:
> At least within postfix, there is a very nice command to just fix the
> permissions. (Did Wietse get tired of seeing that particular problem?)
> I have no idea what they should be for clamd.ctl because, as near as I
> can tell, it isn't a permanen
nderstanding what they actually do. Especially if
>> you have copied an older configuration from a different distro that
>> may have its own quirks.
>
> Then we are very close to the point where I'll just have to turn
> everything over to Google Apps. Because I am *never*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/2013 08:34 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>
> Am 21.09.2013 17:25, schrieb DTNX Postmaster:
>> +1 on using Debian ClamAV packages without any problems. We use
>> the milter package to integrate it with Postfix, using unix
>> sockets.
>>
>> The
what they actually do. Especially if
> you have copied an older configuration from a different distro that
> may have its own quirks.
Then we are very close to the point where I'll just have to turn
everything over to Google Apps. Because I am *never* going to
understand postfix configuration.
On Sep 21, 2013, at 18:02, David Benfell wrote:
> On 09/21/2013 07:36 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> On Saturday, September 21, 2013 03:34:57 David Benfell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> As near as I can tell debian's clamav is just broken. It keeps
>>> whining about clamd.ctl and nothing I can find
On Saturday, September 21, 2013 09:02:05 David Benfell wrote:
> On 09/21/2013 07:36 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Saturday, September 21, 2013 03:34:57 David Benfell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> As near as I can tell debian's clamav is just broken. It keeps
> >> whining about clamd.ctl and no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/2013 07:36 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Saturday, September 21, 2013 03:34:57 David Benfell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As near as I can tell debian's clamav is just broken. It keeps
>> whining about clamd.ctl and nothing I can find on the web
On Saturday, September 21, 2013 17:34:35 li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> Am 21.09.2013 17:25, schrieb DTNX Postmaster:
> > +1 on using Debian ClamAV packages without any problems. We use the
> > milter package to integrate it with Postfix, using unix sockets.
> >
> > The problem people generally run int
Am 21.09.2013 17:25, schrieb DTNX Postmaster:
> +1 on using Debian ClamAV packages without any problems. We use the
> milter package to integrate it with Postfix, using unix sockets.
>
> The problem people generally run into with unix sockets is one of
> permissions. The milter socket needs to
On Sep 21, 2013, at 16:36, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Saturday, September 21, 2013 03:34:57 David Benfell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As near as I can tell debian's clamav is just broken. It keeps whining
>> about clamd.ctl and nothing I can find on the web fixes it.
>
> You didn't post your origi
On Saturday, September 21, 2013 03:34:57 David Benfell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As near as I can tell debian's clamav is just broken. It keeps whining
> about clamd.ctl and nothing I can find on the web fixes it.
You didn't post your original configuration, so I don't know what your original
problem
David Benfell:
> As near as I can tell debian's clamav is just broken. It keeps whining
> about clamd.ctl and nothing I can find on the web fixes it.
>
> So fine. It's broken. I want it gone.
>
> I tried commenting out the lines in master.cf and main.cf. But now it
> complains about connection re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
As near as I can tell debian's clamav is just broken. It keeps whining
about clamd.ctl and nothing I can find on the web fixes it.
So fine. It's broken. I want it gone.
I tried commenting out the lines in master.cf and main.cf. But now it
co
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 07:15:47PM -0400, Tim Prepscius wrote:
> It would be great if the mail never touched disk. I could guarantee
> the mail handler returns almost instantaneously.
Postfix always commits messages to disk before notifying the remote
SMTP client that the message has been accept
ok so i have that working with the mysql db.
I'll eventually create a separate db with just one table.
I'm using a kludge from here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4772229/configure-mail-server-to-receive-mail-from-any-domain
to get around specifying the domain:
virtual_mailbox_domains = pcr
Tim Prepscius:
> oh wow, this worked, first time too. jeeze.. that's awesome.
>
> Thank you again, to answer your questions:
>
> 1. I do in fact want to only accept mail from static ips and those
> not on the block list. But I figure there are configuration examples
> for this. I can spend th
oh wow, this worked, first time too. jeeze.. that's awesome.
Thank you again, to answer your questions:
1. I do in fact want to only accept mail from static ips and those
not on the block list. But I figure there are configuration examples
for this. I can spend the time to figure this out I t
1 - 100 of 235 matches
Mail list logo