On 01/22/2010 07:58 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Majordomo is a Perl script, so you can debug it with all the standard
> Perl debugging features.
>
> This discussion is no longer appropriate for the Postfix mailing
> list, so this is my last post.
>
Thanks for the help. What you've told me has
> It would help if you posted the log messages you receive along with the
> information provided here: http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html.
>
> After you do that then we can try and help you.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
>
>
>
Thanks Daniel
The relevant log area says this:
an 22 17:49:47 www
Ruben Safir:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> On 01/22/2010 05:22 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:27:06PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> >> If I recall correctly, the wrapper program needs to be installed
> >> set-uid, and it needs to be configured a
- Original Message
> From: Ruben Safir
> To: Postfix users
> Sent: Sat, January 23, 2010 12:33:53 AM
> Subject: Re: Postfix Majordomo problem
>
> On 01/22/2010 05:22 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:27:06PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> >> If I recall corre
On 01/22/2010 01:18 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:10:51PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
>
>
>> Aliases look like this
>>
>> majordomo: "|/usr/lib/majordomo/wrapper majordomo"
>>
> This script will run as "nobody" unless a non-root user owns the
> "aliases.
On 01/22/2010 05:22 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:27:06PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> If I recall correctly, the wrapper program needs to be installed
>> set-uid, and it needs to be configured at compile time with the
>> right uid/gid information.
>>
> Ruben Saf
On 2010-01-22 5:36 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Here's the bug:
Sorry, meant to send that direct to Stan...
On 2010-01-21 8:23 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up. Yes, I'm using IMAP and TB3. So I'm sure
> this is the same bug. Interestingly, like I said, the filter on
> Sender works fine for newly arriving messages. It just doesn't work
> on messages already in the inbox when running
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:27:06PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> If I recall correctly, the wrapper program needs to be installed
> set-uid, and it needs to be configured at compile time with the
> right uid/gid information.
Ruben Safir:
> I made it SIUD and the wrapper config-test seems to believ
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:18:10PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:10:51PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
>
> > Aliases look like this
> >
> > majordomo: "|/usr/lib/majordomo/wrapper majordomo"
>
> This script will run as "nobody" unless a non-root user owns th
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:27:06PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Victor Duchovni:
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:10:51PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >
> > > Aliases look like this
> > >
> > > majordomo: "|/usr/lib/majordomo/wrapper majordomo"
>
> That's how I run majordomo on my mac
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:10:51PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
>
> > Aliases look like this
> >
> > majordomo: "|/usr/lib/majordomo/wrapper majordomo"
That's how I run majordomo on my machine.
If I recall correctly, the wrapper program needs to be installed
set-uid
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:10:51PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote:
> Aliases look like this
>
> majordomo: "|/usr/lib/majordomo/wrapper majordomo"
This script will run as "nobody" unless a non-root user owns the
"aliases.db" file from which this alias is read.
All tutorials on integratin
On 1/22/2010 10:58 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Noel Jones put forth on 1/22/2010 10:00 AM:
Nothing is logged because the DNS server gives an authoritive "does not
exist" answer. That's not an error, it is the expected response when a
client is not listed in an RBL.
Hi Noel,
I was not venting a
Hello
I have this puzzle that I can't figure out. I had my mailing list
working on openSuSE 11.2
with postfix and majordomo. I've been using majordomo on sendmailf or
years with no trouble.
I moved to postfix with no trouble and now, suddenly I'm getting nothing
through to my lists.
I know this
Mark Goodge put forth on 1/22/2010 11:07 AM:
> It's not the fault of
> Spamhaus, Google or Postfix if people don't RTFM.
I'll give you that. I'd been using zen for years, and sbl-xbl for years before
that. When I changed my resolvers to Google from my current provider's (for
performance reasons,
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
My venting should be aimed at Spamhaus. What they've done here is the opposite
of transparency. In the case of Google DNS, Spamhaus has pulled something a bit
underhanded in my estimation. They don't want people using Google DNS to query
Spamhaus zone
On 22/01/2010 16:58, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
My venting should be aimed at Spamhaus. What they've done here is the opposite
of transparency. In the case of Google DNS, Spamhaus has pulled something a bit
underhanded in my estimation. They don't want people using Google DNS to query
Spamhaus zone
Noel Jones put forth on 1/22/2010 10:00 AM:
> Nothing is logged because the DNS server gives an authoritive "does not
> exist" answer. That's not an error, it is the expected response when a
> client is not listed in an RBL.
Hi Noel,
I was not venting at Postfix, or Wietse, or any of the devs f
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:40:03AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Kenneth Marshall put forth on 1/22/2010 8:39 AM:
>
> > pdns-recursor 3.1.7.2 is easy to configure/use and has a tuneable
> > resource footprint.
>
> Got her installed, configured, up and running. Let's see if this improves
> this
Kenneth Marshall put forth on 1/22/2010 8:39 AM:
> pdns-recursor 3.1.7.2 is easy to configure/use and has a tuneable
> resource footprint.
Got her installed, configured, up and running. Let's see if this improves this
spamhaus situation, and a handful a day of other dns related errors I've been
On 1/22/2010 6:18 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
1. Spamhaus has banned Google Public DNS resolver queries. I didn't know this
until today. If Postfix is using Google Public DNS resolvers, rbl queries to
zen.spamhaus.org fail but Postfix (Debian Lenny 2.5.5-1.1) logs NOTHING about
it. Not the quer
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:33:58AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > One could argue that the SMTP server should use the external form of the
> > recipient for these lookup, to match downstream behaviour in cleanup(8)...
>
> Indeed. There was no address validation in the initial design and
> implem
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:16:07AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > > The lookup keys and RHS values for virtual(5) are in rfc822 format.
> > > A PCRE table can take care of this:
> >
> > Virtual alias lookups are done in the "unquoted" form, while
> > canonical map lookups ar
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:16:07AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > The lookup keys and RHS values for virtual(5) are in rfc822 format.
> > A PCRE table can take care of this:
>
> Virtual alias lookups are done in the "unquoted" form, while
> canonical map lookups are in "quoted" form.
No, the cl
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 08:34:35AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Mikael Bak put forth on 1/22/2010 7:50 AM:
> > Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >>
> >> 1. Spamhaus has banned Google Public DNS resolver queries.
> >
> > Stan,
> > Do you have a good enough reason to not run your own name resolver on
> > you
Mikael Bak put forth on 1/22/2010 7:50 AM:
> Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>
>> 1. Spamhaus has banned Google Public DNS resolver queries.
>
> Stan,
> Do you have a good enough reason to not run your own name resolver on
> your front MX machine?
>
> IMO relying on third parties for DNS on an MX is bad d
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List
wrote:
> This is a client IP not a sender, e. g. 'MAIL FROM: br...@example.com'
>
> The IP should go into a file referenced by a check_client_access
> restriction.
I think I still don't have a understanding at how to properly read /
und
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 02:13:17PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> > > Is there something I can do to avoid these rejections (other than the
> > > obvious -- get dba...@example2.com to fix his address book)?
> >
> > Hm, you could try and alias " soli...@example.com" to
> > "
Stan Hoeppner:
> 1. Spamhaus has banned Google Public DNS resolver queries. I
> didn't know this until today. If Postfix is using Google Public
> DNS resolvers, rbl queries to zen.spamhaus.org fail but Postfix
> (Debian Lenny 2.5.5-1.1) logs NOTHING about it. Not the query
> attempt, not the fa
* Victor Duchovni :
> This said, far better to just reject this, and let the sender correct
> their address list.
Yes.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 02:13:17PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > Is there something I can do to avoid these rejections (other than the
> > obvious -- get dba...@example2.com to fix his address book)?
>
> Hm, you could try and alias " soli...@example.com" to
> "soli...@example.com"
>
> But h
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:40:58AM -0330, Doug Robbins wrote:
> Is there something I can do to avoid these rejections (other than
> the obvious -- get dba...@example2.com to fix his address book)?
A milter could remove recipients with spaces and add back ones without
spaces. To do it completely c
On 22-Jan-2010 10:11 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Doug Robbins:
Messages containing leading whitespace in the recipient address are
rejected.
Only if the recipient does not exist.
Example:
Jan 22 08:32:41 vps10 postfix/smtpd[5937]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
smtpout.eastlink.ca[24.222.0.30]:
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> 1. Spamhaus has banned Google Public DNS resolver queries.
Stan,
Do you have a good enough reason to not run your own name resolver on
your front MX machine?
IMO relying on third parties for DNS on an MX is bad design.
Mikael
Hi List,
RFC2821 section 4.5.3.2 Timeouts reads
"An SMTP server SHOULD have a timeout of at least 5 minutes while it
is awaiting the next command from the sender."
When I try to connect to an one.com mx (mx-cluster1.one.com or
mx-cluster2.one.com) I notice they will close the connection after ab
Doug Robbins:
> Messages containing leading whitespace in the recipient address are
> rejected.
Only if the recipient does not exist.
> Example:
>
> Jan 22 08:32:41 vps10 postfix/smtpd[5937]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> smtpout.eastlink.ca[24.222.0.30]: 550 5.1.1 < soli...@example.com>:
> Re
* Doug Robbins :
> Messages containing leading whitespace in the recipient address are
> rejected.
>
> Example:
>
> Jan 22 08:32:41 vps10 postfix/smtpd[5937]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> smtpout.eastlink.ca[24.222.0.30]: 550 5.1.1 < soli...@example.com>:
> Recipient address rejected: User unknow
Messages containing leading whitespace in the recipient address are
rejected.
Example:
Jan 22 08:32:41 vps10 postfix/smtpd[5937]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
smtpout.eastlink.ca[24.222.0.30]: 550 5.1.1 < soli...@example.com>:
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table;
fr
Stan Hoeppner put forth on 1/22/2010 1:28 AM:
> I've wondered for a couple of months why my rbl check is being skipped. I've
> not seen a spamhaus entry in my logs since Sept 25 '09. Interestingly,
> postgrey
> is being called now and then, and it is after the rbl check in main.cf. Any
> idea w
It works like a charm.
Thanks a lot.
On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 13:36 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Victor Duchovni:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 02:57:17PM +0100, Mickael CANEVET wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'd like postfix to treat EX_CANTCREAT (73) as "temporary failure".
> > >
> > > I use t
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:35:25 -0500 (EST), wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse
Venema) wrote:
> Martijn de Munnik:
>> Jan 21 17:02:30 marcus postfix/qmgr[16421]: 523FD1C11A:
>> from=, size=650750, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
>> Jan 21 17:02:30 marcus postfix/smtp[16449]: 523FD1C11A: host
>> mx-cluster1.one.com[
42 matches
Mail list logo
