Mark Martinec skrev 2010-04-13 14:17:
Patric,
I looked in to it a little more and it looks like Maia re-writes the
new.sub.domain.com to sub.domain.com.
I get:
/usr/sbin/amavisd-new[22834]: (22834-04) Checking: [62.127.194.20]
patric.falin...@omg.nu -
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 21:15 +0200, Ignacio García wrote:
Hi there. Some days ago 1 of our postfix servers was abused by bot
networks using one of our customer's stolen credentials, inadvertently
done by a virus/keylogger probably. In few hours more than 2 spam
messages were in our
This morning, I got a warning in my logs that I have never seen
before:
postfix-hub/cleanup[27115]: warning: defer: removed spurious 1E0DE10003 log
It was followed by what seemed the normal delivery of a single mail:
postfix-hub/smtpd[27112]: 1E0DE10003:
Stefan Foerster:
This morning, I got a warning in my logs that I have never seen
before:
postfix-hub/cleanup[27115]: warning: defer: removed spurious 1E0DE10003 log
Long ago, queue file after {incoming/active/deferred}/1E0DE10003 was
deleted, without removing also removing the file
Patric Falinder:
Ok after a little trail and error I tried to remove the
no_address_mappings from -o receive_override_options= in mater.cf
and it started working:D I did as I first was told, with the options in
main.cf so I didn't add the -o recipient_bcc_maps =
On 4/15/2010 8:04 AM, Eduardo Júnior wrote:
Hi, all
Due the high load of e-mails over my link, I want that
my messages outgoing through more IPs with only postfix box.
I read about that, but not in official documentation.
I want understand how this works and how to implement.
Anyone could
Anyone could point me to the respective doc?
how about:
http://www.kutukupret.com/2009/11/30/postfix-smtp-outgoing-ip-rotator-using-iptables/
--
Eero
On 4/14/2010 11:02 PM, Gary Smith wrote:
We use a filter to break out and run our spamassassin and other checks. In bash
shell that process, we have a need to insert a custom unique header per email
for compliance. Is there a simple way of doing this without having to go into
any special
Is there some reason the Message-ID won't work as a unique
identifier?
It's about compliance tracking and tagging for specific things.
You can use a policy server to insert a header based on
envelope information.
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
If your header must be
On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel Jonesnjo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
On 4/14/2010 1:45 PM, fakessh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:12:25 -0400, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
I changed the entries @fakessh to r...@localhost in
Hi to all,
Just a question, there is any method to limit the outgoing mails ?
Something like domain.com allowed, domain.net not allowed, or
u...@domain.com allowed, u...@domain.net not allowed. And this can be
done for each user?
If is possible, there is any web based or similar tool to manage
Hi all
My postfix server is set up with amavisd-new and dkim-milter.
In the main.cf:
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:20209
non_smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:20209
milter_protocol = 2
milter_default_action = accept
With this configuration the
From: Birta Levente blevi.li...@gmail.com
Subject: DKIM-milter only for outgoing
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:23:12 +0300
My postfix server is set up with amavisd-new and dkim-milter.
In the main.cf:
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:20209
El 15/04/10 12:41, ram escribió:
The points mentioned should help you especially ratelimits , and FBL's
Are you planning to do outgoing scanning.
Hi Ram. I believe ratelimits and FBLs can help, but just partially. FBLs
are of great help, but they work only after much harm has been done. For
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
Stefan Foerster:
It was followed by what seemed the normal delivery of a single mail:
postfix-hub/smtpd[27112]: 1E0DE10003:
client=edge.kvm.incertum.net[192.168.122.13]
Right, this is a new message that has claimed the name 1E0DE10003,
Postfix
Claudio Prono:
Hi to all,
Just a question, there is any method to limit the outgoing mails ?
Something like domain.com allowed, domain.net not allowed, or
u...@domain.com allowed, u...@domain.net not allowed. And this can be
done for each user?
Postfix enforces such limits while RECEIVING
Stefan Foerster:
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
Stefan Foerster:
It was followed by what seemed the normal delivery of a single mail:
postfix-hub/smtpd[27112]: 1E0DE10003:
client=edge.kvm.incertum.net[192.168.122.13]
Right, this is a new message that has claimed the
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
Normally the queue manager deletes a defer logfile when it brings
a message into the active queue, and the bounce daemon deletes the
defer logfile after sending a mail too old bounce message.
If the defer file still exists without the message file, some
Even if you solve quotes problem, postfix will deliver message to
olpcx@aol.com. Is this what you want?
You may try smtpname option of fetchmail to deliver to local mail user
on postfix server. Or if you do not change rcpt to, you may try to
deliver directly to mda with -m option.
On Fri,
Hi, I'm having some trouble with my production server, that mailman
stopped working apparently without any modification. I think
everything at my postfix configuration is ok, but what I'm seeing is
that virtual_alias_maps isn't working as expected.
My setup consists in one virtual domain
Eduardo Júnior put forth on 4/15/2010 8:04 AM:
Due the high load of e-mails over my link, I want that
my messages outgoing through more IPs with only postfix box.
If you only have one physical link, how will sending mail from multiple IPs
within the same subnet solve your link congestion
I have several boxes that check my relay every 40 seconds to
check that the server is up.
After multiple attempts to get the number of checks reduced I would
like the know the preferred way to block specific IP addresses in Postfix.
I have no issue with checks.. but every 40 seconds is
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, CT wrote:
I have several boxes that check my relay every 40 seconds to
check that the server is up.
After multiple attempts to get the number of checks reduced I would
like the know the preferred way to block specific IP addresses in Postfix.
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Eduardo Júnior put forth on 4/15/2010 8:04 AM:
Due the high load of e-mails over my link, I want that
my messages outgoing through more IPs with only postfix box.
If you only have one physical link, how will
On 4/15/2010 3:22 PM, Bruno Ribeiro da Silva wrote:
Hi, I'm having some trouble with my production server, that mailman
stopped working apparently without any modification. I think
everything at my postfix configuration is ok, but what I'm seeing is
that virtual_alias_maps isn't working as
On 2010-04-15 Bruno Ribeiro da Silva wrote:
Hi, I'm having some trouble with my production server, that mailman
stopped working apparently without any modification. I think
everything at my postfix configuration is ok, but what I'm seeing is
that virtual_alias_maps isn't working as expected.
CT put forth on 4/15/2010 4:43 PM:
I have several boxes that check my relay every 40 seconds to
check that the server is up.
After multiple attempts to get the number of checks reduced I would
like the know the preferred way to block specific IP addresses in Postfix.
I have no issue with
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel Jonesnjo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
On 4/14/2010 1:45 PM, fakessh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:12:25 -0400, Charles Marcus
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:26:25 +0200, fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel Jonesnjo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
On 4/14/2010 1:45 PM, fakessh
Eduardo Júnior put forth on 4/15/2010 4:52 PM:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Eduardo Júnior put forth on 4/15/2010 8:04 AM:
Due the high load of e-mails over my link, I want that
my messages outgoing through more IPs with only postfix box.
If
CT a écrit :
I have several boxes that check my relay every 40 seconds to
check that the server is up.
After multiple attempts to get the number of checks reduced I would
like the know the preferred way to block specific IP addresses in Postfix.
I have no issue with checks.. but every 40
Dear List
I don't find anywhere in TLS documentation how to make postfix respect a crl
so that client's whose certs have been revoked cannot use the submission server.
Can someone please confirm that this feature is supported or not?
Thanks
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:07:55 +1000, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net
wrote:
Postfix must first know the user(s)
therefore this isa postfix issue and not dovecot
dovecot deliver assumes the MTA has verified the user to accept mail
from and does not do further authentication
how to build
it may be a problem in dealing with amavisd perl milter
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:07:55 +1000, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net
wrote:
Postfix must first know the user(s)
therefore this isa postfix issue and not dovecot
Stan Hoeppner wrote, On 04/15/2010 05:16 PM:
CT put forth on 4/15/2010 4:43 PM:
I have several boxes that check my relay every 40 seconds to
check that the server is up.
After multiple attempts to get the number of checks reduced I would
like the know the preferred way to block specific IP
mouss wrote, On 04/15/2010 06:03 PM:
CT a écrit :
I have several boxes that check my relay every 40 seconds to
check that the server is up.
After multiple attempts to get the number of checks reduced I would
like the know the preferred way to block specific IP addresses in Postfix.
I have no
zhong ming wu:
Dear List
I don't find anywhere in TLS documentation how to make postfix respect a crl
so that client's whose certs have been revoked cannot use the submission
server.
Can someone please confirm that this feature is supported or not?
If it is not in the documentation,
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 07:16:58PM -0400, zhong ming wu wrote:
I don't find anywhere in TLS documentation how to make postfix respect a crl
so that client's whose certs have been revoked cannot use the submission
server.
The supported model for submission servers that use client certs is to
Wietse Venema wrote:
Claudio Prono:
Hi to all,
Just a question, there is any method to limit the outgoing mails ?
Something like domain.com allowed, domain.net not allowed, or
u...@domain.com allowed, u...@domain.net not allowed. And this can be
done for each user?
Postfix enforces
39 matches
Mail list logo
