Lists:
Hi All,
We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes
(mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted
which renders the boxes unreachable.
This causes a 550 error to be sent back to our spam catching server
(running MailScanner spamassassin
Lists:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Lists:
Hi All,
We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes
(mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted
which renders the boxes unreachable.
This causes a 550 error to be sent back to our spam catching
Dhiraj Chatpar:
Hi Sir,
If i am selecting this option
smtp_destination_rate_delay = 1s
Will this reduce delivery to all domains or just one specific domain. Will
the actual throughput to the final delivery be reduced to one email per
second from my binded IP?.. Please confirm as that is
Noel Jones:
On 11/12/2009 12:28 PM, Arjan Melein wrote:
Yea I just found that out when I just tried to sed the queue file :-)
Any way to limit it to only take out the line on domain X Y and Z ?
On a sidenote, its actually the RCPT TO: line and not the normal TO:
line ... not sure if
Mark Martinec:
For the last couple of days I'm now experimenting with the
2.7-20091105-nonprod with the new speed_adjust experimental feature
turned on at the MX port, along with the postscreen. Seems to work
as advertised: timing reports by a pre-queue proxy content filter confirm
that the
St??phane MERLE:
Hi,
Wietse Venema a ?crit :
St?phane MERLE:
I just saw that those mail are sent to n...@localhost :
8652C2E741C6: to=n...@localhost, orig_to=john@distdomain.com,
relay=local, delay=0.02, delays=0.01/0/0/0.01, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced
(unknown user: null
St?phane MERLE:
Wietse Venema a ?crit :
Sorry, that is NOT a good reason to throw away rejected mail.
When non-spam mail is rejected, the sender needs to know. It is
up to the sender to deal with this, not the MTA operator.
When people are sending real spam to hotmail, then silencing
Thanks for the logging. If you have time, can you change the code
to print information about the non-zero size? This could be a
filesystem feature where ftruncate() does not reset st_size until
the file is rewritten or closed (in which case my attempt to force
easly release of disk blocks are in
Mark Martinec:
On Friday 13 November 2009 18:52:03 Wietse Venema wrote:
Thanks for the logging. If you have time, can you change the code
to print information about the non-zero size? This could be a
filesystem feature where ftruncate() does not reset st_size until
the file is rewritten
Dhiraj Chatpar:
Dear Sir,
I have noticed a bug in the 2.6 version of postfix where it says that cannot
find /postmulti folder. Wondering if this is a bug or a installation error
on my part. This error happens when i start postfix on centos.
Wasn't this fixed recently?
Wietse
Dhiraj Chatpar:
Sir, I just did a fresh installation yesterday. and fresh complied the new
version of postfix 2.6 on a centos machine and i got this error. I dont know
why it came. but it did.
This was fixed 20091026, and will be part of Postfix 2.6.6.
Wietse
Wietse Venema:
Mark Martinec:
On Friday 13 November 2009 18:52:03 Wietse Venema wrote:
Thanks for the logging. If you have time, can you change the code
to print information about the non-zero size? This could be a
filesystem feature where ftruncate() does not reset st_size until
Sahil Tandon:
+#if (__FreeBSD_version = 702104 __FreeBSD_version = 80) \
+ || __FreeBSD_version = 800100
It was initially reported to me as available with __FreeBSD_version
= 800098.
The above suggests that the feature does not exist with 80
__FreeBSD_version 800100.
That
Please do not top-post. See wikipedia for background information.
Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre:
Hi,
Wietse, what do you want to say with this? any problem for running
some postfix release on freebsd?
Perhaps I have not received the previous mail...
El 14/11/2009, a las 14:17, Wietse
Jeremy Bowen:
I have a prolem with the new domain I added to the server and it is this
new domain which is doing verification probes to my ISP.
So, you need to add that domain to mydestination= parameter?
It's added to my vdomains file as per:
virtual_mailbox_domains =
Jeremy Bowen:
What is the logic behind where the verification probe is sent ?
4 out of 5 domains (all configured identically as far as I can
tell) operate correctly and the probe seems to be handled locally.
The other domain passes the verification probe to my upstream
(relayhost).
You
Magnus B?ck:
On Mon, November 16, 2009 10:58 am, Jaroslaw Grzabel said:
Is there any way to configure postfix to create separate log file for
every domain it keeps ?
No. Postfix needs to start logging before it even knows to which domain a
log message pertains.
Besides, one message may
Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL:
Hi All,
Because of a crashed exchange server we need to queue messages longer on
our smarthost then usual.
I want to increase the time messages are queued to at least 2 weeks...
Is changing the 'maximal_queue_lifetime' in main.cf sufficient to
Jim Lang:
OK here is the scenario.
Spammer sends mail to: u...@myclientsdomain.com from forged address
vic...@randomdomain.com
If u...@myclientsdomain.com is delivered locally, not a problem, if the
address is invalid, postix rejects the mail during the smtp connection.
But if
Dhiraj Chatpar:
HI,
I am getting this error when i am trying to connect my postfix
via transport_maps = tcp:localhost:2525
Nov 16 13:48:34 mail postfix/trivial-rewrite[4403]: fatal: unsupported
dictionary type: tcp
Use postconf -m to see what types of map are supported.
Wietse
Jim Lang:
But if mycli...@otherserver.com can for whatever reason not be
delivered, otherserver.com does what it is supposed to do and
rejects the mail during the smtp connection, which causes postfix
to send out a non-delivery report to vic...@randomdomain.com --
backscatter.
Is
Miles Fidelman:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Recipient verification does not expand a local alias (imagine what
would have to be done to verify with addresses in .forward files,
or in a mail distribution list).
Maybe I'm dense, but what would be the problem with verifying addresses
Postfix versions 2.3 and later skip a DNS record with a bad name.
Unsupported Postfix versions pretend that the lookup failed when
the result is invalid.
Wietse
Laurence Moughan:
Ok ,
I upgraded to 2.6.5 - and still fails,
Works for me. I suspect that your LOCAL dns server is making trouble.
Wietse
Wietse Venema:
Laurence Moughan:
Ok ,
I upgraded to 2.6.5 - and still fails,
Works for me. I suspect that your LOCAL dns server is making trouble.
Logging:
Nov 17 06:34:54 spike postfix/qmgr[6861]: 509F61F3EA7:
from=wie...@porcupine.org, size=338, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Nov 17
Arjan Melein:
It's been a few days but i just ran into a little bump in the road.. It looks
like the ;1:1 actually changes depending on the number of recipients.
How would I change '/^RCPT\s+TO:(.*);1:1$/ RCPT TO:$1' into matching
'domain.tld;#:#' and put the domain.tld back without the
Matthias Vill:
Hi there,
if I configure my /etc/aliases to read:
test: |/bin/false, u...@external-server
owner-test: u...@external-server
I correctly receive E-Mail to test and owner test at
u...@external-server, but the error-message which is generated by
/bin/false is send back to the
Victor Duchovni:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:12:26PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Apparently, owner-foo works for email addresses but not commands.
That would be a bug.
It is not easy to solve, since bounces are not sent by local(8), so
we would need new a queue-file with owner
Nicholas Robinson:
Hi
I'm trying to re-direct my root email to my external email address.
See: http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html#some_local
Wietse
Dhiraj Chatpar:
We have 5 different servers.. all of them are mailing servers for our main
company domain, I wish to Balance the mails across these 5 servers.
Isn't that what the DNS was invented for? You specify the domain
and its servers, and then all standards-compliant mail systems
will
Laurence Moughan:
obeml1# dig @resolver1.opendns.com eurocommerce.ie
; DiG 8.3 @resolver1.opendns.com eurocommerce.ie
; (1 server found)
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 6
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1,
Dhiraj Chatpar:
Yes the DNS is a good idea..
However what will i achieve if i implement the following?
The solution is to have multiple MX records in the DNS.
All standards-compliant MTAs will spread the load WITHOUT
ANY SENDER SIDE CONFIGURATION.
Wietse
Laurence Moughan:
I do ( detailed in the same email ) - and i get timeouts when there is a
typo in the record - all correct records come back fine.
You are doing one MX lookup that times out. Then, two A lookups
for the email domain name, and that is wrong.
Instead, you need to do one MX
cont...@rusanu.com:
Thanks Andreas,
The reject would be '553 Mail from ... not allowed', so it sounds like
a dead end trying to configure postfix to handle this.
Suggestions on how to workaround are welcome.
This is essentially the same problem as home office sites trying
to send direct
K bharathan:
hi all
the following is the log from my relay for example.com; this is read receipt
which failed; this is happening only with this client domain;
Nov 18 20:13:59 relay2 postfix/smtpd[4225]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
ex.2n.cz[90.182.112.11]: 451 4.3.5 Server configuration
Ian Duggan:
I am trying to configure postfix to work as follows:
1) In a header_check, look for a header X-Vmta: n where n is some number.
2) Based on n, choose an outgoing smtp transport (bound to some ip)
Basically I want postfix to choose the outgoing IP based on a header
that can be
K bharathan:
[90.182.112.11]
Nov 18 20:06:10 relay1 postfix/smtpd[21876]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
ex.2n.cz[90.182.112.11]: 451 4.3.5 Server configurati
Now try:
grep 21876 /the/log/file
Wietse
Ian Duggan:
Nov 18 15:19:22 mail01 postfix/smtp[]: D9024B689D2:
to=test.scr...@gmail.com, relay=none, delay=0.05, delays=0.05/0/0/0,
dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail for mail01.scribd.com loops back to
myself)
header_checks is here:
header_checks:
/^X-Vmta.*1$/ FILTER vmta1:
Ian Duggan:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
The transports(5) manpage mentions that the destination defaults
to the recipient domain. However, the scheduler uses a different
default, which appears to be inconsistent. I wonder what would
break
Dhiraj Chatpar:
r...@campaignindia:/etc# postmulti -I postfix-1 -G mta -e create
postfix: warning: dict_open_dlinfo: cannot open /etc/postfix-1/
dynamicmaps.cf. No dynamic maps will be allowed.
wondering why am i getting this error
That is a DEBIAN extension (also in UBUNTU). I suggest
Pawe? Burzy?ski:
(lost connection with orion.put.poznan.pl[150.254.5.4] while receiving the
initial server greeting)
The TCP-level three-way handshake was completed, but no SMTP-level
greeting was received within $smtp_helo_timeout seconds (default:
300s). In other words, an application-layer
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Peter S?rensen mas...@sdu.dk:
Hi,
We use postfix in front of our local email servers where 80% is based on
exchange. We have around
25000 users/distlist/emaillist
We would like to implement a system where all email addresses are known and
which server will
Ian Duggan:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
In smtpd_recipient_restrictions you can have an access(5) map
that uses PREPEND.
? ?/@([...@]+)$/ PREPEND X-Vmta: $1
which can be picked up by header_checks, because thuse happen later
Magnus B?ck:
On Thursday, November 19, 2009 at 20:01 CET,
Osmany Goderich Navarro osm...@oc.quimefa.cu wrote:
I have a Postfix+Dovecot+MySQL configuration. I want postfix to bcc
messages coming from a specific address to a specific domain. I have
currently hosting three virtual
J. Roeleveld:
On Friday 20 November 2009 13:42:58 Arora, Sumit wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm just testing my postfix server for load and disk usage.
I'm using content filter on some another server, and I don't feed the email
back to postfix.
Email data is getting deleted from my postfix
Arora, Sumit:
I've checked the size of maillog
It's size is getting increased by 4KB on receiving each email.
We know what you believe.
Now we would like to see some actual concrete evidence.
Wietse
Jeronimo:
I chance the restriction because I want that only messages from mydomain
pass through the relay.
That is not what the configuration does.
In reality, it forwards mail from anyone who sends mail
with your domain name in the sender address.
So put back the default
Eugene V. Boontseff:
eug...@mail [/usr/local/etc/postfix]# postmap -fq
ppp92-100-127-177.pppoe.avangarddsl.ru[92.100.127.177] pcre:exper
Use ppp92.. not ppp92...
Wietse
Recently there have been requests for sending mail with source IP
addresses that depend on the envelope sender. Sometimes the request
appeared to be related to showshoe spamming, and sometimes it
appeared to be a legitimate attempt to protect IP-based domain
reputations of different customers.
Ronan REYNAUD:
hello
I'm using a file in aliases (with allow_mail_to_files set)
and it's currently working perfectly.
With allow_mail_to_files, Postfix APPENDS mail to a local file.
But I'd like to know if there's a limit to the number of mail
addresses in this file ? (i'll need about
Ronan REYNAUD:
I thought I must add include to
allow_mail_to_files = alias,forward,include
in main.cf to use include in the aliases
As documented, the allow_mail_to_files feature says whether Postfix
can deliver mail to external files. The syntax for delivering
to file is /file/name.
The
jan gestre:
us...@former.sample: host webmail.former.sample[210.21x.xx.xx] said:
451 Temporary failure, please try again later. (in reply to DATA command)
Postfix always resends after 451, but it stops when the message
is too old (the default limits are: maximal_queue_lifetime = 5d
and
Kevin Bailey:
Hi,
I need to test the move of a mailing list to another server.
What I'd like to do is to stop the Postfix server on the new server from
sending out any mails but still put them into the queue.
I could then test the mail list (which actually only has 43 members) and
Wietse Venema:
Kevin Bailey:
Hi,
I need to test the move of a mailing list to another server.
What I'd like to do is to stop the Postfix server on the new server from
sending out any mails but still put them into the queue.
I could then test the mail list (which actually only
ML:
Hi All,
I have some confusion about multiple reverse PTR records per IP.
You need only one.
The name (from the address-name) lookup must resolve to the address.
Wietse
Comcast has told me that they can only assign 2 reverse PTR records per IP.
So if I have mail.domainA.com
Sharma, Ashish:
Solved the problem using setting:
milter_protocolhttp://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#milter_protocol = 2
as mentioned in:
http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html
in 'main.cf'
When in doubt, read the release notes file.
[Incompat 20090428] The default
Jordi Espasa Clofent:
Hi all,
I've a Postfix working with Perl-based filter. All works fine, but I
don't want filter the legitimate users (who are authenticated using
SASL) when they want to do massive mailing using their e-mail client
(ThunderBird, Outlook... and so on).
That is easy.
Jordi Espasa Clofent:
That is easy.
Have your users connect to the submission port, and let everyone
else connnect to the smtp port. Then, specify =o content_filter=whatever
for the smtp port and not for the submission port.
Yes Wietse, I've considered this simple and clean option,
Daniel Ryslink:
Hello,
I am trying to set rate limits on our smtp relays to prevent abusive
(compromised) user hosts from flooding the service with fast, intensive mail
floods.
I have used the following directives (I can post whole main.cf, but I don't
think it's necessary):
By default, Postfix will exclude clients in mynetworks from
smtpd_client_mumble_limits. You may want to specify a separate list
for mynetworks (relay control) and for anvil (rate control).
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_client_event_limit_exceptions
(with Postfix 2.1, this was
Dennis Putnam:
I'm not sure if this is the right forum for this question but I don't know
where else to start.
I am running Postfix/Cyrus on the same server that contains user
home directories. The forwarding mechanism (.forward) is, of
course, working and I understand it. What I don't
Victor Duchovni:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:41:37PM -0500, Dennis Putnam wrote:
If I understand this correctly, I can set the forward_path to a directory
No, not a directory a file, and not a file, but a set of files, one
for each user.
For example I remember from historic times
Zohan:
Hi,
I need to archive all incoming mail for my virtual domains (by
copying mail to dedicated archive mailbox) and then sort it
according to address it has been delivered to.
Postfix local/pipe/virtual delivery agents record the delivered
to address in the Delivered-To: header.
One
gmx:
In-Reply-To-Message-ID: 20091109012901.6d90f1f3...@spike.porcupine.org
Hi Wietse and Victor,
Thank you very much for your analyses
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-3555 .
As a practitioner, the following question arises as we are in a business
partner
Zohan:
Wietse, thank you,
Postfix local/pipe/virtual delivery agents record the delivered
to address in the Delivered-To: header
That is, the final recipient address after alias processing and
forwarding. All mail that is delivered to the same mailbox has the
same Delivered-To: address.
Marco Giardini:
I have a barracuda server that receives mails, filter them and forward to a
linux system running postfix.
Both machine have a public IP (static).
The linux system is configured to be used as SMTP for sasl authenticated
users as well, besides to be used as SMTP for the
Marco Giardini:
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org [2009-11-26 12:20:19 -0500]:
Marco Giardini:
I have a barracuda server that receives mails, filter them and forward
to a
linux system running postfix.
Both machine have a public IP (static).
The linux system
Harakiri:
I know about all the difficulties with MX lookup etc, the original
goal would be - that i have a policy for external domains - and
that for certain domains a message should only be sent if TLS is
available - if a message to a certain domain is sent which does
not support TLS - it
Greg A. Woods:
There _should_ be one PTR for every _valid_ hostname using a given IP
address.
Statements such as above remind me of silly knights fighting windmills.
There is a difference between right and useful, and it even
depends on where they are used - server or client side.
Multiple
Wietse Venema:
Greg A. Woods:
There _should_ be one PTR for every _valid_ hostname using a given IP
address.
Statements such as above remind me of silly knights fighting windmills.
There is a difference between right and useful, and it even
depends on where they are used - server
Stan Hoeppner:
I'm running my Postfix firewall behind NAT/PAT and the setup didn't
require any non-default Postfix settings to make it work. I port
forwarded TCP 25 from my router to my internal Postfix host IP and all
worked without issue. What settings are you referring to?
Harakiri:
1) Configure the Postfix SMTP client to REQUIRE TLS.
? ? smtp_tls_security_level=encrypt
no - as i said, my filer has own rules and can be based on recipient, sender,
or a combination of both - postfix cant do this, or at least not without
different policy servers
2)
Stan Hoeppner:
Wietse Venema put forth on 11/27/2009 5:17 PM:
Stan Hoeppner:
I'm running my Postfix firewall behind NAT/PAT and the setup didn't
require any non-default Postfix settings to make it work. I port
forwarded TCP 25 from my router to my internal Postfix host IP and all
Emmett Culley:
For some months I've been noticing on multiple servers that mail
from a cron job defined in the root's crontab takes 24 hours to
get to it's destination. It finally bugged me enough to have me
take a look for the reason. This is what I found in the maillog
for each day:
Victor Duchovni:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Emmett Culley wrote:
For some months I've been noticing on multiple servers that mail from a
cron job defined in the root's crontab takes 24 hours to get to it's
destination. It finally bugged me enough to have me take a look
Tobi:
Hello
I just wonder whether my idea is technically possible to fullfill with
Postfix. I already use sender based relaying which works fine.
My problem is that I'm running a Postfix Server on my dynamic IP-Address. I
would say for 80% of the receivers is no problem to send the emails
tobi:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Wietse Venema schrieb:
Tobi:
Hello
I just wonder whether my idea is technically possible to fullfill with
Postfix. I already use sender based relaying which works fine.
My problem is that I'm running a Postfix Server on my
Stan Hoeppner:
Michael Katz put forth on 11/30/2009 2:45 PM:
There are many filtering Postfix AV solutions that are far more
efficient than Amavisd and many AV scanners that are considerably more
scalable than clamav such. A few years ago we did some detailed testing
between ClamAV and
Ali Majdzadeh:
question concerning what Wietse proposed. Does the usage of milter help? I
mean, is the milter architecture considered as a way to kill spam load
_before_ piping inbound connections to AS/AV content filter daemons? Or,
Milter is a way to inspect or update message content without
Ali Majdzadeh:
Wietse,
Hi
Thanks for your reply. I recall that I had read about another filtering
option available in Postfix which was called smtpd_proxy_filter (if I spell
it correctly) and which filtered messages before queuing. So, is there any
difference between the so-called method and
Stan Hoeppner:
Wietse Venema put forth on 12/1/2009 1:20 PM:
If your performance is inadequate, I suggest that you do a detailed
system performance analysis to find out if the limit is CPU, memory,
file I/O or perhaps some trivial DNS configuration problem.
That may be difficult
Stan Hoeppner:
Wietse Venema put forth on 12/1/2009 3:47 PM:
Surely, mail is injected via SMTP, and therefore, the Postfix SMTP
server will attempt to lookup the client hostname and IP address;
since they are using SMTP-based content filters, that is another
source of name service
Len Conrad:
freebsd 7.2
mail_version = 2.7-20091008
out of 6 postscreen machines, I've got one that every 20 or 30
minutes just halts, port 25 is dead (several monit agents see it
dead), then it starts off by itself after a few minutes, dumping
a bunch of these in maillog:
warning:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Hello
is it possible to force a matching From header in the mail if
reject_sender_login_mismatch is used so the From header is the same
as the checked MAIL FROM address? The goal is to prevent spoofing of
the From header for SASL authenticated clients.
Yes, but
Giovanni Mancuso:
Hi guys,
I'm trying to configure my postfix to use a different relayhost if the
sender of the email is in ldap.
You must return a result that satisfies the documented syntax.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.html#relayhost
Wietse
Wietse:
You must return a result that satisfies the documented syntax.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.html#relayhost
Giovanni Mancuso:
Thanks for answer.
But, can i configure ldap search to manage multivalue in entry?
See my previous reply, above.
Wietse
Stefan F?rster:
If I understood the release notes correctly, with smtpd_proxy_options
= speed_adjust, each smtpd process will keep the message it's
currently receiving in a temporary file. That seems to imply that
there could be
(number of smtpd processes) * message_size_limit
bytes of
Len Conrad:
I've got more data. The killer option is when I have this on:
postscreen_blacklist_networks =
mysql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/mysql-mta_clients_reactive_b.cf
I'll mkae a note that postscreen must be used only with low-latency databases
such as local files.
Wietse
Len Conrad:
-- Original Message --
From: wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema)
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:13:17 -0500 (EST)
I'll mkae a note that postscreen must be used only with low-latency databases
such as local files.
the problem postscreen MX
Ed W:
Hi, I'm using postfix 2.5.7 and having some trouble with the server
domain being appended to incomplete sender addresses. I have set
# postconf|grep -e rewrite -e append -e myorigin -e mydomain -e local_header
append_at_myorigin = yes
append_dot_mydomain = no
Ed W:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Ed W:
Hi, I'm using postfix 2.5.7 and having some trouble with the server
domain being appended to incomplete sender addresses. I have set
# postconf|grep -e rewrite -e append -e myorigin -e mydomain -e
local_header
append_at_myorigin = yes
Ed W:
To clarify the question - the goal is if someone connects via the
network (not local sendmail command) and the transcript says RCPT TO:
asdf that this is subsequently bounced as being an invalid
To summarize my other response, by definition an address without
domain delivers to the
Ed W:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Ed W:
To clarify the question - the goal is if someone connects via the
network (not local sendmail command) and the transcript says RCPT TO:
asdf that this is subsequently bounced as being an invalid
To summarize my other response
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 08:54:01PM +0100, Stefan F??rster wrote:
Now, about logging - I'd be really grateful if the existing logging
functionality could be extended in a way so that the pre-queue
content filter's response is logged.
I know that it is actually the content filter's job to log
Ed W:
Wietse Venema wrote:
If you don't want to receive mail for domain-less addresses then
say so, instead of coming up with the wrong solution for the wrong
problem.
OK, I want to accept most emails over smtp and then later bounce emails
with domain-less addresses
Jan Luehr:
Hello,
I've some trouble using ldap aliases. My settings are:
server_host = localhost
search_base = dc=oknw
bind_dn = uid=postfix,cn=staff,dc=oknw
bind_pw = XXX
version = 3
query_filter = ((mail=%s)(objectClass=mailAccount))
result_attribute = forward
Postfix is: 2.5.5
Raffael Schmid:
Hi list
Do you know whether there is a possibility to reject invalid return
paths in postfix?
The problem is, that we get spam with a header-line like the following
and would like to reject those messages:
Return-Path: MAILER-DEAMON
AFAIK the return-path above is
Javier Henderson:
Greetings,
I am trying to configure Postfix to gracefully deal with the
failure of the LDAP server it uses for alias resolution.
It's working fine, using the LDAP server to resolve u...@domain.com
to u...@somehost.domain.com, but if the LDAP server dies or becomes
Christopher Adams:
Thank you for your helpful reply.
So, now I have this in main.cf:
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_blacklist
I have a file sender_blacklist:
m...@somplace.org/ REJECT
I issued the command 'postmap
Len Conrad:
mail_version = 2.7-20091008
fbsd 7.2
we're seeing one of these each time we stop postfix
Dec 8 00:09:06 mx6 postfix/postscreen[49918]: fatal: close database
/var/db/postfix/ps_cache.db: No such file or directory
The Berkeley DB close() function returns an ENOENT error code.
901 - 1000 of 13073 matches
Mail list logo
