Re: Dumping effective postfix configuration

Viktor Dukhovni: > > The Postfix master creates as many sockets as needed for an inet > > service, and sets the socket option SO_REUSEADDR on each socket, > > and bind()s them to the desired addresses. > > > > With that, it may be possible for the Postfix master to create new > > sockets, set

Re: Dumping effective postfix configuration

Demi Marie Obenour: Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE -- Start of PGP signed section. > On 1/6/23 07:15, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Peter Wienemann: > >> Hi, > >> > >> is there a way to dump the effective postfix configuration rather than > &g

Re: Dumping effective postfix configuration

On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 03:28:23PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > > The documentation of inet_interfaces says otherwise, my recollection is > > that master(8) does not attempt to rebind inet sockets on "reload": > > I see. Yes, that could be dififcult. Or maybe not. > > The Postfix master

Re: Dumping effective postfix configuration

Le 06/01/2023 à 21:03, Demi Marie Obenour a écrit : On 1/6/23 07:15, Wietse Venema wrote: Peter Wienemann: Hi, is there a way to dump the effective postfix configuration rather than the one specified in main.cf/master.cf? It seems that changes to main.cf/master.cf have an immediate impact

Re: Dumping effective postfix configuration

Viktor Dukhovni: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 01:45:48PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > > Most changes in main.cf require a reload to become effective but there > > > are some exceptions requiring a restart, e. g. a change of > > > inet_interfaces. > > > > That is incorrect. If

Re: Dumping effective postfix configuration

On 1/6/23 07:15, Wietse Venema wrote: > Peter Wienemann: >> Hi, >> >> is there a way to dump the effective postfix configuration rather than >> the one specified in main.cf/master.cf? It seems that changes to >> main.cf/master.cf have an immediate impact on the

Re: Dumping effective postfix configuration

On 06.01.23 20:02, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 01:45:48PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: Most changes in main.cf require a reload to become effective but there are some exceptions requiring a restart, e. g. a change of inet_interfaces. That is incorrect. If inet_interfaces is

Re: Dumping effective postfix configuration

On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 01:45:48PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Most changes in main.cf require a reload to become effective but there > > are some exceptions requiring a restart, e. g. a change of > > inet_interfaces. > > That is incorrect. If inet_interfaces is changed, then a "postfix >

Re: Dumping effective postfix configuration

Peter Wienemann: > Most changes in main.cf require a reload to become effective but there > are some exceptions requiring a restart, e. g. a change of > inet_interfaces. That is incorrect. If inet_interfaces is changed, then a "postfix reload" (not restart) is required because the master

Re: Dumping effective postfix configuration

On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 06:42:18PM +0100, Peter Wienemann wrote: > Most changes in main.cf require a reload to become effective No. In most cases they merely require the passage of time, and typical changes are not that time-sensitive. > I am trying to put main.cf under configuration >

Re: Dumping effective postfix configuration

On 06.01.23 17:33, Wietse Venema wrote: Peter Wienemann: On 06.01.23 13:15, Wietse Venema wrote: is there a way to dump the effective postfix configuration rather than the one specified in main.cf/master.cf? It seems that changes to main.cf/master.cf have an immediate impact on the output

Re: Dumping effective postfix configuration

es were started an > different times and they will produce different dumps if you change > Postfix configuration without "postfix reload". +1. It makes little sense to ask a distributed (over multiple dynamically spawned processes) system about its "current" state. The age in seconds

Re: Dumping effective postfix configuration

Peter Wienemann: > On 06.01.23 13:15, Wietse Venema wrote: > >> is there a way to dump the effective postfix configuration rather than > >> the one specified in main.cf/master.cf? It seems that changes to > >> main.cf/master.cf have an immediate impact on the outp

Re: Dumping effective postfix configuration

On 06.01.23 13:15, Wietse Venema wrote: is there a way to dump the effective postfix configuration rather than the one specified in main.cf/master.cf? It seems that changes to main.cf/master.cf have an immediate impact on the output of postconf regardless of whether a reload/restart

Re: Dumping effective postfix configuration

Peter Wienemann: > Hi, > > is there a way to dump the effective postfix configuration rather than > the one specified in main.cf/master.cf? It seems that changes to > main.cf/master.cf have an immediate impact on the output of postconf > regardless of whether a reload/rest

Dumping effective postfix configuration

Hi, is there a way to dump the effective postfix configuration rather than the one specified in main.cf/master.cf? It seems that changes to main.cf/master.cf have an immediate impact on the output of postconf regardless of whether a reload/restart of the service was performed. Peter

Re: Postfix Configuration from an Exim background

On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 01:16:34PM -0600, Scott Mutter wrote: > I'm just beginning to look at Postfix configurations (at a very leisurely > pace I might add). You reall should read the Postfix book by Ralf and Patrick, despite its age, it substantially applies to all Postfix releases since. The

Re: Postfix Configuration from an Exim background

Dnia 8.12.2022 o godz. 13:16:34 Scott Mutter pisze: > In an SMTP transaction there are certain commands that pertain to certain > areas of the SMTP message, specifically: > > MAIL FROM > RCPT TO > DATA > > In Exim, there is an ACL configuration block - acl_smtp_mail - that can be > used to

Re: Postfix Configuration from an Exim background

On 08.12.22 13:16, Scott Mutter wrote: In Exim, there is an ACL configuration block - acl_smtp_mail - that can be used to parse the information presented in the MAIL FROM command and this determines if the connection should be allowed to proceed. Likewise, there is an ACL configuration block -

Postfix Configuration from an Exim background

I'm just beginning to look at Postfix configurations (at a very leisurely pace I might add). I come from a mostly Exim background, so the configuration of Postfix is really somewhat foreign to me. In an SMTP transaction there are certain commands that pertain to certain areas of the SMTP

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

Hi Richard, Op 12-04-2022 om 14:07 schreef Richard Rasker: Op 11-04-22 om 18:34 schreef Paul van der Vlis: Hi Richard, ... Eventually you could use my mailserver as a relayhost. That is a very friendly offer, but if I do, that would of course only be temporary, so that I can send e-mail

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

Dnia 12.04.2022 o godz. 15:03:40 Richard Rasker pisze: > > Sorry, I wasn't being clear here. What I mean to ask is if (and how) > using a mail relay for sending mail could solve the problem that at > the receiving end, reverse DNS does not match the originating > domain. Reverse DNS doesn't have

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

Op 12-04-22 om 14:20 schreef Jaroslaw Rafa: Dnia 12.04.2022 o godz. 14:07:13 Richard Rasker pisze: But according to the information supplied, I should also be able to use smtp.xs4all.nl as a relay host, see https://www.xs4all.nl/eigenmailserver/ (in Dutch -- and I already took care of the

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

On 2022-04-12 14:20, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote: Probably not, because smtp.xs4all.nl has IP address 195.121.65.191, and reverse DNS for 195.121.65.191 is 195-121-65-191.dc.kpn.net. So it is also a "generic" hostname which may cause some systems to reject mail sent from this address. The ISP has

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

On 2022-04-12 14:07, Richard Rasker wrote: Op 11-04-22 om 18:34 schreef Paul van der Vlis: Hi Richard, ... But according to the information supplied, I should also be able to use smtp.xs4all.nl as a relay host, see https://www.xs4all.nl/eigenmailserver/ (in Dutch -- and I already took care

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

Dnia 12.04.2022 o godz. 14:20:11 Jaroslaw Rafa pisze: > Dnia 12.04.2022 o godz. 14:07:13 Richard Rasker pisze: > > > > But according to the information supplied, I should also be able to > > use smtp.xs4all.nl as a relay host, see > > https://www.xs4all.nl/eigenmailserver/ (in Dutch -- and I

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

Dnia 12.04.2022 o godz. 14:07:13 Richard Rasker pisze: > > But according to the information supplied, I should also be able to > use smtp.xs4all.nl as a relay host, see > https://www.xs4all.nl/eigenmailserver/ (in Dutch -- and I already > took care of the Spamhaus delisting). > > Question: does

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

Op 11-04-22 om 18:34 schreef Paul van der Vlis: Hi Richard, ... Eventually you could use my mailserver as a relayhost. That is a very friendly offer, but if I do, that would of course only be temporary, so that I can send e-mail again, and I'd contact you in advance. You need a

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

Hi Richard, Op 11-04-2022 om 18:20 schreef Richard Rasker: Hi Paul, Op 11-04-22 om 17:40 schreef Paul van der Vlis: [snip] Maybe switch to freedom.nl, they give you a good reverse DNS. Also IPv6. Thanks for the tip; I think that may be a good idea. They're a lot cheaper as well than

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 06:20:46PM +0200, Richard Rasker wrote: > That is a very friendly offer, but if I do, that would of course only be > temporary, so that I can send e-mail again, and I'd contact you in advance. > > Just to make sure: I guess I need to change my MX record for this to >

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

Hi Paul, Op 11-04-22 om 17:40 schreef Paul van der Vlis: [snip] Maybe switch to freedom.nl, they give you a good reverse DNS. Also IPv6. Thanks for the tip; I think that may be a good idea. They're a lot cheaper as well than XS4All/KPN -- I think I'll contact them first thing tomorrow

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

On 11.04.22 08:21, lists wrote: FWIW my VPS only allows one reverse pointer. I host multiple domains so only one reverse pointer will match. My mail does not get bounced for that. this is not about multiple PTRs records, this is about changing the PTR. And before someone posts you can have

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

lists wrote: FWIW my VPS only allows one reverse pointer. I host multiple domains so only one reverse pointer will match. My mail does not get bounced for that. And before someone posts you can have more than one reverse pointer per IP the VPS (Digital Ocean) says it can't be done. Multiple

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

Op 11-04-2022 om 17:19 schreef Paul van der Vlis: Hi Richard and others, Op 11-04-2022 om 16:52 schreef Richard Rasker: #Set Username and Password   smtp_sasl_password_maps = static:Chosen-Username:Chosen-Password What I use is this: smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/saslpasswd

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

Message   From: m...@junc.eu Sent: April 11, 2022 7:43 AM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration? On 2022-04-11 15:38, Richard Rasker wrote: > Could I solve this by setting smtp_helo_name in main.cf to > 77-172-184-9.fixed.k

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

Hi Richard and others, Op 11-04-2022 om 16:52 schreef Richard Rasker: #Set Username and Password  smtp_sasl_password_maps = static:Chosen-Username:Chosen-Password What I use is this: smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/saslpasswd And in that file something like:

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

On 2022-04-11 17:00, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 11.04.22 15:38, Richard Rasker wrote: I've been using Postfix for many years without significant problems. However, due to a forced change in ISP, I can no longer have a correct PTR record pointing to mail.linetec.nl, causing a lot of

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

On 11.04.22 15:38, Richard Rasker wrote: I've been using Postfix for many years without significant problems. However, due to a forced change in ISP, I can no longer have a correct PTR record pointing to mail.linetec.nl, causing a lot of ISP's to reject e-mail from my server. Reverse DNS

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

Hello Matus, and others, Op 11-04-22 om 16:17 schreef Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 11.04.22 15:38, Richard Rasker wrote: I've been using Postfix for many years without significant problems. However, due to a forced change in ISP, I can no longer have a correct PTR record pointing to

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

Could I solve this by setting smtp_helo_name in main.cf to 77-172-184-9.fixed.kpn.net ? Or is this a bad idea? On 11.04.22 10:20, post...@ptld.com wrote: Yes you can set the helo name to match but this wont have much effect. Some servers are looking at domain -> IP -> domain which in your

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

On 2022-04-11 15:38, Richard Rasker wrote: Could I solve this by setting smtp_helo_name in main.cf to 77-172-184-9.fixed.kpn.net ? Or is this a bad idea? no this will not solve it, you have to talk to isp kindly ask for change of ptr, if thay are unvilling it most cases not a problem to

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

> Could I solve this by setting smtp_helo_name in main.cf to > 77-172-184-9.fixed.kpn.net ? > Or is this a bad idea? Yes you can set the helo name to match but this wont have much effect. Some servers are looking at domain -> IP -> domain which in your case is: mail.linetec.nl ->

Re: Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

On 11.04.22 15:38, Richard Rasker wrote: I've been using Postfix for many years without significant problems. However, due to a forced change in ISP, I can no longer have a correct PTR record pointing to mail.linetec.nl, causing a lot of ISP's to reject e-mail from my server. Reverse DNS

Solving reverse DNS problem with Postfix configuration?

Hello, I've been using Postfix for many years without significant problems. However, due to a forced change in ISP, I can no longer have a correct PTR record pointing to mail.linetec.nl, causing a lot of ISP's to reject e-mail from my server. Reverse DNS for my IP address now points to the

Re: Local address rewrite problem with postfix configuration and sender dependent relayhosts - ISP

On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 09:44:35AM +0200, TTM wrote: > raf wrote: > >> main.cf > >> - > >> [...] > >> receive_override_options = no_address_mappings > > > >I could be wrong, but I don't think you want the above setting. >

Re: Local address rewrite problem with postfix configuration and sender dependent relayhosts - ISP

raf wrote: >> main.cf >> - >> [...] >> receive_override_options = no_address_mappings > >I could be wrong, but I don't think you want the above setting. >You have canonical address maps and virtual alias maps, and >this

Re: Local address rewrite problem with postfix configuration and sender dependent relayhosts - ISP

On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 03:33:05PM +0200, fo...@gmx.de wrote: > Hello together, > I have "Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS" on a raspberry pi 4, and I'm trying to config > postfix to rewrite local-addresses and use then sender-dependent relayhosts. > > Postfix is mail_version = 3.4.13 and i have a dynamic

Re: Local address rewrite problem with postfix configuration and sender dependent relayhosts - ISP

Bernardo: >You canonical map has: > >Local_User_A@local.homenet us...@gmx.de >Local_User_B@local.homenet us...@gmail.com > >but according to the log your "from" is "ttm@ttmsacer.homenet". > >Your map doesn't contain/match anything related to "ttmsacer.homenet" (it only >has entries for

Re: Local address rewrite problem with postfix configuration and sender dependent relayhosts - ISP

On Wed, 8 Sep 2021, TTM wrote: Wietse: Without further information I can't say what mistake you made. Maybe you're looking at an old message that is already in the queue. What would be needed? After each test, I clear thee queue with "postsuper -d ALL". I'm wondering why postfix tries to

Re: Local address rewrite problem with postfix configuration and sender dependent relayhosts - ISP

TTM: > > Wietse: > >The Postfix cleanup daemon applies canonical mapping before it > >writes a message to a queue file. > > Ok, I misunderstood this note in the postfix docu: > "Note: $sender_canonical_maps is processed before $canonical_maps. " > > > Ok, but can I achieve it by setting in

Re: Local address rewrite problem with postfix configuration and sender dependent relayhosts - ISP

Wietse: >The Postfix cleanup daemon applies canonical mapping before it >writes a message to a queue file. Ok, I misunderstood this note in the postfix docu: "Note: $sender_canonical_maps is processed before $canonical_maps. " Ok, but can I achieve it by setting in main.cf:

Re: Local address rewrite problem with postfix configuration and sender dependent relayhosts - ISP

fo...@gmx.de: > For point 1) an 2) i have a file sender_canonical created: > - > Local_User_A@local.homenet us...@gmx.de > Local_User_B@local.homenet us...@gmail.com >

Local address rewrite problem with postfix configuration and sender dependent relayhosts - ISP

Hello together, I have "Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS" on a raspberry pi 4, and I'm trying to config postfix to rewrite local-addresses and use then sender-dependent relayhosts. Postfix is mail_version = 3.4.13 and i have a dynamic IP. The setup looks /should be like this: 1) local user sends email to

Re: 'Send only' postfix configuration works on Ubuntu but not on Rasberry Pi - missing TLS library?

On 07/12/2020 14:58, Chris Green wrote: On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 02:34:14PM +, Dominic Raferd wrote: On 07/12/2020 13:11, Chris Green wrote: On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 01:01:16PM +, Chris Green wrote: [snip] While I'm about it why am I getting identical mail.log and mail.info files

OT: syslog output files (Re: 'Send only' postfix configuration works on Ubuntu but not on Rasberry Pi - missing TLS library?)

Chris Green wrote: While I'm about it why am I getting identical mail.log and mail.info files created in /var/log on the Pi? It's not inherently Pi-specific. The root cause is some wise-guy upstream package maintainer who has (mis?)configured (r)syslog to output multiple log files for

Re: 'Send only' postfix configuration works on Ubuntu but not on Rasberry Pi - missing TLS library?

On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 02:34:14PM +, Dominic Raferd wrote: > On 07/12/2020 13:11, Chris Green wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 01:01:16PM +, Chris Green wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > > > > While I'm about it why am I getting identical mail.log and mail.info > > > files created in

Re: 'Send only' postfix configuration works on Ubuntu but not on Rasberry Pi - missing TLS library?

On 07/12/2020 13:11, Chris Green wrote: On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 01:01:16PM +, Chris Green wrote: [snip] While I'm about it why am I getting identical mail.log and mail.info files created in /var/log on the Pi? I could still do with an answer to this. Check contents of /etc/rsyslog.d

Re: 'Send only' postfix configuration works on Ubuntu but not on Rasberry Pi - missing TLS library?

Chris Green: > > While I'm about it why am I getting identical mail.log and mail.info > > files created in /var/log on the Pi? > > > I could still do with an answer to this. Postfix does not write those files. They are written by diffferent programs: rsyslog, syslogd, or the like.

Re: 'Send only' postfix configuration works on Ubuntu but not on Rasberry Pi - missing TLS library?

On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 01:01:16PM +, Chris Green wrote: [snip] > > Presumably this means there's a SASL/TLS library I need to install on > the Pi, can anyone tell me what it is please. Oh, I have run 'postmap > /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd' on both systems. > Typical! Almost immediately after

'Send only' postfix configuration works on Ubuntu but not on Rasberry Pi - missing TLS library?

I am setting up a 'send only' Postfix configuration on a number of machines so that they can send error messages to me on my desktop machine. The main.cf file is:- compatibility_level = 2 # # # TLS parameters # smtpd_tls_cert_file=/etc/ssl/certs/ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem

Re: 'mlmmj' and Postfix configuration

Gerard E. Seibert: > I am considering running 'mlmmj' on my FreeBSD system. There is a > document that shows how to configure Postfix with 'mlmmj' available. > http://mlmmj.org/docs/readme-postfix/ That document is dated 1/28/2012. > I tend to think it is outdated. It uses stable Postfix

Re: 'mlmmj' and Postfix configuration

On 2020-05-13 19:09, Gerard E. Seibert wrote: Does anyone here use this application and have any suggestions on how to configure it and/or Postfix to work happily together? its dokumented imho on that page how to make it work

'mlmmj' and Postfix configuration

I am considering running 'mlmmj' on my FreeBSD system. There is a document that shows how to configure Postfix with 'mlmmj' available. http://mlmmj.org/docs/readme-postfix/ That document is dated 1/28/2012. I tend to think it is outdated. Does anyone here use this application and have any

Postfix configuration

Hi, Sorry for my english, I'm french. I have some doubts about my Postfix configuration. I have a private mail server, at my home, allowing me to have my personal e-mails ( @my_domain.fr ) My architecture is the following one (on Raspberry Pi with Raspbian): - 1 mail server with Postfix

Re: ETRN use and Postfix configuration

Hi LuKreme, > On Mar 4, 2018, at 8:44 AM, LuKreme wrote: > > Isn't ETRN a good thing? What's the benefit from disabling it? > -- > My main job is trying to come up with new and innovative and effective ways > to reject even more mail. I'm up to about 97% now. > It’s a

Re: ETRN use and Postfix configuration

LuKreme: > On Feb 27, 2018, at 18:29, J Doe wrote: > > postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords > >smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords > > Isn't ETRN a good thing? What's the benefit from disabling it? Good if used by the right client (who needs this nowadays?), otherwise ERTN it

Re: ETRN use and Postfix configuration

On Feb 27, 2018, at 18:29, J Doe wrote: > postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords >smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords Isn't ETRN a good thing? What's the benefit from disabling it? -- My main job is trying to come up with new and innovative and effective ways to reject even

Re: ETRN use and Postfix configuration

Hi Noel, > On Feb 27, 2018, at 10:18 PM, Noel Jones wrote: >> ** Is Postfix logging that ETRN is disabled on the first, unencrypted SMTP >> session and then logging this again for the encrypted session (ie: Postfix >> is just logging I disabled this and Google is not

Re: ETRN use and Postfix configuration

On 2/27/2018 8:29 PM, J Doe wrote: > Hello, > > I read the “Postfix ETRN Howto” [1] as well as man 5 postconf with regards to: > > postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords > smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords > > ... and disabled the announcement of ETRN via: > > postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords

ETRN use and Postfix configuration

Hello, I read the “Postfix ETRN Howto” [1] as well as man 5 postconf with regards to: postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords ... and disabled the announcement of ETRN via: postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords = ETRN smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords = ETRN I then

Postfix configuration postconf

Is there a way of checking for /unnecessary/ entries in the Postfix main or master config files. I was looking through the mailing list and noticed the point that Victor made about smtpd_tls_session_cache_database being mostly unnecessary. This made me wonder if I have entries in the config

Re: Postfix configuration postconf

On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 05:55:47 -0500 John j...@klam.ca wrote: Is there a way of checking for /unnecessary/ entries in the Postfix main or master config files. I was looking through the mailing list and noticed the point that Victor made about smtpd_tls_session_cache_database being mostly

Re: Solved : Postfix configuration postconf

John: postconf -n or postconf -d is not working for you? http://www.postfix.org/postconf.1.html They work very well. But they do not tell me when and what options I may have added to my config which duplicate a default option. While such duplications are not disasters they make the

Re: Postfix configuration postconf

On Feb 08, 2015, at 05.55, John j...@klam.ca wrote: Is there a way of checking for unnecessary entries in the Postfix main or master config files. I was looking through the mailing list and noticed the point that Victor made about smtpd_tls_session_cache_database being mostly

Solved : Postfix configuration postconf

On 2/8/2015 7:06 AM, Koko Wijatmoko wrote: On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 05:55:47 -0500 John j...@klam.ca wrote: Is there a way of checking for /unnecessary/ entries in the Postfix main or master config files. I was looking through the mailing list and noticed the point that Victor made about

Re: SOLVED: Postfix configuration postconf

Surprisingly, I found that I had only six items that were duplicated. One, a file location which I left as is following Wietse's advice. The remainder I left in place as book marks for the future. Thanks to both Wietse and Ben for their input. -- John Allen KLaM

Postfix configuration settings inheritance for additional services in master.cf

Hello. I'd like to ask how configuration directives are applied to additional services that are specified in master.cf. If main.cf contains: ... smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth smtpd_sasl_local_domain = example.com

Re: Postfix configuration settings inheritance for additional services in master.cf

Igor Zinovik: I'd like to ask how configuration directives are applied to additional services that are specified in master.cf. See http://www.postfix.org/master.5.html -o name=value Override the named main.cf configuration parameter. The parameter value can refer to other

postfix configuration

Hi all I'm trying to configure postfix 2.7.1 to protect internal mailing list with the restriction classes as per http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html#internal Example /etc/postfix/main.cf: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = ... check_recipient_access

Re: postfix configuration

On 10/09/2013 10:03 PM, Stefano Gatto wrote: Hi all I'm trying to configure postfix 2.7.1 to protect internal mailing list with the restriction classes as per http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html#internal Example /etc/postfix/main.cf: smtpd_recipient_restrictions =

Re: postfix configuration

On 10/9/2013 3:03 PM, Stefano Gatto wrote: Hi all I'm trying to configure postfix 2.7.1 to protect internal mailing list with the restriction classes as per http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html#internal Example /etc/postfix/main.cf: smtpd_recipient_restrictions =

need to purge clamav from postfix configuration

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, As near as I can tell debian's clamav is just broken. It keeps whining about clamd.ctl and nothing I can find on the web fixes it. So fine. It's broken. I want it gone. I tried commenting out the lines in master.cf and main.cf. But now it

Re: need to purge clamav from postfix configuration

David Benfell: As near as I can tell debian's clamav is just broken. It keeps whining about clamd.ctl and nothing I can find on the web fixes it. So fine. It's broken. I want it gone. I tried commenting out the lines in master.cf and main.cf. But now it complains about connection refused

Re: need to purge clamav from postfix configuration

On Saturday, September 21, 2013 03:34:57 David Benfell wrote: Hi all, As near as I can tell debian's clamav is just broken. It keeps whining about clamd.ctl and nothing I can find on the web fixes it. You didn't post your original configuration, so I don't know what your original problem

Re: need to purge clamav from postfix configuration

On Sep 21, 2013, at 16:36, Scott Kitterman post...@kitterman.com wrote: On Saturday, September 21, 2013 03:34:57 David Benfell wrote: Hi all, As near as I can tell debian's clamav is just broken. It keeps whining about clamd.ctl and nothing I can find on the web fixes it. You didn't post

Re: need to purge clamav from postfix configuration

Am 21.09.2013 17:25, schrieb DTNX Postmaster: +1 on using Debian ClamAV packages without any problems. We use the milter package to integrate it with Postfix, using unix sockets. The problem people generally run into with unix sockets is one of permissions. The milter socket needs to be

Re: need to purge clamav from postfix configuration

On Saturday, September 21, 2013 17:34:35 li...@rhsoft.net wrote: Am 21.09.2013 17:25, schrieb DTNX Postmaster: +1 on using Debian ClamAV packages without any problems. We use the milter package to integrate it with Postfix, using unix sockets. The problem people generally run into with

Re: need to purge clamav from postfix configuration

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/21/2013 07:36 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: On Saturday, September 21, 2013 03:34:57 David Benfell wrote: Hi all, As near as I can tell debian's clamav is just broken. It keeps whining about clamd.ctl and nothing I can find on the web fixes

Re: need to purge clamav from postfix configuration

On Saturday, September 21, 2013 09:02:05 David Benfell wrote: On 09/21/2013 07:36 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: On Saturday, September 21, 2013 03:34:57 David Benfell wrote: Hi all, As near as I can tell debian's clamav is just broken. It keeps whining about clamd.ctl and nothing I can

Re: need to purge clamav from postfix configuration

On Sep 21, 2013, at 18:02, David Benfell dbenf...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/21/2013 07:36 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: On Saturday, September 21, 2013 03:34:57 David Benfell wrote: Hi all, As near as I can tell debian's clamav is just broken. It keeps whining about clamd.ctl and nothing I can

Re: need to purge clamav from postfix configuration

if you have copied an older configuration from a different distro that may have its own quirks. Then we are very close to the point where I'll just have to turn everything over to Google Apps. Because I am *never* going to understand postfix configuration. This isn't even something that's within

Not Solved but Resolved, was Re: need to purge clamav from postfix configuration

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/21/2013 08:34 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: Am 21.09.2013 17:25, schrieb DTNX Postmaster: +1 on using Debian ClamAV packages without any problems. We use the milter package to integrate it with Postfix, using unix sockets. The problem

Re: need to purge clamav from postfix configuration

they actually do. Especially if you have copied an older configuration from a different distro that may have its own quirks. Then we are very close to the point where I'll just have to turn everything over to Google Apps. Because I am *never* going to understand postfix configuration. This isn't even

Re: need to purge clamav from postfix configuration

On Sep 21, 2013, at 21:29, David Benfell dbenf...@gmail.com wrote: At least within postfix, there is a very nice command to just fix the permissions. (Did Wietse get tired of seeing that particular problem?) I have no idea what they should be for clamd.ctl because, as near as I can tell, it

Re: need to purge clamav from postfix configuration

On Saturday, September 21, 2013 23:50:00 DTNX Postmaster wrote: On Sep 21, 2013, at 21:29, David Benfell dbenf...@gmail.com wrote: At least within postfix, there is a very nice command to just fix the permissions. (Did Wietse get tired of seeing that particular problem?) I have no idea what

postfix configuration to a generic handler

Hello, This has probably been answered in some thread, however I'm having a hard time finding it. I'm reading through the documentation, and it is not clear how I would fashion a configuration. I would like to run postfix in the following fashion: 1. post fix receives mail from

Re: postfix configuration to a generic handler

Tim Prepscius: Hello, This has probably been answered in some thread, however I'm having a hard time finding it. I'm reading through the documentation, and it is not clear how I would fashion a configuration. I would like to run postfix in the following fashion: 1. post fix

Re: postfix configuration to a generic handler

oh wow, this worked, first time too. jeeze.. that's awesome. Thank you again, to answer your questions: 1. I do in fact want to only accept mail from static ips and those not on the block list. But I figure there are configuration examples for this. I can spend the time to figure this out I

Re: postfix configuration to a generic handler

Tim Prepscius: oh wow, this worked, first time too. jeeze.. that's awesome. Thank you again, to answer your questions: 1. I do in fact want to only accept mail from static ips and those not on the block list. But I figure there are configuration examples for this. I can spend the time

Re: postfix configuration to a generic handler

ok so i have that working with the mysql db. I'll eventually create a separate db with just one table. I'm using a kludge from here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4772229/configure-mail-server-to-receive-mail-from-any-domain to get around specifying the domain: virtual_mailbox_domains =

  1   2   3   >