[pfx] Re: schleuder and postfix virtual domains

Il 14/01/2024 18:57, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users ha scritto: Does the other .eu mailinglist sill work? If you mean the .space one, it does, but I had to also remove the canonical map :) I had a schleuder .space list, (still) working Now I have a schleuder .eu list, also working Plus

[pfx] Re: schleuder and postfix virtual domains

roughnecks via Postfix-users: Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE -- Start of PGP signed section. > Il 14/01/2024 15:56, roughnecks via Postfix-users ha scritto: > > Il 14/01/2024 15:52, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users ha scritto: > >> To receive receive list mail

[pfx] Re: schleuder and postfix virtual domains

Il 14/01/2024 15:56, roughnecks via Postfix-users ha scritto: Il 14/01/2024 15:52, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users ha scritto: To receive receive list mail fordecentralize-send...@wood...nest.eu you need to list wood...nest.eu in mydestination. But I believe I read in several places in the

[pfx] Re: schleuder and postfix virtual domains

's for .eu There are some things that can be improved on this configuration, (for example it will accept and then bounce mail for non-existent recipients in wood...nest.eu, and you are using two different kinds of virtual domains), but you already have two mailing lists working and I don't want to b

[pfx] Re: schleuder and postfix virtual domains

's for .eu There are some things that can be improved on this configuration, (for example it will accept and then bounce mail for non-existent recipients in wood...nest.eu, and you are using two different kinds of virtual domains), but you already have two mailing lists working and I don't want to b

[pfx] Re: schleuder and postfix virtual domains

some things that can be improved on this configuration, (for example it will accept and then bounce mail for non-existent recipients in wood...nest.eu, and you are using two different kinds of virtual domains), but you already have two mailing lists working and I don't want to break those.

[pfx] Re: schleuder and postfix virtual domains

Il 14/01/2024 15:52, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users ha scritto: To receive receive list mail fordecentralize-send...@wood...nest.eu you need to list wood...nest.eu in mydestination. But I believe I read in several places in the docs to NOT add a virtual domain to mydestination.. Didn't I

[pfx] Re: schleuder and postfix virtual domains

roughnecks via Postfix-users: Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE -- Start of PGP signed section. > Il 14/01/2024 14:07, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users ha scritto: > > > If there are any schleuder users on this list, maybe someone knows > > what you are talking about. > > > > For the

[pfx] Re: schleuder and postfix virtual domains

Il 14/01/2024 14:07, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users ha scritto: If there are any schleuder users on this list, maybe someone knows what you are talking about. For the rest of the readership, concrete informnation (settings, not beliefs) is needed.

[pfx] Re: schleuder and postfix virtual domains

roughnecks via Postfix-users: Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE -- Start of PGP signed section. > Hello, > > sorry for the little OT, but I asked schleuder team and they weren't > able to assist me. > > My postfix conf has a virtual domain set up. > At first I only had one domain and

[pfx] schleuder and postfix virtual domains

Hello, sorry for the little OT, but I asked schleuder team and they weren't able to assist me. My postfix conf has a virtual domain set up. At first I only had one domain and my first schleuder list was made for that domain and it still works today. Now I wanted to start a new ML on the

[pfx] Re: Unable to Successfully Configure for Virtual Domains

ostfix-users wrote: > I am trying to set up a virtual domains on a server and either end up with > no mail being delivered, or mail being delivered but with warning: > > do not list domain example2.co.uk in BOTH virtual_alias_domains and > relay_domains. > > What I am tryin

[pfx] Unable to Successfully Configure for Virtual Domains

I am trying to set up a virtual domains on a server and either end up with no mail being delivered, or mail being delivered but with warning: do not list domain example2.co.uk in BOTH virtual_alias_domains and relay_domains. What I am trying to do is * Configure a dedicated server to host 5

[pfx] Re: Virtual Domains

Scratch this: I've spotted my typo Thanks Ken Ken Smith via Postfix-users wrote: Hi All, I'm sure I'm missing some subtle point in the documentation but could someone kindly clarify for me. This is postfix 3.5.8 on a Rocky Linux system. Delivery is by lmtp to cyrus-imap on another

[pfx] Virtual Domains

Hi All, I'm sure I'm missing some subtle point in the documentation but could someone kindly clarify for me. This is postfix 3.5.8 on a Rocky Linux system. Delivery is by lmtp to cyrus-imap on another machine. My e-mail domain kensnet.org, among others, is set up as a virtual domain. There

[pfx] Re: wildcast for virtual domains

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 11:56:41AM +0800, Tom Reed via Postfix-users wrote: > Does virtual domains (such as virtual_alias_domains) support wildcard? > such as putting this one in the file: > > *.foo.com > > so that one.foo.com, two.foo.com... will be a recipient domain. You

[pfx] wildcast for virtual domains

Hello list, sorry for the silly question. does virtual domains (such as virtual_alias_domains) support wildcast? such as putting this one in the file: *.foo.com so that one.foo.com, two.foo.com... will be a recipient domain. Thanks. -- sent from https://dkinbox.com

Re: Virtual domains

On 4/15/22 10:15 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 14.04.22 08:26, Emmett Culley wrote: I recently changed the host name of one of the servers from one domain I am hosting to another of the domains the server is serving. Upon verifying the server I noticed that the Received: headers on

Re: Virtual domains

On 14.04.22 08:26, Emmett Culley wrote: I recently changed the host name of one of the servers from one domain I am hosting to another of the domains the server is serving. Upon verifying the server I noticed that the Received: headers on email sent via that server now have the new host name

Re: Virtual domains

On 4/14/22 9:58 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Emmett Culley: Is there anything I can do to specify that the Recieved: headers have the "correct" domain name depending on what domain is sending an email (From:)? The Received: headers contain the value of the "myhostname" parameter, i.e. the

Re: Virtual domains

Emmett Culley: > Is there anything I can do to specify that the Recieved: headers > have the "correct" domain name depending on what domain is sending > an email (From:)? The Received: headers contain the value of the "myhostname" parameter, i.e. the identity of this Postfix MTA instance. This

Re: Virtual domains

On 4/14/22 8:38 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: On 4/14/22 09:26, Emmett Culley wrote: I would include the output of postconf, but it is very large and I don't know how to narrow it down to what is needed to help resolve this issue. Try "postconf -n".  This should only show settings that are

Re: Virtual domains

On 4/14/22 09:26, Emmett Culley wrote: I would include the output of postconf, but it is very large and I don't know how to narrow it down to what is needed to help resolve this issue. Try "postconf -n".  This should only show settings that are different from default. elyograg@bilbo:~$

Virtual domains

I run a couple of mail servers using postfix, currently at version 2.10.1. They are set up to send and receive email for multiple virtual domains and have been doing that beautifully for years. I recently changed the host name of one of the servers from one domain I am hosting to another

Alter virtual domains MySQL table to insert relay host for some domains

Hi all, I'm running a personal Postfix mail server together with Courier for a virtual domain setup. By now I have a domains table with a single transport field which is used by transport_maps directive in order to know if incoming emails must be delivered locally or need to be sent to the next

Migrating from Virtual domains to Postmulti setup

Hi, I have been using Postfix with Dovecot (lmtp/imaps) for a few years now for 5 domains with the virtual domains setup and self-signed certificates using OpenSSL 1.0.x For spam/virus protection I use Postscreen, Spamassassin and Clamav; I also use py-spfpolicyd, OpenDmarc, OpenDkim and Clamav

Gnu Mailman, Postfix relay_domains and MySQL virtual domains/users tables

Hi Friends! I've just installed Mailman 2.1.23 on Debian Stretch, Postfix 3.1.8-0+deb9u1 + Dovecot 2.2.27 (c0f36b0) with "virtual_domains" "virtual_users" "virtual_aliases" on MySQL, and all seems works fine, but not tested on production environment again. I write you for clarification

Re: Multiple Virtual Domains

On 20.06.18 11:44, Ruben Safir wrote: The first part is for incoming email. If I get email to a specific user, c...@newcorp.com , it should be accepted and the MTA should relay it a user ceo or an alias mysuer. It should reject anything other than newcorp.com or mrbrklyn.com on the incoming

Re: Multiple Virtual Domains

> On Jun 20, 2018, at 12:36 PM, Ruben Safir wrote: > > I added the domain to mydestinations variable, but this might not be the > best idea. It lets me pass through the domain and accept it, but it > doesn't permit me to assign certain users for that domain specifically

Re: Multiple Virtual Domains

Ruben Safir: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:23:54PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Ruben Safir: > > > I get this when sending email to the new domain > > > > > > 2018-06-20T12:10:14.319765-04:00 www2 postfix/smtpd[13841]: NOQUEUE: > > > reject: RCPT from l2mail1.panix.com[166.84.1.75]: 454 4.7.1 >

Re: Multiple Virtual Domains

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:23:54PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Ruben Safir: > > I get this when sending email to the new domain > > > > 2018-06-20T12:10:14.319765-04:00 www2 postfix/smtpd[13841]: NOQUEUE: > > reject: RCPT from l2mail1.panix.com[166.84.1.75]: 454 4.7.1 > > : Relay access denied;

Re: Multiple Virtual Domains

Ruben Safir: > I get this when sending email to the new domain > > 2018-06-20T12:10:14.319765-04:00 www2 postfix/smtpd[13841]: NOQUEUE: > reject: RCPT from l2mail1.panix.com[166.84.1.75]: 454 4.7.1 > : Relay access denied; > from= to= proto=ESMTP > helo= Relay control is specified with

Re: Multiple Virtual Domains

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:44:23AM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 09:54:54AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Ruben Safir: > > > Hello > > > > > > I have a new domain on my server and I want certain accounts to > > > be sent out with the new domain, rather than the default.

Re: Multiple Virtual Domains

Ruben Safir: > Hello > > I have a new domain on my server and I want certain accounts to > be sent out with the new domain, rather than the default. I have it > set up at the moment so that any domain that you try to send though > get rewritten to the default, mrbrklyn.com. But I'd like this

Multiple Virtual Domains

Hello I have a new domain on my server and I want certain accounts to be sent out with the new domain, rather than the default. I have it set up at the moment so that any domain that you try to send though get rewritten to the default, mrbrklyn.com. But I'd like this new domain to be allowed

Re: Relay mail from virtual domains and issue when the sender and recipient is on same server

Thank you for your reply and tips :-) > > Your content_filter only applies to MX mail on port 25. > Yes I want to use bogofilter only for incoming mails from other mail servers. It's configured with a global sieve rule to move spam e-mails to Spam folder for each mailbox. Dovecot is

Re: Relay mail from virtual domains and issue when the sender and recipient is on same server

On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 05:17:09AM +0300, Christos Chatzaras wrote: > What I want to do: > > I want to disable local delivery for e-mails from virtual domains / > mailboxes when sender / recipient is on same server. I want these > e-mails to pass through a relay. > > -

Re: Relay mail from virtual domains and issue when the sender and recipient is on same server

> On Apr 14, 2018, at 12:23 AM, Christos Chatzaras wrote: > > I think the only way to fix this is to have 2 postfix instances, right? One > for incoming and one for outgoing. If you want to round-trip mail through an external SMTP server, and then bring it back to the

Re: Relay mail from virtual domains and issue when the sender and recipient is on same server

More info to make it clearer: The 'relay denied' I wrote in my previous is not in smtp.example.com logs. E-mail from u...@example.com to u...@example.com : -- client (1) --> server1.example.com (2) --> smtp.example.com (3) --> server1.example.com (4) -- The 'relay denied' message is

Relay mail from virtual domains and issue when the sender and recipient is on same server

What I want to do: I want to disable local delivery for e-mails from virtual domains / mailboxes when sender / recipient is on same server. I want these e-mails to pass through a relay. -- My setup : I have postfix and dovecot on server1.example.com and smtp.example.com acts

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

On 10/26/2017 03:36 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 26.10.17 23:29, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote: > >> it appears to me that Postfix has evolved organically (Read: >> disorganized) as have many legacy applications like Apache used to be. >> The documentation you refer to is there alright, but

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

On 26 Oct 2017, at 22:55 (-0400), Viktor Dukhovni wrote: You're wrong of course, Postfix has been designed and implemented with much care. What we've not done is maintained a free book along with the software. Postfix comes with "reference documentation", and topic-specific tutorials:

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

> On Oct 26, 2017, at 5:29 PM, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote: > > I am surprised with this sprawl, in the 21st Century. In 30 minutes > I've figured out and implemented DKIM. DKIM is comparatively simple, it does just one thing. And yet, you really should fix your DNS, you may think you

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

you dont add all virtual domains to ptr, who are you being misguiden from ? :( On 26. okt. 2017 21.37.02 cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote: On 10/26/2017 12:21 PM, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote: the whole fact that mail was SENT by thunderbird has nothing to do with the fact that you

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

> Date: Thursday, October 26, 2017 12:36:37 -0700 > From: cac...@quantum-equities.com > > On 10/26/2017 12:21 PM, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote: >>> the whole fact that mail was SENT by thunderbird has nothing to do >>> with the >>> fact that you need mail server on quantum-equities.com if

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

On 26.10.17 23:29, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote: > it appears to me that Postfix has evolved organically (Read: > disorganized) as have many legacy applications like Apache used to be. > The documentation you refer to is there alright, but it's all about > bit-twiddling, nothing about

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

> On Oct 26, 2017, at 16:29, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote: > I am surprised with this sprawl, in the 21st Century. In 30 minutes I've > figured out and implemented DKIM. But it appears to me that Postfix has > evolved organically (Read: disorganized) as have many legacy applications >

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

On 10/26/2017 12:21 PM, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote: >> the whole fact that mail was SENT by thunderbird has nothing to do >> with the >> fact that you need mail server on quantum-equities.com if you want to >> RECEIVE mail for quantum-equities.com. >> >> configure postfix on

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

> the whole fact that mail was SENT by thunderbird has nothing to do > with the > fact that you need mail server on quantum-equities.com if you want to > RECEIVE mail for quantum-equities.com. > > configure postfix on quantum-equities.com that will have > "quantum-equities.com" in mydestination. >

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

> Date: Thursday, October 26, 2017 20:00:44 +0200 > From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas > Here's what delphi-real-estate.com looks like: www 28800  A 72.251.232.102 @   28800  MX  10 mail.delphi-real-estate.com. Do you mean I need to set an

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

On 26.10.17 10:32, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote: The test email I'm sending from quantum-equities.com to delphi-real-estate.com, causes the delphi postfix to try and contact quantum on port 25, for some reason. this is the reason: quantum-equities.com. 300 IN MX 0

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

On 26.10.17 09:36, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote: Yes I have my smtp server set to mail.delphi-real-estate.com. Maybe I have it now.  I've set my zone file so:         mail                                28800    A    72.251.232.102 Is this correct? On 26.10.17 20:00, Matus UHLAR -

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

Here's what delphi-real-estate.com looks like: www 28800  A 72.251.232.102 @   28800  MX  10 mail.delphi-real-estate.com. Do you mean I need to set an A record for delphi-real-estate.com ? On 10/26/2017 09:18 AM, Richard wrote: No, you don't need an A-record for

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

The test email I'm sending from quantum-equities.com to delphi-real-estate.com, causes the delphi postfix to try and contact quantum on port 25, for some reason. Thing is, there is nothing listening there on 25 as the test email was sent by Thunderbird. Oct 26 09:06:33 quantum

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

Thank you Richard. On 10/26/2017 09:18 AM, Richard wrote: > >> Here's what delphi-real-estate.com looks like: >> >> www 28800  A 72.251.232.102 >> @   28800  MX  10 mail.delphi-real-estate.com. >> >> Do you mean I need to set an A record for delphi-real-estate.com ? > No, you don't

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

> Date: Thursday, October 26, 2017 08:40:13 -0700 > From: cac...@quantum-equities.com > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > > On 10/25/2017 12:39 PM, Richard wrote: >> >>> Date: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 11:55:13 -0700 >>> From: cac...@quantum-equities.com >>> >>> Sending an email from a remote

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

On 10/25/2017 12:39 PM, Richard wrote: > >> Date: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 11:55:13 -0700 >> From: cac...@quantum-equities.com >> >> Sending an email from a remote machine pretends like it goes out >> just fine.  But it never arrives in the server's mail folder.  >> Zero goes into maillog,

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

> Date: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 11:55:13 -0700 > From: cac...@quantum-equities.com > > Sending an email from a remote machine pretends like it goes out > just fine.  But it never arrives in the server's mail folder.  > Zero goes into maillog, even with systemctl restart postfix.  TLS > is

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

On 10/24/2017 10:20 AM, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote: > > On 10/23/2017 11:55 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: >> cac...@quantum-equities.com: >>> On 10/21/2017 11:25 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: cac...@quantum-equities.com: > How does DNS know where mail.example1.com is? Should I set it in

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

On 10/23/2017 11:55 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > cac...@quantum-equities.com: >> On 10/21/2017 11:25 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: >>> cac...@quantum-equities.com: How does DNS know where mail.example1.com is? Should I set it in my registrar, in the mail system, in Apache as a virtual domain,

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

cac...@quantum-equities.com: > > On 10/21/2017 11:25 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > cac...@quantum-equities.com: > >> How does DNS know where mail.example1.com is? Should I set it in > >> my registrar, in the mail system, in Apache as a virtual domain, > >> or where? > > Normally, someone pays a

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

On 10/21/2017 11:25 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > cac...@quantum-equities.com: >> How does DNS know where mail.example1.com is? Should I set it in >> my registrar, in the mail system, in Apache as a virtual domain, >> or where? > Normally, someone pays a registrar, so that the payer can configure >

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

cac...@quantum-equities.com: > How does DNS know where mail.example1.com is? Should I set it in > my registrar, in the mail system, in Apache as a virtual domain, > or where? Normally, someone pays a registrar, so that the payer can configure the names of DNS servers that hold DNS records for

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

How does DNS know where mail.example1.com is? Should I set it in my registrar, in the mail system, in Apache as a virtual domain, or where? In /etc/postfix/virtual ( have     # Redirect system email so it can be picked up     root    r...@quantum-equities.com Will this bypass

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

On 10/20/2017 12:42 PM, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote: > Thanks Noel and Rob, I may be on the right track now.  Good to know > I can trust the docs to be current. > > So my three domains with 6 users are completely independent of one > another;  no aliasing.  Thus I used > *Non-Postfix

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

Thanks Noel and Rob, I may be on the right track now.  Good to know I can trust the docs to be current. So my three domains with 6 users are completely independent of one another;  no aliasing.  Thus I used *Non-Postfix mailbox store: separate domains, non-UNIX accounts* In main.cf I set

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:42:34AM -0700, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote: > My mail server will receive mail for 3 domains with 6 users, and > the MUA will be on another machine on The Internets. That is very small. The simplest choice is to add the second and third domains to

Re: Virtual Domains/ Users

On 10/18/2017 12:42 PM, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote: > My mail server will receive mail for 3 domains with 6 users, and the > MUA will be on another machine on The Internet> > I'm seeing conflicting info on setting this up.  The simplest recipe > is here: >

Virtual Domains/ Users

My mail server will receive mail for 3 domains with 6 users, and the MUA will be on another machine on The Internets. I'm seeing conflicting info on setting this up.  The simplest recipe is here: https://blog.tinned-software.net/setup-postfix-for-multiple-domains/ ... but nothing is mentioned

Re: Question regarding Postfix virtual domains and SPF

Hi /dev/rob0, > On Oct 17, 2017, at 10:26 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: >> As an example case, if I send an e-mail from a Hotmail account to >> an address on my server it then forwards that mail to the user’s >> GMail e-mail address. > > Another example to consider is when spam gets

Re: Question regarding Postfix virtual domains and SPF

Hi Viktor, > On Oct 16, 2017, at 10:40 PM, Viktor Dukhovni > wrote: > >> 1. When using Postfix and virtual domain hosting in this fashion, is >> there any way to pass SPF when mail from a sending account is forwarded >> to another host (ie: Gmail) ? > > This

Re: Question regarding Postfix virtual domains and SPF

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:05:07PM -0400, J Doe wrote: > I have two questions regarding using SPF when I am using Postfix > with virtual domain hosting. > > I currently have an SPF record in my DNS: > > example.comTXT“v=spf1 ip4:1.2.3.4/32 ip6:1:2:3::4/128 ?all” .^no dot?

Re: Question regarding Postfix virtual domains and SPF

On 17 October 2017 at 03:40, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:05:07PM -0400, J Doe wrote: > > > My questions are: > > > > 1. When using Postfix and virtual domain hosting in this fashion, is > > there any way to pass SPF when mail from a sending

Re: Question regarding Postfix virtual domains and SPF

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:05:07PM -0400, J Doe wrote: > My questions are: > > 1. When using Postfix and virtual domain hosting in this fashion, is > there any way to pass SPF when mail from a sending account is forwarded > to another host (ie: Gmail) ? This requires SRS, and fairly effective

Re: Question regarding Postfix virtual domains and SPF

I solved this particular problem (forwarding third-party email to google) using "postsrsd" https://github.com/roehling/postsrsd. SRS (Sender Rewriting Scheme) rewrites the envelope sender address so that it appears to be from your domain (allowing SPF to work). This is the scheme used by

Question regarding Postfix virtual domains and SPF

Hi, I have two questions regarding using SPF when I am using Postfix with virtual domain hosting. I currently have an SPF record in my DNS: example.comTXT“v=spf1 ip4:1.2.3.4/32 ip6:1:2:3::4/128 ?all” I virtually host a domain (in this example case, example.com), that is set to

Re: Seperate maps for virtual domains?

Julian Kippels: > > You are doing N/2 table lookups to find the table that contains the > > data. That is, you're doing linear search on top of hashing. > > > @Wietse: N/2 is a little pessimistic, but thats only because I know the > makeup of my mailboxes? 90% of it is in one virtual domain and

Re: Seperate maps for virtual domains?

Am Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:17:53 -0400 (EDT) schrieb wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema): > Patrick Ben Koetter: > > > > At which message throughput rate will this make a difference? > > > > > > Always. Because you're replacing hashing with linear search. > > > > If you compare hashing to

Re: Seperate maps for virtual domains?

Patrick Ben Koetter: > > > At which message throughput rate will this make a difference? > > > > Always. Because you're replacing hashing with linear search. > > If you compare hashing to linear search, yes. But I am not sure this is what > the OPs question was about? > > He wrote "would it be

Re: Seperate maps for virtual domains?

gt;: > > > > > would it be faster to have several smaller files for alias_maps and > > > > > transport_maps for each virtual domain, or have one giant file each > > > > > with > > > > > all users domain from all virtual domains in one file?

Re: Seperate maps for virtual domains?

r alias_maps and > > > > transport_maps for each virtual domain, or have one giant file each with > > > > all users domain from all virtual domains in one file? Around 90% of > > > > traffic is for one domain and the rest is split among 32 other domain. &

Re: Seperate maps for virtual domains?

for each virtual domain, or have one giant file each with > > > all users domain from all virtual domains in one file? Around 90% of > > > traffic is for one domain and the rest is split among 32 other domain. > > > > Hard to tell. If they are static, binary maps Pos

Re: Seperate maps for virtual domains?

* Julian Kippels <kipp...@hhu.de>: > would it be faster to have several smaller files for alias_maps and > transport_maps for each virtual domain, or have one giant file each with > all users domain from all virtual domains in one file? Around 90% of > traffic is for one d

Seperate maps for virtual domains?

Hi, would it be faster to have several smaller files for alias_maps and transport_maps for each virtual domain, or have one giant file each with all users domain from all virtual domains in one file? Around 90% of traffic is for one domain and the rest is split among 32 other domain. Thanks

Re: separate TLS certificates for virtual domains - how ?

On 24/03/17 00:30, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: That answer was for the port 25 inbound MX relay host, which can be changed by updating MX records without any interaction with the users. [...] You are conflating MX hosts with MSAs. Users don't configure their MUAs to talk to MX hosts. Not quite. In

Re: separate TLS certificates for virtual domains - how ?

ot support SNI-based certificate >> selection. And this is not needed. Just point all the virtual domains >> at a common MX host with a single certificate. > > That is not an appropriate answer for my clients who are paying me to > provide them with their own domain identity at a

Re: separate TLS certificates for virtual domains - how ?

On 23/03/17 23:06, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: is it possible to setup separate SSL certificates for an each virtual domain ? The Postfix smtpd(8) service does not support SNI-based certificate selection. And this is not needed. Just point all the virtual domains at a common MX host with a single

Re: separate TLS certificates for virtual domains - how ?

he Postfix smtpd(8) service does not support SNI-based certificate selection. And this is not needed. Just point all the virtual domains at a common MX host with a single certificate. Submission services make for a better use-case of SNI-based certs, but the supporting code has not yet been written.

separate TLS certificates for virtual domains - how ?

Hi, is it possible to setup separate SSL certificates for an each virtual domain ? Thanks in advance for any support. Cheers Konrad

Re: Single to virtual domains tutorial

rom serving a single domain > >> to serving virtual domains? Here's my setup - > > Hi Danny, did you try: > > > > http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html ? > > > >> Postfix 3.1.1 > >> Uses Unix system accounts > >> Dovecot IMAP server > &

Re: Single to virtual domains tutorial

On 01/08/2016 3:01 pm, /dev/rob0 wrote: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 12:31:33PM +0100, Danny Horne wrote: >> Can someone point me to an easy to understand tutorial on >> reconfiguring Postfix from serving a single domain to serving >> virtual domains? Here's my setup - &g

Re: Single to virtual domains tutorial

On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 12:31:33PM +0100, Danny Horne wrote: > Can someone point me to an easy to understand tutorial on > reconfiguring Postfix from serving a single domain to serving > virtual domains? Here's my setup - Hi Danny, did you try: http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_RE

Single to virtual domains tutorial

Hi all, Can someone point me to an easy to understand tutorial on reconfiguring Postfix from serving a single domain to serving virtual domains? Here's my setup - Postfix 3.1.1 Uses Unix system accounts Dovecot IMAP server TLS / DKIM / DMARC used Probably other stuff I've forgotten, if you

Re: majordomo + postifx + virtual domains + mysql...

On 7/7/2016 8:16 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: Note that your problem at this point has*nothing* to do with majordomo. Switching to Mailman would not change anything. I second this. I run both Mailman and Majordomo (on separate servers) and the Postfix configuration is almost identical.

Re: majordomo + postifx + virtual domains + mysql...

On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:30:33PM +0100, postmas...@quantum-radio.net wrote: > Getting closer. But not understanding some basics. > Now at least using the command line, > > echo 'lists' | mail majordomo See "man mail" to learn how to use your mailx(1) client. Or, better yet, as below, just

Re: majordomo + postifx + virtual domains + mysql...

Getting closer. Now at least using the command line, echo 'lists' | mail majordomo I get this. It is actually looking to deliver it to the command line. = But not yet... Jul 7 08:48:21 zeus postfix/pickup[95164]: 2AF4137FD740: uid=3D501 = from=3D Jul 7 08:48:21 zeus postfix/cleanup[96311]:

Re: majordomo + postifx + virtual domains + mysql... close

Found the sticky problem. There was a commented out line in “mydestination” that continued to a second line, and that second line was not commented out. like this… #mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost, $mydomain, mail.$mydomain, www.$mydomain Fixed, and now on

Re: majordomo + postifx + virtual domains + mysql... close

On 7/6/2016 11:10 AM, postmas...@quantum-radio.net wrote: @Norton Allen Thanks for that info. I thought it would do it. And, I was happy to hear that someone else has actually got it working :-) I have this now in main.cf alias_maps= hash:/etc/aliases alias_database= hash:/etc/aliases

Re: majordomo + postifx + virtual domains + mysql... close

postmas...@quantum-radio.net: mail for zeus.quantum-radio.net loops back to myself You need to add zeus.quantum-radio.net to the mydestination setting. http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html#mydestination Wietse

Re: majordomo + postifx + virtual domains + mysql... close

@Norton Allen Thanks for that info. I thought it would do it. And, I was happy to hear that someone else has actually got it working :-) I have this now in main.cf alias_maps= hash:/etc/aliases alias_database= hash:/etc/aliases All I have in the aliases file now is the majordomo aliases and

  1   2   3   4   >