On Thursday 24 April 2008 00:48, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote:
I think I'm going to enjoy (in some sad way) taking this m.f. to
court if he doesn't pay.
Hi Michael!
Court? How much are deposits nowadays, anyway? Filing fees, lawyers, taking
time off of work, travel . . . are
I'd just slash his tires. LOL
--- On Thu, 4/24/08, Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT] Yet another person trying to f*ck me over
To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com
Date: Thursday, April 24, 2008, 3:05 AM
On Thursday 24 April
Michael,
Ozzie's CSA and was CTO. Ballmer's CEO. They both answer to
the board.
Aah, then he perhaps IS the guy who could certainly affect
change in the
right (whatever that is) direction rather than continuing an angle of
the company that perhaps isn't correct (whatever that is)!!
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used to work with a douchebag who would brag that he would never give back
a security deposit, he would find enough damage to equal the security
deposit.
Landlords are the same this side of the pond.
It's not
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
Any sport where there's subjective scoring is not a real sport.
Boxers should fight until someone is knocked out
Wrestlers should wrestle to a pin.
Professional wrestling,
Hi Everybody!
Why, if it had been Michael Moore taking the other side the left would have
applauded rather than snipping and criticizing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle
How dare the third world want economic progress when the environment is in
danger is perhaps
I see many apps moving to technologies like Air and Silverlight,
ultimately, which offer a web-based but rich-client-like experience,
with the advantage of cross-platform.
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:49:29 -0500, Stephen Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Apple Safari 3.1.1 for Windows.
There really are much better browser choices on Windows. I mean that it
ain't the product that it is on Mac.
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Everybody!
WTF? In the states where there are taxes on everything but your p*nis, perhaps
even that, we pay a minimum of 30%, usually much more. Maybe the 10p tax rate
means something other than 10%?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080421105117AAVIKet
--
Regards,
Pete
Pete,
The 10% rate is up to a low fixed amount of total salary (£2.5K), after that
you pay the standard 20% rate up to the top threshold (£36K) whereafter you
pay another higher rate of 40%.
What you have to realize though in the UK is that you also have an
additional 15% National Insurance tax
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Dave Crozier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately us poor b*stards over here are now in the situation that we
are paying for all the bad sub-prime lending that your financial
institutions have made despite it not being our fault. Mortgages are up at
On Thursday 24 April 2008 05:08, Dave Crozier wrote:
Hi Dave!
So the guy on the link was only making £2.5K or less per year? And he didn't
know about all the other taxes? That makes sense.
I am very willing to let you have all the fatties, and they no doubt would
shrink over there. Junk food
The other resolution is to put it local. I thought at one time there was
also a registry hack.
REGEDIT
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\HTMLHelp\1.x\itssRestrictions]
MaxAllowedZone = dword:2
Allen wrote:
Thanks tracy.
Do you know where the resolve is. The chm should not be on
Bill Arnold wrote:
Michael,
I think, for now, the better course of action is just to sell products
and see where we stand in 5 or so years. MS is eventually going to have
to do something about VFP's continuity, and I think they know that. Best
resolution: turn it over to some team that
Hi Andrew
The file is local. And its run from the exe. Its not the first time I have
had problems with chm files. Seems M$ likes to make a standard then make
sure no one can use it :)
I don’t think I can get users to hack the registry though. Not a safe plan.
Allen
-Original Message-
Hey John -- why do they always say Person of interest instead of
suspect? You always heard suspect many years ago. Is this
something related to politically correct or some sort of guard vs. lawsuits?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Paul Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I used to work with a douchebag who would brag that he would never give
back a security deposit, he would find enough damage to equal the security
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Jean Laeremans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Dave Crozier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Unfortunately us poor b*stards over here are now in the situation that
we
are paying for all the bad sub-prime lending that your financial
On Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:54 AM Stephen Russell wrote:
I have to call a bull shit on that. You bought securities that said
they were paying 90% on time and it's rate was AMAZING. It was
gold and EVERYBODY bought it thinking that they were going to get rich.
Sorry but England did the same
On Thursday 24 April 2008 00:48, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote:
I think I'm going to enjoy (in some sad way) taking this m.f. to
court if he doesn't pay.
Hi Michael!
Court? How much are deposits nowadays, anyway? Filing fees, lawyers, taking
time off of work, travel . . . are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 24 April 2008 00:48, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote:
I think I'm going to enjoy (in some sad way) taking this m.f. to
court if he doesn't pay.
Hi Michael!
Court? How much are deposits nowadays, anyway? Filing fees, lawyers, taking
time
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Rick Schummer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that why Microsoft is so lackluster? They are merely an army of
yes-people that aren't going to speak up if they see something wrong?
Paul, you and I have obviously must have met or know different people at
On Apr 24, 2008, at 8:54 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
I have to call a bull shit on that. You bought securities that said
they
were paying 90% on time and it's rate was AMAZING. It was gold and
EVERYBODY bought it thinking that they were going to get rich.
EVERYBODY.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Stephen Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to call a bull shit on that. You bought securities that said they
were paying 90% on time and it's rate was AMAZING. It was gold and
EVERYBODY bought it thinking that they were going to get rich.
Sorry but
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Bill Arnold
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael,
Ozzie's CSA and was CTO. Ballmer's CEO. They both answer to
the board.
Aah, then he perhaps IS the guy who could certainly affect
change in the
right (whatever that is) direction rather than continuing
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:40 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey John -- why do they always say Person of interest instead of
suspect? You always heard suspect many years ago. Is this
something related to politically correct or some sort of guard vs.
Stephen Russell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:40 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey John -- why do they always say Person of interest instead of
suspect? You always heard suspect many years ago. Is this
something related to politically correct or
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 24, 2008, at 8:54 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
I have to call a bull shit on that. You bought securities that said
they
were paying 90% on time and it's rate was AMAZING. It was gold and
EVERYBODY bought it
Person of interest is the PC way of saying suspect.
JH
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of MB Software Solutions General Account
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:17 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Person of interest vs. Suspect
Could we call it Algoring the sacred cow?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle
How dare the third world want economic progress when the environment is in
danger is perhaps the highlight of it all. Particularly the Greenpeace
founder guy on this topic.
The programme
John Harvey wrote:
Person of interest is the PC way of saying suspect.
Thought so. I hate this politically correct crap. I can't think of one
good thing that came from that sh!t.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Stephen Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So can you elaborate more on this bail out and define pints that I have
missed?
And as always the man has beer on his mind
A+
jml
___
Post Messages to:
On Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:09 AM John Harvey wrote:
Person of interest is the PC way of saying suspect.
I like UnSub like they say on Criminal Minds...
David L. Crooks
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
http://www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=4042
v/r
//SIGNED//
Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF
6th MDG Data Services Manager
6th MDG Information System Security Officer
Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of MB Software
Hi foxgang
For anyone interested, the sessions for the Prague VFP (hhmm and other)
conference will be posted 28th April (it says).
Allen
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.4/1394 - Release Date: 23/04/2008
19:16
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:15 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account
To illustrate how cheap and illegal these bastards were---they'd turn
off my heat--turning it down to 58 except one occasion where they
completely turned it off from the boiler room--after I left on Sunday to
go back to
Alan Bourke wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:49:29 -0500, Stephen Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Apple Safari 3.1.1 for Windows.
There really are much better browser choices on Windows. I mean that it
ain't the product that it is on Mac.
Apple software on Windows kinda blows, true.
Paul
There is a tax on your p*nis, it's called the pole tax.
--- On Thu, 4/24/08, Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OT] Whining over 10p tax rate?
To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com
Date: Thursday, April 24, 2008, 6:31 AM
Hi Everybody!
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Paul McNett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Bourke wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:49:29 -0500, Stephen Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Apple Safari 3.1.1 for Windows.
There really are much better browser choices on Windows. I mean that it
ain't the
Make Ethanol - Starve People!
--- On Thu, 4/24/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT] Goring the sacred cow LOL.
To: profox@leafe.com
Date: Thursday, April 24, 2008, 10:19 AM
Could we call it Algoring the sacred cow?
If you are a digest subscriber, you need to be considerate of others
when replying and correct the subject to the subject of the message to
which you are replying. Yes, I know that for some of you this
represents more mental effort than you are capable of exerting, but
that's the
On Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:40 AM Ed Leafe wrote:
If you are a digest subscriber, you need to be considerate of
others when replying and correct the subject to the subject of the
message to which you are replying. Yes, I know that for some of you
this represents more mental effort than
On Apr 24, 2008, at 9:42 AM, David Crooks wrote:
Does anyone think it's time to filter out posts based on the
presence of 'ProFox Digest' in the subject?
Yeah, we need more rules in the free society (service)! YMMV
It's not a new rule; it's the application of an existing rule,
Ed Leafe wrote:
If you are a digest subscriber, you need to be considerate of others
when replying and correct the subject to the subject of the message to
which you are replying. Yes, I know that for some of you this
represents more mental effort than you are capable of exerting,
Stephen Russell wrote:
Can you do The Peoples Court? Get the true nature of a crummy landlord
out on the airwaves.
it's Pine Grove, PA, Steveno one gives a shit about that hole.
Certainly not entertaining in the slightest.
___
Post
I had not noticed a big problem myself. The only thing that is annoying is
not knowing from the subject line what it refers to. I find those that don’t
snip posts more annoying.
Allen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Leafe
If
- Original Message -
From: Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 April 2008 15:40:21 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London
Subject: [ADMIN] Replying To Digests
Does anyone think it's time to filter out posts based on the presence
of 'ProFox Digest' in the subject?
At 07:25 AM 4/24/2008 -0700, Paul McNett wrote:
Alan Bourke wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:49:29 -0500, Stephen Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Apple Safari 3.1.1 for Windows.
There really are much better browser choices on Windows. I mean that it
ain't the product that it is on Mac.
Banks, like Bear Sterns, were making short term loan to Hedge Funds
invested in sub-prime mortgages and mortgage REIT (eg Real Estate
Investment Trust). The loans were highly leveraged.
I have some stock in TMA, (eg Thornborg Mortgage, Inc.), which is a
mortgage REIT. TMA makes loans on
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:15 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To illustrate how cheap and illegal these bastards were---they'd turn
off my heat--turning it down to 58 except one occasion where they
completely turned it off from the boiler room--after I left
Wolfe, Stephen S Civ USAF AMC 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote:
http://www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=4042
Huh, I never thought about it. I just assumed it meant possible suspect.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
On Apr 24, 2008, at 9:16 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
Who is getting bailed out?
The government is guaranteeing the funds within the bank so if you
had money
there it was safe.
We are not talking FDIC insured accounts in savings banks; that was
another Republican administration.
Ed Leafe wrote:
Does anyone think it's time to filter out posts based on the presence
of 'ProFox Digest' in the subject?
Honestly, until you pointed it out, I never even noticed. I think that
I've been on mailing lists for so many years, I've been automatically
hitting the delete
Ed Leafe wrote:
On Apr 24, 2008, at 9:16 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
Who is getting bailed out?
The government is guaranteeing the funds within the bank so if you
had money
there it was safe.
We are not talking FDIC insured accounts in savings banks; that was
another
Ed Leafe wrote:
Does anyone think it's time to filter out posts based on the presence
of 'ProFox Digest' in the subject?
I only read messages with subjects I'm either interested in or am
already following. Subjects with ProFox Digest in them don't qualify.
Non-issue for me.
Paul
Paul Hill wrote:
So heating is included in your rent?
It seems odd that the landlord would have legal access to the
thermostat, mine certainly doesn't.
$575 deposit? Wow, a deposit on a cheap flat here in London would be
in the $2500 range...
(6 weeks rent generally)
That's one of
Small claims court so no lawyers and I'd be like Michael, I'd do it.
Might actually lose money but it would be worth it if the guy actually
shows up, which he doesn't have to do and probably won't.
::michael
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Thursday 24 April 2008 00:48, MB Software Solutions General
Hi Ed
I'd rather you just bounce them back to the sender. That way at least
the poster gets feedback that they made a mistake. To err is human. To
build software that doesn't appreciate that fact is unfortunately all
too common.
Frankly it's a PITA (using gmail) to remember to switch to plain
Mike yearwood wrote:
Frankly it's a PITA (using gmail) to remember to switch to plain text,
Email is much nicer IMO when you always stick to plain text. Email was
never intended to send all the crap we send with it today. In
Thunderbird, I read messages in the format they were sent in (I see
Does anyone think it's time to filter out posts based on the presence
of 'ProFox Digest' in the subject?
I just wrote a rule in my email client that deletes it so I won't see them
again.
Rick
White Light Computing, Inc.
www.whitelightcomputing.com
www.swfox.net
www.rickschummer.com
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Ed Leafe wrote:
On Apr 24, 2008, at 9:16 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
Who is getting bailed out?
The government is guaranteeing the funds within the bank so if you
had money
there it was safe.
We are not talking FDIC insured
On Apr 24, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Mike yearwood wrote:
I'd rather you just bounce them back to the sender.
I like that idea, too.
Ken
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free
the legal system is broken
http://www.king5.com/localnews/consumer/stories/NW_042308GJB_get_jesse_ebay_lawsuit_SW.91a63b84.html
Kwame Kilpatrick Gear!
http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike
Jack Kevorkian for Congress!
by God?
http://tinyurl.com/5kl7o3
Ken
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive:
Michael,
I think, for now, the better course of action is just to sell
products
and see where we stand in 5 or so years. MS is eventually going to
have to do something about VFP's continuity, and I think they know
that. Best resolution: turn it over to some team that will take it
over
Ed,
Absolutely. The digest version is done as a convenience for those that don't
want to get individual messages each day. Now, let's make the reverse apply
as well and let only those digest postings that have a modified subject line
get through.
Makes perfect sense to me. It is a balanced
Mike,
My habit is click reply type something click send. I save my cranial
exersions for work. Any good suggestions to simplifying replying to
Profox with gmail will be appreciated.
If you just send a bunch of flotsam without trimming, you're telling your
recipient that you don't value
My vote: Bounce digest emails back to the sender! That's value-added for
everyone.
Malcolm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
Paul,
What is so hard with:
click reply
change subject if needed
trim excess
type response
click send
And if gmail is a limiting factor, why limit yourself?
I was thinking the same thing about gmail myself...
Kristyne
___
Post Messages
Larry,
The programme describes the idea of restricting the world's
poorest people to alternative energy sources as the most
morally repugnant aspect of the Global Warming campaign.
I believe that the first world needs to move to alternative energy sources,
and disagree with restricting the
Madigan,
That's odd. I have one neutral ebay rating myself... I got it because I took
too long to ship and item, and therefore deserved it.
It had the desired effect on my shipping speed.
Kristyne
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
My portfolio is diverse, and TMA is only a small part of it, so I'm
doing OK. Some of my investments go up, some of my investments go down,
and TMA goes worthless, which should be a crime considering . . . LOL
Oh well, TMA will make a nice write-off for income tax purposes. I had
a cost of
Message: 10
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:17:08 -0700
From: Kristyne McDaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ADMIN] Replying To ProfoxTech Digest ;)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Paul,
What is so hard with:
click reply
Mike,
Bounce the email back to me so I can
say Doh, slap my forehead and fix it without being seen as
inconsiderate by anyone.
You are correct. That is the most reasonable choice in this case.
Kristyne
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Well, I had a point but after today's security mitigation review of over
200 findings on our pharmacy robot, I've forgotten what it was... :(
v/r
//SIGNED//
Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF
6th MDG Data Services Manager
6th MDG Information System Security Officer
Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994
Speaking of Criminal Minds did you like last night's episode?
v/r
//SIGNED//
Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF
6th MDG Data Services Manager
6th MDG Information System Security Officer
Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Wolfe, Stephen S Civ USAF AMC 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote:
Well, I had a point but after today's security mitigation review of over
200 findings on our pharmacy robot, I've forgotten what it was... :(
Well that certainly sounds interesting, probably even moreso over beers,
but in your case, I'm
I need to transfer a sweet little old lady's address book from her old
computer to her new one (in exchange for 2 dozen fresh eggs - yeah, life
in Mayberry is great!) and took a quick look at the problem while I was
there last time. I found the export function ok, ran it, and it
instantly
Vince Teachout wrote:
I need to transfer a sweet little old lady's address book from her old
computer to her new one (in exchange for 2 dozen fresh eggs - yeah, life
in Mayberry is great!) and took a quick look at the problem while I was
there last time. I found the export function ok,
On Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:59 PM Stephen Wolfe wrote:
Speaking of Criminal Minds did you like last night's episode?
I missed it. It generally is a good show... Has some pretty good
geekiness to it...
I had DVR'd some episodes of Download: The True Story of the Internet -
from the Science
It should ask you where you want to store it - it does on mine (Outlook
2000).
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
I need to transfer a sweet little old lady's address book from her old
computer to her new one (in exchange for 2 dozen fresh eggs - yeah, life
in Mayberry is great!) and took
http://tinyurl.com/6px9ua
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive:
Using ZLOC as a shortcut key for local variables is cool, but is there
such a beast for private variables (and public variables for that matter)?
tia,
--Michael
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
Matt Jarvis wrote:
My first guess would be the same place it keeps the PST file
I'll search for both a PST and WAB file when I go back tonight. Thanks.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
John Weller wrote:
It should ask you where you want to store it - it does on mine (Outlook
2000).
Mine, too. Must be something weird on her machine.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone think it's time to filter out posts based on the presence
of 'ProFox Digest' in the subject?
Nope. I invoke Postel's Law [1], roughly, Be liberal in what you
accept and strict in what you produce.
I
On Apr 24, 2008, at 2:56 PM, Jean Laeremans wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/6px9ua
JIC anyone believed this...
http://www.snopes.com/horrors/techno/radar.asp
-- Ed Leafe
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
Hi Michael,
s there such a beast for private variables
I still use ISX for that. It displays local, private and public variables,
field names, #DEFINEs and properties:
http://foxpert.com/download/isx.PRG
--
Christof
___
Post Messages to:
The IntelliSense code does not look for PRIVATE. It will look for PUBLIC in
the current code window.
I know there are other scripts out there that have been created for use with
specific tables, where to get them I don't recall. I do know Marcia Akins
has a large set of them. She presents them at
WAB files can be found by opening Outlook Express. Then Tools, Options,
Maintenance Tab. Then Store Folder.
PST files cannot be found using the Search function. Normal location is
C:\Documents and Settings\x\Local Settings\Application
Data\Microsoft\Outlook where x is the user name.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 24, 2008, at 2:56 PM, Jean Laeremans wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/6px9ua
JIC anyone believed this...
http://www.snopes.com/horrors/techno/radar.asp
-- Ed Leafe
Oh i knew it was fishy' but i just
We have a FoxWeb / VFP 9 application we are trying to migrate to a MS Server
2003 with ISS running. Can't seem to get the VFP runtime (vfp9renu.dll etc)
right.
Any suggestions as the the steps required and or requirements on the Server
2003 box?
TIA
George
--- StripMime Report -- processed
there is a movie to see what it does.
http://www.xippee.com/
pops right in and a FF restart is all it takes.
--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
Mimeo.com
Memphis TN
901.246-0159
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body
Hi George,
Can't seem to get the VFP runtime (vfp9renu.dll etc) right.
Have you create a new web extension in IIS Manager Web Service Extensions,
added the runtime libraries and your application and set all of them to
Allowed? Otherwise IIS would refuse to load the DLL.
--
Christof
http://www.microsoft.com/opensource/heroes/default.mspx
I thought is was an Onion article[1] at first.
Paul
[1] http://theonion.com
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free
Nicholas Geti wrote:
WAB files can be found by opening Outlook Express. Then Tools, Options,
Maintenance Tab. Then Store Folder.
PST files cannot be found using the Search function. Normal location is
C:\Documents and Settings\x\Local Settings\Application
Data\Microsoft\Outlook where
On Apr 24, 2008, at 3:59 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
http://www.microsoft.com/opensource/heroes/default.mspx
I thought is was an Onion article[1] at first.
Embrace, extend, extinguish.
-- Ed Leafe
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
I've had much better luck with importing from the existing PST rather than
exporting a file and trying to use it.
Kristyne
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of
Hi all
I'm trying to figure out what I think should be an exists query
What I have is two tables
Lookup List has two fields ID (autonumber) and a description
ID=1, description=Red
ID=2, description=blue
ID=3, description=Green
ID=4, description=Purple
The customer table has a name field and
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Jean Laeremans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 24, 2008, at 2:56 PM, Jean Laeremans wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/6px9ua
JIC anyone believed this...
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
