Hey Folks,
I've made a LOT of progress on this Utility I've been working on - to
automate conversion of system PRG code to Screens/Forms.
However, I've run into a complication that's a bit of a stumper.
Just to Prefix the explanation of the problem. To do the Screen Hacking - I
create
Leave the OBJCODE field blank and issue a COMPILE FORM yourformname command
to build it from your METHOD code.
Fred
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Kurt k...@isssusa.com wrote:
Hey Folks,
I've made a LOT of progress on this Utility I've been working on - to
automate conversion of system
Kurt,
Off the top of my head, isn't the memo field simply compiled code. Removing it
should force a recompilation and apropriate re-constitution of the correct code
in the form you are modifying. VFP checks to see that the compiled code matches
the source code but sometimes gets it wrong,
Hey Fred - I understand what you mean - and that DOES Make sense. I shall
try it now...
-K-
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Fred
Taylor
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 10:29 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: MORE Screen
Hey Dave - thanks for your feedback - sounds similar to Fred's. I'm going to
attempt to try it and see if that solves the problem.
-K-
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dave
Crozier
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 10:30 AM
To:
That's the 'p-code' for your compiled methods. You could save those memo
contents as a .FXP, then reverse-engineer them back into a PRG with
ReFox, for example.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
Wow Alan - that sounds like even More Fun! I think I just read something
about that on the Web when searching for a solution to this problem. But,
alas - I wasn't finding the right answers on the Web - but, got the Perfect
help from Fred Dave here! It worked. Did the Compile command - and now all
Thanks Christof - I already got it resolved by suggestions from others - and
I already implemented Blanking of Objcode - besides doing the Compile.
-K-
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Christof
Wollenhaupt
Sent: Monday, February 04,
Its quite true about this Group! Sometimes - if I know the answer to
someone's question - I will try to respond Quickly - to beat others to the
punchline...
:-)
-K-
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Christof
Wollenhaupt
Sent: Monday,
Use _SCREEN.ActiveForm, not _VFP.
Fred
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Chris Davis chr...@actongate.co.uk wrote:
Hi All,
I have a Top Level Form with two toolbars, which have been docked in code
in the activate event.
When clicking buttons on these toolbars it fires events on the form.
Thanks Fred, tried that but still the same.
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Fred Taylor
Sent: 04 February 2013 17:46
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Releasing a form from a docked toolbar.
Use _SCREEN.ActiveForm, not _VFP.
Ah! I will give this a go.
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Christof
Wollenhaupt
Sent: 04 February 2013 17:47
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Releasing a form from a docked toolbar.
Why am I not able to put thisform.release
Thank's Christof works a treat!
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Christof
Wollenhaupt
Sent: 04 February 2013 17:47
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Releasing a form from a docked toolbar.
Why am I not able to put
Hi Christof,
Would you mind talking a bit about your Guineu project?
How it is going? Are you committed to it? Any links to information on the
project?
A quick search found this very interesting article, but it's dated back in
2007.
http://www.mail-archive.com/profox@leafe.com/msg38551.html
I can see what you are trying to accomplish and you did cut down on the
length. I hate being a nudge. But you lost me. Who are you aiming this video
at? Is this is how-to video? Are you training a programmer or an artist? Are
you demonstrating the 3D printer?
You spent a third of the video
Just wonderingthe folks that have this problem, are they using the
same OS? Same OS level?
Mike
Original Message
Subject: [NF] perplexing Zip/Excel problem
From: M Jarvis brewda...@gmail.com
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Date: 2/4/2013 1:16 PM
I am having a very perplexing
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Mike Copeland m...@ggisoft.com wrote:
Just wonderingthe folks that have this problem, are they using the same
OS? Same OS level?
Mike
Sorry - forgot to mention XP SP 3... one user is next to me here in
the IT dept and she's 100% patched and such and has
M Jarvis wrote on 2013-02-04:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Mike Copeland m...@ggisoft.com wrote:
Just wonderingthe folks that have this problem, are they using the
same
OS? Same OS level?
Mike
Sorry - forgot to mention XP SP 3... one user is next to me here in
the IT
*Is your internet server an Apache server?*
*
*
*Linux using 'magic' to look at the files contents and determines that an
XLSX file is, in fact, a ZIP file. (It is!)*
*
*
*Internet Explorer gets the MIME content from the Apache server telling it
that an XLSX file is a ZIP file and, in its wisdom,
On 02/04/13 11:16 AM, M Jarvis wrote:
I am having a very perplexing problem opening an XLSX spreadsheet...
Actually I can open it fine, it's a couple of users that are having
the problem.
I believe the problem is that IE7 can't handle an .xlsx file. The .xlsx
is only from Excel 2010, and is
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox)
foxh...@information-architecture.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Paul McNett p...@ulmcnett.com wrote:
Gee, I found Eclipse to be incredibly daunting, too. Too much so for me to
bother with. I thought it was just another
On 2/4/13 12:15 PM, Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox) wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Paul McNett p...@ulmcnett.com wrote:
Eclipse or Visual
Studio extremely difficult to use, and my productivity would tank.
Gee, I found Eclipse to be incredibly daunting, too. Too much so for me to
bother
On 2/4/13 12:25 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
Add another vote there! I used Eclipse for a couple of Ruby in Rails
projects, and found it slow and difficult to maintain. Having come from the
tightly-integrated IDE of FoxPro, I thought this would be a gentler
introduction into FOSS tools, but found it
On 2/4/2013 4:58 PM, Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox) wrote:
There we part ways a bit. Being still a bit typing-impaired, I find a tool
which auto-fills variable/function/object names helps me a lot. Especially
since I subscribe to
LongDescriptiveFunctionNames(WhichHelp,TheMushySpace,BetweenMyEars)
On Feb 4, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox)
foxh...@information-architecture.com wrote:
These days, a terminal, a browser and a ViM session are all I need.
There we part ways a bit. Being still a bit typing-impaired, I find a tool
which auto-fills variable/function/object names
On Feb 4, 2013, at 3:39 PM, Paul McNett p...@ulmcnett.com wrote:
I suspect there are probably some nice things I'm missing by not using an
IDE, but I
haven't tried an IDE yet that didn't annoy me in some way. Like you, I think
this is
some deficiency in me, not in the IDE, since so many
On 2/4/13 2:11 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
These days, a terminal, a browser and a ViM session are all I need.
There we part ways a bit. Being still a bit typing-impaired, I find a tool
which auto-fills variable/function/object names helps me a lot. Especially
since I subscribe to
On Feb 4, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Paul McNett p...@ulmcnett.com wrote:
Do you use the built-in autocomplete or something else?
Built-in - what more could you need? ;-)
-- Ed Leafe
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Ed Leafe ed.le...@rackspace.com wrote:
Just in case you didn't know, vim has auto-completion, too. I
couldn't work very well without it.
And support for multiple windows, multiple buffers, a built-in scripting
language, a rich community of plugins that
On 2/4/13 2:30 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
Do you use the built-in autocomplete or something else?
Built-in - what more could you need? ;-)
Well unless I'm missing something the built-in one has no idea what namespace
context
we are in when suggesting completions, and it doesn't complete
On Feb 4, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Paul McNett p...@ulmcnett.com wrote:
Well unless I'm missing something the built-in one has no idea what namespace
context
we are in when suggesting completions, and it doesn't complete method
arguments, etc.
Ah, I see what you mean. No, I don't miss any
Yeah, I agree: simple auto-complete is enough.
Now that I have completely hijacked this thread: My apologies.
Ken
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Ed Leafe ed.le...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Feb 4, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Paul McNett p...@ulmcnett.com wrote:
Well unless I'm missing something the
Christof,
Would you mind talking a bit about your Guineu project?
How it is going? Are you committed to it? Any links to information
on the project?
A difficult topic... How is it going? Slowly. Am I committed? Yes, but
regular business has priority.
When I started the project 2006 my
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013, at 09:41 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
It has probably improved over time:
this was in
probably 2002.
It's no Visual Studio, but it's pretty good and very flexible, although
it does have an insanely complicated preferences system.
Anyway - a seasoned shell and text editor
34 matches
Mail list logo
