Re: [PEDA] Query MAnager

2002-03-07 Thread Ian Wilson
At 02:17 PM 7/03/02 +1100, you wrote: >For example, I just wrote a query that selected: >all pads with holes = 32thou AND >all components with comment = 4u7 AND >all fills on the Top Overlay layer. >(Not useful but it demonstrates my point) > >Hit APPLY and all three object types are s

Re: [PEDA] Query MAnager

2002-03-07 Thread Ian Middleton
holes that "get away". > -Original Message- > From: Dennis Saputelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 07 March 2002 04:50 > To: Protel EDA Forum > Subject: Re: [PEDA] Query MAnager > > > this is news to me, thanks for pointing that out > i will play with it some

Re: [PEDA] Query MAnager

2002-03-06 Thread Dennis Saputelli
this is news to me, thanks for pointing that out i will play with it some more, but clearly this is a feature which is more bells than whistles it reminds me of something dvorak quipped in the recent PC mag: two old ladies at a restaurant, one said 'this food is inedible' and the other said 'yes

Re: [PEDA] Query MAnager

2002-03-06 Thread Dwight Harm
In Mr. Doyle's example, the "AND" is not acting as a "logical" AND -- it's an OR, that is, the result is the addition (union) of the selections, not the intersection. HOWEVER, I then tried using the same "object type" in multiple selections, and in that case, it WAS a boolean AND. For example:

Re: [PEDA] Query MAnager

2002-03-06 Thread Linden Doyle
gt; To: Protel EDA Forum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, 7 March 2002 02:59 Subject: Re: [PEDA] Query MAnager >On 02:17 PM 3/7/2002 +1100, Linden Doyle wrote: > >>Hi All, >> >> > >> >IMHO it would be MUCH more useful if it offered true LOGICAL AND &

Re: [PEDA] Query MAnager

2002-03-06 Thread Dennis Saputelli
that's right the difference between the common English usage of AND and the 'logical AND' can be confusing the common english usage is closer to this 'OR' this etc. just as you have described in the case of the query manager the logical OR (plain English AND) is easy to achieve by other means, a

Re: [PEDA] Query MAnager

2002-03-06 Thread Andrew Jenkins

Re: [PEDA] Query MAnager

2002-03-06 Thread Linden Doyle
Hi All, > >IMHO it would be MUCH more useful if it offered true LOGICAL AND >functions instead of the LOGICAL OR functions that it uses > Maybe I've got hold of the wrong end of the stick here, but I thought it already did an "AND" function. For example, I just wrote a query that selected:

Re: [PEDA] Query MAnager

2002-03-06 Thread Steve Wiseman
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Dwight Harm wrote: > I've used it occassionally. One thing it can do that global edit can't is > select by "less than" or "greater than" comparisons, I also use it to select all nets of a bus, since the sch -> PCB exporter assigns each bus into a handy class. > Certainly t

Re: [PEDA] Query MAnager

2002-03-06 Thread Dwight Harm
I've used it occassionally. One thing it can do that global edit can't is select by "less than" or "greater than" comparisons, e.g., for track width or hole size. Also, the ability to save/name the selection criteria is handy sometimes. Note, however, that the queries aren't stored with the PCB;

Re: [PEDA] Query MAnager

2002-03-05 Thread Dennis Saputelli
anyone use the query manager/wizard in PCB? (and found it to be good for anything?) it doesn't seem to do anything that you can't do just as readily with global edits IMHO it would be MUCH more useful if it offered true LOGICAL AND functions instead of the LOGICAL OR functions that it uses Denn