-Original Message-
From: Rene Tschaggelar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
You're wrong. The NDA applies for afterwards too.
The NDA covers the NDA too, I guess.
The beta was a lot of tiring work, so let's forget about
the beta and focus on the release.
You do your
purchase
A software company trying to cover up its bugs
Invoking both the controversial 1998 DMCA and computer crime laws, HP has
threatened to sue a team of researchers who publicized a vulnerability in
the company's Tru64 Unix operating system.
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-947325.html
I will
And it looks like beta v2 to me.
Igor
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Jenkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 31 July 2002 10:01 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP Discussion
-Original Message-
From: Rene Tschaggelar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Ian wrote,
Just a brief comment before the discussion really hots up.
My comments: Ian,follow the context of the messages on this forum from
release of 99 to present. The earlier tone from these discussions was
nothing but frustration. Some of us were mad as hell at simple things not
Just downloaded DXP demo yesterday and rejoined the forum (missed any
earlier discussion).
My initial impressions:
To compare the product I choose an 8-channel amplifier board that is one of
six identical cards used in a 48 transducer system. Of course this was very
tedious to do (or tedious
Ian,
This is really scarey, you beta'd the thing and you cant say anything more
constructive yourself?
Talk about George Orwellean 1984 doublespeak . . .
JaMi
- Original Message -
From: Ian Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002
.
-Original Message-
From: JaMi Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:45 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Cc: JaMi Smith
Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP Discussion
Ian,
This is really scarey, you beta'd the thing and you cant say anything more
constructive yourself
- Original Message -
From: Tony Karavidas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP Discussion
Part of the beta agreement was to not disclose things that transpired
during
the beta period. That would seem
: Michael Reagan (EDSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:36 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP Discussion
Tony,
Thank you for the reminder, I don't think I have disclosed anything other
than reinforcing any commentary that I have posted here for the past year
program , it just could be better
without having to write code from the floor up.
Mike Reagan
EDSI
- Original Message -
From: Tony Karavidas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP Discussion
Part
- Original Message -
From: Tony Karavidas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP Discussion
Hi Mike,
My comment was more focused on Jami's comment to Ian:
This is really scarey, you beta'd the thing
This is really scarey, you beta'd the thing and you cant say anything
more
constructive yourself?
Tony,
I felt very strong that the platform (99SE) was and is superior to anything
else in the price range. A few minor tweaks, a few lines of code taken out
to optimize long compilations, and
You're wrong. The NDA applies for afterwards too.
The NDA covers the NDA too, I guess.
The beta was a lot of tiring work, so let's forget about
the beta and focus on the release. You do your
purchase decision on the release and not on the beta.
The beta is gone ...
Rene
Joe Sapienza wrote:
Mike,
100% Correct.
Bob Wolfe
Mike wrote
I disagree,This is expensive software. I purchase $49.00 software and
complain to store managers if my $49.00 package doesnt work, why shouldnt
ALTIUM receive heat from us about not correcting bugs and not meeting our
expectations. We are the
On 09:46 PM 30/07/2002 -0400, Robert M. Wolfe said:
Mike,
100% Correct.
Bob Wolfe
Mike wrote
I disagree,This is expensive software. I purchase $49.00 software and
complain to store managers if my $49.00 package doesnt work, why shouldnt
ALTIUM receive heat from us about not correcting
In the US, 'to bag' generally means the same thing. I think some places it
means to 'capture' or 'get lucky' but I'm not sure where...
-Original Message-
From: Ian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 7:14 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP
InterestingIn my neck of the woods (NW US), to bag something is to
abandon it
as useless, but without extreme prejudice
Brian
At 07:32 PM 7/30/02 -0700, you wrote:
In the US, 'to bag' generally means the same thing. I think some places it
means to 'capture' or 'get lucky' but I'm not
17 matches
Mail list logo