Tony, Thank you for the reminder, I don't think I have disclosed anything other than reinforcing any commentary that I have posted here for the past year and long before dXP was a gleam in the Kangaroo's eye. I believe Andrew Jenkins past comments on here also reflect the poor response from Protel to fix bugs and make 99SE more usable. I wish they would sell me the old 99 code, let me hire some of their programmers to polish an already good program like 99SE. It is a very good program , it just could be better without having to write code from the floor up.
Mike Reagan EDSI ----- Original Message ----- From: Tony Karavidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Protel EDA Forum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:54 AM Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP Discussion > Part of the beta agreement was to not disclose things that transpired during > the beta period. That would seem to imply good or bad. The comments made on > this list should be 'freshly formed' from the released demo that everyone > has access to right now, not from what beta people saw in the past. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: JaMi Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:45 AM > > To: Protel EDA Forum > > Cc: JaMi Smith > > Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP Discussion > > > > > > Ian, > > > > This is really scarey, you beta'd the thing and you cant say anything more > > constructive yourself? > > > > Talk about George Orwellean 1984 "doublespeak" . . . > > > > JaMi > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ian Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 11:26 PM > > Subject: [PEDA] DXP Discussion > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > Just a brief comment before the discussion really hots up. > > > > > > There is lots to like about DXP. There is lots to re-learn. There is > > lots > > > that is the same. There is lots to dislike. > > > > > > Lets try to make the discussion constructive. Altium do watch this list > > > and I would guess they would be watching this as one of their prime > > sources > > > of feedback. > > > > > > We can bag DXP - that is really easy. Can we do the harder > > stuff of being > > > constructive? > > > > > > All that said, I am ready to call something rubbish when I think it is. > > > > > > There are a number of us that will be somewhat circumspec as > > the NDA beta > > > testers signed does cover some info we may have received. Also, IMO, I > > > think it is well worthwhile letting fresh eyes pass comment without too > > > much prompting. > > > > > > Ian Wilson > > > > > > > > > ************************************************************************ > > > * Tracking #: A153AA0099921341A1FD9A73CE937F13AA986D52 > > > * > > > ************************************************************************ > > > > > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
