Hi,
I didn't participate in the Beta test. However I may recall incorrectly that
the Beta test NDA applied only during the term of the test and not after. I
did the beta on 98 and I seem to recall that these were the terms. Maybe I'm
wrong, does anyone have a copy of the DXP BETA NDA  handy.
Joe


----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Karavidas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP Discussion


> Hi Mike,
>
> My comment was more focused on Jami's comment to Ian:
>
> "This is really scarey, you beta'd the thing and you cant say anything
more
> constructive yourself?"
>
> I hinted that it might be possible for Ian to not say too much because of
> the NDA.
>
> Tony
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Reagan (EDSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:36 PM
> > To: Protel EDA Forum
> > Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP Discussion
> >
> >
> > Tony,
> > Thank you for the reminder,  I don't think I have disclosed anything
other
> > than reinforcing any commentary that I have posted  here for the past
year
> > and long before dXP was a gleam in the Kangaroo's eye.   I believe
Andrew
> > Jenkins past comments on here  also reflect the poor response
> > from Protel to
> > fix bugs  and make 99SE more usable.    I wish they would sell me
> > the old 99
> > code, let me hire some of their programmers to polish an already good
> > program like 99SE.  It is a very  good  program , it just could be
better
> > without having to write code from the floor up.
> >
> >
> > Mike Reagan
> > EDSI
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Tony Karavidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Protel EDA Forum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:54 AM
> > Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP Discussion
> >
> >
> > > Part of the beta agreement was to not disclose things that transpired
> > during
> > > the beta period. That would seem to imply good or bad. The comments
made
> > on
> > > this list should be 'freshly formed' from the released demo
> > that everyone
> > > has access to right now, not from what beta people saw in the past.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: JaMi Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:45 AM
> > > > To: Protel EDA Forum
> > > > Cc: JaMi Smith
> > > > Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP Discussion
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ian,
> > > >
> > > > This is really scarey, you beta'd the thing and you cant say
anything
> > more
> > > > constructive yourself?
> > > >
> > > > Talk about George Orwellean 1984 "doublespeak" . . .
> > > >
> > > > JaMi
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Ian Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 11:26 PM
> > > > Subject: [PEDA] DXP Discussion
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hello all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Just a brief comment before the discussion really hots up.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is lots to like about DXP.  There is lots to
> > re-learn.  There is
> > > > lots
> > > > > that is the same.  There is lots to dislike.
> > > > >
> > > > > Lets try to make the discussion constructive.  Altium do watch
this
> > list
> > > > > and I would guess they would be watching this as one of their
prime
> > > > sources
> > > > > of feedback.
> > > > >
> > > > > We can bag DXP - that is really easy.  Can we do the harder
> > > > stuff of being
> > > > > constructive?
> > > > >
> > > > > All that said, I am ready to call something rubbish when I think
it
> > is.
> > > > >
> > > > > There are a number of us that will be somewhat circumspec as
> > > > the NDA beta
> > > > > testers signed does cover some info we may have received.
> > Also, IMO,
> > I
> > > > > think it is well worthwhile letting fresh eyes pass comment
without
> > too
> > > > > much prompting.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ian Wilson
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > ************************************************************************
> > > > > * Tracking #: A153AA0099921341A1FD9A73CE937F13AA986D52
> > > > > *
> > > > >
> > ************************************************************************
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to