Hi Mike,

My comment was more focused on Jami's comment to Ian:

"This is really scarey, you beta'd the thing and you cant say anything more
constructive yourself?"

I hinted that it might be possible for Ian to not say too much because of
the NDA.

Tony




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Reagan (EDSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:36 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP Discussion
>
>
> Tony,
> Thank you for the reminder,  I don't think I have disclosed anything other
> than reinforcing any commentary that I have posted  here for the past year
> and long before dXP was a gleam in the Kangaroo's eye.   I believe Andrew
> Jenkins past comments on here  also reflect the poor response
> from Protel to
> fix bugs  and make 99SE more usable.    I wish they would sell me
> the old 99
> code, let me hire some of their programmers to polish an already good
> program like 99SE.  It is a very  good  program , it just could be better
> without having to write code from the floor up.
>
>
> Mike Reagan
> EDSI
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tony Karavidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Protel EDA Forum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP Discussion
>
>
> > Part of the beta agreement was to not disclose things that transpired
> during
> > the beta period. That would seem to imply good or bad. The comments made
> on
> > this list should be 'freshly formed' from the released demo
> that everyone
> > has access to right now, not from what beta people saw in the past.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: JaMi Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:45 AM
> > > To: Protel EDA Forum
> > > Cc: JaMi Smith
> > > Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP Discussion
> > >
> > >
> > > Ian,
> > >
> > > This is really scarey, you beta'd the thing and you cant say anything
> more
> > > constructive yourself?
> > >
> > > Talk about George Orwellean 1984 "doublespeak" . . .
> > >
> > > JaMi
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Ian Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 11:26 PM
> > > Subject: [PEDA] DXP Discussion
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > Just a brief comment before the discussion really hots up.
> > > >
> > > > There is lots to like about DXP.  There is lots to
> re-learn.  There is
> > > lots
> > > > that is the same.  There is lots to dislike.
> > > >
> > > > Lets try to make the discussion constructive.  Altium do watch this
> list
> > > > and I would guess they would be watching this as one of their prime
> > > sources
> > > > of feedback.
> > > >
> > > > We can bag DXP - that is really easy.  Can we do the harder
> > > stuff of being
> > > > constructive?
> > > >
> > > > All that said, I am ready to call something rubbish when I think it
> is.
> > > >
> > > > There are a number of us that will be somewhat circumspec as
> > > the NDA beta
> > > > testers signed does cover some info we may have received.
> Also, IMO,
> I
> > > > think it is well worthwhile letting fresh eyes pass comment without
> too
> > > > much prompting.
> > > >
> > > > Ian Wilson
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> ************************************************************************
> > > > * Tracking #: A153AA0099921341A1FD9A73CE937F13AA986D52
> > > > *
> > > >
> ************************************************************************
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to