I tend to agree with most of what you said except for AMD. I have a
Athlon900 sytem here and it seems to "blow away the doors" of a PIII-700
that is also here for general purpose use. Yes I know it's faster, but it
seems WAY faster.
> -Original Message-
> From: Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
> I tend to agree with most of what you said except for AMD. I have a
> Athlon900 sytem here and it seems to "blow away the doors" of a PIII-700
> that is also here for general purpose use. Yes I know it's faster, but it
> seems WAY faster.
The problem with comparing earlier cpu's is that the
> Tom's Hardware Guide www.tomshardware.com is an excellent starting resource
> for everything, other than entering key words in a search engine.
Thanks, I completely forgot about Tom's hardware guide. I use to go to that page
back in the old days when I used to try to
overclock 200MHz proc
Yes, true...
You must have quoted someone a flat rate on a big job??? :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Guralnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 2:13 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Fastest possible Protel system, price is not a
> concern.
>
> Yes, true...
>
> You must have quoted someone a flat rate on a big job??? :)
>
I guess it's that obvious...
Brian Guralnick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice (514) 624-4003
Fax (514) 624-3631
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Karavidas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA For
On 11:24 AM 21/07/2002 -0700, Drew said:
>Brian,
>
>This is a great topic, especially when money is not a concern. I have great
>trust with the opinions of this group, but make sure that you spend a good
>amount of time researching the stats of what you are looking at and the
>advice you receive
> Tom's HG is not hugely useful I think if you are a professional interested
> in rock-solid stability rather than overclocking tweaks. Reviews from some
> of the big CAD magazines would be better but are harder to find.
>
> Ian Wilson
After taking a brief look at Tom's hardware guide page, I
I would guess that your money on Protel would go the furthest with a lower
cost motherboard and LOTS of memory and plenty of display space. Cut those
pans. dual display?? triple display ??matrox g550 is working nicely here
on 2 diplays.
My point being if you are manually laying out, I wouldn't
Semiconductor burn in boards run up to 150 deg with operating devices in them.
Im not sure what material they use but its some type of FR4 material. You could
try a search of burnin board manufacturers, maybe Golden Altos or Liberty Labs
and see what they use. Back in the old AWA/Quality days d
Release to the Australian Stock Exchange earlier:
SYDNEY, Australia -July 22, 2002 - Altium Limited (ASX: ALU),
a leading developer of Windows-based electronic design and
development software, is pleased to announce there release
of
A pity about the spelling mistake, but their you go! Perhaps they spent
more time on the software.
-Original Message-
From: Darren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 2:06 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: [PEDA] Well, here it comes.
Release to the Australian
Here is a link to the Australian Stock Exchange where
the original release come from. The cut and paste did
have some problems???
http://www.aspectfinancial.com.au/asxpdf/20020722/pdf/00305689.pdf
Darren Moore
> -Original Message-
> From: Darren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monda
How about this instead: "...but there you go"
> -Original Message-
> From: Hugh Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 9:23 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Well, here it comes.
>
>
> A pity about the spelling mistake, but their you go!
I'm pretty sure Hugh was being ironic, as this was the same type of mistake
made in the Altium press release.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, 22 July 2002 4:03 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Well, here it comes.
>
At 16:14 19.07.02 +0200, you wrote:
>In my next Design i am planning to use the Cypress CY62157CV33 witch comes
>in a FBGA BA48F Footprint.
>
>What are the recomendations for a footprint ? The Datasheet does not give a
>hint it only tells me where the "balls" are but not what diameter the top
>lay
Yeah yeah, I know you were joking... (right? You were joking, weren't you?)
;)
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 11:03 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Well, here it comes.
>
>
> How about this instead
That may be so, but it was not the way the real
release had had it, it was made by me after I
cut and pasted it from the pdf file. The formatting
was screwed up and so was my editing.
After all, english is not my first language, I speak
in electronic schematics normally ;-)
Darren Moore
> --
their their Darren (and Tony)
> -Original Message-
> From: Darren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, 22 July 2002 4:29 PM
> To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Well, here it comes.
>
>
> That may be so, but it was not the way the real
> release had had it, it was m
LOL. Their's one in every crowd!
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Bishop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, 22 July 2002 4:47 PM
> To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Well, here it comes.
>
>
> their their Darren (and Tony)
>
> > -Original Message-
> > Fr
20 matches
Mail list logo
