the schem wiring could be better
but as a result of experience what i do is right click a lot between end
points
it's not too hard and often makes editing easier
it helps if you can anticipate what you are going to change :)
Dennis Saputelli
Jon Elson wrote:
>
> "Watnoski, Michael" wrote:
>
>
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
> At 03:35 PM 2/11/2002 -0600, Jon Elson wrote:
> >There's a lot of history, there. Accel originally sold Protel's Tango
> >package
> >in the US. When Protel was solw to deliver the next version, Accel went
> >out, hired programmers, and created their own program that
"Watnoski, Michael" wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I will admit that I have had more experience with PCAD than Protel.
> I have used PCAD for about 3 years and Protel for only abut six months now.
>
> It is the common things that Protel fails in that drive me crazy.
> Things like having to
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
>
> I'd also like to hear from other experienced Protel users as to how to
> rewire quickly.
>
If you left-click on the end of the wire like you said but then hit the
delete key instead of placing the vertex you have over another vertex
and clicking, this will dele
el EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: (bcc: Clive Broome/sdc)
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Accel vs. protel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A good synchronisation of Schematic and PCB (Update board/schematic).
How about swapping p
On 03:52 PM 8/02/2002 -0500, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax said:
><..snip..>
>Or the wire can be picked up and moved from one end, which might be
>faster. Yes, if you are grunting every time you want to insert a resistor
>into a wire, the grunting will severely slow you down!
>
>PCAD's reported behavior h
At 04:38 PM 2/8/2002 -0500, Watnoski, Michael wrote:
> Was Accel so bad that they went out of business, or so good that
>Protel was so desperate for a useable package that they offered so much to
>buy them that they couldn't refuse? I think the latter.
Neither of these is a good descript
On 04:19 PM 2/8/2002 -0500, Michael Reagan wrote:
>yea yea yea Acel was so damn good they went out of business. Dont get my
>going slamming bit mapped crayola like Accel.
Well...not exactly. And obviously, the program had enough of a value that Protel
purchased the company, and appears to have
rom 23M in sales to over 50 in two years should not be taken
lightly.
My point of view
Hardcore User
Mike Reagan
EDSI
> -Original Message-
> From: Watnoski, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 4:38 PM
> To: 'Protel ED
#x27;Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Accel vs. protel
Was Accel so bad that they went out of business, or so good that
Protel was so desperate for a useable package that they offered so much to
buy them that they couldn't refuse? I think the latter.
Michael Watnos
Darryl,
I will have to differ with you with respect to your views on Protel. We have
the latest PCAD here too and I have made it my best attempt to keep away
from it.
I have to admit, being a former Protel 98 user, I was intimidated by the DDB
interface at the first run. It did take the first tw
At 01:54 PM 2/8/2002 -0500, Watnoski, Michael wrote:
>Hi All,
>
> I will admit that I have had more experience with PCAD than Protel.
>I have used PCAD for about 3 years and Protel for only abut six months now.
First of all, it should be noted that PCAD is, as Altium has represented
it,
ment, and
> route--all manually.
>
> My crystal ball says that Phoenix will include those PCAD
> niceties and more
> like integrated libraries and perhaps even in-place library
> editing. I could
> be wrong.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Watnoski, Mic
uld
be wrong.
> -Original Message-
> From: Watnoski, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 13:54
> To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Accel vs. protel
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I will admit that I have had mor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A good synchronisation of Schematic and PCB (Update board/schematic).
How about swapping pins in PCB and backannote to SCH?
Seamless in Accel and no way in Protel. :(
Yuriy.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAI
Georg Beckmann wrote:
>
> Altium is now selling to different systems. Protel and Accel.
> Does anybody work with both systems. ?
> Which is better, or are they similar. ?
> Whats the major difference ?
Advantages of Accel EDA:
Ability to swap pins and gates on PCB and backannotate this to SCH
At 09:59 AM 2/8/2002 -0500, Watnoski, Michael wrote:
> I regularly use both systems and I prefer PCAD. I only use Protel
>because my day job insists that I use what they already paid for. I find
>PCAD far more efficient and easier to learn. I am able to turn out jobs in
>about a third
Beckmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
08.02.2002 08:02
Please respond to "Protel EDA Forum"
To: "'Protel EDA Forum'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:[PEDA] Accel vs. protel
Altium is now selling to different systems
Altium is now selling to different systems. Protel and Accel.
Does anybody work with both systems. ?
Which is better, or are they similar. ?
Whats the major difference ?
Georg
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave
22 matches
Mail list logo
