Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 657 by abys...@gmail.com: Unnecessary dependency against protobuf
in third-level targets.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=657
I have C++ generated file, say `a.pb.cc`, and I link it into shared library
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Owner: jie...@google.com
Comment #1 on issue 609 by jie...@google.com: protoc produces java code
with compiler errors when terminating message field names with "field"
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=609
Thanks for repo
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Owner: jie...@google.com
Comment #3 on issue 576 by jie...@google.com: please add
TextFormat.printUnicode() or open class Printer
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=576
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this
Updates:
Labels: FixedIn-2.6.0
Comment #3 on issue 598 by jie...@google.com: unused parameter warnings
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=598
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 598 by jie...@google.com: unused parameter warnings
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=598
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Comment #1 on issue 641 by jie...@google.com: Lots of "implicit conversion
loses precision" errors.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=641
Issue 631 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send a
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 641
Comment #2 on issue 631 by jie...@google.com: Fixing issue #641
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=631
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: jie...@google.com
Labels: FixedIn-2.6.0
Comment #2 on issue 636 by jie...@google.com: Bug in
com.google.protobuf.TextFormat.TextGenerator.print()
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=636
Thanks for reporting this
--
You
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: jie...@google.com
Labels: FixedIn-2.6.0
Comment #3 on issue 654 by jie...@google.com: Code bloat caused by
repeated_field.h #include'ing
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=654
Thanks for reporting this
--
You rec
Updates:
Owner: jie...@google.com
Comment #5 on issue 429 by jie...@google.com: Support ByteBuffer in
CodedInputStream and CodedOutputStream to avoid redundant copies for direct
ByteBuffer.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=429
(No comment was entered for this
Updates:
Owner: jie...@google.com
Comment #2 on issue 656 by jie...@google.com: Example protobuf uses
required fields
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=656
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #1 on issue 656 by jie...@google.com: Example protobuf uses
required fields
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=656
Just show users how to use it, so we covered the basic required, optional
and repeated. It also helps for the testing
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: FixedIn-2.6.0
Comment #4 on issue 429 by jie...@google.com: Support ByteBuffer in
CodedInputStream and CodedOutputStream to avoid redundant copies for direct
ByteBuffer.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=429
(No comment was
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 656 by hirshlei...@google.com: Example protobuf uses required
fields
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=656
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Look at the example protobuf definition on
Comment #2 on issue 605 by v1ne...@gmail.com: protoc just segfaults on
FreeBSD 10-RELEASE arm
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=605
This also occurs on FreeBSD 11 on Cubieboard2.
Although this could also be a clang issue, I'll try building with GCC.
--
You received
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 655 by simon...@gmail.com: String corruption
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=655
I am seeing an issue with string corruption under very specific
circumstances.
My Proto file:
message
Comment #2 on issue 654 by mohit.a...@gmail.com: Code bloat caused by
repeated_field.h #include'ing
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=654
Just removing '#include ' from repeated_field.h reduced our
compilation times by 10% throughout. The reason was that
Comment #1 on issue 654 by mohit.a...@gmail.com: Code bloat caused by
repeated_field.h #include'ing
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=654
Just removing repeated_field.h reduced our compilation times by 10%
throughout. The reason was that most .h or .cc files included
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 654 by mohit.a...@gmail.com: Code bloat caused by
repeated_field.h #include'ing
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=654
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Try preprocessing a .
Updates:
Owner: jie...@google.com
Labels: FixedIn-2.6.0
Comment #13 on issue 434 by xiaof...@google.com: With
PROTOCOL_BUFFERS_PYTHON_IMPLEMENTATION=cpp, parent object deleted while
child still exists: causes segmentation fault
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail
Comment #12 on issue 434 by xiaof...@google.com: With
PROTOCOL_BUFFERS_PYTHON_IMPLEMENTATION=cpp, parent object deleted while
child still exists: causes segmentation fault
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=434
We are working a new release (2.6.0) right now and it will
Comment #1 on issue 653 by ajkinn...@gmail.com: Repeated fields in python
do not implement the "index()" function
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=653
Correction to expected output:
Return the *index of the* matching value from the repeated field list, or
Val
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 653 by ajkinn...@gmail.com: Repeated fields in python do not
implement the "index()" function
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=653
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Define
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 652 by lawr.es...@gmail.com: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin,
but liblto_plugin.so not found
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=652
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. download protobuf
Comment #2 on issue 650 by tha...@chromium.org: Clang barks at
file->options() != NULL
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=650
The line this fires on has been deleted in the google-internal version of
protobuf.
--
You received this message because this project
Comment #7 on issue 488 by lawr.es...@gmail.com: powerpc-linux cross
compilation not compiling anymore
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=488
After apply 2 patches return following:
0001-Add-generic-GCC-support-for-atomic-operations.patch
0001-Add-generic-gcc-header-to
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Patch
New issue 651 by lawr.es...@gmail.com: Patch for
/trunk/src/google/protobuf/stubs/platform_macros.h
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=651
ppc64 support
Attachments:
platform_macros.h.patch 421 bytes
--
You received this
Comment #7 on issue 607 by nialldouglas14: Replace TSan API declarations in
atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607
Correct, Ubuntu's clang supports ThreadSanitiser but without the header
file mentioned. You can see t
Comment #6 on issue 607 by xiaof...@google.com: Replace TSan API
declarations in atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607
Hi Niall,
Do you mean the Clang version you installed supports ThreadSanitizer but
without header file
Comment #5 on issue 607 by nialldouglas14: Replace TSan API declarations in
atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607
Can you revert this patch please? I don't have the header file
sanitizer/tsan_interface_atomic.h
Comment #1 on issue 635 by yuk...@google.com: Min and max not defined under
Windows/Intel C++
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=635
Could be a duplicate of Issue 531 and Issue 616. If so, the fix has already
been available as r512.
--
You received this message because
Comment #4 on issue 593 by dave.b...@gmail.com: FatalException on calling
SerializeAsString()
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=593
This exact same issue occurs for me too - and when I replace the usage of
all bools with uint32s, the problem goes away.
Looking through
Comment #4 on issue 269 by thecodem...@gmail.com: Would like to have byte
or int8 type for the message definition
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=269
I don't need a fixed length string; I want to encode RGB or RGBA data as 3
or 4 bytes. I could pack them into an
Issue 650: Clang barks at file->options() != NULL
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=650
This issue is now blocking issue chromium:381910.
See http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=381910
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fie
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 650 by gli...@chromium.org: Clang barks at file->options() != NULL
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=650
With the ToT Clang the following warning is reported when I'm trying to
build
Comment #2 on issue 649 by kra...@gmail.com: Windows: IE Dev Channel
(App-V?) causes protobuf tests to fail on the C: drive
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=649
Updated https://github.com/mumble-voip/mumble-releng/issues/5:
It also happens inside junction points.
--
You
Comment #3 on issue 360 by dmitrinesteruk: Precompiled header support
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=360
Upvoting this!
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification
Comment #1 on issue 649 by kra...@gmail.com: Windows: IE Dev Channel
(App-V?) causes protobuf tests to fail on the C: drive
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=649
See also the upstream bug:
https://connect.microsoft.com/IE/feedback/details/909134/unexpected-filesystem
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 649 by kra...@gmail.com: Windows: IE Dev Channel (App-V?) causes
protobuf tests to fail on the C: drive
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=649
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Install IE dev
Comment #2 on issue 480 by jcredl...@googlemail.com: Make binary package
available for OSX
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=480
When you do it'd be useful if it: supported as many architectures as
possible; was compatible with OSX back to 10.6; supported IOS as we
Updates:
Owner: jie...@google.com
Comment #12 on issue 286 by xiaof...@google.com: Inconsistency with
repeated fields using C++ protobufs
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=286
Hi robert,
I couldn't say for sure when the new release will be out. Our targeted
re
Comment #11 on issue 286 by robert.e...@gmail.com: Inconsistency with
repeated fields using C++ protobufs
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=286
Do you have a firmer expected release date? Debian is expected to freeze in
Q4 (November 2014), and I'd like to have th
Comment #10 on issue 286 by xiaof...@google.com: Inconsistency with
repeated fields using C++ protobufs
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=286
We are working on a new release (2.6) right now. It will include the new
python c++ implementation and the old experimental one
Comment #9 on issue 286 by bram.dej...@native-instruments.de: Inconsistency
with repeated fields using C++ protobufs
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=286
It's already Q2 (almost Q3) 2014. Any update?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 648
Comment #1 on issue 647 by xiaof...@google.com: Compilation error on Win 7
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=647
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured
Comment #2 on issue 648 by xiaof...@google.com: Support for Lua files
generation
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=648
Issue 647 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this
Updates:
Status: OutOfScope
Comment #1 on issue 648 by xiaof...@google.com: Support for Lua files
generation
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=648
Lua is not one of the officially supported languages so protoc along can't
generate code for that. But you can
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 648 by jbbalu...@gmail.com: Support for Lua files generation
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=648
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.Is this protoc-2.5.0-win32 version supports generaton
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 647 by jbbalu...@gmail.com: Compilation error on Win 7
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=647
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.Used protoc.exe to generate .Lua files from .proto command
2
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 646 by ema...@freebsd.org: autogen.sh tries to read from a tape
drive on FreeBSD if gtest is not present
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=646
autogen.sh invokes 'curl ... | tar jf' which reads
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 645 by xiaof...@google.com: Add link for Gradle
Protobuf Plugin to ThridParty page
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=645
Added to "Other Utilities" section.
--
You received this message because this project is con
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 645 by aant...@gmail.com: Add link for Gradle Protobuf Plugin to
ThridParty page
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=645
Add a reference link to Gradle Protobuf Plugin
[https://github.com
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 628 by xiaof...@google.com: Update ThirdPartyAddOns
link to protobuf-c
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=628
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send
Comment #16 on issue 493 by sjl...@gmail.com: protobuf-java (2.5.0)
GeneratedMessage#getUnknownFields() not implemented
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=493
I agree with @owen's comments. Yes, it is ideal that all users of hadoop
upgrade to the protobuf version tha
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 644 by meetmith...@gmail.com: when i try to generate the header
file for rpc server and client i am getting the following error.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=644
What steps will
Comment #15 on issue 493 by oliver.j...@gmail.com: protobuf-java (2.5.0)
GeneratedMessage#getUnknownFields() not implemented
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=493
protobuf requires that if you have some generated class G that was
generated using protoc version V, then G
Comment #14 on issue 493 by owen.oma...@gmail.com: protobuf-java (2.5.0)
GeneratedMessage#getUnknownFields() not implemented
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=493
This is more than "can only use one version." Protobuf requires that you
run with precisely the vers
Comment #13 on issue 493 by oliver.j...@gmail.com: protobuf-java (2.5.0)
GeneratedMessage#getUnknownFields() not implemented
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=493
The "can only use one version" issue is not a problem specific to protobuf;
it's a general prob
Comment #12 on issue 493 by oliver.j...@gmail.com: protobuf-java (2.5.0)
GeneratedMessage#getUnknownFields() not implemented
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=493
In this case, why doesn't hadoop-mapreduce have a dependency on the library
version it requires for co
Comment #11 on issue 493 by owen.oma...@gmail.com: protobuf-java (2.5.0)
GeneratedMessage#getUnknownFields() not implemented
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=493
For your own project, regenerating the code is not unreasonable.
The problem comes when you use ant/ivy or
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 643 by vimlesh@gmail.com: Which protocol buffer version shall
be used on windows 7 64 bit machine.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=643
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. build
Comment #10 on issue 493 by xiaof...@google.com: protobuf-java (2.5.0)
GeneratedMessage#getUnknownFields() not implemented
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=493
Protoc and the runtime together forms the protobuf library. Taking protoc
in one version and trying to use it
Comment #9 on issue 493 by owen.oma...@gmail.com: protobuf-java (2.5.0)
GeneratedMessage#getUnknownFields() not implemented
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=493
Help us understand why you consider cross version compatibility between the
generated code and library
Comment #8 on issue 493 by xiaof...@google.com: protobuf-java (2.5.0)
GeneratedMessage#getUnknownFields() not implemented
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=493
We don't want to provide this runtime compatibility across different
versions. If you are using protoc 2.5
Comment #7 on issue 493 by jeag...@gmail.com: protobuf-java (2.5.0)
GeneratedMessage#getUnknownFields() not implemented
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=493
Can a project member please comment on the patch posted in comment #6. It
is a must have to understand what the
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 642 by linzuxio...@gmail.com: Do not support php??
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=642
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
2.
3.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead
Comment #21 on issue 213 by danielko...@gmail.com: libprotobuf.so.6 not
found after installation
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=213
ldconfig fixed my libprotobuf.so.* problem as well, thanks!
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Comment #20 on issue 45 by vigneswa...@silvanlabs.com: build error
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=45
./configure --host=arm-linux CC= CXX=compiler g++ path> --with-protoc=< type the path after untaring
/protobuf-2.5.0/src/protoc > --prefix=
sudo make
sud
Comment #19 on issue 45 by vigneswa...@silvanlabs.com: build error
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=45
./configure --host=arm-linux
CC=/opt/bbb-angstrom-toolchain/usr/local/angstrom/arm/bin/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc
CXX=/opt/bbb-angstrom-toolchain/usr/local/angstrom
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 641 by jetfo...@gmail.com: Lots of "implicit conversion loses
precision" errors.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=641
Build with protobuf 2.5.0 for ARM64 (after fixing the platfor
Updates:
Status: WorkingAsIntended
Comment #2 on issue 634 by xiaof...@google.com: Header file path is wrong
in generated .cc files for .proto files in inner directories
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=634
This is by design.
If you want the generated code to
Comment #1 on issue 634 by tfar...@chromium.org: Header file path is wrong
in generated .cc files for .proto files in inner directories
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=634
I don't think this is wrong. Protobuf is generating full path, which imo is
a good thing.
Ho
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 640 by cld8...@g.rit.edu: OstreamOutputStream destructor can
cause double exception.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=640
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. set Exceptions to badbit
Comment #3 on issue 585 by heckfer: No support compile for Windows Phone 8
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=585
Any news ?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification
Comment #4 on issue 585 by deivison...@gmail.com: No support compile for
Windows Phone 8
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=585
Any news ? Have some one success to do a port to WP8 ?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Comment #2 on issue 585 by heckfer: No support compile for Windows Phone 8
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=585
Any news ?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification
Comment #2 on issue 639 by xiaof...@google.com: Protobuf segfaults on
attempt to serialize a very large object
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=639
Protobuf uses int to represent sizes so the largest size it can possibly
support is <2G. We don't have any plan t
Comment #1 on issue 639 by leonid.g...@gmail.com: Protobuf segfaults on
attempt to serialize a very large object
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=639
failed to mention - I am just reporting this bug.
Both discovery of bug and solution was done by Andrey Pliss.
--
You
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 639 by leonid.g...@gmail.com: Protobuf segfaults on attempt to
serialize a very large object
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=639
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. attempt to
Comment #9 on issue 455 by peilin...@gmail.com: google/protobuf/message.cc
is missing #include
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=455
add the missing include to the message.cc helps
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #1 on issue 638 by xiaof...@google.com: Unknown fields are
preserved now in python implementation version 2.5.0, but document is out
of date.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=638
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 638 by leexiao...@gmail.com: Unknown fields are preserved now in
python implementation version 2.5.0, but document is out of date.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=638
http://code.google.com
Comment #2 on issue 637 by per...@carrosses.com: Patch for
/trunk/src/google/protobuf/stubs/once.cc
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=637
I have investigated a bit deeper.
It's failing on MIPS64 n64 because protobuf doesn't detect MIPS64
architectures, so it t
Comment #1 on issue 637 by per...@carrosses.com: Patch for
/trunk/src/google/protobuf/stubs/once.cc
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=637
Here is the full patch.
Attachments:
protobuf-0001-fix-protobufoncetype.patch 2.7 KB
--
You received this message because this
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Patch
New issue 637 by per...@carrosses.com: Patch for
/trunk/src/google/protobuf/stubs/once.cc
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=637
Specify the right type of once to fix this compilation failure:
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #1 on issue 636 by xiaof...@google.com: Bug in
com.google.protobuf.TextFormat.TextGenerator.print()
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=636
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 636 by adityaki...@gmail.com: Bug in
com.google.protobuf.TextFormat.TextGenerator.print()
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=636
In TextGenerator.print(...)
...
write
Comment #9 on issue 447 by arnethed...@gmail.com: No C++11 move constructors
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447
Attaching a compiler plugin which adds move construction, assignment and
string move assignment to the generated C++ code - to use, simply add
--cxx11_out
Comment #8 on issue 447 by m...@google.com: No C++11 move constructors
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447
Any updates on this?
Attached is a patch is that adds a move constructor and assignment operator
to the generated messages.
Attachments:
patch 2.4 KB
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 635 by dmitrinesteruk: Min and max not defined under
Windows/Intel C++
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=635
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Try compiling using Intel C++ compiler
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 634 by ajo...@definitionnetworks.com: Header file path is wrong
in generated .cc files for .proto files in inner directories
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=634
What steps will reproduce
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 633 by stijnsan...@gmail.com: Double encoded as length-delimited
wire-type
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=633
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Using
https://github.com/rethinkdb/rethinkdb
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 632 by tom.ritc...@gmail.com: Protocol buffer library fails to
build if download directory path contains a space.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=632
What steps will reproduce the problem
Comment #11 on issue 434 by tom.ritc...@gmail.com: With
PROTOCOL_BUFFERS_PYTHON_IMPLEMENTATION=cpp, parent object deleted while
child still exists: causes segmentation fault
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=434
Another xoogler here. Unfortunately convinced my team to use
Comment #1 on issue 631 by omer.d...@gmail.com: Fixing issue #641
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=631
Please close. There's a better patch in #641.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
Yo
Comment #1 on issue 621 by omer.d...@gmail.com: Python library does not run
setup.py under a Python 3.x interpreter
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=621
I didn't notice you already had a patch.
Please pull ASAP.
--
You received this message because this proje
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Patch
New issue 631 by omer.d...@gmail.com: Fixing issue #641
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=631
I surrounded the print statements with parenthesis.
Hopefully thats it.
Attachments:
setup.py.patch 782 bytes
--
You received this
Comment #4 on issue 502 by jhuxh...@googlemail.com: protoc generated Java
code has numerous javadoc warnings
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=502
Java 8 javadoc is now creating warnings without explicitly activating them.
Fixing them manually isn't worthwhile sinc
Comment #7 on issue 630 by kral.voj...@gmail.com: Java: initializing
bitFields variables
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=630
I see. That is what confuse me the difference between attributes with zeros
and the bitFields.
--
You received this message because this project
Comment #6 on issue 630 by xiaof...@google.com: Java: initializing
bitFields variables
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=630
Re #5:
JVM will only set the value to 0 but an integral protobuf field may have a
non-zero default value (set by field option [default = 12345
301 - 400 of 2413 matches
Mail list logo
