On Jun 11, 11:26 pm, ualtinok wrote:
> Hey Jon, I sent you the project you asked. I'm not confident in the SL
> proto library and also i didn't remade the modifications on the
> original library with the latest updates.(I think it's from late
> February)
Thanks, I've got the project.
As I've ex
Hey Jon, I sent you the project you asked. I'm not confident in the SL
proto library and also i didn't remade the modifications on the
original library with the latest updates.(I think it's from late
February)
Ufuk
On Jun 7, 10:16 pm, Jon Skeet wrote:
> On Jun 7, 2:24 pm, ualtinok wrote:
>
>
On Jun 7, 2:24 pm, ualtinok wrote:
> Although those modifications had worked for me (at least just for my
> trials), it's not solid.
Solid in what sense? Do you run into problems, or you're just not
confident in them?
> Can you tell me what you will need in the sample project? A full test
>
Actually I had sent you some small changes on the library to make it
compile in SL:
-SortedLists are not implemented in SL2 so i used a similar method
"SortedDictionnary" which i found while googling.
-Regex performance parameter RegexOptions.Compiled is also missing. So
i dropped them.
-Encoding
On Jun 6, 1:29 pm, ualtinok wrote:
> Is there any news on Silverlight ? We are approaching to SL3 release
> and it would be great if we have a working protobuf library for SL.
I haven't looked at Silverlight at all, I'm afraid... but if that
would be a useful thing for you, I'd be willing to at
I considered using protobuf-net for my project but as you mentioned
your library is more .net centric and I couldn't find a way to
establish a reliable RPC connection between c++ port (server) and
protobuf-net (client-SL), because I'm also using that RPC server to
serve other client implementation
For info, protobuf-net (a separate implementation) works on SL2; I
haven't tried it on the SL3 bits, but I could give it a go.
On the plus side, this is more .NET idiomatic, and allows either
contract-first (.proto) or can be used with your existing types; on
the other hand, it uses a different A
Hi Jon,
Is there any news on Silverlight ? We are approaching to SL3 release
and it would be great if we have a working protobuf library for SL.
Ufuk
On May 30, 12:22 pm, Jon Skeet wrote:
> Just a quick update on the C# port of the Java code
> (athttp://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/
