Andrew, thanks for positive words about scripteka!
I talked to Mislav earlier and the main reason for not mentioning it
on a blog seemed to be 1.6 incompatibility issues.
I manually input all of the 75+ extensions into a DB and have
obviously read through all the descriptions.
You will be surpris
When I get around to adding it, i'll add a community section to my company
homepage, with a few of these bits and pieces on there.
Til then, i think I have a blog (virtually never updated) somewhere, and I
could post them there. I'll make a spinoffs post on this when I add it.
Thanks for the tip o
On Nov 22, 6:21 pm, "Mislav Marohnić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> While maybe not a good fit for core (most of the users wouldn't use it),
> those seem definitely useful. I'll hope you'll still share them somehow
> (public dir in your svn repo is an option).
I'd like to emphasize this. Despite
On Nov 23, 2007 1:03 AM, Gareth Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While possible features are being discussed, I have a 'get iframe document
> object' function, and functions to set/get the caret position in an input,
> and get [I haven't written set] the selection in a input.
While maybe not a
While possible features are being discussed, I have a 'get iframe document
object' function, and functions to set/get the caret position in an input,
and get [I haven't written set] the selection in a input.
I have them tested them in opera, ie and ff at present.
They *are* based on snippets I foun
On Nov 22, 6:29 pm, "Mislav Marohnić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Because of the silence of other core members at the moment, it would be best
> for you to make a plug-in script that is included after Prototype library.
> Then you can share it on this ML with specific proposals what you think
>
On Nov 22, 10:29 am, "Mislav Marohnić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Because of the silence of other core members at the moment,
Keep in mind the western faction has been asleep, and it is a holiday
in America. ;-)
> it would be best
> for you to make a plug-in script that is included after Pr
Because of the silence of other core members at the moment, it would be best
for you to make a plug-in script that is included after Prototype library.
Then you can share it on this ML with specific proposals what you think
should be core functionality. Think it through, though; we are very picky
a
I probably handle up to 10 patches a week on trac. So we don't ignore
them we just treat them as quickly as we can.
Also, the goal for the upcoming 1.6.0.1 version is to remove bugs, not
add features.
What would very helful though, would be to help clean-up trac by
closing duplicated tickets, ti
This is a bit off topic, but what would be the ideal process of
submitting patches for you guys?
It seems to me that the trac bugtracker is pretty much ignored, so
should I send patches to this ML. And should I send multiple patches,
or one big patch from which you can pick what you feel would be
On Nov 22, 2007 11:57 AM, Viktor Kojouharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've made a ticket with an attached patch that adds a script insertion
> method a few months ago, right here:
> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/9871
Whoa, that's a lot of code.
I think the problem with this sort of fun
I've made a ticket with an attached patch that adds a script insertion
method a few months ago, right here:
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/9871
I also believe that this method works with Safari 2 (It works with
Konqueror). And so far, It has worked very well for me.
On Nov 22, 11:56 am, "Ric
Here is the Scriptaculous.require method ...
var Scriptaculous = {
Version: '1.8.0',
require: function(libraryName) {
// inserting via DOM fails in Safari 2.0, so brute force approach
document.write('
Hello Mr Ken,
you did not understand me very well, i do the same thing as you do,
merging many javascript and css files into single files to optimize
resources. but i do not merge all files at once. as user need, i may
dynamically load one or many optimized file, and this does not require
XMLHTTP
On Nov 21, 2007 3:29 AM, tbela99 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hello all the guys from the prototype core.
>
> I really adore what you're doing. it changed the way I was programming
> javascript for a while. anyway I have some features that will please
> me if they are incorporated in the prototy
For the Cookies you have Prototype.Tidbits on livepipe:
http://livepipe.net/projects/prototype_tidbits/
And I know someone had done Moo's Assets for Prototype, but can't find the link.
Best,
-Nicolas
On Nov 21, 2007 8:35 AM, Mislav Marohnić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These are useful, but I don
These are useful, but I don't think most of them deserve their place in
core. The ones I'd like to have are:
1. dynamic SCRIPT element
2. injecting CSS content
Also, cookies could make an excellent add-on. Tobie, did you have some code
ready for cookie support? I think I can recall you ment
17 matches
Mail list logo
