In the currently latest version of prototype.js
http://www.prototypejs.org/assets/2008/1/25/prototype-1.6.0.2.js
there is no def for onSuccess? yet when I use
Ajax.Request(url, { onSuccess : function(r) { ... }it works...
So is it defined some where else?
I was mainly looking for the con
Hi,
I need to record the new position of a dragged div. I know the
starting position, so my plan is to calculate the change in screen
cursor positions from drag to drop, and add to the div's position. my
problem is that window.event.screenX or window.event.screenY are not
working within the new D
I'm having a very similar problem!!
I have a form of 3 steps and I'm using Ajax.Request to update the
contents of a div between the steps and also do some other checks.
>From step1 to step2 everything is fine. I submit my form and get a new
div (with some html+js) to replace the first step with
Hi guys,
I wrote the following code :
$$('ul#list_works > li.clicked').each( function(x)
{ x.removeClassName('clicked'); } );
which seems to work fine, but I can see the follwoing error in the js
console :
Warning : reference to undefined property responder[callback]
source file : http://local
Hi,
> In the currently latest version of prototype.js
> ...
> there is no def for onSuccess? yet when I use
>
> Ajax.Request(url, { onSuccess : function(r) { ... }it works...
>
> So is it defined some where else?
Yes, *you're* defining it (above). Prototype calls it.
> I was mainly lookin
Hi,
If you google "warning reference to undefined property" (without the
quotes), you'll find several pages discussing this issue. It relates
to Firefox's javascript.options.strict option, which sounds like a
good idea but apparently has issues.
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Sep 5, 4:28 pm, elduderino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No it's not unique...the element is created on the fly and is a copy
> of another elementi'm not worried about semantics here especially
> as the element only a copy...this is a really complicated dragging and
> dropping application
i am having the same problem (sometimes) and can not reproduce when
the
htmlelement is extended an when not. there is another bug filled for
chrome:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1058
...but the attached example works for me with chrome.
On 3 Sep., 23:08, kangax <[EMAIL PROTE
On Sep 8, 10:12 am, elduderino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to set more than one class for the accept param in the
> droppables api.http://github.com/madrobby/scriptaculous/wikis/droppables
> says you can 'Set accept to a string or an array of strings
> describing CSS classes' but i've t
I think in some situations, the XmlHttpRequest returns a status of 304 and
at the same time provide the responseText or XML.
http://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886/tickets/331-status-304-not-checked-for-onsuccess-for-ajaxrequest
status 304 not checked for onSuccess for Ajax.Request
Re
On Sep 9, 9:55 am, lawrencejob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the thread reincarnation
Sorry?
>, but I had a client wanting similar
> recently.
Similar to what? Do you mean trying to determine if touch events are
supported? Here's a sample function that does just that:
var touch
Yeah this absolutely is not a bug whatsoever with prototype or
scriptaculous. It's an internet explorer issue by the sounds of
things.
Completely ignore javascript/prototype/scriptaculous for a while. Just
try to get the following static html displaying properly in all
browsers first:
SpacesAft
On Sep 8, 10:27 pm, "Justin Perkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Alexey Bass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What I'm asking is that why this is not documented on Prototype site.
>
> Maybe it should be mentioned, but really Element#update is just using
> innerHTML
[quote]
Ajax.Responders API Page
...
All callbacks in the life-cycle are available; actually, onCreate is
only available to responders, as it wouldn’t make a lot of sense to
individual requests: you do know when your code creates them, don’t
you? It is triggered even before the XHR connection is o
Haven't read the whole topic but it looks like you could certainly
make use of the Element#identify() method which will give the element
a unique id (and return this id). You might alternatively want to call
the down() method on the element which will traverse down the dom and
return the first des
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:05 AM, bluezehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - but right now I can't register an onFailure.
Maybe it's just not getting invoked when you are expecting it to? You
might want to use the onException callback instead, or even have a
global onComplete handler and then within t
it's actually really strange and has gone beyond the scope of my js
knowledge!
Take a look at this code (may be syntax errors as it's from memory):
Ajax.Responders.register({
onCreate: function(request, response)
{
request.url = 'somewherethatdoesntexist.php';
var spe
below the others on a new row.
A testcase can be found here: http://ruri.sidvind.com/static-20080909.html
I can't really figure out what I am doing wrong so any ideas would be
great. Thanks!
--
//*David Sveningsson [eXt]*
Freelance coder | Game Development Student
http://sidvind.com
Thou
I want to allow the user to sort.
>
> The sorting works great except when I move an image last in any group
> which causes the image to appear below the others on a new row.
>
> A testcase can be found here:http://ruri.sidvind.com/static-20080909.html
>
> I can't really
;>
>> The sorting works great except when I move an image last in any group
>> which causes the image to appear below the others on a new row.
>>
>> A testcase can be found here:http://ruri.sidvind.com/static-20080909.html
>>
>> I can't really figure
The synthetic onSuccess, onFailure, and onXXX don't get dispatched to
the Ajax.Responders. Don't know if that is by design or just because
nobody had has a need for it, but it would be kind of handy.
I've been doing the following for a generic failure handler...
pretty - http://gist.github.com/9
Hi bluezehn/Justin & All in this forums,
THANKS FOR ALL YOUR HELP!!!
I think I'm able to solve the issue with different way. Space
issue varies from browser to browser. However, passing the value to the next
form can be achieved using afterUpdateElement parameter. I just realized
that
Hi bluezehn/Justin & All in this forums,
THANKS FOR ALL YOUR HELP!!!
I think I'm able to solve the issue with different way. Space
issue varies from browser to browser. However, passing the value to the next
form can be achieved using afterUpdateElement parameter. I just realized
that
Hi alpineedge3,
First of all, try to use Event.positionX(event) and
Event.positionY(event) instead.
I assume that the chunk of code you gave as an example comes from a
server-side language like php, so I will simplify this with raw
JavaScript.
If you want to get the cursor position, try someth
group
> >> which causes the image to appear below the others on a new row.
>
> >> A testcase can be found here:http://ruri.sidvind.com/static-20080909.html
>
> >> I can't really figure out what I am doing wrong so any ideas would be
> >> great. Thanks!
> >> -
alpineedge3,
I just Googled 'window.event.screenX' and, you're right, it seems to
be a valid native way to get the mouse coordinates. I just learned
this new stuff today! :-)
But as per my experience, calling an alert dialog in some dynamic/
anychronous JavaScript can cause trouble.
Just try ge
Diodeus skrev:
> Did you put style='float:left' on your DIVs?
Yes, and the divs is nicely floating next to each other at the beginning
and they form a new nicely floating row below the original when moved.
http://ruri.sidvind.com/static-20080909-2.html <--- Wrapping in div'
@Darrinholst could you please post a ticket about your issue:
http://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886-prototype/tickets/new
I know some contributors have fixed this issue on there own during
their own rewrites of the ajax portion
of Prototype.
It would be nice to tie it to a ticket so w
Hi,
I've started using latest version 1.8.4 & I'm using it for
Autocompleter. I've used following syntax to display the
autocompleter:
new Ajax.Autocompleter("companyName", "companyHint", "abc.php",
{paramName: "companyName", minChars: 1, indicator: 'inprogress',
callback: null, afterUpdateEle
I am trying to set a cookie during the onUpdate and it is not
working. Please see the code below and as always any help is
appreciated.
...
ul id="blocks" class="block">
{content
block='Recent Updates'}
{content
block='Search'}
{content
block='Calendar'}
{content
block='News'}
{con
Hi All,
The issue is resolved. This library is SUPER!!! Actually, the problem
was on my server side code..Thanks again!
Regards!
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I've started using latest version 1.8.4 & I'm using it for
> Autocompleter. I've u
Hi,
I'm using 1.8.4 latest scriptaculous library for autocomplete
functionality. Everything works Perfect!
I would like to know if scriptaculous supports highligting the
returned results. When I type say "a" in the textbox, then the
scrollable options will appear with results which conta
what's in the requested
I'm working on a custom extension of a couple of functions to the
Object class and was just wondering how prototype connects functions
such as Object.inspect(variable); to variable.inspect();
So far I have:
Object.extend(Object.prototype, {
talk: function(object)
{
On Sep 9, 6:05 pm, sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm working on a custom extension of a couple of functions to the
> Object class and was just wondering how prototype connects functions
> such as Object.inspect(variable); to variable.inspect();
It doesn't : )
>
> So far I have:
>
> Object.ex
Thank you and I apologize for the delayed response. What I ended up
doing was to create an on click event for the image, which creates a
new image, appends it to the document (not the div container) then
follows the mouse and it worked quite well.Thanks, Jon
On Aug 29, 12:50 am, patrick <[EMAIL
Hi, I would like to use the OnEnd event of the draggable to call an
external function instead of putting it inline. The function itself
will be probably 30-50 lines long and will be unwieldy inline. I
prefer the function to reside in a js include page for easier
debugging with FireBug. Is ther
> @Darrinholst could you please post a ticket about your
> issue:http://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886-prototype/tickets/new
>
I really didn't have an issue with it, but I'm more than happy to make
a contribution -
http://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886-prototype/tickets/334
Hi byrd48,
Of course, you can always define an external function and pass it
later as an handler:
var myExternalFunction = function(draggable, event) {
// do your stuff for onEnd
// you can use draggable and event objects
}
Also, to be sure that your external function is loaded from th
39 matches
Mail list logo
