Re: Maybe covered before, but I really need help, Bigtime!

Perfect! Though a bit tedious, it should work. --- Christopher Gilland Co-founder of Genuine Safe Haven Ministries http://www.gshministry.org (980) 500-9575 - Original Message - From: Slau Halatyn To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 11:36 PM

Re: Maybe covered before, but I really need help, Bigtime!

I'm going to describe the steps to identify beats. I'm not going to go through describing all of the things you should already know about selecting tracks, linking timeline and edit selections, positioning the insertion point, etc. You're going to be scrubbing or moving the insertion point to

Re: Maybe covered before, but I really need help, Bigtime!

K, how would this be done? --- Christopher Gilland Co-founder of Genuine Safe Haven Ministries http://www.gshministry.org (980) 500-9575 - Original Message - From: Chris Smart To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 10:01 PM Subject: Re: Maybe covered

Re: Maybe covered before, but I really need help, Bigtime!

Doesn't ProTools have a feature called Beat Detective, that basically detects transients? At 09:23 PM 9/19/2017, you wrote: I'd do it in Reaper, but I'm not totally advanced enough with it to know what I'm doing. Also, how would I quantize things? I can't, as it's audio, not midi. Chris.

Re: Maybe covered before, but I really need help, Bigtime!

yeah, why not make the click conform to the music, rather than the other way around? At 06:38 PM 9/19/2017, you wrote: I know of no way of achieving this as a blind user. A sighted user might possibly be able to drop warp markers at each bar/beat and then quantize to a fixed tempo. I'm not

Re: Maybe covered before, but I really need help, Bigtime!

Most DAWs have a way of using time compression and expansion to quantize audio these days. If Pro Tools and Reaper licenses Elastic Audio , Logic uses their FlexTime algorithm. It can be done in reaper as well yes. The problem is the efficient ways of doing this is A( very visual, and B(

Re: Maybe covered before, but I really need help, Bigtime!

I'd do it in Reaper, but I'm not totally advanced enough with it to know what I'm doing. Also, how would I quantize things? I can't, as it's audio, not midi. Chris. --- Christopher Gilland Co-founder of Genuine Safe Haven Ministries http://www.gshministry.org (980) 500-9575 - Original

Re: Maybe covered before, but I really need help, Bigtime!

OK, then, how would I do that suggestion with the markers? I'd prefer it to be a constant tempo, but no, it's not mandatory. --- Christopher Gilland Co-founder of Genuine Safe Haven Ministries http://www.gshministry.org (980) 500-9575 - Original Message - From: Slau Halatyn To:

Re: A few questions

Not to discourage you from Pro Tools as its definitely the most accessible out of the box and SloTools only seem to make it more so. However what you are describing can be done in reaper on the Mac especially now that the OSARA plug in has been ported. I was just a bit confused since you stated

Re: Maybe covered before, but I really need help, Bigtime!

I imagine once he got the tempo following along to the subtle tempo changes if the right elastic audio algorithm is selected and then all the tempo changes selected and changed to the same value the audio should playback at the set tempo then. Just going by what I remember from using ProTOols.

Re: Maybe covered before, but I really need help, Bigtime!

I know of no way of achieving this as a blind user. A sighted user might possibly be able to drop warp markers at each bar/beat and then quantize to a fixed tempo. I'm not sure how this might specifically work. Is it important that everything be at a constant tempo? I mean, you could easily

Re: Pro Tools versions

Hi Ignasi, Pro Tools First is somewhat accessible but I'd recommend the regular version of Pro Tools (some refer to it as "vanilla"). While HD has some more features, I'd say it's not particularly necessary for what you are planning to do plus it'll be much, much more expensive. Slau > On Sep

Pro Tools versions

Hello all, On my quest to get started with PT I’ve been exploring the Avid website, and discovered that there are three versions of Pro Tools: Pro Tools | First, Pro Tools and Pro Tools | HD. Are all of these programs accessible or only Pro Tools | HD? Would Pro Tools | First be enough for me

Re: A few questions

Hello, Yes, my main use for PT would be to record and mix piano. I usually record with 4 mics, but occasionally use 3 when recording chamber music. Most of the time I use an Apogee Quartet. Believe it or not the standard in classical music is Sequoia, because it apparently has some very special

Maybe covered before, but I really need help, Bigtime!

I asked this a while back on list, but don't recall ever getting a definite direct answer. I have a song which has been professionally recorded, though without a click track. I have absolutely no control over this, as it was done by a very famous country music artist. Obviously, though fairly

Re: A few questions

Hello, No no, I am a Mac user and own several of them, so I was hoping to use Pro Tools with VoiceOver. What would be the best resource for me to get started? Are the Pro Tools with Speech tutorials still the way to go or would you recommend something more recent? Weren’t those tutorials

Re: A few questions

Hi Ignasi, I'm not sure exactly what you mean by crossfades specifically designed for piano or classical music in general (you didn't exactly specify) but I can assure you that no platform is more widely used than Pro Tools. Also, it happens to be extremely accessible, especially for purposes

Re: Recording small narration, and splitting them into small files after editing.

Hi Ramy, In this case, there's no such thing as more or less professional. Either approach is viable. It all depends on what is needed in the end and which approach you feel more comfortable with. > On Sep 19, 2017, at 2:09 PM, Ramy Moustafa wrote: > > Hi Slau: > >

Re: A few questions

P.s. I misheard the last line of your email and thought you said "sorry for my english" instead of "sorry for my ignorance ". Brian Sent from my smart-ish phone! > On 19/09/2017, at 6:51 PM, Ignasi Cambra wrote: > > Hello all, > First of all I would like to apologize

Re: A few questions

Hi Ignasi, Firstly your english and questions are perfectly phrased so thank you. I think protools will be perfect for you and all the workflow you describe will be both accessible and more simple than how you do things currently. I edit piano and acoustic instruments every day and protools

Re: Recording small narration, and splitting them into small files after editing.

Hi Slau: Thanks so much for this, but what is more professional, to put the reverb and delay on the track itself, or to put each fx ina Bus and insert it on the track wanted? On 9/19/17, Slau Halatyn wrote: > OK, this is a perfect example of how your approach will vary

A few questions

Hello all, First of all I would like to apologize as I’m sure every once in a while people send emails to this list with this type of questions. I will try and be as brief as I can. I am a classical concert pianist and have a fair amount of recording equipment at home. I have a nice space with

Re: Recording small narration, and splitting them into small files after editing.

OK, this is a perfect example of how your approach will vary based upon your needs. You never mentioned that you'll be needing to export 100 files. With that in mind,it might be best to take the approach of keeping things on one track and exporting as needed. Still, you can even accomplish this

Re: Recording small narration, and splitting them into small files after editing.

Hi Slau: ok, but, if I will put some waves on track 2, others on track 3, to change the reverb or delay, how can I export all in seprat files? I need to have like 100 file at the end, so, how will I export the 2 long waves into small tracks? On 9/19/17, Slau Halatyn

Re: Vocal Tuning with Protools

For what its worth, I use autotune EFX with I think is the cheapest form of the range, and I have found with experimentation I get extremely transparent results. Like Slau said I often do more manual tuning on individual notes etc, and again the audio suite version of autotune EFX is geat for

Re: Recording small narration, and splitting them into small files after editing.

Hi Ramy, You cannot split files while recording. You can punch in and out while the transport is engaged but that will be quite problematic. You can set markers on the fly by simply pressing the Enter key on the num pad. If you're going to do that, you'll want to set the preference for

Vocal Tuning with Protools

Hello all. I've read on-list that Antares Auto-Tune is accessible in PT using Voiceover. Though I fully intend to purchase Auto-Tune at some point, I am wondering if it will be possible for me to perform pitch corrections using Protools's built-in functionality, until I can acquire AutoTune?

Recording small narration, and splitting them into small files after editing.

Hi all: as you asked me to do, I force myself to leave sonar, to use Pro tools and, I can now learn by experience. studying, reading manual, etc. but, in these days, am recording some small narration for very small stories, the narrator was recording about 2 hours, after he recorded, don't know