Improving Communication and Expectations (was: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests])

organizations I encourage the chairs of the new WebApps WG to start holding regular telcons in which binding decisions are made, based on evidence presented in email, wikis, tests, other documents, and (yes) verbal discussion. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

[minutes] DOM3 Events Telcon, 18 June 2008

Andrew, Emmons Chair Doug Schepers Scribe Olli Pettay Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]Wheel Event * [6]Summary of Action Items _ trackbot Date: 18 June 2008 shepazu [7]http

Element Nodelist - ISSUE-6 (was: ElementTraversal progress?)

Traversal. I hope this resolves your issue satisfactorily. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Re: Agenda and logistics...

Hi, Folks- Fixed. Sunava, you can put away the heart meds. :) -Doug Charles McCathieNevile wrote (on 6/24/08 12:10 AM): On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:30:39 +0200, Sunava Dutta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The meeting says Tuesday through Thursday 24th - 26 June 2008 in the Overview section. I

Agenda+ DOM3 Events (was: Agenda and logistics...)

Hi, Folks- At the upcoming F2F, I would also like to spend an hour or two discussing DOM3 Events, if we find the time and have the right people. I don't care what day this happens on. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Reminder: DOM3 Events Telcon Cancelled, Resumes in 2 Weeks

Hi WebApps Fans- Because of a number of regrets, today's DOM3 Events telcon has been cancelled. We will also not meet next week, due to the F2F. We will resume telcons in 2 weeks, on July 9. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI

Re: F2F Agenda Updated

Hi, Jonas- Jonas Sicking wrote (on 6/25/08 8:48 PM): Doug Schepers wrote: Hi, WebApps WG- The WebApps F2F meeting page has been updated to reflect the current agenda: http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/Group/f2f0807.html (member-only) I do notice that some of the times are in what you

Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]

into the uppercase. We all know that typing in all caps is rude, and forcing all keyboard events to SHOUT would degrade the bounds of polite society. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events

Hi, Sergey- Thanks for your prompt and informative feedback! Sergey Ilinsky wrote (on 7/15/08 6:39 AM): Doug Schepers wrote: * DOMNodeRemoved and DOMNodeRemovedFromDocument would be fired after the mutation rather than before * DOM operations that perform multiple sub-operations

Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events

as reliable as we all thought. Well, there are those who would argue that anyone, but I'm not one of them. :) Your point about compatibility with DOM2 is very well made and taken. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events

that mutates the DOM should be considered a compound operation. Maybe a DOM3 Core 2nd edition, or DOM4 Core, could provide these stricter event orders for compound operations. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events

it. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Reminder: No DOM3 Events Telcon, 30 July 2008

Hi WebApps Fans- This is a reminder that the 30 July telcon for DOM3 Events has been cancelled, due to a number of absences. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI

Re: [Element Traversal LC] XML Core (no comment) review

Hi, Paul- Thanks very much for your review. Though it resulted in no comments (and therefore no changes to the spec), feedback of this sort is nevertheless valuable to maintain a consistent platform. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF Grosso, Paul wrote (on 3

Re: [Element Traversal LC] Minor comments

Fixed. B: Shouldn't the In a User Agent... text be placed outside the code div? In its current position it looks bad all bold, and it also causes: B: Repetition: ...has the attributes defined below. The Element object has the following attributes: Fixed. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact

Re: ISSUE-5 (Unexpanded Entities): Wording for the Treatment of Unexpanded Entity References and Entity Replacement Markup [Element Traversal]

, it descends into it without informing the caller, and processes any children as if they had been present at the place where the entity node was found. If this does not satisfy either of you, please respond within two weeks, or sooner if possible. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact

Re: [Element Traversal LC] Minor comments

Hi, Sergiu- I forgot to mention, if you are not satisfied by these responses, please respond within two weeks, or sooner if possible. Regards- -Doug Doug Schepers wrote (on 7/30/08 2:56 AM): Hi, Sergiu- Thanks for your detail review Sergiu Dumitriu wrote (on 3/14/08 4:07 PM): Some

Re: [widgets] OMTP input to W3C Widget Requirements (2 of 2)

be very helpful and greatly appreciated. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF David Rogers wrote (on 8/1/08 7:41 AM): Dear Art, Marcos and all, Please find attached the second set of OMTP BONDI input to the W3C Web Applications WG Widget Requirements last call

Re: My Action Item

Hi, Carmelo- We aren't using the wiki for uploading files, only for editing wiki pages. Please use the DOM3 Events CVS repository to upload files: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/tests/ If you need help with that, please let me know. Regards- -Doug Carmelo Montanez

Tracker Guidelines

, so I put them in our wiki as a general guideline. [3] If anyone has any comments or questions, please let us know. [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/ [2] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML [3] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Tracker_Guidelines Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact

Re: ElementTraversal support in Firefox 3.1

. Contributions welcome. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Agenda: DOM3 Events Telcon, 03 September 2008 (Now!!)

and planned telcons, with a brief summary of issues discussed. [3] [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/DOM3Events#Day_and_Time [2] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/03_Sept_2008 [3] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/DOM3Events_Agenda Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI

WebIDL in the News

Hi, WebApps Fans- WebIDL is in the news, including a short interview with Cameron, and an endorsement by Hixie! http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/09/WebIDL Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Re: Regarding DOM 3 Tests Format

this behavior socially competent behavior. Garrett Regards, ^^ Insincere. Maciej And this: Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Arthur Barstow [EMAIL PROTECTED], Doug Schepers [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is *not* Private mail. Only you

Re: [D3E] Include mouse capture functionality

, or other mousemove-specific operations) it can help with performance. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Reminder: No DOM3 Events Telcon Today

Hi DOM3 Events Fans- This is a reminder that we will *not* have a DOM 3 Events telcon today. Telcons will resume October 15. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI

Cancelled: DOM3 Events Telcon

Hi WebApps Fans- I have to cancel this week's telcon, and TPAC is next week. DOM3 Events telcons will resume in November. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI

[selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API

a normative reference to CSS Namespaces[1]. Clarify if Other references means Informative references or something else. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-namespace/ Regards- -Doug Schepers, on behalf of the SVG WG

Re: Copyright license for ElementTraversal Java interface

Hi, Cameron- My opinion is that the editor of the Element Traversal spec simply didn't know what he was doing (no offense). I would suggest that a separate file be made with the appropriate Java interface file, with the appropriate license, and that it be linked from an errata (and later a

Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API

at decreasing unnecessary dependence on namespaces (such as potentially allowing @href to be used in the null ns (that is, not prefixed with xlink:). Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

SVG as Widget Icon (was: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009)

in this regard. [1] http://www.schepers.cc/svg/blendups/embedding.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: SVG as Widget Icon

Hi, Marcos- Marcos Caceres wrote (on 1/29/09 12:51 PM): On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org wrote: If you would like me to work up proposed spec text, I could oblige you. That would be great! The relevant sections are: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets

Use Cases for Use Cases (was: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API)

is necessary, but not sufficient. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

W3C is Not Pay-to-Play (was: Required support for SVG in widgets)

revenue benefits from it. That seems fair to me. Just correcting the record. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

[widgets] [access] Naming Conflict: access Element

/ Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: [widgets] [access] Naming Conflict: access Element

Hi, Robert- Robert Sayre wrote (on 2/20/09 12:56 PM): On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org wrote: Thoughts? Believe in namespaces or don't. Oh, I believe in namespaces. But when it can be avoided, it's better for authors if: a) there are as few duplicate names

Apple Patent Exclusion on Widgets 1.0: Updates

/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Exclusion [5] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/patent-exception-management Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Request for Review: Cross-Origin Resource Sharing

-abarth-origin-00 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2007OctDec/0298.html Best Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10

-charter Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Web Storage Scope and Charter (was: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10)

to the WG as a whole, I would ask that a message similar to the above be put in a prominent place in the spec. This seems like the soundest way forward. Art, Chaals, care to chime in? Other comments on this matter? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs Jonas Sicking

Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter

Hi, Ian- Ian Hickson wrote (on 4/23/09 4:18 PM): On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Doug Schepers wrote: Jonas and others seem to support broadening the scope, and I've also been reading various posts in the blogosphere that also question whether SQL is the right choice (I see a lot of support for JSON

Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter

Hi, Nikunj- Nikunj Mehta wrote (on 4/24/09 2:24 AM): On Apr 23, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Doug Schepers wrote: Rather than change the charter (which would require everyone who's already rejoined to re-rejoin at the simplest, and might require another AC review at the worst), Nikunj offered that he

Re: addEventListener naming

its own remover? Is it worth thinking about simply adding an optional parameter to el.listen( evtname, function(e) {}, number-of-times-to-listen )? (Probably not.) Listing some use cases for it might help this along. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Working Vacation

Hi, WebApps and SVG- Just to let you know, I will be away for the next week-and-a-half, for a conference and a short vacation. I will still be checking my email periodically, but I may not respond very quickly. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

[widgets] Open in Browser?

are related? I'm thinking that a downloaded and saved file might reuse the widget mechanisms, but with an optional flag that indicates it might be opened directly in an application (like a browser or authoring tool) rather than (or in addition to) a standalone miniapp. Regards- -Doug Schepers

Next DOM3 Events Telcon (Time and Day?)

/meetingdetails.html?year=2009month=6day=17hour=21min=0sec=0p1=43p2=101p3=234p4=240 [3] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/proposals/d3e-keyflow.svg [4] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/proposals/keyflow-gecko.svg Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Agenda:DOM3 Events Telcon

+ diagrams * Event wording [1] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2009month=6day=17hour=21min=0sec=0p1=43p2=101p3=234p4=240 Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: 'scroll' and 'resize' events

/0124.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Points of order on this WG

the best way forward is here. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Points of order on this WG

that we agree are important for the web than further specification work. Actually, I think that's an excellent point. Nikunj, maybe that is the next logical step? Could you take charge of that? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Berkeley DB (was: Points of order on this WG)

by changing the license? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Specs using Web IDL

. Yes, it seems pretty clear to me that it should be normative. The Process is flexible enough with regards to Rec-track deliverables that it allows us to decide what the best way for this spec to be demonstrably baked. Cameron McCormack wrote (on 6/28/09 7:21 AM): Doug Schepers: As we

Re: Specs using Web IDL

Hi, again- Oops, email sent too soon... I need to disable the keyboard shortcut for Send on Thunderbird, it's very annoying. Email finished inline Doug Schepers wrote (on 6/28/09 3:37 PM): Hi, Cam- Cameron McCormack wrote (on 6/28/09 7:10 AM): Robin Berjon: I wonder what the value

Re: addEventListener naming

adding it, and solve other problems than just the length of the method name. We are winding down on new features for DOM3 Events (trying to get it out the door), but if there's a lot of implementer enthusiasm on this, we could put it in. Any implementers care to chime in? Regards- -Doug Schepers

Re: DOM3EV: [ViewModes] typeArg on initXXXEvent

using the shortest name that still conveys what the event is meant to do. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Web IDL for our API spec.

the specifications using it. It is an abstraction layer, Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Marked addEventListenerNS and removeEventListenerNS At Risk

/NodeEventTarget.html#addEventListenerNS%28java.lang.String,%20java.lang.String,%20org.w3c.dom.events.EventListener,%20boolean,%20java.lang.Object%29 [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-events/ Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Focus and focus()/blur() [ISSUE-102]

Hi, Folks- I plan to tackle this issue soon. If you have any thoughts about it, I'd appreciate your feedback before I get to it. Please respond directly to this message, or send a message to www-dom with [ISSUE-102] in the subject line so Tracker finds it. Thanks! Regards- -Doug Schepers

CfC: Event Namespaces Removed

/html/DOM3-Events.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Let's set up a mailing list for coordination with ECMA and Web IDL discussion

with significant and substantive feature requests, of course. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs Arthur Barstow wrote (on 9/27/09 5:24 PM): On Sep 27, 2009, at 7:33 PM, ext Maciej Stachowiak wrote: ECMA TC39 (the group responsible for ECMAScript) has expressed

New Scripting Coordination List Set Up

://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/ [2] http://www.w3.org/Mail/Request [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/aa/ Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Web IDL and the New Scripting Coordination List

IDL or just coordination-related discussions re Web IDL? FWIW, I prefer all Web IDL. Yes, I've talked with Cameron about this, and public-script-coord is intended for all Web IDL discussions, not just coordination between WGs or other standards bodies. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact

Re: Touch and gestures events

suppose you have Mac binaries? What sort of hardware is needed to support it? Are there any restrictions on the OS level, or can you enable multitouch on any OS? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs kari.hiit...@nokia.com wrote (on 10/15/09 10:33 AM): Hi, I suppose

Re: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?

Hi, Michael- Sorry for the tardy response. This was an unfortunate oversight. I've now added this to the proposed errata [1]. Please let me know if this suits your needs. [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/12/REC-ElementTraversal-20081222-errata#S1 Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG

Re: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?

Hi, Anne- Anne van Kesteren wrote (on 10/17/09 2:33 AM): On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:46:56 +0200, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org wrote: Sorry for the tardy response. This was an unfortunate oversight. I've now added this to the proposed errata [1]. Please let me know if this suits your needs. [1

childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?)

. What is the purpose of childElementCount? One comment response from you (Doug Schepers):- | While many uses of Element Traversal do not require this attribute, I | speak from personal developer experience when I confirm that it is | useful. Does not describe the problem that childElementCount

Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children

Hey- Maciej Stachowiak wrote (on 10/20/09 4:42 PM): On Oct 18, 2009, at 4:14 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org mailto:schep...@w3.org wrote: So, rather than dwell on an admittedly imperfect spec, I personally suggest that we urge WebKit

Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns

, and learn later from our mistakes how to improve the situation. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns

the kinds of things one can evaluate with a honeypot-type contest. They're worried about what web developers will build if we give them CORS as a tool. Sorry for being dense, but why couldn't the whitehats build toy systems on an open honeynet? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG

Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns

Hi, David-Sarah- David-Sarah Hopwood wrote (on 10/24/09 2:45 AM): Doug Schepers wrote: I'm not at all a security expert, or even particularly well-informed on the topic, but it does occur to me that most of CORS' opponents seem very much in the capability-based security camp [1], and may

CORS Best PRactices (was: [cors] unaddressed security concerns)

not to do with CORS (and cross-site scripting in general), which W3C could host alongside CORS, to get the right messages out there. If the security community is willing to write up articles as well, W3C would be happy to link to or host that material. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG

Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns

Hi, Maciej- Maciej Stachowiak wrote (on 10/24/09 4:42 PM): On Oct 24, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Adam Barth wrote: On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org mailto:schep...@w3.org wrote: Sorry for being dense, but why couldn't the whitehats build toy systems on an open

Changes to DOM3 Events Key Identifiers

have to wait for the next version, but send them on anyway.) [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/html/DOM3-Events.html#keyset [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/svgudom.html#KeyIdentifiersSet Regards- -Doug Schepers, on behalf of the WebApps WG Editor, DOM Level 3 Events W3C

Travel Notification: Expect Delayed Responses

. My apologies in advance for slow response times. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely

of the browser (be it a desktop or mobile). Please send in use cases, requirements, concerns, and concrete suggestions about the general topic (regardless of your opinion about my suggestion). [1] http://www.w3.org/2009/11/02-dap-irc#T20-40-39-1 Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG

Fwd: [office] Public Review of OpenDocument Version 1.2

Hi, WebApps folks (particularly Widgets folks)- The ODF 1.2 packaging specification has just been released for public review at OASIS. I'm forwarding the announcement for those of you who might be interested in reviewing it, given the overall similarities to Widgets packaging. Regards-

Spam Alert (was: Warning Notice!!!)

, for your own security. I'm sure I don't have to tell you this, but never send a stranger your username, password, phone number, or date of birth. You can, however, send me your bank account information... trust me... :) Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs W3 Online Team

Re: MPEG-U

to make sure that the process is understood and accepted, before sending the liaison itself. Could you please request that right away? I know you are doing what you can to make sure the communication channels are clear, so I appreciate your help. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG

Re: MPEG-U

Hi, Cyril- Cyril Concolato wrote (on 1/20/10 12:24 AM): Le 13/01/2010 19:59, Doug Schepers a écrit : Cyril Concolato wrote (on 1/13/10 10:37 AM): Yes, you're right, the problem is that liaisons usually are not considered as public documents so the secretariat or MPEG members

Re: [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2

to see emails from people on the CSS WG who are unpleasantly surprised by developments in the Selectors API spec. This requires more than the usual inter-group review. Please let me know how I can help facilitate this. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs Daniel Glazman

Re: [widgets] Null in PC

the implementation language and the content language... the content should not get a '0', right? It should get 'null', I'd think. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Rechartering WebApp WG

://www.w3.org/2010/webapps/charter/Overview.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Rechartering WebApp WG

it should be the previous version of the Web Apps WG charter, It hink. Corrected. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Rechartering WebApp WG

. friends, friends-of) Are these deliverables the Widgets folks are willing to take on? If so, are there clear use case requirements documents, and available editing resources? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Rechartering WebApp WG

Hi, Art- Thanks for the feedback. Arthur Barstow wrote (on 2/9/10 9:34 AM): On Feb 8, 2010, at 7:25 AM, ext Doug Schepers wrote: We are interested in comments to refine the charter before submitting it to the Advisory Committee and W3C management for review. [1] http://www.w3.org/2010

Re: Rechartering WebApp WG

, and having integrated the feedback from the discussions on member-webapps and public-webapps, I would like to move ahead with W3M review, so we can get this in front of the Advisory Committee for further consideration. [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/webapps/charter/Overview.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C

Re: Rechartering WebApp WG

Hi, Anne- Thanks for your feedback. Anne van Kesteren wrote (on 2/11/10 11:06 AM): On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:58:40 +0100, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org wrote: [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/webapps/charter/Overview.html Sorry for being late. NP, just in time. Should it say DOM Level 4 Core

[widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources

resource without touching that file itself. Mix this with parameters (something we are working on in SVG and CSS), and it's a nice model. Is it possible to add something like this? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: [widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources

Hi, Boris- Boris Zbarsky wrote (on 2/11/10 12:04 PM): On 2/11/10 11:57 AM, Doug Schepers wrote: One odd part of the separation of content and presentation is that a stylesheet is applied to a file by including a link to the stylesheet in the target file. That is totally backward. Strictly

Re: Window id - an idea to make multi page web application easier

is in our new draft charter. It needs to address resource discoverability, which your proposal might be part of. [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/webapps/charter/Overview.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Rechartering WebApp WG

and requirements you have for this social API are? [1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/postmsg/ [2] http://dev.w3.org/html5/websockets/ [3] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest/ [4] http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/contacts/ Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs Scott Wilson

Social APIs (was: Rechartering WebApp WG)

that it works well with Widgets. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs Scott Wilson wrote (on 2/13/10 5:21 AM): Hi Doug, I'm not adamant that these requirements are met specifically just for Widgets, just that these are where the current use-cases come from

Re: How do I join this list?

Hi, David- Like that. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: How do I join this list?

Hi, David- More specifically, you simply send an email to public-webapps-requ...@w3.org with the subject line subscribe. The archives are here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/ Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Notifications

should design for the future, in any case, and not limit ourselves to simple text notifications. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) wrote (on 2/23/10 1:06 PM): This thread seems to have languished, and I'm trying to figure out how to move forward here

Re: Notifications

it was an informed decision. I agree with the simplicity goal. Fallbacks and defaults make a lot of sense to me. I'll noodle a bit and see if I can come up with a simple mechanism, but I'm probably happier reviewing other people's proposals. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG

Re: Notifications

Doug Schepers wrote (on 2/23/10 2:43 PM): HTML is a little bit more widely adopted than SVG (I suspect that there are 10x as many HTML documents as SVG documents on the Web). I've been told offlist that it may not be obvious that I was joking here... 10x is an absurdly low figure... HTML

Re: Notifications

started a simple wiki page to kick this off: http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Web_Notifications Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs Drew Wilson wrote (on 2/23/10 5:26 PM): 2010/2/23 Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc The same is not true for the suggest notification

Re: Event handlers - Pointer Devices

, and this should help frame a successful outcome for this spec. [1] http://www.w3.org/2009/05/DeviceAPICharter Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Items not listed as new in the draft charter

/webapps/wiki/Charter Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

  1   2   >