On 08.05.2015 11:36, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 8 May 2015 6:52 pm, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 07.05.2015 04:30, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Can we please make the monkeypatch a regular part of Python's
site.py which can enabled via an environment variable, say
export PYTHONHTTPSVERIFY=0
On 30.04.2015 02:33, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Hi folks,
This is just a note to highlight the fact that I tweaked the Opting
out section in PEP 476 based on various discussions I've had over the
past few months: https://hg.python.org/peps/rev/dfd96ee9d6a8
The notable changes:
* the example
On 21.04.2015 18:08, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:33 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 21.04.2015 05:37, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Jack Diederich jackd...@gmail.com
wrote:
* Uploading stubs for other people's code is a terrible
On 21.04.2015 05:37, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Jack Diederich jackd...@gmail.com wrote:
* Uploading stubs for other people's code is a terrible idea. Who do I
contact when I update the interface to my library? The random Joe who
helped by uploading annotations
On 17.04.2015 19:31, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Am 17.04.15 um 00:46 schrieb M.-A. Lemburg:
I had asked the PSF for a StartSSL certificate when the previous
certificate expired, and the PSF was not able to provide one. After
waiting several weeks for the PSF to provide the certificate, Kurt
On 16.04.2015 21:34, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Am 04.04.15 um 21:54 schrieb M.-A. Lemburg:
FWIW: The PSF mostly uses StartSSL nowadays and they also support code
signing certificates. Given that this option is a lot cheaper than
Verisign, I think we should switch, unless there are significant
On 04.04.2015 02:49, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Apr 3, 2015, at 6:38 PM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 04.04.2015 00:14, Steve Dower wrote:
The thing is, that's exactly the same goodness as Authenticode gives,
except everyone gets that for free and meanwhile you're the only one who
On 04.04.2015 16:41, Steve Dower wrote:
Relying only on Authenticode for Windows installers would result in a break
in technology w/r to the downloads we make available for Python, since all
other files are (usually) GPG signed
This is the point of this discussion. I'm willing to make such
/
For Anaconda (the MS Azure chosen python distribution):
* http://docs.continuum.io/anaconda/install.html#windows-install
...
These should/could/are checking GPG signatures for Windows packages
downstream.
http://www.scipy.org/install.html
On Apr 3, 2015 5:38 PM, M.-A. Lemburg
m
On 04.04.2015 21:49, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015, at 03:35 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 04.04.2015 21:02, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
For the record, that is a Symantec/Verisign code signing
certificate. We paid $1123 for it last April. It expires
April 2017.
If you don't switch
On 03.04.2015 11:56, Larry Hastings wrote:
My Windows development days are firmly behind me. So I don't really have an
opinion here. So I put
it to you, Windows Python developers: do you care about GnuPG signatures on
Windows-specific files?
Or do you not care?
Regardless of target
On 03.04.2015 19:35, Steve Dower wrote:
My Windows development days are firmly behind me. So I don't really have an
opinion here. So I put it to you, Windows Python developers: do you care
about
GnuPG signatures on Windows-specific files? Or do you not care?
The later replies seem to
On 04.04.2015 00:14, Steve Dower wrote:
The thing is, that's exactly the same goodness as Authenticode gives, except
everyone gets that for free and meanwhile you're the only one who has
admitted to using GPG on Windows :)
Basically, what I want to hear is that GPG sigs provide
On 06.02.2015 00:27, Francis Giraldeau wrote:
I need to access frame members from within a signal handler for tracing
purpose. My first attempt to access co_filename was like this (omitting
error checking):
PyFrameObject *frame = PyEval_GetFrame();
PyObject *ob =
On 24.01.2015 21:23, Zachary Ware wrote:
On Saturday, January 24, 2015, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Fri Jan 23 2015 at 5:45:28 PM Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','g...@krypto.org'); wrote:
On Fri Jan 23 2015 at 11:20:02 AM M.-A. Lemburg m
On 23.01.2015 19:48, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 01/23/2015 06:30 PM, Cyd Haselton wrote:
Related to my earlier question regarding building Python on Android
and an undefined reference to dlopen error...I have the following
question: Is it possible to build and install Python without having
to
On 23.01.2015 21:56, Cyd Haselton wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:19 PM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 23.01.2015 19:48, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 01/23/2015 06:30 PM, Cyd Haselton wrote:
Related to my earlier question regarding building Python on Android
and an undefined reference
On 13.01.2015 23:50, Victor Stinner wrote:
2015-01-13 23:46 GMT+01:00 M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com:
Just a note of caution: for older preview releases of VS the
only way to get back to a clean system was to reinstall
Windows.
Does it mean that it's not possible to have VS 2008 and VS 2015
On 13.01.2015 23:42, Brian Curtin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-01-13 23:18 GMT+01:00 Steve Dower steve.do...@microsoft.com:
Technically, Python 3.5 requires Visual Studio 2015
For me, it's *very* difficult to find how to install
On 13.01.2015 23:04, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
To compile Python on Windows, there are a few information in the
Developer Guide:
https://docs.python.org/devguide/setup.html#windows-compiling
Python 3.5 now requires Visual Studio 2010 *SP1*, or newer Visual Studio:
Hi Facunda,
you should either write to webmas...@pycon.org, the
conference ML or me directly, since I'm managing these the
pycon.org subdomains.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014, at 10:59, Facundo Batista wrote:
Hi!
Don't remember where to ask for changing the redirection of that
domain name. Somebody
Just FYI (and for the archives), to perhaps save someone a few minutes:
I've been hitting a problem with hg pull and hg clone on a box recently
and after staring at it for a while, finally found the cause.
Here's what hg printed:
HG-Python/cpython hg pull -u -b 2.7
abort: no suitable response
On 06.11.2014 15:39, Brett Cannon wrote:
What is pythontest.net? Is it something we control, and if so how do we add
things to it for tests? Did I miss an email on python-dev or
python-committers about this?
pythontest.net is a domain owned by the PSF and run by Donald
Stufft and Benjamin (I
On 26.10.2014 00:14, Ned Deily wrote:
In article m28uk4wxod@valheru.db3l.homeip.net,
David Bolen db3l@gmail.com wrote:
David Bolen db3l@gmail.com writes:
which appears to die mid-stream while receiving the manifests.
So I'm sort of hoping there might be some record
On 10.10.2014 11:26, Larry Hastings wrote:
On 10/10/2014 08:07 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On 10 October 2014 01:29, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
What about the Python stable ABI? Would it be broken if we use a
different compiler?
What about third party Python extensions?
On 24.09.2014 03:48, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 24 September 2014 03:05, Steve Dower steve.do...@microsoft.com wrote:
Larry Hastings wrote:
On 09/19/2014 03:31 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I think we need a Python 3.5 Release Schedule PEP.
Just checked it in as PEP 478. It should show up here in a
Thanks for the insights, Steve.
More below...
On 24.09.2014 18:52, Steve Dower wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
I'd rather be conservative here and wait for another Python release before
switching VC versions. There are a few important questions that need answers
before we can consider a new VC
On 01.09.2014 10:09, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 1 September 2014 17:13, Christian Heimes christ...@python.org wrote:
On 01.09.2014 08:44, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Yes, it would have exactly the same security failure modes as
sitecustomize, except it would only fire if the application
imported the ssl
On 30.08.2014 01:37, Greg Ewing wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
we needed
a way to make sure that Python 3 also optionally supports working
with lone surrogates in such UTF-8 streams (nowadays called CESU-8:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CESU-8).
I don't think CESU-8 is the same thing
On 30.08.2014 04:44, Alex Gaynor wrote:
Thanks for the rapid feedback everyone!
I want to summarize the action items and discussion points that have come up
so
far:
To add to the PEP:
* Emit a warning in 3.4.next for cases that would raise a Exception in 3.5
* Clearly state that the
On 30.08.2014 12:40, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 12:19:11 +0200
M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
To add to the PEP:
* Emit a warning in 3.4.next for cases that would raise a Exception in 3.5
* Clearly state that the existing OpenSSL environment variables
On 30.08.2014 12:55, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 12:46:47 +0200
M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
The change is to the OpenSSL API, not the OpenSSL lib. By setting
the variable you enable a few special calls to the config loader
functions in OpenSSL when calling
On 30.08.2014 15:32, R. David Murray wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 14:03:57 +0200, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 30.08.2014 12:55, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 12:46:47 +0200
M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
That use case should be served with the SSL_CERT_DIR
On 29.08.2014 02:41, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
In the process of booking up for my other post in this thread, I
noticed the 'surrogatepass' handler.
Is there a real use case for the 'surrogatepass' error handler? It
seems like a horrible break in the abstraction. IMHO, if there's a
need,
On 29.08.2014 13:22, Isaac Morland wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 29.08.2014 02:41, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Since Python allows working with lone surrogates in Unicode (they
are valid code points) and we're using UTF-8 for marshal, we needed
a way to make sure
On 29.08.2014 21:47, Alex Gaynor wrote:
Hi all,
I've just submitted PEP 476, on enabling certificate validation by default for
HTTPS clients in Python. Please have a look and let me know what you think.
PEP text follows.
Thanks for the PEP. I think this is generally a good idea,
but some
On 29.08.2014 23:11, Donald Stufft wrote:
Sorry I was on my phone and didn’t get to fully reply to this.
On Aug 29, 2014, at 4:00 PM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 29.08.2014 21:47, Alex Gaynor wrote:
Hi all,
I've just submitted PEP 476, on enabling certificate validation
On 23.06.2014 18:09, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:09 AM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
* Should we make use of the potential breakage with 2.7.10
to introduce a new Windows compiler version for Python 2.7 ?
Assuming it is a good idea to continue producing
On 23.06.2014 22:20, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Jun 23, 2014, at 3:27 PM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 23.06.2014 18:09, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:09 AM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
* Should we make use of the potential breakage with 2.7.10
With PEP 466 and the constant flow of OpenSSL security fixes
which are currently being handled via Python patch level releases,
we will soon reach 2.7.10 and quickly go beyond that (also see
http://bugs.python.org/issue21308).
This opens up a potential backwards incompatibility with existing
On 21.06.2014 12:51, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 21 June 2014 20:27, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
With PEP 466 and the constant flow of OpenSSL security fixes
which are currently being handled via Python patch level releases,
we will soon reach 2.7.10 and quickly go beyond that (also see
On 21.06.2014 22:34, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 2:57 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 21.06.2014 12:51, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Such code has an easy fix available, though, as sys.version_info has
existed since 2.0, and handles two digit micro releases just fine
On 17.06.2014 20:27, Steve Dower wrote:
Yates, Andy (CS Houston, TX) wrote:
Python Dev,
Andy here. I have a Windows product based on Python and I'm getting hammered
to
release a version that includes the fix in OpenSSL 1.0.1h. My product is
built
on a Windows system using Python installed
On 17.06.2014 22:36, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Le 17/06/2014 14:55, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit :
Alternatively, you could make use of our pyOpenSSL distribution,
which includes pyOpenSSL and the OpenSSL libs (also for Windows):
http://www.egenix.com/products/python/pyOpenSSL/
We created
On 06.06.2014 20:25, Brian Curtin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Steve Dower steve.do...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Steve Dower steve.do...@microsoft.com
wrote:
On 06.06.2014 20:49, Brian Curtin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:41 PM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 06.06.2014 20:25, Brian Curtin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Steve Dower steve.do...@microsoft.com
On 08.05.2014 23:22, Donald Stufft wrote:
On a personal note, I'm uncomfortable with the way this change is
perceived as a case of *pip* enforcing a behaviour that the pip
developers feel should be required. I actually don't like this change
particularly. So having pip implement the
On 09.05.2014 13:44, Donald Stufft wrote:
On May 9, 2014, at 4:12 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
Donald: I don't think anyone is arguing that hosting packages on
PyPI is a bad thing and PyPI as a service has gotten a lot better
than it was a few years ago.
Didn’t mean to imply
On 09.05.2014 17:39, Donald Stufft wrote:
On May 9, 2014, at 9:58 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 09.05.2014 13:44, Donald Stufft wrote:
On May 9, 2014, at 4:12 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
Donald: I don't think anyone is arguing that hosting packages on
PyPI
Well, to be fair and leaving aside uptime concerns and the general
desire to always install packages from some server instead of
a safe and trusted local directory (probably too obvious ;-),
it would certainly be possible to add support for
trusted externally hosted packages.
However, for some
On 08.05.2014 15:58, Donald Stufft wrote:
On May 8, 2014, at 9:39 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
Well, to be fair and leaving aside uptime concerns and the general
desire to always install packages from some server instead of
a safe and trusted local directory (probably too
On 08.05.2014 15:57, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 8 May 2014 23:39, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
However, for some reason there's a strong resistance against
doing this, which I frankly don't understand.
Because we're taking responsibility for the end-to-end user experience
of PyPI
On 08.05.2014 16:42, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 08.05.2014 15:58, Donald Stufft wrote:
On May 8, 2014, at 9:39 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
Well, to be fair and leaving aside uptime concerns and the general
desire to always install packages from some server instead of
a safe
On 18.04.2014 23:03, Ezio Melotti wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Brett Cannon bcan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu Apr 17 2014 at 1:34:23 PM, Jurko Gospodnetić
jurko.gospodne...@pke.hr wrote:
Hi.
On 14.4.2014. 23:51, Brett Cannon wrote:
Now the question is whether the
On 15.04.2014 09:45, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Brett Cannon bcan...@gmail.com wrote:
In my work environment (Python 2.7.2, all the heavy lifting done in
C++), startup costs are dominated by dynamic linking of all our C++
libraries and their Boost wrappers:
Sure,
On 11.04.2014 03:15, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 10 Apr 2014 18:55, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014, at 14:50, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
Yep. All binary Python distributions that bundle SSL support need
updating.
But... what MRAB said.
We also *likely* have SSL
n 31.03.2014 21:09, Chris Barker wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Fred Drake f...@fdrake.net wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz
wrote:
ISO 8601 doesn't seem to define a representation for
negative durations, though, so it wouldn't solve the
On 02.04.2014 15:04, Skip Montanaro wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 7:52 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
print now() + RelativeDateTime(months=+1, day=1)
2014-05-01 14:49:05.83
I find this sort date arithmetic unintuitive, though I'm at a loss to
come up with better logic than you
On 23.03.2014 08:07, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Open Questions
==
* What are the risks associated with allowing OpenSSL to be updated to
new feature versions in the Windows and Mac OS X binary installers for
maintenance releases? Currently we just upgrade to the appropriate
On 24.03.2014 13:33, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Le 24/03/2014 10:10, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit :
On 23.03.2014 08:07, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Open Questions
==
* What are the risks associated with allowing OpenSSL to be updated to
new feature versions in the Windows and Mac OS X binary
On 24.03.2014 18:23, Ned Deily wrote:
In article
cadisq7f0cnzrfm4i8xj13j+slq63uynqkdo12czm5yeq3bf...@mail.gmail.com,
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
You also reminded me that I need to dig around for and reference Ned's
email about the status of OS X and reference that (OpenSSL
On 22.03.2014 22:11, Nick Coghlan wrote:
PEP: 466
Title: Network Security Enhancement Exception for All Branches
+1
--
Marc-Andre Lemburg
eGenix.com
Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Mar 22 2014)
Python Projects, Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/
On 18.02.2014 05:25, Tim Peters wrote:
[M.-A. Lemburg]
Now, the choice to have None compare less than all other objects
may have been arbitrary, but IMO it was a good, consistent and
useful choice.
Possibly useful for some apps, sure. Not for my apps. For example,
when I initialize
On 15.02.2014 07:03, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg writes:
IMO, it was a mistake to have None return a TypeError in
comparisons, since it makes many typical data operations
fail, e.g.
I don't understand this statement. The theory is that they *should*
fail
On 17.02.2014 12:23, Gustavo Carneiro wrote:
On 17 February 2014 11:14, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 15.02.2014 07:03, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg writes:
IMO, it was a mistake to have None return a TypeError in
comparisons, since it makes many typical data
On 17.02.2014 12:47, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
17.02.14 13:14, M.-A. Lemburg написав(ла):
Here's a particularly nasty case:
l = [(1, None), (2, None)]
l.sort()
l
[(1, None), (2, None)]
l = [(1, None), (2, None), (3, 4)]
l.sort()
l
[(1, None), (2, None), (3, 4)]
l = [(1, None), (2, None
On 17.02.2014 12:49, Gustavo Carneiro wrote:
On 17 February 2014 11:43, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 17.02.2014 12:23, Gustavo Carneiro wrote:
On 17 February 2014 11:14, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 15.02.2014 07:03, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg writes
On 17.02.2014 13:12, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 17 Feb 2014 21:15, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 15.02.2014 07:03, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg writes:
IMO, it was a mistake to have None return a TypeError in
comparisons, since it makes many typical data operations
On 17.02.2014 13:19, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
17.02.14 13:56, M.-A. Lemburg написав(ла):
Yes, but that's not the point. Unlike strings or other mixed types that
you cannot compare, None is used as placeholder in data processing as
special value to mean no value available.
Isn't float('nan
On 17.02.2014 14:29, Gustavo Carneiro wrote:
On 17 February 2014 12:30, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 17.02.2014 13:19, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
17.02.14 13:56, M.-A. Lemburg написав(ла):
Yes, but that's not the point. Unlike strings or other mixed types that
you cannot compare
On 17.02.2014 15:38, Jon Ribbens wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:43:25PM +0100, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
This doesn't only apply to numeric comparisons. In Python 2 you
can compare None with any kind of object and it always sorts first,
No you can't. See http://bugs.python.org/issue1673405
On 17.02.2014 21:12, Tim Peters wrote:
[...]
Guido wanted to drop all the arbitrary but consistent mixed-type
comparison crud for Python 3. Nothing special about None in that. As
already noted, the various `datetime` types were the first to
experiment with implementing full blown
On 14.02.2014 11:20, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 20:13:43 +1000
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 February 2014 20:02, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:46:50 +0100
Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
Sending this to python-dev as
On 22.01.2014 11:30, Donald Stufft wrote:
I would like to propose that a backwards incompatible change be made to
Python to make
verification of hostname and certificate chain the default instead of
requiring it to be opt
in.
Python 3.4 has made great strides in making it easier for
On 22.01.2014 11:56, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Jan 22, 2014, at 5:51 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 22.01.2014 11:30, Donald Stufft wrote:
I would like to propose that a backwards incompatible change be made to
Python to make
verification of hostname and certificate chain
On 22.01.2014 12:36, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Jan 22, 2014, at 6:30 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
The change would also disable all services using self-signed
certificates which are very common in internal networks and
for ad-hoc setups. Many routers and other devices use self
On 13.01.2014 07:51, Nick Coghlan wrote:
[Using a new asciistr type]
The key thing that the text model change in Python 3 enabled is for us
to use the type system to *help* with managing the complexity of
dealing with text encodings. We've got a long way with just the two
pure types, and no
On 11.01.2014 14:54, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 11.01.2014 14:49, schrieb Georg Brandl:
Am 11.01.2014 10:44, schrieb Stephen Hansen:
I mean, its not like the bytes type lacks knowledge of the subset of bytes
that happen to be 7-bit ascii-compatible and can't perform text-ish
operations
on
On 11.01.2014 16:34, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 12 January 2014 01:15, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 11.01.2014 14:54, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 11.01.2014 14:49, schrieb Georg Brandl:
Am 11.01.2014 10:44, schrieb Stephen Hansen:
I mean, its not like the bytes type lacks knowledge
On 09.01.2014 22:45, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 13:36:05 -0800
Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
Some folks have suggested using latin-1 (or other 8-bit encoding) -- is
that guaranteed to work with any binary data, and round-trip accurately?
Yes, it is.
Just a word
On 06.01.2014 14:24, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
bytes % args and bytes.format(args) are requested by Mercurial and
Twisted projects. The issue #3982 was stuck because nobody proposed a
complete definition of the new features. Here is a try as a PEP.
The PEP is a draft with open questions.
On 29.11.2013 16:25, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
How about acknowledging that these waters are dark and murky and help
making things better?
Well, how about? If Anatoly has a concrete proposal, surely he can propose a
patch to make things better.
Which is what he did. And instead of
On 16.11.2013 01:47, Victor Stinner wrote:
Adding transform()/untransform() method to bytes and str is a non
trivial change and not everybody likes them. Anyway, it's too late for
Python 3.4.
Just to clarify: I still like the idea of adding those methods.
I just don't see what this addition
On 16.11.2013 18:48, Eric Snow wrote:
While looking at something unrelated, I happened to peek at
Python/frozenmain.c and found Py_FrozenMain(). I kind of get the idea
of it, but am curious what motivated the addition and who might be
using it. The function is not documented and doesn't have
On 15.11.2013 08:13, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 15 November 2013 11:10, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 11/14/2013 5:32 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
I don't like the functions codecs.encode() and codecs.decode() because
the type of the result depends on the encoding (second parameter). We
On 15.11.2013 12:45, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 15 November 2013 20:33, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:28:35 +1100
Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
One benefit is:
import codecs
codec = get_name_of_compression_codec()
result = codecs.encode(data,
On 13.11.2013 15:29, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Back in Python 3.2, the non-Unicode codecs were restored to the
standard library, but without the associated aliases (mostly due to
some thoroughly confusing error messages when they were mistakenly
used with the Unicode encoding convenience methods).
On 04.11.2013 16:10, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2013/11/4 M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com:
On 04.11.2013 11:01, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
bugs.python.org is still not responding on IPv6. Can someone please
remove the record from python.org DNS, or fix the IPv6
configuration?
It's
On 04.11.2013 11:01, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
bugs.python.org is still not responding on IPv6. Can someone please
remove the record from python.org DNS, or fix the IPv6
configuration?
It's an issue on my PC because my PC has IPv6 address and so it cannot
reach bugs.python.org. wget
On 04.11.2013 17:05, R. David Murray wrote:
On Mon, 04 Nov 2013 16:34:46 +0100, Antoine Pitrou anto...@python.org wrote:
On lun., 2013-11-04 at 16:09 +0100, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 04.11.2013 11:01, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
bugs.python.org is still not responding on IPv6. Can someone please
On 04.11.2013 20:54, Victor Stinner wrote:
2013/11/4 M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com:
Some things to try on the box:
* ping6 2001:888:2000:d::a2 (that's python.org)
$ ping6 -c 4 2001:888:2000:d::a2
PING 2001:888:2000:d::a2(2001:888:2000:d::a2) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 2001:888:2000:d::a2
On 08.06.2013 09:45, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
Here is attached a list of obsoleted RFCs referred in the *.rst, *.txt, *.py,
*.c and *.h files. I
think it would be worthwhile to update the source code and documentation for
more modern RFCs.
Thanks for creating such a list.
BTW: What is
On 29.05.2013 21:19, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 29 May 2013 21:59:21 +0300
Carlos Nepomuceno carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com wrote:
[1] pybench - run the standard Python PyBench benchmark suite. This is
considered
an unreliable, unrepresentative benchmark; do not base decisions
On 12.05.2013 06:03, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
The long anticipated emergency 2.7.5 release has now been tagged. It
will be publicly announced as binaries arrive.
Originally, I was just going to cherrypick regression fixes onto the
2.7.4 release and release those as 2.7.5. I started to this
On 15.05.2013 19:11, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2013/5/15 M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com:
On 12.05.2013 06:03, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
The long anticipated emergency 2.7.5 release has now been tagged. It
will be publicly announced as binaries arrive.
Originally, I was just going to cherrypick
On 30.04.2013 11:15, Paul Moore wrote:
Before I raise a bug for this, can someone confirm if I've simply missed
something? I don't see any way, either in the docs or in the helpstrings
from the codecs, of listing the codecs that have been registered.
FWIW, I picked this up when I was looking
On 30.04.2013 11:52, Paul Moore wrote:
On 30 April 2013 10:42, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
It would be possible to get a list of registered codec search functions,
but there's no API to ask the search functions for a list of supported
codecs.
OK, so there's no way to determine
On 23.04.2013 23:37, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 24 Apr 2013 01:25, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 23.04.2013 17:15, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Apr 22, 2013, at 06:22 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
You can ask the same question about all the other codecs. (And that
question has indeed been
On 23.04.2013 19:24, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:04 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 23.04.2013 17:47, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:22 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
Just as reminder: we have the general purpose
encode()/decode
On 23.04.2013 17:15, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Apr 22, 2013, at 06:22 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
You can ask the same question about all the other codecs. (And that
question has indeed been asked in the past.)
Except for rot13. :-)
The fact that you can do this instead *is* a bit odd. ;)
101 - 200 of 989 matches
Mail list logo
