On Mar 23, 2014, at 7:03 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Mar 23, 2014, at 08:00 AM, Skip Montanaro wrote:
I'm unclear how this would be better than just biting the bullet and
making a 2.8 release. On the one hand, the 2.7.x number suggests
(based on the existing release
fwiw, I'm offering the keys/account/etc for getpython3.com to whomever
has the time to keep it fresh and up to date.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Wes Turner wes.tur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hardly marketing documents, but potentially useful nonetheless:
I'm giving AMK the keys to the kingdom right now:
AMK: Feel free to go nuts. Email me your public key
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On 24/01/2014 16:37, Jesse Noller wrote:
fwiw, I'm offering the keys/account/etc for getpython3.com to whomever
On Jan 22, 2014, at 5:30 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 22.01.2014 11:56, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Jan 22, 2014, at 5:51 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 22.01.2014 11:30, Donald Stufft wrote:
I would like to propose that a backwards incompatible change be made
On Jan 22, 2014, at 6:58 AM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
Do you really think those people would be making the same complaints
if they could restore the previous behavior with a simple boolean flag
delivered
On Jan 22, 2014, at 8:03 AM, Christian Heimes christ...@python.org wrote:
On 22.01.2014 14:55, Donald Stufft wrote:
As an additional side note, anecdotal evidence and what not, but
*every* time I bring this up somewhere I get at least one reply
that looks similar to
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
Never mind. If someone else cares they can propose it. I withdraw.
I'll throw writing a PEP for 3.5 to do this following the deprecation
policy on my todo list so 3.4 fixing can move on. I needed to brush up
on my ReST
On Sep 28, 2013, at 12:59 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
It sounds like a reasonable approach to me.
In terms of naming, would you consider concurrent.asyncio? When we created
that parent namespace for futures, one of the other suggested submodules
discussed was the
Email me the name of the repo you want, and your github username
(preferably off list so I don't miss it!) and I will set you up Eli
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25,
On Feb 27, 2013, at 3:20 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
* security by obscurity in legal position of PSF towards contributors
https://code.google.com/legal/individual-cla-v1.0.html
vs
http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ +
On Feb 28, 2013, at 6:42 AM, Stefan Krah ste...@bytereef.org wrote:
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ + http://opensource.org/
licenses/apache2.0.php
and why PSF doesn't comply the 4. Redistribution clause from Apache 2.0
On Feb 28, 2013, at 6:55 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Le Thu, 28 Feb 2013 06:48:24 -0500,
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com a écrit :
Perhaps it's an idea to have a python-legal mailing list for these
topics?
I don't think it's fundamentally wrong to scrutinize licenses
On Feb 28, 2013, at 7:23 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Le Thu, 28 Feb 2013 06:57:36 -0500,
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Feb 28, 2013, at 6:55 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
wrote:
Le Thu, 28 Feb 2013 06:48:24 -0500,
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com
On Feb 28, 2013, at 7:31 AM, Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 28, 2013, at 7:23 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Le Thu, 28 Feb 2013 06:57:36 -0500,
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Feb 28, 2013, at 6:55 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
On Feb 28, 2013, at 8:03 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
Stefan Krah writes:
Why would [the PSF list] help to resolve such an issue (if it is an
issue at all!)
Precisely.
If there *is* a compliance problem, there's nothing to be done before
talking to the lawyers.
See: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-legal-sig
Open archives. As the header says this is for the discussion of CLA/other
issues. If specific legal questions or alterations to Python/the PSF
trademarks, CLA/etc are requested those *must* be sent to p...@python.org for
board
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Stefan Krah wrote:
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com (mailto:jnol...@gmail.com) wrote:
We have one: p...@python.org (mailto:p...@python.org)
That's not exactly a public mailing-list.
Nope. But it's also where lawyers flock
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Stefan Krah wrote:
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com (mailto:jnol...@gmail.com) wrote:
Why would it help to resolve such an issue (if it is an issue at all!)
for a single person on a private mailing list?
See: http://mail.python.org
On Feb 21, 2013, at 5:32 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Le Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:18:35 +0100,
Christian Heimes christ...@python.org a écrit :
Am 21.02.2013 08:42, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
Sure, but in many instances, rebooting a machine is not
business-threatening. You will
On Feb 20, 2013, at 6:22 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:21:22 -0500
Donald Stufft donald.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
It's not a distributed DoS issue, it's a severe DoS vulnerabilities. A
On Monday, February 11, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:07:50 +0300
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com (mailto:techto...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
(mailto:gu...@python.org) wrote:
Anatoly,
On Friday, December 21, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Dear python-dev *and* python-ideas,
I am posting PEP 3156 here for early review and discussion. As you can
see from the liberally sprinkled TBD entries it is not done, but I am
about to disappear on vacation for a few weeks
I think becoming an apple signed developer to get a cert is the best approach.
If anyone wanted to approach apple about open source/non profit gratis
licenses, that would be appreciated.
Otherwise I could do it / fund it from the PSF board side, which I am happy to
do.
I also concur with
More fuel; fire:
http://lucumr.pocoo.org/2012/6/22/hate-hate-hate-everywhere/
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
On Friday, June 8, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Meador Inge wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:06 AM, mar...@v.loewis.de
(mailto:mar...@v.loewis.de) wrote:
I hereby predict that Microsoft will revert this decision, and that VS
Express
11 will be able to build CPython.
And your prediction
I'd like to discuss top-posting.
On Monday, March 19, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Mar 19, 2012, at 05:25 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
apology: I searched for a few minutes and could not find a code of
conduct regarding HTML mail.
I'm not sure it's written down
FWIW, I agree that much of the rhetoric in the current version of PEP
414 is excessive.
Armin has given me permission to create an updated version of PEP 414
and toning down the hyperbole (or removing it entirely in cases where
it's irrelevant to the final decision) is one of the things
On Saturday, February 25, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
If this can encourage more projects to support Python 3 (even if it's
only 3.3 and later) and hence improve adoption of Python 3, I'm all
for it.
A small quibble: I'd like to see a benchmark of a 'u' function implemented in
I've been trying to publicize it on twitter, my blog, google plus and
elsewhere.
help welcome.
On Friday, February 10, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
Hi all,
I'd never heard of this until some Dutch geezer whose name I'm now
forgotten pointed me to it. Had I known about it a
On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
Hello all,
A paper (well, presentation) has been published highlighting security
problems with the hashing algorithm (exploiting collisions) in many
programming languages Python included:
On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
Hello all,
A paper (well, presentation) has been published highlighting security
problems with the hashing algorithm (exploiting collisions
On Friday, December 9, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Cedric Sodhi wrote:
IF YOU THINK YOU MUST REPLY SOMETHING WITTY, ITERATE THAT THIS HAD BEEN
DISCUSSED BEFORE, REPLY THAT IT'S SIMPLY NOT GO'NNA HAPPEN, THAT WHO
DOESN'T LIKE IT IS FREE TO CHOOSE ANOTHER LANGUAGE OR SOMETHING
SIMILAR, JUST DON'T.
On Aug 30, 2011, at 9:05 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:29:59 +1000
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Anecdotal, non-reproducible performance figures are *not* the way to
go
2011/8/29 Charles-François Natali neolo...@free.fr:
+3 (agreed to Jesse, Antoine and Ask here).
The http://bugs.python.org/issue8713 described non-fork implementation
that always uses subprocesses rather than plain forked processes is the
right way forward for multiprocessing.
I see two
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:03:53 -0400
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/8/29 Charles-François Natali neolo...@free.fr:
+3 (agreed to Jesse, Antoine and Ask here).
The http://bugs.python.org/issue8713 described
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Le lundi 29 août 2011 à 13:23 -0400, Jesse Noller a écrit :
Yes, it is annoying; but again - this makes it more consistent with
the windows implementation. I'd rather that restriction than the
sanitization
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Nir Aides n...@winpdb.org wrote:
Another face of the discussion is about whether to deprecate the mixing of
the threading and processing modules and what to do about the
multiprocessing module which is implemented with worker threads.
There's a bug open -
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Brian Curtin brian.cur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:36, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Le Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:54:33 -0500,
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org a écrit :
2011/8/10 Brian Curtin brian.cur...@gmail.com:
Now that
Now that we have the machine, we need to start working on
collecting/organizing the resources needed to get a shared codespeed
system in place. After speaking with various people, we felt that
overloading codespeed-dev, pypy-dev or python-dev with the discussions
around this would be sub optimal.
I've posted a more expansive entry on my blog:
http://jessenoller.com/2011/06/29/announcing-the-new-speed-python-org-machine/
But the short version, that as discussed at the VM and language
summit, we now have a hosted machine dedicated to the running of
cross-interpreter speed tests, etc. The
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
As Jesse has said, there is an RFP in development to improve
python.org to the point where we can self-host blogs and the like and
deal with the
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
With respect to Google Blogger, I don't see a good reason to use it as
the platform for the blog.
As with any infrastructure, there is a reasonably high cost in
changing, as people have become used to a certain way of
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
[snip]
This PEP has received a lengthy discussion by now, so here's why I think
it's being fought so heavily by several CPython core developers,
specifically those who have traditionally carried a large part of the
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
I think this social problem of the PEP can only be solved if the CPython
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 21:32:48 -0500
Brian Curtin brian.cur...@gmail.com wrote:
Three weeks after this security vulnerability was *publicly* reported on
bugs.python.org, and two days after it was semi-officially
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Le dimanche 17 avril 2011 à 09:30 -0400, Jesse Noller a écrit :
If we want to make official announcements (like releases or security
warnings), I don't think the blog is appropriate. A separate
announcement channel
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Brian Curtin brian.cur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 15, 2011 3:46 AM, Gustavo Narea m...@gustavonarea.net wrote:
Hi all,
How come a description of how to exploit a security vulnerability
comes before a release for said vulnerability? I'm talking about this:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:36:16 -0400
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Brian Curtin brian.cur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 15, 2011 3:46 AM, Gustavo Narea m...@gustavonarea.net wrote
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/07/2011 07:52 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
Personally I think the Gsoc project should just take the pypy suite and
run with that - bikeshedding about what benchmarks to
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz scop...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking
efforts. My brief comment is below.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:52 AM, DasIch dasdas...@googlemail.com wrote:
1. Definition of the
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk wrote:
On 08/04/2011 00:36, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk
wrote:
On 07/04/2011 22:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:32:24 -0400
Tres
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Nick Stinemates nstinema...@gmail.com wrote:
This is really great to hear and something I would be hugely interested in
contributing to.
Lurking has paid off :)
Nick
Once I get the machine in place, and the team engaged, I am sure
they'll be looking for help.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
For the record, I added a page documenting our continuous integration
setup at:
http://docs.python.org/devguide/buildbots.html
Regards
Antoine.
that's awesome. should we document how to donate/add a buildbot
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:14:10 -0400
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
For the record, I added a page documenting our continuous
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Tennessee Leeuwenburg
tleeuwenb...@gmail.com wrote:
PyPy maintains http://speed.pypy.org/, which provides very clear information
about the relative performance of PyPy trunk against some
Hello everyone:
I wanted to take a moment to outline another idea which came out of
PyCon 2011 this year from numerous sources - a Python Core Mentorship
Program predicated on the idea that Python-Core, and Python as a whole
would be served by further lowering the barrier to entry of
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:04 AM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On 12:03 pm, jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone:
The new list will also have a closed, members-only archive. After
consulting with other core developers, we believe it's easier to ask
questions when you don't have to
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:04 AM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On 12:03 pm, jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone:
The new list will also
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone:
I wanted to take a moment to outline another idea which came out of
PyCon 2011 this year from numerous sources - a Python Core Mentorship
Program predicated on the idea that Python-Core, and Python
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au
wrote:
If you don't want a specific party snooping the site, just block that
specific party. Why make a walled garden that *nobody* outside can look
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org writes:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au
wrote:
Surely a forum specifically for mentorship will be more useful if
outsiders can be directed
On Mar 25, 2011, at 8:14 PM, Laura Creighton l...@openend.se wrote:
In a message of Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:14:02 -0400, Jesse Noller writes:
Ben,
In principle I agree with you - I would like open archives for the
specific reasons you cite, but I value the ability for people who may
On Mar 25, 2011, at 8:44 PM, Tommy tommywol...@gmail.com wrote:
I was kinda hoping that a private list would have much less noise, and would
serve the actual mentoring better. Maybe a mailing list isnt't the ideal tool?
That is a hope I would like to see realized. I don't think we will be
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Glenn Linderman v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com wrote:
So... start two mentoring groups, one open, one closed, and see which one
survives.
I'd rather not. I'd rather walk away from the idea entirely. In fact,
this entire thread is quickly becoming an example of why people
Some remarks below.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:33 PM, DasIch dasdas...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello Guys,
I'm interested in participating in the Google Summer of Code this year
and I've been looking at projects in the Wiki, particularly
speed.pypy.org[1] as I'm very interested in the current VM
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:33:55 +0100
DasIch dasdas...@googlemail.com wrote:
3. Several benchmarks (at least the Django and Twisted ones) have
dependencies which are not (yet) ported to 3.x and porting those
dependencies
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com wrote:
Doug Hellmann wrote:
We are nearly ready to launch the new blog for python-dev.
Cool. But I always thought planet.python.org was a kind of blog for
python-dev. How will python-dev blog be different? Will add
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Nick Coghlan, 12.03.2011 12:43:
I posted my rough notes and additional write-ups for Wednesday's VM
summit and Thursday's language summit:
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org/2011/03/python-vm-summit-rough-notes.html
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 07:32:34 -0400
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
The reason why there was no mention is probably because no one
intimately familiar with Cython was there, and if they were - it was
not brought
...snip
IMHO, taking modules that currently only have a C implementation due to
performance constraints and rewriting them in Cython is a much more
worthwhile thing to do than adding an alternative pure Python implementation
that other Python runtimes wouldn't use anyway. And at least
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Jesse Noller, 20.03.2011 13:51:
...snip
IMHO, taking modules that currently only have a C implementation due to
performance constraints and rewriting them in Cython is a much more
worthwhile thing to do than adding
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 3/17/2011 1:45 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2011/3/16 Thomas Hellerthel...@ctypes.org:
I would like my committer rights to be retracted.
I have been contributing to Python here and there for 10 years now,
and it was a
As agreed to at the language summit, I have pinged the IronPython,
Jython and PyPy teams for committers on their respective teams who
(do/did not) have commit rights prior to PyCon. These people are:
Jeff Hardy (IronPython)
Alex Gaynor (PyPy)
Carl Friedrich Bolz (PyPy)
Maciej Fijalkowski (PyPy)
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Martin v. Löwis, 08.03.2011 23:47:
I think everything here is as it should be. People who really cared
about forwards compatibility could have known, but factually, most
people don't care enough. Those then learn for the
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
I'm very happy to announce that the core Python repository switch
to Mercurial is complete and the new repository at
http://hg.python.org/cpython/ is now officially open for cloning,
and for commits by those who had commit
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 20:43:27 -0800
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
But I wouldn't be surprised if some people had regrets about the way
the community works (I can recall at least one such case) and it would
be
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 20:43:27 -0800
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
But I wouldn't be surprised if some people had regrets about the way
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Hello,
In
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/2011-February/001340.html,
I was asking whether it would be useful to make a survey of past
contributors, as in:
First, we did a survey of all
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
Antoine Pitrou writes:
Following the example given in the original article, I was considering
a single freeform question: why did you stop contributing after your
last patch to CPython? (of course, that text
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
Now that the language moratorium is lifted, let's make sure to get PEP
380 implemented for Python 3.3. I think there are some minor issues to
be resolved, but I don't think that should stop someone from doing a
first
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Feb 21, 2011, at 12:39 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Le dimanche 20 février 2011 à 23:22 +0100, Georg Brandl a écrit :
On behalf of the Python development team, I'm delighted to announce
Python 3.2 final release.
Python 3.2
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
I would like to know if it should be considered as a release blocker.
Georg Brandl said yes on IRC.
Under the condition that it is within reason to fix it before the
release.
What *should* be possible is to disable
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
Hi,
FreeBSD 7.2 3.x buildbot is red since some weeks (or months?) because of
a concurrent.futures failure. The problem is that
test_concurrent_futures uses many (multiprocessing) POSIX semaphores,
whereas
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Am 29.12.2010 18:54, schrieb Jesse Noller:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de
wrote:
I would like to know if it should be considered as a release blocker.
Georg Brandl said yes on IRC
On Dec 29, 2010, at 3:49 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
If the functionality is not supported then users get an import error
(within multiprocessing). However, RDM's understanding is correct, and
the test is creating more than supported.
Hmm. The tests do the absolute
On Dec 29, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Am 29.12.2010 22:34, schrieb Jesse Noller:
On Dec 29, 2010, at 3:49 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
If the functionality is not supported then users get an import error
(within multiprocessing
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:26:53 +
Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk wrote:
Antoine is firmly of the opinion that making TestCase instances
unpickleable is a feature...
Apparently you didn't really understand
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
You mean: actively feeling responsible for it? I guess nobody - as for
many other modules in the standard library.
Or do you mean: who is willing to work on it, in principle?
Both. Originally the module is/was meant
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Who is doing multiprocessing maintenance these days? I thought Ask
Solem had been given commit privs for that, but I haven't seen any
activity from him; and Jesse is, mostly, absent. Is anyone working on
the
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Hello,
The first 3.2 beta is scheduled by Georg for November 13th.
What would you think of scheduling a bug week-end one week later, that
is on November 20th and 21st? We would need enough core developers to
be
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:01:43 -0400
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de
wrote:
Who is doing multiprocessing maintenance these days? I thought Ask
emails sent.
January 19th, 2011: Early bird registration closes.
March 9-10th, 2011: Tutorial days at PyCon.
March 11-13th, 2011: PyCon main conference.
March 14-17th, 2011: PyCon sprints days.
Contact Emails:
Van Lindberg (Conference Chair) - v...@python.org
Jesse Noller (Co-Chair) - jnol
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
I would like to recommend that the Python core developers start using
a code review tool such as Rietveld or Reviewboard. I don't really
care which tool we use (I'm sure there are plenty of pros and cons to
each) but I
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:52 AM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On 02:47 pm, jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
wrote:
I would like to recommend that the Python core developers start using
a code review tool such as Rietveld or
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 12:53 PM, geremy condra debat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Sep 30, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
Not to mention; there's a lot to be learned from doing them on both
sides. At work, I learn about
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
I saw the code for PEP 3148 go by on python-checkins the other day. Is
there anything left to be done on that front, or can the PEP be marked
Final?
Cheers,
Nick.
Argh, yes :)
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 3:56 PM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
I have only done the Python 3-specific changes at this point; the diff is
here if anybody wants to review, nitpick or otherwise comment:
http://svn.python.org/view/peps/trunk/pep-0333.txt?r1=85014r2=85013pathrev=85014
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:29:51 -0400
Fred Drake fdr...@acm.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
the first thing on the agenda is a complete rewrite of the developer
docs
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Sep 23, 2010, at 08:40 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
That's right. It is true that it isn't branch-specific information,
and that does cause a little bit of irritation for me too, but neither
is Misc/developers.txt or
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Sep 23, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
-1 on wiki; wikis are where good information goes off to die.
Well, *all* documentation requires vigilance to remain relevant and current.
I'm sure you don't think
1 - 100 of 336 matches
Mail list logo
