Roundup is a simple-to-use and -install issue-tracking system with
command-line, web and e-mail interfaces. It is based on the winning design
from Ka-Ping Yee in the Software Carpentry Track design competition.
The 0.8.5 stable release includes an Argentinian Spanish translation by Ramiro
Morales
Initial release of ABT 0.7 under QPL license
http://dev.artenum.com/projects/abt
ABT automates the building of projects by executing the minimum set of
commands to update the project like the famous Make.
ABT is given a file, called the recipe (filename is abt-recipe.xml),
that describes how
py2exe 0.6.3 released
=
py2exe is a Python distutils extension which converts Python scripts
into executable Windows programs, able to run without requiring a
Python installation. Console and Windows (GUI) applications, Windows
NT services, exe and dll COM servers are
The next meeting of BayPIGgies will be Thurs, October 13 at 7:30pm at
IronPort.
Tim Thompson will describe and demonstrate the interaction between
Burning Man and Python using two applications, Radio Free Quasar and
Ergo.
BayPIGgies meetings alternate between IronPort (San Bruno, California)
and
On Monday 03 October 2005 03:48 am, Volker Grabsch wrote:
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
/... snip comment that the natural order is C, X, Y and that programmers
that
care about readable code will probably want to be extremely careful with
this
new feature .../
That's also my opinion, but
Version of python: 2.4
O/S: Win2K
I will be writing some python scripts to do some client-side
programming that involves socket.py. I expect that I will be making
calls to the following methods/functions:
connect_ex()
setsockopt()
sendall()
recv()
close()
Where can one find information about
py2exe 0.6.3 released
=
py2exe is a Python distutils extension which converts Python scripts
into executable Windows programs, able to run without requiring a
Python installation. Console and Windows (GUI) applications, Windows
NT services, exe and dll COM servers are
i'd like to use
os.access(path,mode)
where path may contain linux style wildcards.
i've failed so far.
my workaround is the bash command.
os.system('[ -e %s ]' % fn )
any suggestions?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Jeremy Moles wrote:
[...] What I'm trying
now is the following:
PyObject* obj = _PyObject_New(PyType_MyType);
obj = PyObject_Init(obj, PyType_MyType);
...
return obj;
When obj gets back to the interpreter, Python sees it (or rather, it's
__repr__) in
mike wrote:
i'd like to use
os.access(path,mode)
where path may contain linux style wildcards.
os.access(glob.glob(path), mode)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:33:43 -, Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-10-06, DaveM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frankly, I can't watch Shakespeare or movies like the full
monty or trainspotting because I can't understand a damn
word they say. British talk sounds like gibberish to me for
See scapy.py
I've completed windows support at this time and am currently testing it,
working out some bugs.
If you want a copy just ask. I need some testers.
It can do almost any packet transmissions you want. (google it)
Z
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Ok, that one looks more sleak than what I came up with.
Couple of things I learn from your solution, please correct me if I
misunderstood something:
1. list containing other lists will sort itself based on first element
on lists inside ?
2. sort(), pop() is not costly operations
Other than that
thanks Leif. poor question on my part.
I had been using
glob.glob(path)==[]
and was looking for something more readable, hence
os.system('[ -e %s ]' % path )
but that doesn't seem like a good idiom for crossplatform.
I thought there may either be a way to escape the wildcards, or an
thanks Leif. poor question on my part.
I had been using
glob.glob(path)==[]
and was looking for something more readable, hence
os.system('[ -e %s ]' % path )
but that doesn't seem like a good idiom for crossplatform.
I thought there may either be a way to escape the wildcards, or an
Op 2005-10-06, Diez B. Roggisch schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Suppose we have a typesystem which has the type ANY, which would mean
such an object could be any type. You could then have homogenous lists
in the sense that all elements should be of the same declared type and
at the same time mix
On Thursday 06 October 2005 11:57 pm, Timothy Smith wrote:
i try to run my app and i get this
%python DutyShift.py
error
thats it. thats the error. mya pp was previously working, and i did make
some fairly large changes to it, but i'd expect a more descriptive
message then just error.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Version of python: 2.4
O/S: Win2K
I will be writing some python scripts to do some client-side
programming that involves socket.py. I expect that I will be making
calls to the following methods/functions:
connect_ex()
setsockopt()
sendall()
recv()
close()
Oh well. I had wanted to be able to define two functions f and g, and
have f*g be the composition of f and g.
func_type = type(lambda: None)
class composable_function(func_type):
... def __mult__(f,g):
... def c(*args, **kw):
... return f(g(*args, **kw))
...
You should tell us more about DutyShift.py, without the code it is very
difficult for other people to guess what's going on.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi everyone,
MathDOM 0.5 is ready for download from SourceForge.
http://mathdom.sourceforge.net/
MathDOM is a set of Python modules (using PyXML and pyparsing) that import
mathematical terms as a Content MathML DOM. It currently parses MathML and
literal infix terms into a DOM and writes out
Timothy Smith wrote:
i try to run my app and i get this
%python DutyShift.py
error
thats it. thats the error. mya pp was previously working, and i did make
some fairly large changes to it, but i'd expect a more descriptive
message then just error. anyidea where i need to start
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-10-06, Diez B. Roggisch schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Suppose we have a typesystem which has the type ANY, which would mean
such an object could be any type. You could then have homogenous lists
in the sense that all elements should be of the same declared type and
at
infidel wrote:
A 13-foot Burmese python recently burst after it apparently tried to
swallow a live 6-foot alligator whole, authorities said.
An allegory telling how Python the language really ought to stay slim and
lean and not get bloated by incorporating lots of features from other
Jeremy Moles wrote:
PyObject* obj = _PyObject_New(PyType_MyType);
obj = PyObject_Init(obj, PyType_MyType);
...
return obj;
The call to PyObject_Init is redundant: _PyObject_New
is malloc+init. However, this shouldn't cause any crashes (except in the
debug
Cigar wrote:
What I want:
- the simplest thing that could possibly work!
A splash screen that informs the user that it's
confidential data, and that unauthorized use will
lead to prosecution?
Besides, I think it's not the program you need to
protect, but the data. Think about that. Who cares
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main jist of the problem is that I'm trying add data from one
module to a list and a dictionary in another module, and it doesn't
seem to stick over there.
It's probably best to avoid any circular depentencies, but as
long as you make sure you really use your
infidel wrote:
By Denise Kalette
Associated Press
MIAMI - The alligator has some foreign competition at the top of the
Everglades food chain, and the results of the struggle are horror-movie
messy.
A 13-foot Burmese python recently burst after it apparently tried to
swallow a live
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
at the end I upgraded to 2.4, but now I am not able to load dcop module
(part of the Python-KDE3 bindings).
Any help?
Install PyKDE for 2.4
Diez
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In other words, you want Python to be strongly-typed, but sometimes
you want to allow a reference to be to any object whatsoever. In which
case you can't possibly do any sensible type-checking on it, so this
new Python+ or whatever you want to call it
DaveM wrote:
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:33:43 -, Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
For example: In British English one uses a plural verb when the
subject consists of more than one person. Sports teams,
government departments, states, corporations etc. are
grammatically plural. In
Paul Rubin wrote:
Brian Quinlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Without a clear idea of the nature of the proposal, it is impossible
to assess it's costs and benefits. So could a proponent of optional
declarations please provide a more clear proposal?
There is no proposal on the table. There's
Paul Rubin wrote:
Oh well. I had wanted to be able to define two functions f and g, and
have f*g be the composition of f and g.
func_type = type(lambda: None)
class composable_function(func_type):
... def __mult__(f,g):
... def c(*args, **kw):
... return
Paul Rubin wrote:
Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In other words, you want Python to be strongly-typed, but sometimes
you want to allow a reference to be to any object whatsoever. In which
case you can't possibly do any sensible type-checking on it, so this
new Python+ or whatever you
Brian Quinlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is no proposal on the table. There's a discussion of how this
stuff can work, and whether it's useful. As for how the compiler
deals with imported modules, see for example Common Lisp or Haskell or
ML--how do they do it?
Except that you
Why do you call this a JAVA Object or C void*? Why don't you call
it a PYTHON object. It is this kind of reaction that IMO tells most
opponents can't think outside the typesystems they have already
seen and project the problems with those type systems on what
would happen with python should
Paul Rubin wrote:
Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In other words, you want Python to be strongly-typed, but sometimes
you want to allow a reference to be to any object whatsoever. In which
case you can't possibly do any sensible type-checking on it, so this
new Python+ or whatever you
Paul Rubin wrote:
Let's see if I understand what you're saying:
C and Java: you get useful type checking except when you declare
a reference as type ANY. This is a shortcoming compared to:
Python: where you get no useful type checking at all.
That is not very convincing
As mentioned earlier only a dictator can make such decisions and of course as
with many dictatorships the wrong decision is often made. There's no such thing
as a benevolent dictatorship.
--
Robin Becker
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Leif K-Brooks wrote:
os.access(path,mode)
where path may contain linux style wildcards.
os.access(glob.glob(path), mode)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in ?
TypeError: access() argument 1 must be string, not list
it's not clear from the OP if he wants
Ben Sizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's started to get very misleading - Python gives you plenty of
type-checking, as we all know, just not at compile-time.
There's more to it than just that. Python's type checking is not just not
done at compile time, it's done as late in run time as
Timothy Smith wrote:
i try to run my app and i get this
%python DutyShift.py
error
thats it. thats the error. mya pp was previously working, and i did make
some fairly large changes to it, but i'd expect a more descriptive
message then just error. anyidea where i need to start
Op 2005-10-07, Steve Holden schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-10-06, Diez B. Roggisch schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Suppose we have a typesystem which has the type ANY, which would mean
such an object could be any type. You could then have homogenous lists
in the sense that
Hi, this email address does not exist. Please go to the site and use the
correct form to send your message.
No one has seen this message.
Thanks
Matchfinder
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 06:01:00 -0400, Roy Smith wrote:
There's more to it than just that. Python's type checking is not just not
done at compile time, it's done as late in run time as possible. One might
call it just-in-time type checking.
Well there you go then. Instead of pulling our hair
Roy Smith a écrit :
There's more to it than just that. Python's type checking is not just not
done at compile time, it's done as late in run time as possible. One might
call it just-in-time type checking.
It's more of a Nearly too late type checking I would say. Not that I
complain but it
I had the opportunity to glance through the book in Borders yesterday.
On the whole, I think it is well covered and is very readable. Perhaps I
was looking for a specific aspect, and I find that threads did not get
enough attention. Looking at the index pages, the topics on threads
(about 4-5
Xah Lee wrote: « would anyone like to translate the following perl
script to Python or Scheme (scsh)?»
Here's the Python version.
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
# Python
# Wed Oct 5 15:50:31 PDT 2005
# given a dir, report all html file's size. (counting inline images)
# XahLee.org
import re,
Christophe wrote:
It's more of a Nearly too late type checking I would say. Not that I
complain but it would be great if there were also some automatic type
checking to catch a few errors as soon as possible.
use assert as the soonest possible point. implementing type gates is
trivial, if
Hello,
In a recursive function like the following :
def foo( j ) :
j += 1
while j n : j = foo( j )
return j
in found that the recursivity is limited (1000 iterations). Then, I have
two questions :
- why this mecanism has been implemented ?
- it is possible to increase or remove (and
Op 2005-10-07, Diez B. Roggisch schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why do you call this a JAVA Object or C void*? Why don't you call
it a PYTHON object. It is this kind of reaction that IMO tells most
opponents can't think outside the typesystems they have already
seen and project the problems with
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 09:01:21 +0100, Steve Holden wrote:
and yes, I split that infinitive just to
annoy any pedants who may be reading
*Real* pedants will know that English is not Latin, does not follow the
grammatical rules of Latin, and that just because split infinitives are
impossible --
Fredrik Lundh a écrit :
Christophe wrote:
It's more of a Nearly too late type checking I would say. Not that I
complain but it would be great if there were also some automatic type
checking to catch a few errors as soon as possible.
use assert as the soonest possible point. implementing
Nice job~Thank you.On 10/7/05, Jimmy Retzlaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
py2exe 0.6.3 released=py2exe is a Python distutils extension which converts Python scriptsinto executable Windows programs, able to run without requiring aPython installation. Console and Windows (GUI)
mg wrote:
Hello,
In a recursive function like the following :
def foo( j ) :
j += 1
while j n : j = foo( j )
return j
in found that the recursivity is limited (1000 iterations). Then, I have
two questions :
- why this mecanism has been implemented ?
- it is possible to
[Steve]
and yes, I split that infinitive just to
annoy any pedants who may be reading
[Steven]
*Real* pedants will know that English is not Latin, does not follow the
grammatical rules of Latin, and that just because split infinitives are
impossible -- not forbidden, impossible -- in Latin
Is there no way to implement your idea in a classical loop? Usually the
syntax is cleaner, and there is no limit (except the limit of the range
function in certain cases). For example what would be wrong with.
def foo(j):
while j n:
j+=1
return j
I don't know much about
def foo(j):
while j n:
j+=1
return j
of course I mean:
def foo(j):
while j n:
j+=1
return j
sorry
== Posted via Newsgroups.com - Usenet Access to over 100,000 Newsgroups
==
Get Anonymous, Uncensored, Access to West and East Coast Server Farms!
Do the divisions have to be themselves rectangles?
xB_C___x
x_Ax
would be a representation of the problem?
However, though, I think that what you mean with your Points being
smaller
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
use assert as the soonest possible point. implementing type gates is
trivial, if you think you need them.
What this is about (to me at least) is the edit-debug cycle. Let's
say I write some Python code, using assert to validate datatypes.
Maybe I've
Maurice LING wrote:
I had the opportunity to glance through the book in Borders yesterday.
On the whole, I think it is well covered and is very readable. Perhaps I
was looking for a specific aspect, and I find that threads did not get
enough attention. Looking at the index pages, the topics on
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Then argue against my ideas, and not your makings of it.
If I just use 'ANY' and you fill that in with C void* like
implementation and argue against that, then you are arguing
against your own ghosts, but not against what I have in mind.
Well, you didn't tell us what
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 21:03:33 -0700, barnesc wrote:
I added some recipes to the Python Cookbook:
- listmixin
Use ListMixin to create custom list classes from a small subset of
list methods:
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/440656
That looks great. Now,
Hello,
I came accross what i think is a serious bug in the python interpreter.
Membership testing seems not to work for list of objects when these
objects have a user-defined __cmp__ method.
It is present in Python 2.3 and 2.4. I don't know about other versions.
The following code illustrates
Well, suppose you have a class MyObject and you want to add to it some
methods to make its instances into a database. You could put these
methods into another class called Storable (the mixin class).
Then you can mix MyObject with Storable and get what you want,
a class StorableObject inheriting
It is not about falling back on generic declarartion, it is about
how such object will be treated. Diez seems to think that
strongly-typed language can only deal with generic declarations
by using something that allows circumventing the type system.
No, I don't - now it's you who makes
Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What this is about (to me at least) is the edit-debug cycle. Let's
say I write some Python code, using assert to validate datatypes.
Maybe I've made 4 errors. I then write a test function and run it.
Boom, the first assert fails. I fix the first
Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That looks great. Now, if only I understood mixins: what are they, and
what they are for, and in particular, how they differ from mere
subclassing.
I'm not sure what you mean by mere subclassing so maybe there is no
difference. Mixins are sort of a
Now some of the Python-is-perfect crowd seems to suffer from a Blub
paradox (http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?BlubParadox). They see annoying,
static typed languages like C and Java, and they see pleasant,
dynamically typed languages like Python, and conclude that static
types = annoying, when in fact
Michele Simionato [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Once in a time, I thought mixins where a good idea; now I don't think
so since they are too easily abused (see Zope 2) and as a consequence
you get spaghetti-inheritance, where you have objects with methods
inherited from everywhere. So be very
I'm trying to track down the name of a file format and python module,
that was featured in the Daily Python URL some time in the last month or
two.
The format was ASCII with a multiline header defining types for the
comma seperated column data below. It may have had the capability to
store
Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- FPs share their own set of problems - try writing a server. The
have inherent troubles with event-driven programs.
Erlang?
Still, FP is cool. But python too. And just attaching some
type-inference to python won't work.
Yeah, I've figured
[Robert Kern]
[...] an ODE integrator would probably want to adaptively select its
timesteps as opposed to laying out a uniform discretization upfront.
Eons ago, I gave myself such a little beast (but really found in an
Appendix of a book on simulation), which I use since then whenever I
need
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 05:11:00 -0700, Michele Simionato wrote:
Well, suppose you have a class MyObject and you want to add to it some
methods to make its instances into a database. You could put these
methods into another class called Storable (the mixin class).
Then you can mix MyObject with
Paul Rubin wrote:
Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- FPs share their own set of problems - try writing a server. The
have inherent troubles with event-driven programs.
Erlang?
Guess what, worked with that, too :) And let me assure you - it does
have pretty much runtime type
Richie Hindle wrote:
[Steve]
and yes, I split that infinitive just to
annoy any pedants who may be reading
[Steven]
*Real* pedants will know that English is not Latin, does not follow the
grammatical rules of Latin, and that just because split infinitives are
impossible -- not
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 17:08:03 GMT, Cameron Laird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jorgen Grahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
.
.
It depends. I do not feel /that/ advanced, but I've been bitten by pexpect's
Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 21:03:33 -0700, barnesc wrote:
I added some recipes to the Python Cookbook:
- listmixin
Use ListMixin to create custom list classes from a small subset of
list methods:
Paul Rubin wrote:
Yeah, I wonder though how much of that is a result of Python's
cavalier approach to multiple inheritance. Does that happen much in
CLOS? In Java because of multiple interfaces? I've studied Flavors a
little and mix-ins were used in some extensive ways, but maybe
programs
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
Paul Rubin wrote:
Oh well. I had wanted to be able to define two functions f and g, and
have f*g be the composition of f and g.
func_type = type(lambda: None)
class composable_function(func_type):
... def __mult__(f,g):
... def c(*args,
Christophe wrote:
Fredrik Lundh a écrit :
Christophe wrote:
It's more of a Nearly too late type checking I would say. Not that I
complain but it would be great if there were also some automatic type
checking to catch a few errors as soon as possible.
use assert as the soonest possible
The next meeting of BayPIGgies will be Thurs, October 13 at 7:30pm at
IronPort.
Tim Thompson will describe and demonstrate the interaction between
Burning Man and Python using two applications, Radio Free Quasar and
Ergo.
BayPIGgies meetings alternate between IronPort (San Bruno, California)
and
Thanks for everyones advice. I finally went
for a very basic BSD style template that
I found somewhere. Its really short and
easy to understand, at least to me!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
striker wrote:
Does anyone who has this book willing to sell it. Please e-mail me the
condition and any other details if you are interested.
Thanks,
Kevin
half.com has a couple of people selling it. One for $35.24 and another
for $129.97.
--
Hi all,
My problem is
# I have to run a script which takes a command line parameter which is
unicode text
# I cant use Windows console as it doesnt support /display unicode
# I dont seems to find a way to pass command line arguments to scripts
in IDLE.
Please suggest me what I can do.
Thanks in
François Pinard wrote:
[Robert Kern]
[...] an ODE integrator would probably want to adaptively select its
timesteps as opposed to laying out a uniform discretization upfront.
Eons ago, I gave myself such a little beast (but really found in an
Appendix of a book on simulation), which I use
So mixins are just a sub-class [pun intended] of sub-classing?
I've just found this:
[quote]
A mixin class is a parent class that is inherited from - but not as
a means of specialization. Typically, the mixin will export services to a
child class, but no semantics will be implied about the
Why would it be a bug? You've made it so that every instance of OBJ is
equal to every other instance of OBJ. The behaviour is as expected.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I came accross what i think is a serious bug in the python interpreter.
Membership testing seems not to work for list of objects when these
objects have a user-defined __cmp__ method.
It is present in Python 2.3 and 2.4. I don't know about other versions.
Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, that one looks more sleak than what I came up with.
For the most efficient and elegant solution, check out Raymond Hettinger's
reply to:
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/141934
George
--
Op 2005-10-07, Diez B. Roggisch schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Then argue against my ideas, and not your makings of it.
If I just use 'ANY' and you fill that in with C void* like
implementation and argue against that, then you are arguing
against your own ghosts, but not
There is definitely a bug.
Maybe the follownig snippet is more clear:
class OBJ:
def __init__(self,identifier):
self.id=identifier
self.allocated=0
#def __cmp__(self,other):
# return cmp(other.allocated,self.allocated)
mylist=[OBJ(i)
Thanks, that looks like Mike's solution except that it uses the
built-in heapq module.
While this one contains less code than Mike's solution it seems to lack
the ability to control the comparison operation, which means it won't
work in my case. I need to both be able to sort on an arbitrary
Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Erlang?
Guess what, worked with that, too :) And let me assure you - it does
have pretty much runtime type error issues. It's interpreted.
Yes, it makes no attempt at being statically typed. It's like Python
that way, AFAIK.
Easy cases are
Linux Journal annually polls its readers on questions such as their
favorite programming language. In the 2005 poll, Python is 2nd, its
highest ranking ever. Below are the results by year. I wish that
rankings beyond the first 3 were available and that the number of votes
were shown. Nerds like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I came accross what i think is a serious bug in the python interpreter.
Membership testing seems not to work for list of objects when these
objects have a user-defined __cmp__ method.
it does not work if they have *your* __cmp__ method, no. if you add
a print
[Richie]
Your previous post to this thread was chock-full of split nominatives: The
Hollywood voice, the specific regional accent, the English-speaking
world, the original French. And you call yourself a grammarian.
[Steve]
I am presuming this post was meant to be a joke?
It was.
No
Sorry Fredrik but I don't understand. Just comment out the assert and
you have different results depending on whether an unrelated sort
function is defined.
This seems weird to me !
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well - function inheritance is not known so far in python - and in no
other language I know.
Yeah, I didn't really expect it to work, but it seems like a logical
consequence of type/class unification.
Basically you want __mult__ being part of f or g
Robin Becker wrote:
As mentioned earlier only a dictator can make such decisions and of
course as
with many dictatorships the wrong decision is often made. There's no
such thing
as a benevolent dictatorship.
Ever cared to check what committees can do to a language ;-)
--eric
--
1 - 100 of 268 matches
Mail list logo
