Hi all !
I'm trying to configure an ISA PnP card (RTL8019AS based) for use on
my Q60. The card got a "jumperless" mode (i.e. a mode where PnP is
disabled) that may be enabled via a DOS software (on a PC) and its
parameters (I/O address, IRQ, Duplex/Simplex modes) can be set via
this software too.
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 20:09:16 +0200, Peter Graf wrote:
> .../...
>
> If someone buys a new ethernet card with the RTL8019AS for Qx0, other than
> from D&D Systems, he should be prepared to deal with cutting the IRQ10+11
> lines on the Ethernet card near the ISA connector. The corresponding pins
Hi all !
I started again to compile some cool software for Linux-Qx0.
More to come !
http://q60linux.dyns.net/
http://thgodef.nerim.net/q60linux/ (in the case the first doesn't work...)
Thierry Godefroy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
r the
patched kernel sources):
ide-cd.c: In function "ide_cdrom_dump_status"
ide-cd.c:619: compiler internal error in verify_local_live_at_start, at flow.c:609
.../...
Thierry Godefroy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
PS: more cool stuff is available from my q60linux site, enjoy !
( http://q60lin
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 10:55:50 +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 01:22:19AM +0200, Thierry Godefroy wrote:
> >
> > Hi !
> >
> > In an attempt to bring more pre-compiled packages for the ShoeString
> > distribution, I tried to compile
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 14:38:48 +0200, Peter Graf wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> nice to see that you are active again!
Only half-active, alas... Not yet enough free time to do serious development
(i.e. SMSQ/E one)...
> I'd like to ask if you are still
> absolutely opposed to the idea of Debian based
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 22:31:45 +0100, Tony Firshman wrote:
> Debian is worth getting _just_ for the apt_get etc.
>
> There were many packages I simply did not install under Redhat 'cos the
> dependencies were just too complicated.
Dependencies exist in all the Linux distributions and they are a n
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 09:58:01 +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:24:20PM +0200, Thierry Godefroy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I'm using the full crypto-API (with all the ciphers; AES being a rather
> > weaker one than Serpent, for example...).
&
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:50:48 +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 02:14:54AM +0200, Thierry Godefroy wrote:
>
> > Actually, this is not quite exact. It is true that more cryptoanalyis
> > was done on Serpent (which algorythm is easier to analyse). But so f
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 11:06:08 +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> This is loop-AES with additional ciphers btw and I would recommend
> to stick with that as it will be maintained for the foreseeable
> future. The other intl patches are bound to suffer incompatible
> changes every week now that intl s
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 00:24:26 +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 08:55:28PM +0200, Thierry Godefroy wrote:
>
> > I got no compatibility problem with the crypto API but for when
> > they changed from 2.2 to 2.4 kernel (the data had to be transfered
>
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 11:30:21 +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> Btw, did someone notice that hdX=ide-scsi is handled differently in
> 2.4.21?
Hmm... Didn't notice any difference on ix86 plateforms where I use this
option (I don't use it on the Q60, for I got no CD-R writer on it)...
What's wrong w
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 18:57:54 +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 10:36:07AM +0200, Thierry Godefroy wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 11:30:21 +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> >
> > > Btw, did someone notice that hdX=ide-scsi is handl
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 20:23:08 +0200, Peter Graf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I made an experimental boost of QLwIP speed to the Ethernet maximum of 10
> Mbit/sec, which results in a massive amount of calls to MT.SUSJB, MT.RELJB
> and MT.PRIOR, typically several thousands per second.
>
> After days of of d
On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 00:24:18 +0200, Peter Graf wrote:
>
> Thierry wrote:
>
> .../...
>
> >Plus, I'm a bit surprised that you are apparently using jobs to fetch the
> >data from the ethernet card... It should be done via an interrupt handler
> >instead...
>
> At first sight it looks like that o
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 21:53:34 +0200, Peter Graf wrote:
> Thierry wrote:
>
> >Yes, this I know, thanks... I'm perfectly aware of the fragmentation and of
> >out of order receipt of TCP packets... That doesn't change the fact you could
> >use the fast interrupt to store as many TCP packet as needed
.4RC2.
Enjoy !
Thierry Godefroy.
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:56:30 +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:40:14AM +0100, Thierry Godefroy wrote:
>
> .../...
> > - Linux kernel v2.4.23 (with cryptoloop and supermount patches).
>
> wrt supermount, did you look at http://submount.sourcefor
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 23:37:44 +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a short roundup of issues I am messing with:
>
> !!! WARNING !!! Kernel 2.4.18 (probably anything <2.4.21)
> will eat filesystems on disks>137GB.
* chuckles * I didn't even figured out how to get this damned
atari_fdisk to p
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:03:21 +0100, Peter Graf wrote:
> You might run 8 in parallel (not that I'd design the board :)
Aww common !... ;-)
Thierry.
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 23:37:44 +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> !!! WARNING !!! Kernel 2.4.18 (probably anything <2.4.21)
> will eat filesystems on disks>137GB.
Read in Documentation/ide.txt of the Linux kernel sources:
==
How To Use *Big* ATA/IDE drives with Linux
Erf... I meant 'come on', of course...
---
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:56:37 +0100
From: Thierry Godefroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-developers] 2GHz 68060
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:03
nored
make[1]: *** [setup.o] Error 1
The weird thing is that the -m68060 option is passed and 'as' complains about no 68060
fpu...
The version for 'as' is 2.11.90.0.25, gcc is v3.1.
The v2.4.23 of the Linux kernel compiles just fine in this respect...
Any idea ?
Thierry Godefroy.
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 01:28:34 +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 12:16:04AM +0200, Thierry Godefroy wrote:
> >
> > Hello...
> >
> > I tried to compile the v2.4.27 kernel for the Q60 today, but I came
> > across a strange assembler
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:33:13 +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 12:46:48PM +0200, Thierry Godefroy wrote:
>
> .../...
>
> > I changed it for:
> > asm __volatile__ (".chip 68060; frestore %0" : : "m" (zero));
> >
> >
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:27:07 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thierry Godefroy wrote:
>
> > If the shebang compiles properly, new pre-compiled Q60-Linux kernels should
> > be available "soon" (the poor 68060/66MHz is so slow when compared to a
> >
Yep, they are available from my website:
http://q60linux.dyns.net/
Also available is nedit v5.5rc1 and Xdialog v2.1.2.
Thierry Godefroy.
will find the 68060 device errata document here:
http://www.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/no_sub_type/MC68060DE.pdf
Anyway...
I'm now in search for a bug-less and full blown 60MHz 68060
(0E41J mask ONLY)...
Is anyone, by any luck, selling one ?
Thierry Godefroy.
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:45:18 +0200, Peter Graf wrote:
> On 23 Aug 2004 at 15:22, Thierry Godefroy wrote:
>
> > I'm quite upset !...
> >
> > I just discovered that my Q60 was fitted with a buggy 68060 !
> > Yes, a pre-1996 mask 060 (1G65V mask), while my Q
29 matches
Mail list logo
