No idea, I have 2 other different Eth cards in Q40 and
Q60 and works ok, as far as the card is NE2000
compatible should be ok.
Are you starting from Shoestring Linux or the previous
version ?
In the previous Linux version you need to add some
specific lines in modules.dep to be sure that linux
:-) The problem is how can tight it is into the system and
how many things that are done by SMSQ/E are performed with
the assumption of S*Basic being there?
U - none ? !
Wolfgang
Hi all,
I just wanted to point out something to the general QL world at
large: as you all know, SMSQ/E is being made available publicly,
under a licence that was discussed at length here.
This licence is now the current licence for all versions of SMSQ/E.
Under this licence, only appointed
??? 5/11/2002 9:24:38 ??, ?/? Marcel Kilgus ql-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:
Phoebus Dokos wrote:
I was under the impression that Peter had acquired (ie
paid) the rights to
resell/modify SMSQ/E...
No, he didn't.
Marcel
In that case you can forget what I wrote :-) Although my
assumption
??? 5/11/2002 9:36:12 ??, ?/? Bill Cable [EMAIL PROTECTED]
??:
Wolfgang,
What if you already own a current legal copy of SMSQ/E in
QPC2 or some other
way when you buy a Q40/60 as many already do. Surely you
do not have to buy it
twice.
-- Bill
Now that's an interesting thought :-).
Peter Fox wrote:
The sound is rather like grinding gears and also happened when I had
problems with flp1_ running QPC2 3.03 under XP.
There seems to be a bug in DirectSound which can affect the first few
milliseconds of a sound. To circumvent this you can try to configure
Enable sound to
John Sadler wrote:
How? There's much more to it than a simple move.l is called mov on
Intel.
In principle the same way as a RISC compiler handles higher level
instructions.
Though it may be that modern Intel or AMD chips do not have enough
registers.
Internally they have anything from a
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I just wanted to point out something to the general QL world at
large: as you all know, SMSQ/E is being made available publicly,
under a licence that was discussed at length here.
This licence is now the current licence for all versions
On 5 Nov 2002, at 8:46, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
Wolfgang,
I was under the impression that Peter had acquired (ie paid) the rights to
resell/modify SMSQ/E...
Not that I know of
Even it isn't so, I do not believe that DD would want to hijack the
software only that there's an honest
On 5 Nov 2002, at 10:05, Öïßâïò Ñ. Íôüêïò wrote:
Now that's an interesting thought :-). However Bill, that's
(legally) up to the software license. If it doesn't EXPLICITLY
state that for every platform you NEED to have a separate
copy of the software (I haven't read the finalized license in
On 5 Nov 2002, at 9:36, Bill Cable wrote:
Wolfgang,
What if you already own a current legal copy of SMSQ/E in QPC2 or some other
way when you buy a Q40/60 as many already do. Surely you do not have to buy it
twice.
-- Bill
Under the licence you do, because you get an entirely new copy
Hi Wolfgang,
Hey, we live in a democracy - if you don't like what I'm saying, just
say so (and if you do, too).
Indeed we do, so here's my take on it.
When your initial email came through, I though 'oh bloody hell, the shit is
really going to hit the fan now !'. Why ? Because in a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need better apps which can show the true worth of Aurora, QPC and Q40 etc,
and to do this, we need them both to support the same software and speeds.
We have already had to face the incompatabilities built into the new higher
colour display drivers and so any steps
??? 5/11/2002 11:15:39 ??, ?/? Marcel Kilgus ql-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:
snip
I would estimate the development of a JIT compiler to be
several
hundred hours. I had the time to do this a few years ago, but
probably
not the knowledge and skills. Plus back then I thought that
the
overhead of
Öïßâïò Ñ. Íôüêïò wrote:
A very nice 68000-68040 JIT compiler exists and its sources
are freely available for UAE / Basilisk... Surely a programmer of
your caliber could adapt it?
It's under the GPL. And it's supposed to cause problems.
Marcel
I have cut out the original correspondence to shorten this e-mail
With respect to Poebus's reply what is the PIZZA challenge.?
I presume it opens lots of small programs does something with them.
I was told that one of the advantages of the Unix system is it scales well.
Phoebus'es comments
Hello everyone,
It is time to start putting QL Today together once again. I'm a bit
short of both news and articles this time, so if anyone has material
to include in QL Today please send it to me as soon as possible.
--
Dilwyn Jones
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Software pirates in our midst?
Hi all,
I just wanted to point out something to the general QL world at
large: as you all know, SMSQ/E is being made
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
He he. Wish I'd known what a Pizza fan Marcel was before a gang of us
tried to force curry on him for his birthday a few years ago... Oops.
Oh yes, that was really bad. Worst birthday meal ever ;-)
But actually I'm not that much into pizza anymore. While I have eaten
one or
??? 5/11/2002 3:07:40 ??, ?/? Bill Waugh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Software pirates in our midst?
Hi all,
I just wanted to point out something to
??? 5/11/2002 12:23:18 ??, ?/? Dave P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I just wanted to point out something to the general QL
world at
large: as you all know, SMSQ/E is being made available
publicly,
under a licence that was discussed at
??? 5/11/2002 12:23:18 ??, ?/? Dave P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:
snip on Dave's email
After careful consideration and drawing on my own experience
on skirmishes on Ql-Users (everybody probably remembers
the huge misunderstanding between me and Richard Z. in
which I grossly misunderstood him
Öïßâïò Ñ. Íôüêïò wrote:
[Quote cut]
BTW: You're quoting in this mail was horrible. OE used to be the only
program that output those non-readable mails, pity Opera seems to do
the same.
Apart from what's legal (or not legal), there should be a level
of reason among users, vendors and
- Original Message -
From: Norman Dunbar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ql-users] Software pirates in our midst?
So, have you tried to communicate with DD to find out if what you say is
true, or whether they have some other arrangments etc ?
If you have asked and not received any
??? 5/11/2002 4:28:03 ??, ?/? Marcel Kilgus [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:
Öïßâïò Ñ. Íôüêïò wrote:
[Quote cut]
BTW: You're quoting in this mail was horrible. OE used to be the only
program that output those non-readable mails, pity Opera seems to do
the same.
My mistake, I set up Opera to word
??? 4/11/2002 6:09:13 ??, ?/? John Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:
I have cut out the original correspondence to shorten this e-mail
With respect to Poebus's reply what is the PIZZA challenge.?
I presume it opens lots of small programs does something with them.
I was told that one of the
Marcel wrote:-
Hehe. No, despite this incident I really enjoyed the stay. I still
have the electric mointain, snowdown etc. flyers. And actually I
should return with my almost-sister-in-law. She's a very big fan of
sheep and that's something you really have enough up there :-)
Now you've
Dilwyn Wrote:-
Which proves Geoff's statement... Greeks (or their
inventions... ie Pizza ;-) are everywhere ;-). Our legacy
does affect even Marcel :-P hehehehe
He he. Wish I'd known what a Pizza fan Marcel was before a gang of us
tried to force curry on him for his birthday a few years
Geoff Wicks writes:
In fairness to Wolfgang let it be said that this is not a new problem. I
have known about it for some weeks, and you can be certain that a lot of
activity has gone on in the background to try to resolve the situation.
That is also my understanding.
Surely an extra 10
?? ?. ?? writes:
Features like background I/O were promised at one point or another :-)
At extra cost, I seem to remember.
Per
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Roy Wood wrote:
The whole point of the licence was to stop people modifying the code
without some central controlling authority - which would be Wolfgang.
And the question is Is Wolfgang able to treat DD fairly in light of his
sense that they are seemingly ignoring his
31 matches
Mail list logo
