RE: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-26 Thread Jimmy MONTESINOS
ilwyn Jones Envoyé : jeudi 15 juillet 2004 22:47 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K > Is the QL2K project still active and is it possible to get that emu from > somewhere? Tried contacting the author through his homepage's email link, > but got my email und

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-25 Thread Stephen
On 24 Jul 2004 at 23:08, Phoebus R. Dokos wrote: > On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:13:56 +0100, Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > This doesn't seem to install the required "cygZ11-6.dll". Where do I > > find that? > > > > Regards > > > > Stephen Meech > > Make sure everything in these options g

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-24 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 23:08:14 -0400, Phoebus R. Dokos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You left my message on top and I was trying to figure out what you meant :-) And of course I meant on the bottom it is getting late :-D -- Visit the QL-FAQ at: (Still uploadi

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-24 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:13:56 +0100, Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This doesn't seem to install the required "cygZ11-6.dll". Where do I find that? Regards Stephen Meech Make sure everything in these options gets installed. If you expand your packages you will find all the required dlls. Ad

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-24 Thread Stephen
This doesn't seem to install the required "cygZ11-6.dll". Where do I find that? Regards Stephen Meech On 17 Jul 2004 at 19:38, Phoebus R. Dokos wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:43:28 -0400, Phoebus R. Dokos > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Two basic packages needed: > > Base > and > X11 > > Via

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-18 Thread Roy wood
No slight to Marcel, but QPC2 is commercial and costs $$. UQLX is free. When it comes to computers I always try for the cheaper route, esp. with software. Hence I prefer MicroEmacs over QD, etc. Tim Swenson In some ways this is the reason that so many of the more commercial and innovative pr

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-18 Thread Timothy Swenson
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 08:15:28 +0200, Wolfgang Lenerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Wouldn't the alternatve be to install QPC2? No slight to Marcel, but QPC2 is commercial and costs $$. UQLX is free. When it comes to computers I always try for the cheaper route, esp. with software. Hence I pref

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-18 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 19:37:41 +0200, Michael Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - Original Message - From: "Dilwyn Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 7:26 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K Why not try Qe

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-18 Thread Michael Berger
- Original Message - From: "Dilwyn Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 7:26 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K > Why not try QemuLator? you are right, good proposal, I will try it as soon as I can. In the

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-18 Thread Dilwyn Jones
> > Wouldn't the alternatve be to install QPC2? > > You are completely right. But only if you imply that every user is a power > user. No doubt QPC2 is the most powerful software that has ever been written > to emulate an environment that is mostly QDOS compatible. > I just use the QL (or emulation

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-18 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 18 Jul 2004 at 12:42, Michael Berger wrote: (...) > My > only purpose is to discover some of the magic of Sir Clive's black box - and > learn some 68K assembler. Hmm, I'd suggest that nothing but a true QL can give you the former, whereas QPC can certainly give you the latter > Sometimes

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-18 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 08:15:28 +0200, Wolfgang Lenerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 17 Jul 2004 at 22:29, Michael Berger wrote: () The alternative would be to install a linux version. Maybe I will try this later. Wouldn't the alternatve be to install QPC2? Not when you wish to run old softwa

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-18 Thread Michael Berger
- Original Message - From: "Wolfgang Lenerz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Wouldn't the alternatve be to install QPC2? You are completely right. But only if you imply that every user is a power user. No doubt QPC2 is the most powerful software that has ever been written to emulate an environmen

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-17 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 17 Jul 2004 at 22:29, Michael Berger wrote: () > The alternative would be to install a linux version. Maybe I will try this > later. Wouldn't the alternatve be to install QPC2? Wolfgang www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-17 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 17 Jul 2004 at 15:43, Phoebus R. Dokos wrote: > It's definitely not 'basic' It does have TCP/IP built in and now (due to > the good work of R.Z and S.G) also sound (QLSSS) SSS - perhaps it does now, it didn't then. Wolfgang www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-17 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:43:28 -0400, Phoebus R. Dokos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Two basic packages needed: Base and X11 Via the installer, changed the "Base" and "X11" from "Default" to "Install" and that's all you need. Phoebus ___ QL-Users Mailing

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-17 Thread Michael Berger
s R. Dokos (Φοίβος Ρ. Ντόκος)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 9:43 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K > On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 19:24:27 +0200, Wolfgang Lenerz > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 16 Jul 2004 at 20:53

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-17 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 19:24:27 +0200, Wolfgang Lenerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 16 Jul 2004 at 20:53, Timothy Swenson wrote: The question is, exactly what CGYWN packages need to be downloaded for UQLX-win32. I've heard "Base and X" but the packages listed on the CGWYN web sites don't list "

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-17 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 16 Jul 2004 at 20:53, Timothy Swenson wrote: > The question is, exactly what CGYWN packages need to be downloaded for > UQLX-win32. I've heard "Base and X" but the packages listed on the CGWYN > web sites don't list "base" or "X" but list a bunch that have X in them. > If anyone figures it

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-16 Thread Timothy Swenson
The question is, exactly what CGYWN packages need to be downloaded for UQLX-win32. I've heard "Base and X" but the packages listed on the CGWYN web sites don't list "base" or "X" but list a bunch that have X in them. If anyone figures it out, let me know as I want to try UQLX-win32. I'm now

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-16 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marcel Kilgus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes Michael Berger wrote: Forgive me, I do not really want to be anoying, but as a typical windoze user I do not have a tool 'ready to use' to un-RAR a file :-( So I am into the next riddle now. Actually pretty all Windows archi

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-15 Thread Dilwyn Jones
> Is the QL2K project still active and is it possible to get that emu from > somewhere? Tried contacting the author through his homepage's email link, > but got my email undeliverably returned. > > Must admit although I do have a registered copy of QPC2 I mostly use QLAY > when playing around with

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-15 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Phoebus R. Dokos wrote: > Hmmm I do not run WinZip... Me neither. I'm a Powerarchiver guy ;-) > but last time I did it couldn't handle RAR files... Seems like my memory did fail me, looks like it still can't handle it. In that case WinZIP is even worse than I remembered. But WinAce, WinRAR (of c

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-15 Thread Dilwyn Jones
> Is the QL2K project still active and is it possible to get that emu from > somewhere? Tried contacting the author through his homepage's email link, > but got my email undeliverably returned. > > Must admit although I do have a registered copy of QPC2 I mostly use QLAY > when playing around with

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-15 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 23:12:09 +0200, Marcel Kilgus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Michael Berger wrote: Forgive me, I do not really want to be anoying, but as a typical windoze user I do not have a tool 'ready to use' to un-RAR a file :-( So I am into the next riddle now. Actually pretty all Windows

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-15 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 21:06:08 +0200, Michael Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - why is hunting easter eggs SOO difficult (?!) - first off many thanks, but the windows emu is archived in RAR format (which reminds me a bit of the Aesop fable of the fox and the stork) while everything else o

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-15 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Michael Berger wrote: > Forgive me, I do not really want to be anoying, but as a typical > windoze user I do not have a tool 'ready to use' to un-RAR a file > :-( So I am into the next riddle now. Actually pretty all Windows archiver tools (WinZIP, PowerArchiver and the like) should be able to han

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-15 Thread Michael Berger
Thursday, July 15, 2004 8:00 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K > On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 19:13:21 +0200, Michael Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > Is the QL2K project still active and is it possible to get that emu from > > somewhere?

Re: [ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-15 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 19:13:21 +0200, Michael Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello! Is the QL2K project still active and is it possible to get that emu from somewhere? Tried contacting the author through his homepage's email link, but got my email undeliverably returned. Must admit although I d

[ql-users] how to get QL2K

2004-07-15 Thread Michael Berger
Hello! Is the QL2K project still active and is it possible to get that emu from somewhere? Tried contacting the author through his homepage's email link, but got my email undeliverably returned. Must admit although I do have a registered copy of QPC2 I mostly use QLAY when playing around with pro