Mate Wierdl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could anybody point me to a URL where postfix and qmail are
(objectively) compared?
There's a bit in LWQ:
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#comparison
Which includes a link to Cameron Laird's MTA comparison, which
includes links to his profiles of
"Todd A. Jacobs" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running this following command:
tai64nfrac /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current | \
/usr/local/qmailanalog/bin/matchup
But when I pipe it through any of the z* commands, I get nothing except
the column headers from the z* command itself. What am I
Agi Subagio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/var/qmail/control/virtualdomains :
testing.com:myname
mail.testing.com:myname
and i have a .procmailrc in /home/myname directory :
:0
/home/myname/testing.txt
1. If i run TEST.deliver and send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED],
qmail gave me a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please forgive my naivete as I am new to qmail and this list, but hearing a
statement such as yours, Peter, gives me pause to consider: If there may
not be future development, am I betting on a dead (or dying) horse?
Dan's got plans for qmail, he just hasn't released
"John P" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Our server handles mail for office.domain.com (this value is in 'me')
- This works OK, but messages to root (cron et al) get delivered to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] which isn't under our control (domain.com is our
webserver)
so I don't get to see them. This is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But there's a lot of time that I stopped using the pure qmail-1.03 with LWQ
instructions. And I bet a lot of are in the same situation.
What patch(es) did you find necessary?
Isn't it a lot of work? And I need to install gcc friends in most machines
just to install
"Hatem" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to test local-local part in the TEST.deliver..
but unfortunately I got the above error!!
Can someone help me out here!!
You didn't follow the installation instructions carefully. Either blow
everything away and start from scratch, or go back through
My qmail project, only 1 week away from implementation, was canned, we are
now moving to Lotus Notes.
Well, it's not a total loss. At least you learned something about
qmail.
-Dave
Joe Janitor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I made some modifications to the homedir files:
$HOME/.qmail now has
| preline /usr/bin/procmail -m /home/joe/.procmailrc
(the -m file was previously mis-named)
and $HOME/.procmailrc has
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/bin:$PATH
ORGMAIL=$HOME/Mailbox
"John P" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Manually typing each filename doesn't sound fun.
Use a shell that implements filename completion.
Why does multilog store it this way?
Guaranteed unique and self documenting.
-Dave
Peter Cavender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The LWQ description of setting up pop3 for qmail only
says to put the tcpserver command in the qmail startup file.
Shouldn't this "service" be supervised by svscan?
Ideally, yes.
Why do the other qmail processes get this, but pop3 does not?
Because the
I've set up a mirror of cr.yp.to using ftpcopy, and a list to which
any updates will be sent. I'll mirror twice daily for now. Any changes
to the files distributed via cr.yp.to, including the addition of new
files, the updating of existing files, or the removal of existing
files, will be detected
Brandon Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The messages themselves have been pre-generated and exist as a file and is
qmail-injected to place them in the queue. The message is the same across
the board with the exception of some personalization, such as the name.
Ouch. That's gonna cost you dearly.
Marcus Korte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have setup a qmail server with the patched dns.c file (PACKETSZ increased
to 65536).
You shouldn't do that if you're using dnscache.
Also a local dnscache based on djbdns-1.05 is setup according to the FAQs.
Normal lookups are working fine, but qmail
I really should let this die, but I just can't...
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:34:36PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
Where does apachectl live?
/usr/sbin/apachectl, but thats irrelevant as apache is NOT started or
stopped or whatever by apachectl, apachectl
Paul Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
even though I have log/run set up EXACTLY as in the supervise man
page.
Including the sticky bit on the on the qmail-send directory?
Is this a supervise/multilog bug?
No.
anyone getting qmail to log deliveries
to multilog using log/run ?
Of course.
"JK" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a Linux 6.2 box with qmail, bind8 and apache on it. It was installed
by a Linux consultant
Ugh. BIND might not be your problem at the moment, but it will be
sooner or later. How could your consultant have been clueful enough to
install qmail but not djbdns?
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just enter
PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin
svscan /service
in your /etc/rc.local
Since we're talking about LWQ, that would have to be "svscan
/var/qmail/supervise ". But putting:
/usr/local/sbin/qmail start
in rc.local is the correct approach.
-Dave
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry Dave, but having such a beast like the sysv-init-script for qmail on
OpenBSD is definetly not the correct approach. Thats against any BSD
concept, especially the OpenBSD concept.
Nonsense. The "qmail" script from LWQ is compatible with the System V
"Robin S. Socha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, putting init scripts in /usr/local does not make any sense at all
I've been putting stuff in /usr/local for at least a decade. I'm not
going to stop just because some upstart free OS's want to impose their
idea of the One True Filesystem Hierarchy
"Sumith" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
perl qmail-qsanity-0_52
did not display anything does that mean..that my Qmail Queue system
is set right. or what does it really mean.
What does the qmail-qsanity documentation say?
perl qmail-lint-0_55
Warning: users/assign checking not implemented.
What
"Robin S. Socha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010222 10:41]:
"Robin S. Socha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, putting init scripts in /usr/local does not make any sense at all
I've been putting stuff in /usr/local for at least a decade. I'm not
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:00:46AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
Nonsense. The "qmail" script from LWQ is compatible with the System V
init script mechanism, but it's also perfectly compatible with BSD and
generally useful on all UNIX flavors
Peter Cavender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I volunteered to talk about and "defend" qmail at a Linux Users' Group
meeting where there will be people speaking on 3 or 4 of the main MTAs.
I am competent in setting up and maintaining qmail, but I must say that I
am unable to respond properly to a lot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) How do I prevent qmail from trying to deliver locally on the qmail
server?
Leave control/locals empty.
2) How can I correctly set-up the group redirects in a way that will
eliminate (if not reduce) duplication due to an error sending to one
address in the group?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a problem with messages staying in the queue. I was running some
tests that
relayed 7,000 messages through one qmail server (n201) to another qmail
server (saturn) which processed the messages locally. All on a local
network.
[root@n201 bin]# ./qmail-qstat
kat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to automate the whole thing i.e.
when a user send mail from KDEmail, netscape or any email client, it
should queue the mails in a directory [i.e the user should feel that
mail is delivered] and when I connect to net it should send
the mails to the specified
mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should I add:
| /var/qmail/bin/splogger pop3 3
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 04:02:58PM +, mick wrote:
grep for pop3 on mail.log and daemon.log for pop3 (digital unix) returns
nothing.
this is how it is called:
Marcus Korte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there an remarkable performance improvement, if the mailserver has a
local DNS cache (instead of contacting a external nameserver)?
Potentially. If your current nameserver is not very fast and you
switch to a local dnscache that's properly configured,
"qmailu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the default maximum value of POP3 connects in VPOPMAIL 4.9.6
?Where do I specify the maximum number of POP3 connects ?
If you're serving POP3 through tcpserver, the default is 40. You can
increase that to whatever you want by modifying the tcpserver
"zbeinet" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I setup freebsd4.2 with qmail in my intranet, I used 192.168...IP
address; and I have a DNS server with 202.96...IP address to provide
name service to dialup users(outside), the FB and DNS are connected
with a router. I hope dialup users could send and receive
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyway to implement into the qmail pop3d? If so where can I find
some good docs on it?
stunnel, as Pawel Garbowski pointed out, will do this.
I looked at Frederik Vermeulen's patch for SSL, and couldn't really make
much sense of it. First is it possible to
"ed lim" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My concurrency remote is already 250...how do I install a big to-do
script?
You want the big-concurrency patch.
is it easy?
Yes, for some people. :-) There's some information on patching qmail
at:
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#patches
qmail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've almost read Running qmail, various docs and searched the email
archives. There is a thread about qmail as a smart relay host for ms
exchange, but it's not quite right. It looks like I need to setup a
virtual domain for my real domain! For some reason I can't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feb 13 18:54:21 samba qmail: 982119261.837833 delivery 11917: deferral:
/bin/sh:_/home/medi/l/foo:_Permission_denied/
What is the output of:
ls -ld / /home /home/medi /home/medi/l /home/medi/l/foo
(ls really needs a "recursively upward" option.)
-Dave
"Dario Dal Ben" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During the tests I have verified, with qmail-qstat, that the number of
messages in the queue grows enough fastly
and that the concurrency-local does not exceed 10/40 (as visible in
/var/log/maillog).
During the test the free RAM remains around to 512MB
Gregor Szaktilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] should go to dom-1-01
[EMAIL PROTECTED] should go to dom-1-02
[EMAIL PROTECTED] should go to dom-1-03
[EMAIL PROTECTED] should go to dom-2-01
[EMAIL PROTECTED] should go to dom-2-02
[EMAIL PROTECTED] should go to dom-2-03
Is that
Daniellek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
W dniu Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 03:54:38PM -0500, Dave Sill wystuka-B(a):-A
If he injects them via SMTP, it's a bit trickier. You could run
/var/qmail2/bin/qmail-smtpd on a non-standard port, e.g., 2500, and
tell him to configure his mail client to use port 2500
"INSOMNIA - Janusz Oles" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how about if I add couple of lines to /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail
What you added looks good.
how about run file in /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/
What should I type in to that run file?
Model it after qmail-smtpd/run, but use the qmail-pop3d
"Schiffbauer, Anthony" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks! umm.. I am trying to look at the logs. I cant find them. Where are
they?
Where'd you tell them to go? If you don't know that, then tell us how
you installed qmail and we'll tell you where to look for the logs.
-Dave
Alex Le Fevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sadly enough, after doing `chown -R alias:users
/home/alias`, I still can't get mail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (thankfully,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] still works). Is that just
because I've got the wrong group set up?
What does:
grep alias /etc/passwd
show?
-Dave
Daniellek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had concurrencyremote set to 40, but with this setting it blocked my queue
for several hours! (some of receipments are very far from me), so i switched
to 120 and it's better because queue is blocked for 30 minutes at most, but
i takes all my bandwith...
"Joe" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a qmail installation on Redhat 6.2. I am using takeshi's
MySQL+Qmail patches to allow authent. from MySql. However, my queue
is not being processed untill i reboot the server. Seems like
qmail-send is dying on me somehow.
What Do The Logs Say? (tm) What
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what is qmail-smtp being used for?
Assuming you mean /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current, it's used by tcpserver
to log connections to port 25.
i also don't really understand how multilog knows to pull information for
smtp as opposed to send since the run scripts are
Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus spake Jocelyn Clement ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Anybody has any luck or experience with this OS.
What kind of question is this?
Sounds reasonble to me.
Why don't you just try and see if it works?
Maybe he's got better things to than
Brandon Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sending out a bunch of emails and would like to generate a list
usernames whose mail bounces. Does Qmail have any feature to accomplish
this? Or is there another way to accomplish this?
Sure, use VERP's, and in the VERP .qmail file, append the offending
Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paco Gracia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to send a daily newsletter to 60.000 e-mail addresses that are stored
in a MySQL database. The newsletter is the same for everybody and the process
of composing and sending it will be started from a PHP web
Paulo Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been in this list, on and off, for about two years,
and I have seen the issue discussed several times, but have never seen a
solution for this particular case (customer on a dialup line, sending
large mails to several people). Has anyone come up with a way
"John P" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1 - Forward all user mails to *@office.domain.com and have Qmail deliver
them to each user - but, our ADSL connection is a bit unreliable, and
sometimes the server will be 'off the internet' for an hour or so - could
this be a problem with the lack of a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are so many garbage mails in /var/qmail/queue. Is there a good
and simple way to delete all mails in the queue? Can I use OS
commands as "mv" or "rm" ?
Sure. See:
http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/view.phtml/aid/6567/fid/286
-Dave
"Neil Grant" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when I try to run qmail start after installing (the lwq way)
I get a lot of errors:
multilog: fatal: unable to switch to current directory: access denied
so I am assuming that a log directory hasnt got the right permissions or
ownership, my
"Dale Herring" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I get this to send to and allow recieve from /home/user/Maildir when
nesecary and /home/thisdir/user/Maildir/ when needed?
I hope that makes some sense.
It's automatic. qmail uses $HOME/Maildir, so it'll use whatever home
directory is specified in
"Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The port as it stands follows the INSTALL instructions
shipped with the original tarball source almost to the letter.
The problem is that those instructions are way outdated. That's DJB's
fault, of course. A modern qmail
Irwan Hadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just curious, how to make a nobody account that all emails sent to that
address will be automatically redirected to /dev/null ?
I want to make an account to forward emails from doublebounce, so I won't get
junk mails because a person's mail bounce and the
"Mike Jackson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When was the last time anybody actually heard from DJB?
He seems to be in a DNS mode right now. He's active on the dns list
and actively maintaining djbdns.
-Dave
Michael Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Setup is Solaris 7 and qmail + big todo + big concurrency
What's going wrong here ?
Thanks for Answer!
You asked this yesterday. Do you think the answer is different today?
In my responses to you yesterday, I *twice* asked if you'd tried
turning off
Michael Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1999/12/msg00465.html
This here exactly describes the Situation!
Please stop yelling!
OK, so now the question is where the new messages to be processed are
coming from. If they're bounces or other
"Kris Kelley" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incoming messages are first stored in ~/Maildir/tmp. They are only moved to
~/Maildir/new once the file write is complete. Therefore, as long as you
are only backing up ~/Maildir/cur and ~/Maildir/new, you shouldn't have any
risk of incomplete file
Michael Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm running qmail on Solaris 7 (SUN Netra T1) and I am trying to
send out 500.000 e-Mails for Testing.
How? 500,000 separate messages or one message with 500,000 recipients?
If the former, have you tried stopping qmail-send until the messages
are
Michael Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How? 500,000 separate messages or one message with 500,000 recipients?
If the former, have you tried stopping qmail-send until the messages
are injected--and do you really need to send each recipient a
different message?
They are seperate messages and
"dennis" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being a newbie to qmail and ldap
Danger, Will Robinson! qmail-ldap is not for newbies.
I am wondering if there is a qmail with the
qmail-ldap patch already applied.
Perhaps, but if you can't handle applying the patch, you're definitely
not ready for
"Daniel Yip" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was following every single steps from Life with qmail to install
qmail on a Linux server. When I typed /usr/local/sbin/qmail start, it
gave me an error message of "softlimit: fatal: unable to run : file
does not exist
Sounds like there's a typo in your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MAILFROM=`/usr/bin/formail -xFrom:`
:0 c
|(/usr/bin/formail -X "" \
-I "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" -X "To:" \
-I "Cc: " -X "Cc:" \
-I "Bcc: " -X "Bcc:" \
-I "From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" -X "From:"; \
echo "Email from:$MAILFROM "; \
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am wondering that how to backup mail directory. I am having trouble with
how to do it. Please give me some idea what you are doing.
Which mail directory are you referring to? /var/qmail?
/var/spool/mail? ~user/Maildir? And what kind of trouble are you
having?
I use
Peter Peltonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used qmHandle-0.4.1 which worked very well. Got my messages deleted from the
queue. Thanks for the tip.
Though I did not stop / start qmail, I just used the tool. Could have I
achieved some harm to my system by doing so?
Anytime you're fiddling with
Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andres Rusconi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
suidperl: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: failed to map
segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory
[...]
Can somebody help with this ?
malloc() failed; you're low on memory/swap.
Or
Tomas TPS Ulej [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \
qmail-start '|dot-forward .forward
./Maildir' splogger qmail
That should be:
./Maildir/' splogger qmail
(note the trailing slash)
-Dave
"NDSoftware" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why when a send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with my account
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in Outlook or The Bat!, i receveid this message in
double ?
What's in antivirus' .qmail file? What Do The Logs Say? (tm)
-Dave
Wolfgang Zeikat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#!/bin/bash
#~/filter
cat /tmp/to$RECIPIENT.txt
if [ "$(grep 'Subject: whatever' /tmp/to$RECIPIENT.txt)" = "Subject:
whatever" ]
then
cat "/tmp/to$RECIPIENT.txt" | qmail-inject devnul
else
cat "/tmp/to$RECIPIENT.txt" | qmail-inject
"NDSoftware" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The logs say only for one message !
OK, but I'd still like to see a sample. And you never answered by
other question:
What's in antivirus' .qmail file?
-Dave
Chris McDaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wondering what the consequences of breaking QSBMF are. My desire is to
change the bounce messages to something more professional (we've had some
complaints)
Seriously? Sheesh.
and the req'd "Hi. This is the" would probably be the first
thing to go.
Clemens Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My Problem is this: DJB says as the first words in his statement
about Software user's rights:
In the United States, once you own a copy of a program..
2 Problems:
a) I am not within the United States
Good question... I suppose your rights would be
"Patrick Bihan-Faou" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I guess that this one is definitely elligible for the "qmail security
challenge".
http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/qmail-challenge.html
If you don't count that as a bug in qmail, then I don't know what is a
bug...
Sure, it's a bug. Dan didn't
"Jesse Sunday" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
starting delivery 26: msg 92275 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
delivery 26: failure:
preline:_fatal:_unable_to_run_procmail:_file_does_not_exist/
status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
bounce msg 92275 qp 27352
end msg 92275
Lieven Van Acker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are a number of customers, whose incoming and outgoing e-mail must be
rerouted via a central service that provides virus-scanning. As these
customers are connected each to various ISP's, and we want to provide the
virus-scanning service (and
Matt Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has been a feature of recent spam, which is probably why it's now
an issue. Several spam senders are now having sender addresses of
spammer@spamdomain, where spamdomain resolves via DNS to
'0.0.0.0'.
Eventually qmail rejects the message because it
Lieven Van Acker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mail from cust.mailserv MR - dest-mx
| ^
| |
V |
MAILPROCESSOR
mail to cust.domain MR
Peter Samuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Dave Sill wrote:
Here's a possible fix. In control/virtualdomains:
[0.0.0.0]:alias-devnull
And in ~alias/.qmail-devnull-default
#
Which should throw away all mail to MX's resolving to 0.0.0.0.
Are you sure
Marcus Korte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the log file:
2001-01-23 17:03:20.131989500 tcpserver: status: 1/20
2001-01-23 17:03:20.132080500 tcpserver: pid 4044 from ...
2001-01-23 17:03:20.134806500 tcpserver: ok 4044 ...
2001-01-23 17:03:20.134811500 tcpserver: warning: dropping connection,
"Kelly Prophet" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, basically what I am asking is if anyone is aware of a way to pipe
incoming email for a specified user to a location on the server. In
this case, a CGI-script.
How about, in the appropriate .qmail file:
|/path/to/cgi-script
-Dave
Does users/cdb supplement regular users or is it an alternative to
them? In other words, if I have a users/assign and users/cdb with a
set of entries that doesn't include all valid local users, will mail
to one of the non-cdb users bounce?
The qmail-spawn man page says it won't:
For each
Peter Samuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Dave Sill wrote:
Does users/cdb supplement regular users or is it an alternative to
them? In other words, if I have a users/assign and users/cdb with a
set of entries that doesn't include all valid local users, will mail
to one
"Andy Abshagen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are in the midst of a security audit performed by Ernst Young.
They are claiming something about a DOS situation. What I need to
find out is whether there are any known DOS situations out there. If
so what needs to be done to take care of the
"Andy Abshagen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. And no. I just read the preliminary report from them. The report
actually states in it that it only affect qmail 1.02 and older. They
dropped it on the report because they could not get our mail server to
report a version number. Since we are
Tap, tap, tap. Hello? Is thing on?
Andrew Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The standard DoS is to open lots of SMTP connections to an SMTP server,
which could be qmail, or any other MTA - and leave them open.
No, the "standard" qmail DOS is to make a single connection to
qmail-smtpd and send
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is, is it possible to run multiple instances
of qmail, sharing the same disk structure, configuration, etc..
No. The queue cannot be shared by multiple instances of qmail.
-Dave
"Boz Crowther" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a DOS command-line mailer that doesn't correctly construct
mail, it seems. I've used recordio to get exactly what's coming from
the mailer in the logs and what I see is that the mailer doesn't
include header information specified on the command
"Jacques Frip' WERNERT" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you tell me much more about that please?
From: "Dave Sill" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Jacques Frip' WERNERT" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to know why I have messages in the queue (ie given by
qmail-qstat)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've the follows configuration:
[POP-Client] - [qmail-intern] - [qmail-extern] - [Internet]
when the POP-Client send an email, this goes to qmail-intern, then
qmail-extern (I'd like here manipulate the qmail header, put out the header
lines from POP-Client and
Martin Randall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a new install on OpenBSD V2.8 following LWQ...thanks Dave.
You're welcome.
From /usr/local/sbin/qmail
SNIP
cdb)
tcprules /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb /etc/tcp.smtp.tmp /etc/tcp.smtp
chmod 644 /etc/tcp.smtp*
echo "Reloaded /etc/tcp.smtp.
echo "Reloaded
Martin Randall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Dave
On 19-Jan-01, you wrote:
Did you skip the step where you do:
/usr/local/sbin/qmail cdb
No, did that twice. When I did a vi /etc/tcp.smtp I found two identical
entries of 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
had to dd one of them.
When you
Clemens Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to evaluate the logs that are generated within ma LWQ-Setup. I am
not really sure which log directory contains what.
/var/loq/qmail
/var/log/qmail/smtpd
As one might guess the smtpd directory might contain any message that
enters or leaves the
"NDSoftware" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where i can get log for QMail Queue because i have '451 qq Temporary Problem
(#4.3.0)' when in send a mail after install AVP.
How did you configure your logging?
-Dave
Sean Reifschneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there something wrong with the step-by-step instructions in the
"INSTALL" file which is included with the Qmail source? I've found
them to be quite useful.
Yeah, they're out-of-date. They use inetd, for example, which will
certainly work--more or
"Desarrollo y Sistemas" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry I am new in this concepts of list. This in not spam. I just
want to get help. If I am doing something wrong tell me. This Email I
sended 30 minuts ago.
You need to be more patient. Much more patient.
-Dave
Dale Herring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay guys and gals. I see lots of utilities to convert from mailbox to
Maildir, but nothing to move from
vsm to Maildir. Has anyone written a utilitiy to do this?
Or am I going to have to do it the hard way and copy everyones vsm to
mailbox then
"Desarrollo y Sistemas" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed follling exactly LWQ,
Oh, if I only had a nickel for every time I heard that...
I use Maildir and have the /home/user with
the 3 directories. When I send email, I dont have any problem, the messages
arrive to the correct place in the
Clemens Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
who rotates the logs when using multilog?
multilog
I did not find a manpage for multilog.
There isn't one. See:
http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/multilog.html
I want to avoid the automatic rotation and rotate the logs my
own.
That's hard to do with
Clemens Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just use [multilog] because I want to stay as close as possible
with LWQ.
I think it's more important to use a configuration that does what you
want than to use any particular "standard" configuration.
My problem is, that I have to pipe the
Piotr Kasztelowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Dave Sill wrote:
DJB has very clearly expressed disdain for
My question - should we not to wait for a DJB own opinion.
Er, what do you think "DJB has very clearly expressed disdain" means?
See:
http://www.or
201 - 300 of 1816 matches
Mail list logo
