Re: Qmail, tcpserver, environment variables, and qmail-smtpd

2001-08-13 Thread Charles Cazabon
Bill Arlofski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to understand the purpose of being able to set environment variables like $TCPREMOTEHOST with tcpserver for incoming connections (ie: using the -h option or -p 'paranoid' option to perform reverse DNS lookups) and set or unset

Qmail, tcpserver, environment variables, and qmail-smtpd

2001-08-12 Thread Bill Arlofski
Quick question regarding tcpserver, environment variables, and qmail-smtpd. I'd like to be able to stop inbound smtp connections for systems that don't have at least a DNS A record. I mean, c'mon... If you are running a mail server, it should have a valid DNS entry, no? Anyway, here

[OT] tcpserver machine, running amanda?

2001-08-06 Thread Todd Finney
I'd like to complete the removal of inetd from a server, and run everything under tcpserver. Amanda looks like it needs a UDP connection though, which tcpserver's name seems to indicate it doesn't support. Dan mentions netcat on the ucspi-tcp page, is that the current SOP for doing

RE: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help? (fwd)

2001-08-04 Thread Charlie Chrisman
How do you get tcpserver to run the qmail-smtpd daemon? When I run it as in the faq, it runs and I see the process running, but it doesn't accept connections. I then changed it to use inetd using tcp-env and qmail-smtpd accepts connections. Could someone get me starting in the right direction

Re: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-04 Thread Charles Cazabon
install fail and I just didn't realize it? Or is there another problem? It's setuidgid, not setguidgid. So aside from me telling the Canadian guy how to use xinetd to *maybe* get around his problem (I hadn't considered a fire wall issue)instead of tcpserver, can you give me some guidance

Re: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help? (fwd)

2001-08-04 Thread Charles Cazabon
Please quote properly; your original text was after a sig delimiter, and you had no attribution for my text. I wrote: There are precisely zero advantages to using inetd/xinetd in this manner, and several disadvantages (when compared to a simple tcpserver installation). [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help? (fwd)

2001-08-04 Thread Charles Cazabon
Charlie Chrisman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do you get tcpserver to run the qmail-smtpd daemon? When I run it as in the faq, it runs and I see the process running, but it doesn't accept connections. I then changed it to use inetd using tcp-env and qmail-smtpd accepts connections. Could

RE: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-04 Thread Scott Zielsdorf
in the script yet but I must have mis-set a flag, misplaced a line break or something. I gave up after a couple of hours on trying to diagnose my faux paux. Here's what I did to get tcpserver to run: 1. I removed the smtp file from the xinetd.d directory which was invoking tcpwrappers through xinetd

Re: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-04 Thread Charles Cazabon
First of all, I'm on the list, and I set Mail-Followup-To: appropriately. Please don't cc: me on your list messages; I hate duplicates and get 500-1000 messages a day already. Scott Zielsdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's setuidgid, not setguidgid. Yeah, people keep telling me that *I*

RE: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-04 Thread Scott Zielsdorf
qmail in and get it to relay when I started posting to this group seeking the accumulated wisdom of the 'umma'. Now, I have accepted the orthodoxy of the priests of tcpserver, vanquished the satanic xinetd, and can selective relay! Hallelujah I only want this box to accept internal traffic

RE: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-04 Thread Scott Zielsdorf
Gadzooks In my previous reply to Charles Cazabon I was IMPRECISE. My rcpthosts file is NOT blank, it has localhost in it. Just wanted to clear that up before Charles could retort :) Scott Zielsdorf Senior Technical Support Consultant Computer Instruments 9901 W. 87th St. Overland Park, KS

Re: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-04 Thread Charles Cazabon
the orthodoxy of the priests of tcpserver, vanquished the satanic xinetd, and can selective relay! Hallelujah I think you've made things much more complex than necessary. There is lots of documentation on selective relaying with qmail and tcpserver. I think the problem with the run script may

RE: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-04 Thread Scott Zielsdorf
on the LAN has an account on the box. I think you've made things much more complex than necessary. There is lots of documentation on selective relaying with qmail and tcpserver. Charles, in all seriousness, no BS'ing, no being snide, anything, I am a newbie. A very new newbie to qmail and linux. When

tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-03 Thread Craziest Manalive
Hey all, I'll keep it short. I am hoping to implement qmail where i work for a canadian univeristy. I have installed linux 7.1 and qmail and tcpserver. all services appear to be running error free. I can connect to the box on the local machine, but not from outside the box at all. I have

Re: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-03 Thread Charles Cazabon
Scott Zielsdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: By searching on the keywords xinetd and qmail on the web I was able to find a script that allowed xinetd to use tcpserver as its daemon and then the relaying rules in /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb worked. [...] Possibly the reason you were blasted

RE: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-03 Thread Scott Zielsdorf
-Original Message- From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: Re: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help? Possibly the reason you were blasted is that this is incorrect. LOL...You think? You_cannot_ make inetd or xinetd use tcpserver. Your xinetd script

qmail-pop3d || tcpserver (sometimes timing out?)

2001-07-25 Thread erasor
Howdy, searching the archives i had not come across anything that seem'd to match my problem (sorry if i missed it) I've been using qmail with tcpserver for sometime now, and have came across a problem that is puzzeling me concerning users (dialups) not being able to get past a certain number

Re: qmail-pop3d || tcpserver (sometimes timing out?)

2001-07-25 Thread Kman
rc.qmail: /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -R -H 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Try using tcpserver -l -R -H ... It might help. -Kittiwat

tcpserver slow on internal network

2001-07-16 Thread Bill Arends
I have a qmail server running on RH7 w/ tcpserver. I has been installed for about 2 weeks. For about a week it ran fine but it suddenly started to time out forwarding mail both to internal addresses and to external addresses. I researched the list and assumed it was a DNS issue. I added

Re: tcpserver: end xxxx status 256

2001-07-07 Thread Vincent Schonau
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 10:07:11PM -0700, Lists Servers Email wrote: Does any know what causes this error: Server: tcpserver: end status 256 A program that was called by tcpserver exited non-zero. What you obscured is a pid. Client: user xxx +OK pass xx -ERR unable

Re: tcpserver: end xxxx status 256

2001-07-07 Thread Lists Servers Email
I found the problem, tcpserver for pop3 was not running as root. But I have another problem!!! there is mail in the queue but it's not get deliver local. Thanks Kevin. - Original Message - From: Vincent Schonau [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 12:43

Re: tcpserver: end xxxx status 256

2001-07-07 Thread Vincent Schonau
Please don't Cc: me, I'm on the list. On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 01:16:31AM -0700, Lists Servers Email wrote: [...] But I have another problem!!! there is mail in the queue but it's not get deliver local. That sucks. What do the logs say[tm]? Vince.

tcpserver: end xxxx status 256

2001-07-06 Thread Lists Servers Email
Does any know what causes this error: Server: tcpserver: end status 256 Client: user xxx +OK pass xx -ERR unable to write pipe Connection to host lost. Kevin

tcpserver / queue cleaning

2001-07-04 Thread Moritz Schmitt
Hello, I got too questions about qmail and tcpserver. If the tcpserver program is off topic here, please advise me to the right list. 1. How can I delete every message existing in the queue? 2. I'm using tcpserver to start qmail and it seems to work. But there is a little thing I don't

Re: tcpserver / queue cleaning

2001-07-04 Thread Chris Johnson
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 08:26:45PM +0200, Moritz Schmitt wrote: 2. I'm using tcpserver to start qmail and it seems to work. But there is a little thing I don't understand. On my FreeBSD 4.2 RELEASE machine I added the follwing configuration file into /etc/rc: That's not the right place

Re: tcpserver / queue cleaning

2001-07-04 Thread Greg White
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 08:26:45PM +0200, Moritz Schmitt wrote: Hello, I got too questions about qmail and tcpserver. If the tcpserver program is off topic here, please advise me to the right list. 1. How can I delete every message existing in the queue? If this isn't a FAQ, it should

[OT] RE: tcpserver / queue cleaning

2001-07-04 Thread Moritz Schmitt
I'm using /etc/rc to start the tcpserver process because I read it in Running qmail; Richard Blum. To quote him on that: Once the qmail-smtpd boot script is created, it must be run from a system boot script. On a FreeBSD system this can be the /etc/rc script. Because the qmail-smtpd script just

Re: [OT] RE: tcpserver / queue cleaning

2001-07-04 Thread Charles Cazabon
Moritz Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using /etc/rc to start the tcpserver process because I read it in Running qmail; Richard Blum. To quote him on that: Once the qmail-smtpd boot script is created, it must be run from a system boot script. On a FreeBSD system this can be the /etc/rc

Qmail/tcpserver woes

2001-07-01 Thread Matt Hubbard
). However, you guys are the gurus I'm leaning on for insight, so I am, of course, open to any ideas as to the cause. Here is the tcpserver line I am currently using for smtp: 22482 ?S 0:00 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -l mail1.godaddy.com -P -H -R -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c 120 -u 503 -g

Re: Qmail/tcpserver woes

2001-07-01 Thread MarkD
. Here's what happens for me: $ telnet mail1.godaddy.com 25 Trying 63.241.136.35... telnet: connect to address 63.241.136.35: Network dropped connection on reset telnet: Unable to connect to remote host Thanks Matt. That tells me a lot. Specifically that the port is being listened to - so tcpserver

tcpserver: relay iface question

2001-06-25 Thread GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI
Hi all. How can I tell tcpserver to relay clients connected from an interface instead of ip addresses? --yapedu

Re: tcpserver: relay iface question

2001-06-25 Thread Charles Cazabon
GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can I tell tcpserver to relay clients connected from an interface instead of ip addresses? You can wildcard IP addresses on byte boundaries -- i.e., the following entry: 10.10.:allow,RELAYCLIENT= would allow the 16-bit subnet 10.10

Re: tcpserver: relay iface question

2001-06-25 Thread Felix von Leitner
Thus spake GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): How can I tell tcpserver to relay clients connected from an interface instead of ip addresses? You bind one tcpserver on each interface and give the one on the relay-enabled interface a rule set that always matches. It's that easy.

Re: tcpserver: relay iface question

2001-06-25 Thread Henning Brauer
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 09:50:07PM +0200, Felix von Leitner wrote: Thus spake GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): How can I tell tcpserver to relay clients connected from an interface instead of ip addresses? You bind one tcpserver on each interface and give the one

Re: tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used ???

2001-06-21 Thread A A
Hello, Thanks for the great help! I really really apreciate this! I found the following line in my /etc/inetd.conf file in the section Pop and imap mail services et al pop-3 stream tcp nowait root/usr/sbin/tcpd ipop3d The advice seems to suggest that I should comment out this

Re: tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used ???

2001-06-21 Thread Jörgen Persson
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 09:44:02PM -0700, A A wrote: I found the following line in my /etc/inetd.conf file in the section Pop and imap mail services et al pop-3 stream tcp nowait root/usr/sbin/tcpd ipop3d The advice seems to suggest that I should comment out this line. I am

Re: tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used ???

2001-06-21 Thread Frank Tegtmeyer
A A [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: pop-3 stream tcp nowait root/usr/sbin/tcpd ipop3d The advice seems to suggest that I should comment out this line. I am currently running qmail-pop3d. Is commenting out this line the correct way to go? Yes, that's all to do. Don't forget to send

Re: tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used ???

2001-06-20 Thread Jörgen Persson
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 09:15:50PM -0700, A A wrote: [snip] The line 23359 root 20 0 324 324 264 R 0 5.1 0.0 65:51 supervise seems to suggest something called supervise is taking up most of the cpu (5.1%)? There's most probably two (or more) processes of the same

Re: tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used ???

2001-06-20 Thread Frank Tegtmeyer
A A [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think this is probably the cause for the high cpu load from qmail. Can anyone give me a pointer on how I can fix this? I'll admit that I am a complete newbie to linux and qmail, so any help and/or detailed instructions is greatly appreciated. Did you remove

tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used ???

2001-06-19 Thread A A
that I am an absolute newbie at qmail and linux so any help is appreciated. This is what I found on every line in /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current: @40003b2c94571738f434 tcpserver: status: 0/20 which I guess is fairly normal. However, in /var/log/qmail/POP3D/current: I get

RE: courier-imap and tcpserver ?

2001-06-18 Thread Michael Boyiazis
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: courier-imap and tcpserver ? Hi list, I wonder if anyone has courier-imap running under tcpserver, and if so could share how it was done? Thanks in advance. -- Regards // Oden Eriksson Kvikkjokk Networks

tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used

2001-06-17 Thread Alex Tsang
Dear all When I start the qmail-pop3d service, the log files log ¡¥tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used¡¦ errors but I can still use the pop3 server. So what¡¦s this error mean? Alex Tsang

Re: tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used

2001-06-17 Thread Chris Johnson
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:32:51AM +0800, Alex Tsang wrote: When I start the qmail-pop3d service, the log files log ¡¥tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used¡¦ errors but I can still use the pop3 server. So what¡¦s this error mean? It means that something is already bound

courier-imap and tcpserver ?

2001-06-16 Thread Oden Eriksson
Hi list, I wonder if anyone has courier-imap running under tcpserver, and if so could share how it was done? Thanks in advance. -- Regards // Oden Eriksson Kvikkjokk Networks

mrtg for tcpserver -v

2001-06-15 Thread Ken Jones
Are there any mrtg modules to graph tcpserver -v output? Ken Jones

Re: False alarms about services with tcpserver

2001-06-14 Thread Henning Brauer
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:55:55AM +0200, Andrea Cerrito wrote: Thank you for your reply. On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:29:05PM -0400, David Means wrote: If there is a way to configure Mon to report a service as down after a number of failures, then that is my recommendation. Just because

Re: False alarms about services with tcpserver

2001-06-14 Thread Andrea Cerrito
script, I found a little thing intersting: exec /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -c 50 -H -P -R -l pop3.frontend.int -x /coda/qmail/vpopmail/relay/tcp.smtp.cdb \ -u $QMAILUID -g $QMAILGID ip port /coda/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 21 ^^^ But /coda

Re: False alarms about services with tcpserver

2001-06-13 Thread Andrea Cerrito
Thank you for your reply. Andrea Cerrito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a server farm with pop3 / smtp / ftp services running on Linux and served by tcpserver. My monitoring software is Mon, and sometimes I'm receiving alarms about these services: they are always false alarms. Two

Re: False alarms about services with tcpserver

2001-06-13 Thread Andrea Cerrito
Thank you for your reply. On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:29:05PM -0400, David Means wrote: If there is a way to configure Mon to report a service as down after a number of failures, then that is my recommendation. Just because a alertafter 2 15m gives an alert if the service failes 2 times

Re: False alarms about services with tcpserver

2001-06-13 Thread Andrea Cerrito
is: when service fails (in monitoring opinion :) the server is not busy. As I reported in another mail, this is what happens: 2001-06-12 13:27:03.855642500 tcpserver: status: 1/50 2001-06-12 13:27:03.856118500 tcpserver: pid 17372 from 10.10.32.135 2001-06-12 13:27:11.326985500 tcpserver: ok 17372

False alarms about services with tcpserver

2001-06-12 Thread Andrea Cerrito
Hi to all, I have a server farm with pop3 / smtp / ftp services running on Linux and served by tcpserver. My monitoring software is Mon, and sometimes I'm receiving alarms about these services: they are always false alarms. For example: ===SERVICE IS MARKED AS DOWN== Summary output

Re: False alarms about services with tcpserver

2001-06-12 Thread Charles Cazabon
Andrea Cerrito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a server farm with pop3 / smtp / ftp services running on Linux and served by tcpserver. My monitoring software is Mon, and sometimes I'm receiving alarms about these services: they are always false alarms. Two possibilities: tcpserver

Re: False alarms about services with tcpserver

2001-06-12 Thread David Means
by tcpserver. My monitoring software is Mon, and sometimes I'm receiving alarms about these services: they are always false alarms. For example: ===SERVICE IS MARKED AS DOWN== Summary output: Time Out Group : pop3-a.frontend.int Service : smtp

Re: False alarms about services with tcpserver

2001-06-12 Thread Henning Brauer
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:29:05PM -0400, David Means wrote: If there is a way to configure Mon to report a service as down after a number of failures, then that is my recommendation. Just because a alertafter 2 15m gives an alert if the service failes 2 times within 15 minutes. -- *

Quick tcpserver question

2001-06-01 Thread Gordon-Nildram
Hi If you edit the tcp.smtp file then reload the tcp.smtp.cdb file using tcprules do you need to restart qmail for these changes to take effect?

Re: Quick tcpserver question

2001-06-01 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 03:49:30PM +0100, Gordon-Nildram wrote: Hi If you edit the tcp.smtp file then reload the tcp.smtp.cdb file using tcprules do you need to restart qmail for these changes to take effect? No. Greetz, Peter.

Re: Quick tcpserver question

2001-06-01 Thread Kurth Bemis
As far as i know i don't think that you do. I've been known to be wrong tho.. ~kurth Kurth Bemis Senior Network Admin/Owner: USAExpress.net Owner: Ozone Computer http://kurth.hardcrypto.com PGP Key Avail. -

Re: Quick tcpserver question

2001-06-01 Thread Andrea Cerrito
No. --- Cordiali saluti / Best regards Andrea Cerrito ^^ Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Terni S.p.A. P.zzale Bosco 3A 05100 Terni IT Tel. +39 744 5441330 Fax. +39 744 5441372

Re: Quick tcpserver question

2001-06-01 Thread Russell Nelson
Gordon-Nildram writes: If you edit the tcp.smtp file then reload the tcp.smtp.cdb file using tcprules do you need to restart qmail for these changes to take effect? No. -- -russ nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Microsoft

Re: Quick tcpserver question - Thanks

2001-06-01 Thread Gordon-Nildram
Thanks for that, I didn't think you did - Original Message - From: Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 4:09 PM Subject: Re: Quick tcpserver question On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 03:49:30PM +0100, Gordon-Nildram wrote: Hi If you edit

Question about supervise and tcpserver behaviour

2001-06-01 Thread Renato
+ supervise-scripts-3.3. I'm monitoring the behaviour of tcpserver for the pop service ( simple 'ps - aux | grep tcpserver | grep pop' and I get, obviously, just one is running ). Sometimes, supervise tries to restart tcpserver and I see 2 tcpservers. Then the second dies ( port is already bind

Re: Question about supervise and tcpserver behaviour

2001-06-01 Thread Charles Cazabon
Renato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm monitoring the behaviour of tcpserver for the pop service ( simple 'ps - aux | grep tcpserver | grep pop' and I get, obviously, just one is running ). Sometimes, supervise tries to restart tcpserver and I see 2 tcpservers. Then the second dies ( port

Re: Question about supervise and tcpserver behaviour

2001-06-01 Thread Renato
Hi Charles, Thanks for your answer. Renato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm monitoring the behaviour of tcpserver for the pop service ( simple 'ps - aux | grep tcpserver | grep pop' and I get, obviously, just one is running ). Sometimes, supervise tries to restart tcpserver and I see 2

Re: Question about supervise and tcpserver behaviour

2001-06-01 Thread Charles Cazabon
Renato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No. tcpserver shouldn't randomly die. Is there a way to tune up supervise ? (time-out, any other parameters ?) Perhaps you're running it with memory or other process limits, or its hitting a system-wide limit? Without specific information

tcpserver: Return 553 instead of 451?

2001-05-30 Thread Bruce Lane
I'm using tcpserver with qmail and a local blacklist in the form of tcp.smtp and tcp.smtp.cdb. In order to provide local logging, and a brief description to a rejected source of why their connection attempt was rejected, a typical line from my tcp.smtp file may look something like

Re: tcpserver: Return 553 instead of 451?

2001-05-30 Thread Jos Backus
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 10:34:29PM -0700, Bruce Lane wrote: 63.102.43.25:allow,RBLSMTPD=Access denied due to spamming. 63.102.43.25:allow,RBLSMTPD=-Access denied due to spamming. should do the trick. From http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/rblsmtpd.html: However, if $RBLSMTPD begins with a hyphen,

Re: tcpserver: Return 553 instead of 451?

2001-05-30 Thread Russell Nelson
Bruce Lane writes: I'm using tcpserver with qmail and a local blacklist in the form of tcp.smtp and tcp.smtp.cdb. In order to provide local logging, and a brief description to a rejected source of why their connection attempt was rejected, a typical line from my tcp.smtp file may

Re: TCPSERVER status 256

2001-05-29 Thread Dave Sill
Nathaniel L. Keeling III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can I verify if this is a bare line problem or not? Use recordio to record the complete SMTP dialogue. See the faq. My rc file contains 'qmail-start '|dot-forward .forward ./Maildir/' and nothing is showing up in the qmail-send log file.

Re: TCPSERVER status 256

2001-05-29 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 08:44:20AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote: Nathaniel L. Keeling III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can I verify if this is a bare line problem or not? Use recordio to record the complete SMTP dialogue. See the faq. A nice trick: - create /service/qmail-smtpd as you would

RE: TCPSERVER status 256

2001-05-29 Thread Kitabjian, Dave
]Subject: TCPSERVER status 256I am getting a status 256 in the qmail-smtpd log files when one of our other servers try to connect to the mail server to send mail. The log files from the other server is getting good response, the helo and response, and sends the data but the messages

Re: TCPSERVER status 256

2001-05-28 Thread Nathaniel L. Keeling III
in the qmail-send log file. Can anybody help? Here are the entries from qmail-smtpd log file. @40003b0fba66381db324 tcpserver: status: 1/40 @40003b0fba6638bd8d04 tcpserver: pid 8871 from 207.227.131.194 @40003b0fba663ac86894 tcpserver: ok 8871 kweku.akan.net:207.227.131.131:25

TCPSERVER status 256

2001-05-26 Thread Nathaniel L. Keeling III
and there are no entries in the qmail-send log file. Can anybody help? Here are the entries from qmail-smtpd log file. @40003b0fba66381db324 tcpserver: status: 1/40 @40003b0fba6638bd8d04 tcpserver: pid 8871 from 207.227.131.194 @40003b0fba663ac86894 tcpserver: ok 8871 kweku.akan.net:207.227.131.131

Re: TCPSERVER status 256

2001-05-26 Thread Chris Johnson
, and sends the data but the messages are not getting to the users and there are no entries in the qmail-send log file. Can anybody help? Here are the entries from qmail-smtpd log file. @40003b0fba66381db324 tcpserver: status: 1/40 @40003b0fba6638bd8d04 tcpserver: pid 8871 from

RE: TCPSERVER status 256

2001-05-26 Thread Chris Bolt
I am getting a status 256 in the qmail-smtpd log files when one of our other servers try to connect to the mail server to send mail. The log files from the other server is getting good response, the helo and response, and sends the data but the messages are not getting to the users and

Re: slow server (qmail + imap + tcpserver)

2001-05-23 Thread Jörgen Persson
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:33:18PM +0200, MERCHE TOMAS wrote: we have an imap server with qmail and tcpserver. We've been looking for an answer for months, but we cannot find where is the problem. The tcpserver concurrency is 500. We're only 60 users. Sometimes, when there are about

Re: [Fwd: Re: slow server (qmail + imap + tcpserver)]

2001-05-23 Thread Jörgen Persson
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 04:04:06PM +0200, MERCHE TOMAS wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:33:18PM +0200, MERCHE TOMAS wrote: we have an imap server with qmail and tcpserver. We've been looking for an answer for months, but we cannot find where is the problem. The tcpserver

RE: tcpserver blues

2001-05-15 Thread Chris Ochap
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joerg Lenneis Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 4:31 AM To: Nick (Keith) Fish Cc: Chris Ochap; Qmail Mailing List Subject: Re: tcpserver blues Nick (Keith) Fish: Chris Ochap wrote: start() { # Start

RE: tcpserver blues

2001-05-15 Thread Patrick Starrenburg
with qmail and/or Tetsu Ushijima's excellent qmail-conf which has complete configuration scripts for setting up qmail. http://www.din.or.jp/~ushijima/qmail-conf.html I believe that it is not recommended to run qmail in the background, and with tcpserver it is not necessary. The DJB suite has a special

tcpserver -p and smtpd and DNS

2001-05-14 Thread David Killingsworth
) in about 15 minutes that takes the IP of the incoming smtp request looks up the name, then looks up the IP for the NAME. the IP should be the same as the connecting host. If this is not the case the smtp connection should be dropped. I use tcpserver to start smtpd. I use the -p (paranoid) option

Slow start tcpserver

2001-05-14 Thread Andriy T. Yanko
Hi ALL! I decided try tcpserver program for qmail services (smtpd pop3d). It's work properly but sometimes tcpserver strarting very slow ( more than 30 sec ! ). When I used xinetd for starting qmail-smtpd qmail-pop3d I never must wait for starting it. --- /etc/rc.d/rc.qmail --- /usr/local

Re: Slow start tcpserver

2001-05-14 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Try to use the -l name parameter on tcpserver. Tonino At 14/05/2001 14/05/2001 +0300, Andriy T. Yanko wrote: Hi ALL! I decided try tcpserver program for qmail services (smtpd pop3d). It's work properly but sometimes tcpserver strarting very slow ( more than 30 sec ! ). When I used xinetd

Re: tcpserver -p and smtpd and DNS

2001-05-14 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 06:30:44AM -, David Killingsworth wrote: I have been running qmail for about 8 months, It works great. So far I have not been able to resolve on problem. When an smtp connection comes in we only want to connect with servers who have forward and reverse DNS that

Re: Slow start tcpserver

2001-05-14 Thread Patrick Starrenburg
Dear Andriy I believe the -l switch should solve your problem as the other person mentioned. If you are getting into using tcpserver and the other services written by qmail's author you may wish to look at qmail-conf http://www.din.or.jp/~ushijima/qmail-conf.html as this does a nice job

Re: tcpserver -p and smtpd and DNS

2001-05-14 Thread David Killingsworth
(HELO dali.onevision.de) (@212.77.172.50) by mail.myweb.net with SMTP; 14 May 2001 08:59:56 - I have tcpserver -DUvp wrapping smtpd for qmail. Shouldn't tcpserver drop the connection when $TCPREMOTEIP is DNS'd to a hostname and $TCPREMOTEHOST is DNS'd to an IP. if $TCPREMOTEIP can't

Re: tcpserver -p and smtpd and DNS

2001-05-14 Thread Mark Delany
an email to me that contains the following header: Received: from unknown (HELO dali.onevision.de) (@212.77.172.50) by mail.myweb.net with SMTP; 14 May 2001 08:59:56 - I have tcpserver -DUvp wrapping smtpd for qmail. Shouldn't tcpserver drop the connection when $TCPREMOTEIP

slow start tcpserver

2001-05-14 Thread Andriy T. Yanko
Hi ALL! I decided try tcpserver program for qmail services (smtpd pop3d). It's work properly but sometimes tcpserver strarting very slow ( more than 30 sec ! ). When I used xinetd for starting qmail-smtpd qmail-pop3d I never must wait for starting it. --- /etc/rc.d/rc.qmail --- /usr/local

Re: tcpserver -p and smtpd and DNS

2001-05-14 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 10:10:21AM -, David Killingsworth wrote: Shouldn't tcpserver drop the connection when $TCPREMOTEIP is DNS'd to a hostname and $TCPREMOTEHOST is DNS'd to an IP. if $TCPREMOTEIP can't be resolved or if $TCPREMOTEHOST can't be resolved, shouldn't this cause

Re: tcpserver -p and smtpd and DNS

2001-05-14 Thread Jim Steele
. Without it, only sites for which tcpserver didn't unset TCPREMOTEHOST matched. This, of course, is exactly the desired behavior. As already mentioned in this thread, tcpserver -p unsets TCPREMOTEHOST when the name obtained by reverse lookup can't be resolved to the original IP. Consequently

Re: Newbies vs. arrogant experts (was: Newbie with tcpserver)

2001-05-13 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Russell Nelson([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.12 21:54:32 +: Chris Garrigues writes: As it is, I consider unsubscribing several times a week (and it's not because of the newbies). I send qmail list traffic into its own mailbox, and read it once a day. It's kind of handy, because I

Re: Newbies vs. arrogant experts (was: Newbie with tcpserver)

2001-05-12 Thread Chris Garrigues
Well said in both these messages. I really hope that some of the self-appointed experts on this list take your example of civil behavior. I've been on this list now since late 1996 and in recent times, it's become almost intolerable with all the flamage. Somehow on other lists people manage

Re: Newbies vs. arrogant experts (was: Newbie with tcpserver)

2001-05-12 Thread Russell Nelson
Chris Garrigues writes: As it is, I consider unsubscribing several times a week (and it's not because of the newbies). I send qmail list traffic into its own mailbox, and read it once a day. It's kind of handy, because I can see the questions which don't get answered, and sometimes I

Re: Newbie with tcpserver

2001-05-11 Thread Pablo Buenaventura
You are right, I know very well I did wrong without reading the information I needed for (I didn´t read the condition´s information that you need before to subsrcibe to a list). As you can realise for my writting, English is not my primery language (I am Spanish) and for that reason I

Re: tcpserver blues

2001-05-11 Thread Joerg Lenneis
Nick (Keith) Fish: Chris Ochap wrote: start() { # Start daemons. echo -n $Starting $prog: daemon /var/qmail/rc /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -x /etc/tcprules/tcp.smtp.cdb -u 51 -g 50 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd RETVAL=$? [ $RETVAL -eq 0 ] touch /var/lock/subsys/qmail echo

Re: Newbie with tcpserver

2001-05-11 Thread Russell Nelson
Robin S. Socha writes: * Paulo Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010510 11:00]: Considering the guy's name, perhaps English isn't his primary language and he isn't fluent at all with it, which would also explain why he wasn't able to express himself politely enough when rejecting the offer

Re: Newbies vs. arrogant experts (was: Newbie with tcpserver)

2001-05-11 Thread Russell Nelson
Dave Sill writes: Second, the offer of commercial support made to Pablo was sent privately, not to list. Pablo's reposting it publicly is at least as rude as trolling the list for clients. The best way to troll the list for clients is to answer people's questions. Answering FAQ's is

Newbie with tcpserver

2001-05-10 Thread Pablo Buenaventura
Hi All, I´ve been reading Life with Qmail and I am trying to configurate qmail in my office. The first problem I found out was about tcpserver. 1. How to configurate it? 2. Where? In which file? Many thanks for your time, Pablo

Re: Newbie with tcpserver

2001-05-10 Thread Pablo Buenaventura
Sorry Vinient, what do you mean? --- Vinient [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: looking for small price give me off line list - Original Message - From: Pablo Buenaventura [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 2:26 PM Subject: Newbie with tcpserver

Re: Newbie with tcpserver

2001-05-10 Thread Pablo Buenaventura
PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 4:02 PM Subject: Re: Newbie with tcpserver Sorry Vinient, what do you mean? --- Vinient [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: looking for small price give me off line list - Original Message - From: Pablo Buenaventura [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Newbie with tcpserver

2001-05-10 Thread Pablo Buenaventura
, 2001 4:19 PM Subject: Re: Newbie with tcpserver I am running RH7.0 --- Vinient [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: looking for some commercial, we will setup and give you for small charge if you are running on redhat linux - Original Message - From: Pablo Buenaventura

Re[2]: Newbie with tcpserver

2001-05-10 Thread Barry Hill
in the FAQ then answers have to be teased out of the list, which generates more traffic than one short and helpful mail (this thread is a good example of this). Regarding the tcpserver question: AFAIK (and I'm no expert), TCPSEVER is configured in the command line, and uses /etc/tcp.* files

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >