Yes you can. I have a CentOS 5.2 64 bit QmailToaster and I installed
TMDA on it. It took me some doing, because the TMDA instructions
weren't very obvious for the special features I wanted, but I now have
it and it does work. But for the $100 question, can I help you
configure it? Maybe not.
nightduke, I'm sure those who are helping you will continue, and I
just recently installed CentOS5 toaster which is probably a different
version than yours, and when I run that command here is what I get, so
yours is either old, or you are missing parts.
daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.3
will let me login as that user since it has the domain
and user in vpopmail? I'll try that too.
Thanks
John
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tek Support wrote:
I have a few questions in answering your suggestions.
1) In qmailadmin
, and it worked fine.
Thanks
John
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tek Support wrote:
I have a few questions in answering your suggestions.
1) In qmailadmin there is such a thing as a catchall, but I don't
have any catchall setup as such.
2) My .qmail-default
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In many European countries it is also an legal issues not to delete received
(E-)Mails: Mails accepted for delivery must be delivered (except when
infected by viruses).
Does this legal issue mean
and archive the rest of the mails.
Johannes
Tek Support schrieb:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In many European countries it is also an legal issues not to delete
received
(E-)Mails: Mails accepted for delivery must be delivered
your server to a spam-relay which bounces
spams or viruses back to faked senders who are the final messages'
receipients.
Johannes
Tek Support schrieb:
Jake, I'll try changing it to bounce and I'll get back to you. But
doesn't the bounce create more traffic? What I've thought happens
Hi all, I've installed the taps logging into my system and it's
obvious to me that we are getting a copy of every email that comes to
our server even though the recipient doesn't exist. I've viewed the
information on the toaster and inter7, but I don't see any way to
either block spam or log
said don't do this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
But in the instructions it says to do exactly that. If I don't do
that, then what am I supposed to do?
Thanks
John
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tek Support wrote:
Hi all, I've installed the taps
You didn't tell what kind of server and resources your machine has.
One of my suggestions could be to look at your memory and CPU and
decide if you need to upgrade.
Thanks
John
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted
a test TMDA account and it too worked correctly.
So, it was preline and this is now solved.
Thank you for your help,
John
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Tek Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Eric, I can contact you off list but I want to be clear, the
problem isn't with TMDA, it's with preline
more of it when the time
comes. Don't hold your breath. ;)
Tek Support wrote:
I did a google search for tagcose and couldn't find anything. What is it?
Thanks
John
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a note, this should be a capability in tagcose
at the build messages for preline.
Unfortunately, I don't have a 64-bit machine to do any testing on.
Tek Support wrote:
Well I decided to copy the preline file from a (CentOS 5) i386 machine
which the preline was giving the correct messges on, and put it onto
my (CentOS 5) x86_64 machine
any emails,
and they only got a few spam compared to all of those previously. So
for this company, TMDA (as you said) setup properly is a good option
in my opinion.
Thanks
John
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Harry Zink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 4, 2008, at 3:02 AM, Tek Support wrote
and not be a determent to
anyone who still uses the default way.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Tek Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well now that you've let the cat out of the bag, do tell... :)
Really, I'll wait.
Thanks
John
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:49 PM
.
Thanks
John
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tek Support wrote:
I did keep the preline binary - I can send it to you here or off list.
I'm just curious to know if it's really a binary or not. The error message
appears as though it's some sort of script
Oh PS... I installed from scratch and so I didn't use qtp-newmodel
and I didn't redirect any output from the build.
Thanks
John
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tek Support wrote:
I did keep the preline binary - I can send it to you here or off list
the preline on the 64bit machine must be corrupted somehow, or
something is wrong with the coding for 64bit.???
Thanks
John
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Tek Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, I'm trying to run TMDA on my fresh (for a few months) x86_64
CentOS 5 install. I have had
Ditto, I actually host several domains on one machine (5 dedicated
ips) and I'm getting rejected for lack of RDNS - because my server is
using the 2nd IP for all domains outbound emails. If this will work
for my scenerio I too would like to see this used in the Toaster.
Thanks
John
On Tue,
Ho, I guess you missed the recent comment made about TAPS by Eric. I
believe it will do what you want. See the wiki:
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Taps
Thanks
John
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Ho Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My manager want to monitor some user send box to
. Please contact me off
list if you're interested.
FWIW, I don't recall having to use preline at all. That might have been due
to the way TMDA was implemented though.
Tek Support wrote:
Hi all, I'm trying to run TMDA on my fresh (for a few months) x86_64
CentOS 5 install. I have had nothing
it in the toaster. I'm
a little surprised that one of the toaster's ISP users doesn't go ahead and
do this themselves. Some probably have. I seem to remember this coming up
before on the list.
Tek Support wrote:
Ditto, I actually host several domains on one machine (5 dedicated
ips) and I'm
I told you there were smarter people than I. :)
For problem #1, I manually enter each of my [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a
subscriber. Again, with a small company this works.
For problem #2 What if you changed the bounce setting to Only
subscribers can post, all others go to moderators for
I'm sure there is someone smarter than I, but in my company I simply
close off the email group to any incoming subscription requests
(closed list), and then I manually enter each subscriber - each email
address in my company. Mine is small enough that's not a problem, but
if you have a large
if anything going to yahoo from there though.
Then I'd consider turning off DK signatures. Not many servers actively use
them. Even google groups (google 'invented' DKs) only uses DKs in test mode
(last I checked, several months ago).
Tek Support wrote:
Yes that's correct, both
is
different, sort of a successor to DK. DKIM is *not* implemented in the
toaster in any fashion (and probably won't be any time soon).
Tek Support wrote:
I appreciate you doing a test to yahoo, it gives me one more piece to
the puzzle. I've never seriously considered the Mac to be any part
Another question I have is what is this header for?
/m:47/d: 7860
Thanks
John
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Tek Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, now I'm confused. A long time ago I added an SPF TXT record to
our company's DNS. I thought that was DK. Now with the newly
probably wouldn't be this far along.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DomainKeys for (much) more.
P.S. Google is your friend.
Tek Support wrote:
Ok, now I'm confused. A long time ago I added an SPF TXT record to
our company's DNS. I thought that was DK. Now with the newly
installed CentOS
not
be a trivial exercise.
Tek Support wrote:
As you said (would have to), how do I determine the order they are
run? Is it simply that the DKIM header is added on top of the
simscan, thus simscan first and dkim 2nd?
Thanks
John
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED
server for traffic on port 587, and does not rewrite
anything.
Thanks
John
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Tek Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, we probably don't need it that bad that then.
Thanks
John
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
are sending from exactly the same domain, right?
Tek Support wrote:
You know, I don't think it has anything to do with simscan. A staff
member in the office using a Mac laptop is sending mail to port 587
(no TLS option available in her Mac - only SSL, but she is in the
local office and the Mail
. Certificates for IMAPS/POP3S and SMTP/TLS are using
this certificate.
Johannes
Tek Support schrieb:
Hi, now that I'm strongly considering using port 587 for my staff, I
thought it also a wise choice to make them use TLS. I am in my
thunderbird and tested it myself and I get an error message
computers to import a correctly named cert and the
error doesn't come back, I can live with that.
Thanks
John
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:51 AM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tek Support wrote:
Thanks, I'll do that, and do I need a 3party signed cert (like HTTPS)?
The reason you're
think it's from me.
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 4768, pid: 4895, t: 0.0658s
scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.93.3
Wouldn't simscan be run on my box, and if so, would it be done before
DKIM or after?
Thanks
John
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tek
That's great, that's exactly what I was looking for, thank you for the link.
Thanks
John
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:07 AM, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are some more detailed instructions here:
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Certificate
On 25-Aug-08, at 10:39 PM, Tek
, but scans only for viruses (clamav), not
spam (spamassassin). This is consistent with the message you're seeing.
Adding the DK signature would (have to) happen after this scan.
Tek Support wrote:
Hi Eric, thanks for the quick reply. The reason I think it's doing
outbound scanning is a specific
-importing a certificate that has changed (in the case a host name changes
or a certificate expires).
Tek Support wrote:
Ok, I'll see if importing will work also. But initially it said I
needed to import it, and I did that, the error I get now is that the
name doesn't match. So if I create a new
So for a 64bit system is qtp-newmodel worth trying? I'm a bit scared
Thanks
John
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Harry Zink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 23, 2008, at 8:45 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
qtp-newmodel, which is part of the qmailtoaster-plus package, is the most
reliable
Hi all, recently I had asked if there was a reason to use the port 587
if I installed spamdyke (because spamdyke authenticated my dynamic
users and ignored the rbls). Well, maybe I've found something that
would still require me to use 587 instead of port 25. I would
appreciate any info.
As of
Hi, now that I'm strongly considering using port 587 for my staff, I
thought it also a wise choice to make them use TLS. I am in my
thunderbird and tested it myself and I get an error message that the
certificate is owned by localhost, and when I view the cert, it
actually says cn=qmailtoaster.
It sounds similar to something I was going through. If you are using
spamdyke, add the 127.0.0.1 to your /etc/spamdyke/whitelist_ip file.
Thanks
John
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Benedict Claver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Team,
Am having a big trouble here that:
-I have a main
Hi all, I'm new to the toaster install and infact to YUM. I have
received notice from yum-updater that there are new updates. Since I
am new to the toaster I'm wondering if installing updates might hurt
or even cripple anything with my CentOS 5 Qmail-Toaster?
Might it only depend on what
Thank you, I'll go ahead then.
John
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tek Support wrote:
Hi all, I'm new to the toaster install and infact to YUM. I have
received notice from yum-updater that there are new updates. Since I
am new to the toaster I'm
Hi, I need to let you know up front that I'm not one of the qmail
masters on here, nor do I know your phpsupport program. But, a file
called '.qmail-support' suggests that you have or need to create an
email user called [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Then you'll have or need
to create the file called
comes answering questions, and so I just
wanted to make sure I said Thank you.
John
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tek Support wrote:
Thanks Eric, I realize I don't need 587 at all with spamdyke, I was
trying to ask if I needed 587 if spamdyke was using
Message - From: Tek Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Authentication to bypass spam checks
Hi all, I have a few question. Before I learned of this port 587, my
only option was to disable spamhaus
? And again if I have dynamic IP users, and I'm using spamdyke
which includes spamhaus, then I don't need to use 587. Is that right?
Thanks again, I'm just trying to be clear.
John
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tek Support wrote:
So if I understand correctly
Hi all, I have a few question. Before I learned of this port 587, my
only option was to disable spamhaus. And all I did to disable it was
to remove it from my /var/qmail/control/blacklists file.
So, the other day I needed some addition reporting and I remembered
the toaster plus, so I
$SPAMDYKE_CONF \
$SMTPD $VCHKPW /bin/true 21
---After End---
You can see the BLACKLIST=`cat /var/qmail/control/blacklists` is no
longer listed.
Thanks
John
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Tek Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, I have a few question. Before I learned of this port 587, my
in the tcp.smtp file. You'll need
to check the SM config file for specifics on that.
Tek Support wrote:
Dear Eric, I too have just installed CentOS 5/QmailToaster from the
directions at
(http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/CentOS_5_QmailToaster_Install).
By the way, it went very smooth, thank you
Hi Erik, I have not seen a response to my error about sqmail, where
when I try to send an outbound email, it says Error: Server said but
it's blank.
Well I was hoping that this update of sqmail 1.4.15 was the fix. So I
edited the cnt5064-install.sh script and commented out the original
line and
Dear Eric, I too have just installed CentOS 5/QmailToaster from the
directions at
(http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/CentOS_5_QmailToaster_Install).
By the way, it went very smooth, thank you - except this one error.
I have previously installed qmail-rocks on several slackware machines
52 matches
Mail list logo
