[qmailtoaster] Qmail options to block at port
Hey y'all An associate of mine has experience with postfix, and was wondering if qmail blocks messages at SMTP that fail to meet valid criteria. See the postfix log summary generated from his machine, below. I'm aware the qmail toaster comes with support to use the following facilities to block bad messages: RBLs, SPF, domainkeys, simscan, clamav, spamassassin, SURBL. But does it block messages such as the Host not found or other criteria? If not how to configure? I'm aware Greylisting isn't part of the qmailtoaster. The second question, does anyone know of any utilities that can generate reports like this from the qmail logs? Thanks! Q pflogsumm /var/log/mail.log ... message reject detail - RCPT blocked using bl.spamcop.net (total: 19) 12 ocn.ne.jp 6 alpha-net.ne.jp 1 btopenworld.com cannot find your hostname (total: 25) 23 72.35.236.66 1 218.232.129.208 1 221.141.51.93 Client host rejected: Greylisted (total: 7) 3 horsepowerfreaks.com 2 britecast.com 2 campaignmonitor.com Helo command rejected: Host not found (total: 4) 2 80-219-113-121.dclient.hispeed.ch 2 ocn.ne.jp Helo command rejected: need fully-qualified hostname (total: 1) 1 hinet.net - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] Update problems
after a mnaual upgrade of clamv, spamm assasin, courier authlib and imap,
and control panel toaster, I get the following errors,
WARNING: Problem with External get '/usr/bin/qmailmrtg S
/var/log/qmail/spamd':
Expected a Number for 'in' but got 'failed to open dir
/var/log/qmail/spamd'
WARNING: Problem with External get '/usr/bin/qmailmrtg S
/var/log/qmail/spamd':
Expected a Number for 'out' but nothing'
ERROR: Target[spamd][_IN_] ' $target-[3]{$mode} ' did not eval into
defined data
ERROR: Target[spamd][_OUT_] ' $target-[3]{$mode} ' did not eval into
defined dat
Coureir authlib could not install as it conflicts with libtool-ltdl so I
had to remove the libtool-ltdl and cannot re-install as it still conflicts
sith courier-authlib. Could it be the reason I am getting the above
errors?
I will appreciate to get you help as I ams stillworried thinking that it
may result in to bigger problems.
crispin
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] errors during upgrading qt
I have just a message before I saw this thread. The server was down for
the past 24 hours.
I am running qt on FC5.
I removed libtool-ltdl to be able to install courier-authlib. I am however
getting the following errors and would like to know if there is anything I
need to do to rescue this situation.
WARNING: Problem with External get '/usr/bin/qmailmrtg S
/var/log/qmail/spamd':
Expected a Number for 'in' but got 'failed to open dir /var/log/qmail/spamd'
WARNING: Problem with External get '/usr/bin/qmailmrtg S
/var/log/qmail/spamd':
Expected a Number for 'out' but nothing'
ERROR: Target[spamd][_IN_] ' $target-[3]{$mode} ' did not eval into
defined data
ERROR: Target[spamd][_OUT_] ' $target-[3]{$mode} ' did not eval into
defined dat
Could someone on FC4 give this a try:
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/download/courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.2.src.rpm
If you downloaded and attempted to test this yesterday, please
re-download.
I should have some virtual machines available all the time soon,
thanks to Kyle and Wifi7.com.
Thanks,
Erik
On 10/25/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's interesting.
So, on FC4 (at least), libltdl.so is provided by the
courier-authlib-toaster
package, while on CentOS4 (at least) it is provided by the standard
libtool-libs package.
I'm guessing that there must be some patch to libltdl.so that was
necessary
to get courier-authlib-toaster working on FC4.
So the answer to original question (is libtool-ltdl or libtool-libs
necessary?), the answer (apparently) is that it depends on your
distro/release. If you have dependent packages and can't remove
libtool-ltdl
(or libtool-libs) cleanly, I'm guessing that you can remove it with
--nodeps
before installing courier-authlib-toaster, which will replace the
dependent
file(s). Now whether or not the dependent package will actually work or
not
with the courier-authlib-toaster versions might be subject to testing.
This illustrates why it is prudent to run the toaster on CentOS instead
of
FedoraCore.
Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
# ls -l `rpm -ql courier-authlib-toaster | grep libltdl`
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 27004 Sep 19 14:54 /usr/lib/libltdl.a
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 789 Sep 19 14:53 /usr/lib/libltdl.la
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root16 Sep 19 19:08 /usr/lib/libltdl.so -
libltdl.so.3.1.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root16 Sep 19 19:08 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3 -
libltdl.so.3.1.0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 70144 Sep 19 14:53 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3.1.0
Francisco Paco Peralta
- Original Message
From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 5:44:39 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] errors during upgrading qt
Bingo.
So, when upgrading the toaster, one might need to
# rpm -e --nodeps libtools-ltdl
in order to install courier-authlib-toaster.
Paco,
what does
# ls -l `rpm -ql courier-authlib-toaster | grep libltdl`
show?
(BTW, thanks for checking this stuff!)
Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
Here are the results:
# rpm -qf /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3
courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.1
# rpm -qf /usr/lib/ltdl.so.3.1.0
error: file /usr/lib/ltdl.so.3.1.0: No such file or directory
Francisco Paco Peralta
- Original Message
From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 4:51:51 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] errors during upgrading qt
That's interesting. I seem to remember now that the file(s) was
included in
the courier-authlib package for that particular (FC4) distro.
The files (one file, one link) in question are:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root16 Sep 11 19:10 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3 -
libltdl.so.3.1.0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24588 Aug 13 00:13 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3.1.0
Paco, what does
# rpm -qf /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3
tell you? Does that file exist on your system?
Please do the same for /usr/lib/ltdl.so.3.1.0 just for yuks.
Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
Hey Guys,
All right. I ran the following command as requested:
# rpm -qa | grep libtool
libtool-1.5.16.multilib2-3
# rpm -ql libtool-libs
package libtool-libs is not installed
Eric,
I believe the way we got around this problem might have been by
finding
a copy of the missing file and putting it in the directory. Is
there a
way to tell which rpm installed the package?
Francisco Paco Peralta
--
-Eric 'shubes'
--
-Eric 'shubes'
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
Re: [qmailtoaster] errors during upgrading qt
This is a qmailmrtg error. How many have you gotten?
On 10/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just a message before I saw this thread. The server was down for
the past 24 hours.
I am running qt on FC5.
I removed libtool-ltdl to be able to install courier-authlib. I am however
getting the following errors and would like to know if there is anything I
need to do to rescue this situation.
WARNING: Problem with External get '/usr/bin/qmailmrtg S
/var/log/qmail/spamd':
Expected a Number for 'in' but got 'failed to open dir /var/log/qmail/spamd'
WARNING: Problem with External get '/usr/bin/qmailmrtg S
/var/log/qmail/spamd':
Expected a Number for 'out' but nothing'
ERROR: Target[spamd][_IN_] ' $target-[3]{$mode} ' did not eval into
defined data
ERROR: Target[spamd][_OUT_] ' $target-[3]{$mode} ' did not eval into
defined dat
Could someone on FC4 give this a try:
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/download/courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.2.src.rpm
If you downloaded and attempted to test this yesterday, please
re-download.
I should have some virtual machines available all the time soon,
thanks to Kyle and Wifi7.com.
Thanks,
Erik
On 10/25/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's interesting.
So, on FC4 (at least), libltdl.so is provided by the
courier-authlib-toaster
package, while on CentOS4 (at least) it is provided by the standard
libtool-libs package.
I'm guessing that there must be some patch to libltdl.so that was
necessary
to get courier-authlib-toaster working on FC4.
So the answer to original question (is libtool-ltdl or libtool-libs
necessary?), the answer (apparently) is that it depends on your
distro/release. If you have dependent packages and can't remove
libtool-ltdl
(or libtool-libs) cleanly, I'm guessing that you can remove it with
--nodeps
before installing courier-authlib-toaster, which will replace the
dependent
file(s). Now whether or not the dependent package will actually work or
not
with the courier-authlib-toaster versions might be subject to testing.
This illustrates why it is prudent to run the toaster on CentOS instead
of
FedoraCore.
Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
# ls -l `rpm -ql courier-authlib-toaster | grep libltdl`
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 27004 Sep 19 14:54 /usr/lib/libltdl.a
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 789 Sep 19 14:53 /usr/lib/libltdl.la
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root16 Sep 19 19:08 /usr/lib/libltdl.so -
libltdl.so.3.1.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root16 Sep 19 19:08 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3 -
libltdl.so.3.1.0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 70144 Sep 19 14:53 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3.1.0
Francisco Paco Peralta
- Original Message
From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 5:44:39 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] errors during upgrading qt
Bingo.
So, when upgrading the toaster, one might need to
# rpm -e --nodeps libtools-ltdl
in order to install courier-authlib-toaster.
Paco,
what does
# ls -l `rpm -ql courier-authlib-toaster | grep libltdl`
show?
(BTW, thanks for checking this stuff!)
Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
Here are the results:
# rpm -qf /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3
courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.1
# rpm -qf /usr/lib/ltdl.so.3.1.0
error: file /usr/lib/ltdl.so.3.1.0: No such file or directory
Francisco Paco Peralta
- Original Message
From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 4:51:51 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] errors during upgrading qt
That's interesting. I seem to remember now that the file(s) was
included in
the courier-authlib package for that particular (FC4) distro.
The files (one file, one link) in question are:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root16 Sep 11 19:10 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3 -
libltdl.so.3.1.0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24588 Aug 13 00:13 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3.1.0
Paco, what does
# rpm -qf /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3
tell you? Does that file exist on your system?
Please do the same for /usr/lib/ltdl.so.3.1.0 just for yuks.
Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
Hey Guys,
All right. I ran the following command as requested:
# rpm -qa | grep libtool
libtool-1.5.16.multilib2-3
# rpm -ql libtool-libs
package libtool-libs is not installed
Eric,
I believe the way we got around this problem might have been by
finding
a copy of the missing file and putting it in the directory. Is
there a
way to tell which rpm installed the package?
Francisco Paco Peralta
--
-Eric 'shubes'
--
-Eric 'shubes'
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] Periods in the E-Mail Address
Craig I was able to put a dot on username both from qmailadmin and CLI The only time i needed to use : was with .qmail aliases, for example The file /home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.com/.qmail-firstname:lastname Makes an alias for [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Mensaje original- De: Craig Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: jueves, 26 de octubre de 2006 10:02 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Asunto: RE: [qmailtoaster] Periods in the E-Mail Address Are you doing this via the command line? If so then you need to substitute : for . I ran into this issue when I first setup my toaster as well. I was doing /home/vpopmail/bin/vadduser [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it was failing. If you do /home/vpopmail/bin/vadduser firstname:[EMAIL PROTECTED] it qmail picks this up as a . If you are doing it via qmailadmin then I'm not sure as I don't really use it. -Original Message- From: Dairenn Lombard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 October 2006 21:16 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Periods in the E-Mail Address I have a customer who likes to do stuff like [EMAIL PROTECTED] and our server using the most recent version of the toaster, that no longer works. You can add a forward like that, but adding an actual e-mail account with a period throws the error: Email Account [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guy Smiley) could not be added We couldn't find any logs that would explain why it couldn't be added, and this is the same version of qmailadmin as the one on our older server, so, we're not clear on exactly what has gone wrong. A search of the archives has not yielded any results related to this issue, and, there's nothing in google about this problem as it relates to qmailadmin either. Thoughts? Thanks in advance. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:Sánchez Martín;David FN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ORG:E2000 Financial Investments, S.A.;Centro de Nuevas Tecnologías TITLE:Administrador de Sistemas TEL;WORK;VOICE:902196177 ADR;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;;Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA;Asturias;;;Espa=F1a LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA=0D=0AAsturias=0D=0AEspa=F1a URL;WORK:http://www.e2000.es EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] REV:20060705T152542Z END:VCARD - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] Periods in the E-Mail Address
Whoops, that's right. That was also where I had the problem, sorry my bad. It was a few months ago. It was getting qmail to read the .qmail file. Ignore me please it's early in the morning. :-) Thanks for pointing that out David. -Original Message- From: David Sánchez Martín [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 October 2006 09:15 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Periods in the E-Mail Address Craig I was able to put a dot on username both from qmailadmin and CLI The only time i needed to use : was with .qmail aliases, for example The file /home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.com/.qmail-firstname:lastname Makes an alias for [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Mensaje original- De: Craig Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: jueves, 26 de octubre de 2006 10:02 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Asunto: RE: [qmailtoaster] Periods in the E-Mail Address Are you doing this via the command line? If so then you need to substitute : for . I ran into this issue when I first setup my toaster as well. I was doing /home/vpopmail/bin/vadduser [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it was failing. If you do /home/vpopmail/bin/vadduser firstname:[EMAIL PROTECTED] it qmail picks this up as a . If you are doing it via qmailadmin then I'm not sure as I don't really use it. -Original Message- From: Dairenn Lombard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 October 2006 21:16 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Periods in the E-Mail Address I have a customer who likes to do stuff like [EMAIL PROTECTED] and our server using the most recent version of the toaster, that no longer works. You can add a forward like that, but adding an actual e-mail account with a period throws the error: Email Account [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guy Smiley) could not be added We couldn't find any logs that would explain why it couldn't be added, and this is the same version of qmailadmin as the one on our older server, so, we're not clear on exactly what has gone wrong. A search of the archives has not yielded any results related to this issue, and, there's nothing in google about this problem as it relates to qmailadmin either. Thoughts? Thanks in advance. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] [Fwd: RE: [simscan] Thoughts on improving performance]
How much better than spamassassin is dspam? At this point I'm quite satisfied with my qmt with spamassassin as it is very effective for all our clients, but I'm always looking to improve on the system. If Dspam is an improvement it may be worth a concerted effort to get it working effectively on a qmt setup. Preferably on an already working qmt setup. I.E. The procedure needed to replace spamassassin with it. Hopefully something simple like working out the install procedure to integrate into qmail/vpop. Once that is sorted, on the working system rpm -e spamassassin, and then integrate dspam. Somehow though I doubt it would be that easy. Would it be possible to get simscan to call it? I think if those interested do some research (which I will do) we may be able to point the ones with more knowledge in the right direction. Biggest question though, is it really worth doing? Is Dspam really better than SA? It sounds like it from their FAQ. http://dspam.nuclearelephant.com/faq.shtml -Original Message- From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 October 2006 23:34 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] [Fwd: RE: [simscan] Thoughts on improving performance] Kyle Quillen wrote: I would like to see this become a reality. From what I read DSPAM works pretty well. Thanks q There's a post back in the archives somewhere about DSPAM. I know there's a couple people who were on the list (may no longer be) that had it working. The link posted earlier may have been the write-up the person did about it. Here's a couple other links I got from a quick search of my email folder: http://www.griffous.net/qmail-vpopmail-dspam.html http://dspamwiki.expass.de/Installation/ http://forum.qmailrocks.org/showthread.php?t=3426highlight=dspam (QMail Rocks posting) http://weblog.massivegeek.com/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=59 (from a guy that has it working with QMT) Look at March-April archives of this year, as well as August of this year. Nolan was going to write up a how-to in the wiki, but I don't know if he ever got around to it. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] errors during upgrading qt
These errors are sent to my postmaster account, they are more than 40 in
12 hours.
crispin
This is a qmailmrtg error. How many have you gotten?
On 10/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just a message before I saw this thread. The server was down for
the past 24 hours.
I am running qt on FC5.
I removed libtool-ltdl to be able to install courier-authlib. I am
however
getting the following errors and would like to know if there is anything
I
need to do to rescue this situation.
WARNING: Problem with External get '/usr/bin/qmailmrtg S
/var/log/qmail/spamd':
Expected a Number for 'in' but got 'failed to open dir
/var/log/qmail/spamd'
WARNING: Problem with External get '/usr/bin/qmailmrtg S
/var/log/qmail/spamd':
Expected a Number for 'out' but nothing'
ERROR: Target[spamd][_IN_] ' $target-[3]{$mode} ' did not eval into
defined data
ERROR: Target[spamd][_OUT_] ' $target-[3]{$mode} ' did not eval into
defined dat
Could someone on FC4 give this a try:
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/download/courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.2.src.rpm
If you downloaded and attempted to test this yesterday, please
re-download.
I should have some virtual machines available all the time soon,
thanks to Kyle and Wifi7.com.
Thanks,
Erik
On 10/25/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's interesting.
So, on FC4 (at least), libltdl.so is provided by the
courier-authlib-toaster
package, while on CentOS4 (at least) it is provided by the standard
libtool-libs package.
I'm guessing that there must be some patch to libltdl.so that was
necessary
to get courier-authlib-toaster working on FC4.
So the answer to original question (is libtool-ltdl or libtool-libs
necessary?), the answer (apparently) is that it depends on your
distro/release. If you have dependent packages and can't remove
libtool-ltdl
(or libtool-libs) cleanly, I'm guessing that you can remove it with
--nodeps
before installing courier-authlib-toaster, which will replace the
dependent
file(s). Now whether or not the dependent package will actually work
or
not
with the courier-authlib-toaster versions might be subject to
testing.
This illustrates why it is prudent to run the toaster on CentOS
instead
of
FedoraCore.
Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
# ls -l `rpm -ql courier-authlib-toaster | grep libltdl`
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 27004 Sep 19 14:54 /usr/lib/libltdl.a
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 789 Sep 19 14:53 /usr/lib/libltdl.la
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root16 Sep 19 19:08 /usr/lib/libltdl.so -
libltdl.so.3.1.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root16 Sep 19 19:08 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3 -
libltdl.so.3.1.0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 70144 Sep 19 14:53
/usr/lib/libltdl.so.3.1.0
Francisco Paco Peralta
- Original Message
From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 5:44:39 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] errors during upgrading qt
Bingo.
So, when upgrading the toaster, one might need to
# rpm -e --nodeps libtools-ltdl
in order to install courier-authlib-toaster.
Paco,
what does
# ls -l `rpm -ql courier-authlib-toaster | grep libltdl`
show?
(BTW, thanks for checking this stuff!)
Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
Here are the results:
# rpm -qf /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3
courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.1
# rpm -qf /usr/lib/ltdl.so.3.1.0
error: file /usr/lib/ltdl.so.3.1.0: No such file or directory
Francisco Paco Peralta
- Original Message
From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 4:51:51 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] errors during upgrading qt
That's interesting. I seem to remember now that the file(s) was
included in
the courier-authlib package for that particular (FC4) distro.
The files (one file, one link) in question are:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root16 Sep 11 19:10 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3
-
libltdl.so.3.1.0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24588 Aug 13 00:13
/usr/lib/libltdl.so.3.1.0
Paco, what does
# rpm -qf /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3
tell you? Does that file exist on your system?
Please do the same for /usr/lib/ltdl.so.3.1.0 just for yuks.
Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
Hey Guys,
All right. I ran the following command as requested:
# rpm -qa | grep libtool
libtool-1.5.16.multilib2-3
# rpm -ql libtool-libs
package libtool-libs is not installed
Eric,
I believe the way we got around this problem might have been by
finding
a copy of the missing file and putting it in the directory. Is
there a
way to tell which rpm installed the package?
Francisco Paco Peralta
--
-Eric 'shubes'
--
-Eric 'shubes'
-
Re: [qmailtoaster] Qmail options to block at port
Quinn Comendant wrote: Hey y'all An associate of mine has experience with postfix, and was wondering if qmail blocks messages at SMTP that fail to meet valid criteria. See the postfix log summary generated from his machine, below. I'm aware the qmail toaster comes with support to use the following facilities to block bad messages: RBLs, SPF, domainkeys, simscan, clamav, spamassassin, SURBL. But does it block messages such as the Host not found or other criteria? If not how to configure? I'm aware Greylisting isn't part of the qmailtoaster. The second question, does anyone know of any utilities that can generate reports like this from the qmail logs? Thanks! Q pflogsumm /var/log/mail.log ... message reject detail - RCPT blocked using bl.spamcop.net (total: 19) 12 ocn.ne.jp 6 alpha-net.ne.jp 1 btopenworld.com cannot find your hostname (total: 25) 23 72.35.236.66 1 218.232.129.208 1 221.141.51.93 Client host rejected: Greylisted (total: 7) 3 horsepowerfreaks.com 2 britecast.com 2 campaignmonitor.com Helo command rejected: Host not found (total: 4) 2 80-219-113-121.dclient.hispeed.ch 2 ocn.ne.jp Helo command rejected: need fully-qualified hostname (total: 1) 1 hinet.net Right now Toaster blocks at a SMTP level any connection that fails the RBL check defined by the servers in /var/qmail/control/blacklists. It will also dump the SMTP connection if any of the criteria are met in your CHKUSER options in /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp. And no; you have the web page gui that shows some mail stats, but the logging has ALWAYS been clunky in Qmail itself. you can use some extra programs like qmail-analog, but even then they're crappy at best, IMHO. I guess you could write a script that would parse the log and count each type of entry. No one I know of has done so yet. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] bayes getting corrupt (revisited)
Citando Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Eric Shubes wrote: Ok, so here's my situation. I have two apparently identical low-volume servers. One shows the corruption symptoms, the other doesn't (yet). Here is the local.cf (same on both): ok_locales all skip_rbl_checks 0 required_hits 5 report_safe 0 rewrite_header Subject [SPAM] use_pyzor 1 use_auto_whitelist 1 bayes_path /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes use_bayes 1 use_bayes_rules 1 bayes_auto_learn 1 bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 7.0 bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.1 bayes_auto_expire 1 The problem seems to manifest itself when tokens begin to become due to expire. # spamassassin -D bayes --lint shows that the problem server has never sync'd, while the one which hasn't failed (yet) shows a sync'd value. It normally syncs when you train it. Here's my local.cf: ok_locales all skip_rbl_checks 1 required_hits 5 report_safe 0 bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 8.0 rewrite_header Subject ***SPAM*** use_pyzor 1 use_dcc 1 use_auto_whitelist 1 use_bayes 1 use_bayes_rules 1 bayes_auto_learn 1 use_auto_whitelist 1 whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] score SARE_LOTTO_SPAM2 3.8 score ADVANCE_FEE_2 2.4 score ADVANCE_FEE_2 4.1 score DIET_1 1.2 score MPART_ALT_DIFF_COUNT 2.1 score BAYES_05 0.5 score BAYES_50 5.0 score BAYES_95 9.5 score BAYES_99 10.0 score PYZOR_CHECK 5 score AWL -20 score DCC_CHECK 4.4 score URIBL_JP_SURBL 9.5 score SARE_GIF_STOX 6.5 score SARE_GIF_ATTACH 2.5 Which is pretty close to yours. I have yet to have a problem with the database (15 months since last touched). I do run a script nightly at midnight that checks my spam folder and learns from it, which is also where it would sync. Here's another server's local.cf (this Bayes DB moved from the original server, to this one about 18 months ago; it probably has 28-30 months running): ok_locales all skip_rbl_checks 1 required_hits 5.0 report_safe 0 rewrite_header Subject ***SPAM*** use_pyzor 1 use_bayes 1 bayes_file_mode 0700 #bayes_path /root/.spamassassin/bayes bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/.spamassassin/bayes bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 8.0 bayes_auto_expire 1 #use_dcc 1 use_auto_whitelist 1 auto_whitelist_file_mode 0700 #auto_whitelist_path /root/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist auto_whitelist_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist # Whitelist section manually added whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] score SARE_LOTTO_SPAM2 3.8 score ADVANCE_FEE_2 2.4 score ADVANCE_FEE_2 4.1 score DIET_1 1.2 score MPART_ALT_DIFF_COUNT 2.1 score BAYES_05 0.5 score BAYES_50 5.0 score BAYES_95 9.5 score BAYES_99 10.0 score PYZOR_CHECK 5 score AWL -20 score URIBL_JP_SURBL 9.5 score SARE_GIF_STOX 6.5 score SARE_GIF_ATTACH 2.5 And here's a snip of the -D --lint: [932] dbg: bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: 1161817266 [932] dbg: bayes: corpus size: nspam = 18150, nham = 16042 [932] dbg: bayes: score = 0.0886822067616296 [932] dbg: bayes: DB expiry: tokens in DB: 147679, Expiry max size: 15, Oldest atime: 1161421975, Newest atime: 1161835713, Last expire: 1161743994, Current time: 1161836551 [932] dbg: bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: 1161817266 Which is also syncing. This one also runs a learning script nightly. Don't know if this helps you any or not - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] hi, with suse I had do change the bayes_file_mode from 0700 to 666 And I've forgotten about these two: -restart spamd BEFORE the sync. -run sync as root and cp bayes settings from /etc/mail/spamassassin to ~./spamassassin just in case about mysql backend, it IS slower and on a very, very busy server you have to setup a separate instance to run bayes 'cause with too much mail the users start to get erros authenticating. And with a webmail sql backend and sql address books... Uff.. Been there, not good :( --- Zsoft - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Quick Question about the list, not realted directly to qmailtoaster
I didn't think about using my gmail account. Yeah thunderbird's threading is starting to drive me crazy. Like on this thread here, it has listed underneath the thread about Cannon communicate using internal ip :? geeknoob wrote: Well, I am also using Thunderbird for this list - but I agree, there's a better way to do it. Honestly, most of my lists go through gmail, and I'll probably put this one on it as well. The threading is by far the best feature (that i most commonly use) of google-mail, imo. ~GN Ryan Gibbons wrote: So this is the first mailing list I have actually followed religiously with an actual client, not just through the web. What is the best client to use. I have tried using Thunderbird, but the threading feature of it isn't too hot, is there something better to use for managing mailing list. The more I find myself getting into development to more I see them being used, and it is actually becoming difficult to keep up in Thunderbird. It doesn't match up the threads properly and just handles them funky imho, but that might b/c I'm not use to it. So what do you use?
Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster
Citando [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi guys, i've read something about getting dspam on the toaster instead spamassassin. I don't know how dspam works but, shouldn't this be a very traumatic change? I think a nice approach about this will be options. You can use spamassassin or dspam ( can be used BOTH ?) AFAIK. This is the same as clamav, you can use clamav or TrendMicro (via trophie). This could let spamassassin and dspam fans be happy together :-P Just my 2 cents (euro-cents :-P) - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think that BOTH is the right way. I'm still not very convinced about DSPAM. When I've the time I'm going to read the docs and setup a test server, but meantime I'm sticking to spamassassin. But I think the best is to integrate DSPAM support into simscan. I've read a post about it somewhere, maybe on this list???. -- Zsoft - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Quick Question about the list, not realted directly to qmailtoaster
Ryan Gibbons wrote: I didn't think about using my gmail account. Yeah thunderbird's threading is starting to drive me crazy. Like on this thread here, it has listed underneath the thread about Cannon communicate using internal ip :? geeknoob wrote: Well, I am also using Thunderbird for this list - but I agree, there's a better way to do it. Honestly, most of my lists go through gmail, and I'll probably put this one on it as well. The threading is by far the best feature (that i most commonly use) of google-mail, imo. ~GN Ryan Gibbons wrote: So this is the first mailing list I have actually followed religiously with an actual client, not just through the web. What is the best client to use. I have tried using Thunderbird, but the threading feature of it isn't too hot, is there something better to use for managing mailing list. The more I find myself getting into development to more I see them being used, and it is actually becoming difficult to keep up in Thunderbird. It doesn't match up the threads properly and just handles them funky imho, but that might b/c I'm not use to it. So what do you use? The threading issue comes about when people (not to nit-pick) just select a message and hit reply, then delete the subject and body to make a new post. The thread data is still preserved. You're really supposed to send a completely new message to qmailtoaster-list @ qmailtoaster.com when asking a new question to start new thread data.
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailadmin problems
It seems there are other pages in the wiki that are not accessible from the main page.Is there a way to get to those pages from some index. If I go to http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com I can not reach the Troubleshooting page you are talking about unless I type the address in there directly, so I must know that it exists. The same is true for a whole bunch of wiki pages. Am I missing something?Ryan Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Yeah, I always forget that the wiki is editable by everyone, I added to the troubleshooting part, actually created a page, here is the link for those too lazy to go find it :) http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Troubleshooting Eric "Shubes" wrote:Ryan Gibbons wrote: Igor Smitran wrote:Suddenly i can't see postmaster options in main menu after login.I can only see domain name and text "Main menu". No quick links, noro0btos, no mailing lists, no add user option, nothing.I've tried to install qmailadmin again, to install vpopmail again, toreconfigure apache. Nothing helped.Can anyone help me?Thank you,Igor-QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have had an issue with this in the past, I found that by default whentoasteradmin creates the domain, it puts a 0 in the Quotas for thedomain, go into the domain settings and change all these to blank, andthen you should see the menus appear in qmailadmin.This is from my memory, so I could be leaving something out, if you arestill having problems let me know and I will come up with a list of steps. This would make a great addition to the FAQs on the wiki. (hint hint) Francisco "Paco" Peralta
[qmailtoaster] Recommended Upgrade Procedure?
Hi All! I'm planning un upgrade on 2 qmail servers. Currently both have the same versions installed, which are rather outdated as you can see in the list bellow: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -qa | grep toasterucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.2.2qmail-toaster-doc-1.03-1.2.2courier-imap-toaster-3.0.4-1.2.2qmailmrtg-toaster-3.4-1.2.1ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.2.1send-emails-toaster-0.5-1.2.2daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.2.2ucspi-tcp-toaster-doc-0.88-1.2.2qmail-toaster-1.03-1.2.2vpopmail-toaster-5.4.4-1.2.2qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.2.2courier-imap-toaster-doc-3.0.4-1.2.2control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.2.2maildrop-toaster-1.6.3-1.2.2ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.2.1ezmlm-toaster-doc-0.53.324-1.2.1vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.2.2isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.2.1qmail-chkuser-toaster-1.03-1.2.2daemontools-toaster-doc-0.76-1.2.2setup-toaster-1.0.1-1.2.2vpopmail-toaster-doc-5.4.4-1.2.2autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.2.2maildrop-toaster-devel-1.6.3-1.2.2qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.1-1.2.2isoqlog-toaster-doc-2.1-1.2.1horde-toaster-2.2.3-1.0.9[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# My only issue is that each of these 2 machines holds tens of domains, with tens of users per domain, and I'd really like not to have to manually "restore" all user accounts afterwards... Is there some way I can keep all user files, including e-mails, and have everything restored after the qmail-toaster upgrade? Thank you so much for your kind support! Best regards, Fernando
Re: [qmailtoaster] errors during upgrading qt
Erik,I would try this on my system but it is a live system and the last time I had this libtool issue I was off the air for a couple of days until the issue was resolved with the help of "Shubes". Sometimes I just wish I had a sandbox to play in!Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could someone on FC4 give this a try:http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/download/courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.2.src.rpmIf you downloaded and attempted to test this yesterday, please re-download.I should have some virtual machines available all the time soon,thanks to Kyle and Wifi7.com.Thanks,ErikOn 10/25/06, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's interesting. So, on FC4 (at least), libltdl.so is provided by the courier-authlib-toaster package, while on CentOS4 (at least) it is provided by the standard libtool-libs package. I'm guessing that there must be some patch to libltdl.so that was necessary to get courier-authlib-toaster working on FC4. So the answer to original question (is libtool-ltdl or libtool-libs necessary?), the answer (apparently) is that it depends on your distro/release. If you have dependent packages and can't remove libtool-ltdl (or libtool-libs) cleanly, I'm guessing that you can remove it with --nodeps before installing courier-authlib-toaster, which will replace the dependent file(s). Now whether or not the dependent package will actually work or not with the courier-authlib-toaster versions might be subject to testing. This illustrates why it is prudent to run the toaster on CentOS instead of FedoraCore. Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: # ls -l `rpm -ql courier-authlib-toaster | grep libltdl` -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 27004 Sep 19 14:54 /usr/lib/libltdl.a -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 789 Sep 19 14:53 /usr/lib/libltdl.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root16 Sep 19 19:08 /usr/lib/libltdl.so - libltdl.so.3.1.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root16 Sep 19 19:08 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3 - libltdl.so.3.1.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 70144 Sep 19 14:53 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3.1.0Francisco "Paco" Peralta- Original Message From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 5:44:39 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] errors during upgrading qt Bingo. So, when upgrading the toaster, one might need to # rpm -e --nodeps libtools-ltdl in order to install courier-authlib-toaster. Paco, what does # ls -l `rpm -ql courier-authlib-toaster | grep libltdl` show? (BTW, thanks for checking this stuff!) Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: Here are the results: # rpm -qf /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3 courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.1 # rpm -qf /usr/lib/ltdl.so.3.1.0 error: file /usr/lib/ltdl.so.3.1.0: No such file or directory Francisco "Paco" Peralta- Original Message From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 4:51:51 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] errors during upgrading qt That's interesting. I seem to remember now that the file(s) was included in the courier-authlib package for that particular (FC4) distro. The files (one file, one link) in question are: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root16 Sep 11 19:10 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3 - libltdl.so.3.1.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24588 Aug 13 00:13 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3.1.0 Paco, what does # rpm -qf /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3 tell you? Does that file exist on your system? Please do the same for /usr/lib/ltdl.so.3.1.0 just for yuks. Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: Hey Guys, All right. I ran the following command as requested: # rpm -qa | grep libtool libtool-1.5.16.multilib2-3 # rpm -ql libtool-libs package libtool-libs is not installed Eric, I believe the way we got around this problem might have been by finding a copy of the missing file and putting it in the directory. Is there a way to tell which rpm installed the package? Francisco "Paco" Peralta -- -Eric 'shubes' -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted -To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Francisco "Paco" Peralta
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailadmin problems
Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: It seems there are other pages in the wiki that are not accessible from the main page. Is there a way to get to those pages from some index. If I go to http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com I can not reach the Troubleshooting page you are talking about unless I type the address in there directly, so I must know that it exists. The same is true for a whole bunch of wiki pages. Am I missing something? No you're not missing something. There's a few pages that have been typed up, but have yet to be linked to the main page anywhere. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] Conection Refused, Why???
Hi list,what the reason of this problem..2006-10-26 00:51:21.532742500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mail.coopergay-peru.com:unknown:200.47.155.50 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient2006-10-26 00:51:21.681301500 connect(): Connection refused2006-10-26 00:51:21.704285500 tcpserver: end 17425 status 0 2006-10-26 00:51:21.704299500 tcpserver: status: 2/1002006-10-26 00:51:21.793892500 connect(): Connection refused2006-10-26 00:51:21.848510500 tcpserver: end 18037 status 02006-10-26 00:51:21.848525500 tcpserver: status: 1/100 2006-10-26 00:51:22.044001500 tcpserver: end 18084 status 02006-10-26 00:51:22.044016500 tcpserver: status: 0/100-- Anatoly Alexei Pedemonte Ku RAGE SYSTEMS http://www.ragesys.net Av. Juan Pascal Pringles 1225-1227(ex-La Fontana)Phone: 511.3482883 Mobile: 511.97167435
[qmailtoaster] Qmailtoaster failover server procedure
Hello all, Just a quick one to let everyone know, that I've posted up a procedure with scripts that will allow you to configure a backup qmt server that will always be 1 min behind your primary server. Some of you may already have something in place but for those that don't, this is relatively straight forward and on my 2 fc 5 boxes it works without any issues at all. Any change made on the main server including incoming mail replicates to the backup server. When mail is collected and then removed from the primary, that same change replicates to the backup. The nice thing with this, is that you don't need to worry about it, you always have an up to date backup of qmail on hand. Should your primary ever fail, you simply switch ip on the backup so that it assumes the role of primary. The backup then becomes your primary server, and once the primary is sorted and rebuilt it then resumes as your backup, by simply switching the scripts around. This is my first realy foray into scripting so please have some patience with any mistakes. There are no doubt a number of ways this can be done, but I found this to be quite simple especially with the scripts in place. Please let me know what you think, or if anything is unclear so I can edit it accordingly. I hope this is of some help to some people. It is under option 5 on the main page of the wiki or directly as below. http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/QMT_Failover_replication_Setup Regards, Craig --- Craig Smith - Systems Engineer - Doctor Net t. 0870 770 4990 - f. 0870 770 4991 Visit www.doc-net.com - let us be your key to success Visit www.eMailCampaigner.com - close sales cheaper and faster Visit www.SprintCRM.com - understand your customers better and increase sales --- The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailadmin problems
Eric "Shubes" wrote: Jake Vickers wrote: Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: It seems there are other pages in the wiki that are not accessible from the main page. Is there a way to get to those pages from some index. If I go to http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com I can not reach the Troubleshooting page you are talking about unless I type the address in there directly, so I must know that it exists. The same is true for a whole bunch of wiki pages. Am I missing something? No you're not missing something. There's a few pages that have been typed up, but have yet to be linked to the main page anywhere. You can reach all (including unlinked) pages by selecting "New Pages" from the sidebar menu. It might be a little difficult finding what you're looking for though. Yes, and to let everyone know, this *IS* something we're going to work on soon.
Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Citando [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi guys, i've read something about getting dspam on the toaster instead spamassassin. I don't know how dspam works but, shouldn't this be a very traumatic change? I think a nice approach about this will be options. You can use spamassassin or dspam ( can be used BOTH ?) AFAIK. This is the same as clamav, you can use clamav or TrendMicro (via trophie). This could let spamassassin and dspam fans be happy together :-P Just my 2 cents (euro-cents :-P) I think that BOTH is the right way. I'm still not very convinced about DSPAM. When I've the time I'm going to read the docs and setup a test server, but meantime I'm sticking to spamassassin. But I think the best is to integrate DSPAM support into simscan. I've read a post about it somewhere, maybe on this list???. After reading the DSpam FAQs, I'm eager to try this out. I'm particularly impressed with the DSpam's ability to adapt to per-user situations. I've always believed that adaptive learning is best applied at the user level, not at a domain or server level. I also like DSpam's aspects of (claimed) high performance and low administrative requirements. These philosophies fit well with the toaster. I think that SA and DSpam should not be used together though. Per the FAQs, If you are using blacklists, other spam filters, or any other form of training guides, you may be doing more harm than good. If the tool is less accurate than DSPAM is, then you will be training DSPAM to be just as inaccurate. As far as RBLs go, I'd be inclined to continue using a small number of loose RBLs in order to save resources. I'd like to see some test results before making a call on this though. So where do we go from here? I'd like to see a team of volunteers formed to work on a DSpam-toaster project. I'd like to participate in some fashion. Anyone else? P.S. I'm still going to attempt to fix my SA bayes DB problem in the meantime. It's urgency just dropped a bit though. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster
Since I had to completely turn off bayes for now, I think this is a good idea. I'll help how I can. I have a few free systems sitting around I'll try testing, devel, etc. on if I have time. Justice London -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:41 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Citando [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi guys, i've read something about getting dspam on the toaster instead spamassassin. I don't know how dspam works but, shouldn't this be a very traumatic change? I think a nice approach about this will be options. You can use spamassassin or dspam ( can be used BOTH ?) AFAIK. This is the same as clamav, you can use clamav or TrendMicro (via trophie). This could let spamassassin and dspam fans be happy together :-P Just my 2 cents (euro-cents :-P) I think that BOTH is the right way. I'm still not very convinced about DSPAM. When I've the time I'm going to read the docs and setup a test server, but meantime I'm sticking to spamassassin. But I think the best is to integrate DSPAM support into simscan. I've read a post about it somewhere, maybe on this list???. After reading the DSpam FAQs, I'm eager to try this out. I'm particularly impressed with the DSpam's ability to adapt to per-user situations. I've always believed that adaptive learning is best applied at the user level, not at a domain or server level. I also like DSpam's aspects of (claimed) high performance and low administrative requirements. These philosophies fit well with the toaster. I think that SA and DSpam should not be used together though. Per the FAQs, If you are using blacklists, other spam filters, or any other form of training guides, you may be doing more harm than good. If the tool is less accurate than DSPAM is, then you will be training DSPAM to be just as inaccurate. As far as RBLs go, I'd be inclined to continue using a small number of loose RBLs in order to save resources. I'd like to see some test results before making a call on this though. So where do we go from here? I'd like to see a team of volunteers formed to work on a DSpam-toaster project. I'd like to participate in some fashion. Anyone else? P.S. I'm still going to attempt to fix my SA bayes DB problem in the meantime. It's urgency just dropped a bit though. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Quick Question about the list, not realted directly to qmailtoaster
Jake Vickers wrote: Ryan Gibbons wrote: I didn't think about using my gmail account. Yeah thunderbird's threading is starting to drive me crazy. Like on this thread here, it has listed underneath the thread about Cannon communicate using internal ip :? geeknoob wrote: Well, I am also using Thunderbird for this list - but I agree, there's a better way to do it. Honestly, most of my lists go through gmail, and I'll probably put this one on it as well. The threading is by far the best feature (that i most commonly use) of google-mail, imo. ~GN Ryan Gibbons wrote: So this is the first mailing list I have actually followed religiously with an actual client, not just through the web. What is the best client to use. I have tried using Thunderbird, but the threading feature of it isn't too hot, is there something better to use for managing mailing list. The more I find myself getting into development to more I see them being used, and it is actually becoming difficult to keep up in Thunderbird. It doesn't match up the threads properly and just handles them funky imho, but that might b/c I'm not use to it. So what do you use? The threading issue comes about when people (not to nit-pick) just select a message and hit reply, then delete the subject and body to make a new post. The thread data is still preserved. You're really supposed to send a completely new message to qmailtoaster-list @ qmailtoaster.com when asking a new question to start new thread data. This is true, and it can be very annoying. I think we need to periodically (more frequently than we do now) remind people not to 'reply' when creating a new subject. Please, folks, add an entry in your address book for the list. Then 'create' a new message when starting a new thread. Then Thunderbird thread viewing will work as it should. If someone doesn't understand this, please ask until someone explains it in a way that you do. Thank you very much! -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster
Great. I was hoping we wouldn't need to wait for Kyle's VMs before we get going on this. Can we use CentOS4.4 and current toaster on a devel box? I'd also like to see 1 or 2 other volunteers. Before we jump right in, I'm thinking that we need to figure out how DS is going to hook into the process. We'll need to look closely at simscan (I'm already on that email list). It'd be nice if we could keep simscan, and simply turn SA/DS on/off using simcontrol file. Just a thought. Also, I read something in the DS FAQs about easily integrating DSpam w/ clamav. I don't know anything about that yet. Justice London wrote: Since I had to completely turn off bayes for now, I think this is a good idea. I'll help how I can. I have a few free systems sitting around I'll try testing, devel, etc. on if I have time. Justice London -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:41 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Citando [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi guys, i've read something about getting dspam on the toaster instead spamassassin. I don't know how dspam works but, shouldn't this be a very traumatic change? I think a nice approach about this will be options. You can use spamassassin or dspam ( can be used BOTH ?) AFAIK. This is the same as clamav, you can use clamav or TrendMicro (via trophie). This could let spamassassin and dspam fans be happy together :-P Just my 2 cents (euro-cents :-P) I think that BOTH is the right way. I'm still not very convinced about DSPAM. When I've the time I'm going to read the docs and setup a test server, but meantime I'm sticking to spamassassin. But I think the best is to integrate DSPAM support into simscan. I've read a post about it somewhere, maybe on this list???. After reading the DSpam FAQs, I'm eager to try this out. I'm particularly impressed with the DSpam's ability to adapt to per-user situations. I've always believed that adaptive learning is best applied at the user level, not at a domain or server level. I also like DSpam's aspects of (claimed) high performance and low administrative requirements. These philosophies fit well with the toaster. I think that SA and DSpam should not be used together though. Per the FAQs, If you are using blacklists, other spam filters, or any other form of training guides, you may be doing more harm than good. If the tool is less accurate than DSPAM is, then you will be training DSPAM to be just as inaccurate. As far as RBLs go, I'd be inclined to continue using a small number of loose RBLs in order to save resources. I'd like to see some test results before making a call on this though. So where do we go from here? I'd like to see a team of volunteers formed to work on a DSpam-toaster project. I'd like to participate in some fashion. Anyone else? P.S. I'm still going to attempt to fix my SA bayes DB problem in the meantime. It's urgency just dropped a bit though. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] servercert.pem/clientcert.pem expired. Generate new?
I think it'd be nice to copy the relevant part from the install page and paste it in the Certificate page. There should be instructions there for creating a self signed certificate, as well as what's already there. Thanks, Scott. Scott M Andrews wrote: Found it. http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Fedora_Core_4_x86_64_QmailToaster_Install 8. Make a self signed certificate: cd /etc/pki/tls/certs/ make stunnel.pem Note: common name should be your FQDN server.your-domain.com mv stunnel.pem /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem chown root:qmail /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem chmod 644 /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem /ln -s /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem /var/qmail/control/clientcert.pem Cheers anyhow. :-) At 03:28 PM 26/10/2006, you wrote: Hi All, My certificate has expired. When I installed QT some time ago, I remember following the steps to create one, but I can't remember exactly what I did. At the time, I did not send of the request to a Company like VeriSign, etc, and a self signed cert is fine for my needs. I followed the steps on the Wiki (minus the RegistryFly step 4 and the catting of servercert.crt). When I run a test, QT responds - 454 TLS missing certificate: error:0906D06C:PEM routines:PEM_read_bio:no start line (#4.3.0) So, I tried replacing with the backup I'd taken of servercert.pm (as the clientcert.pm is a symlink) but with the same reqult. The permissions are - -rw-r--r-- 1 root qmail 887 Oct 26 15:22 servercert.pem which look to be correct. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated - or even a pointer to a guide for making and using a self signed cert for QT. This may be handy to add to the Wiki also. Cheers! -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Qmail options to block at port
Jake Vickers wrote: Quinn Comendant wrote: Hey y'all An associate of mine has experience with postfix, and was wondering if qmail blocks messages at SMTP that fail to meet valid criteria. See the postfix log summary generated from his machine, below. I'm aware the qmail toaster comes with support to use the following facilities to block bad messages: RBLs, SPF, domainkeys, simscan, clamav, spamassassin, SURBL. But does it block messages such as the Host not found or other criteria? If not how to configure? I'm aware Greylisting isn't part of the qmailtoaster. The second question, does anyone know of any utilities that can generate reports like this from the qmail logs? Thanks! Q pflogsumm /var/log/mail.log ... message reject detail - RCPT blocked using bl.spamcop.net (total: 19) 12 ocn.ne.jp 6 alpha-net.ne.jp 1 btopenworld.com cannot find your hostname (total: 25) 23 72.35.236.66 1 218.232.129.208 1 221.141.51.93 Client host rejected: Greylisted (total: 7) 3 horsepowerfreaks.com 2 britecast.com 2 campaignmonitor.com Helo command rejected: Host not found (total: 4) 2 80-219-113-121.dclient.hispeed.ch 2 ocn.ne.jp Helo command rejected: need fully-qualified hostname (total: 1) 1 hinet.net Right now Toaster blocks at a SMTP level any connection that fails the RBL check defined by the servers in /var/qmail/control/blacklists. It will also dump the SMTP connection if any of the criteria are met in your CHKUSER options in /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp. And no; you have the web page gui that shows some mail stats, but the logging has ALWAYS been clunky in Qmail itself. you can use some extra programs like qmail-analog, but even then they're crappy at best, IMHO. I guess you could write a script that would parse the log and count each type of entry. No one I know of has done so yet. This is admittedly a weak spot in the toaster. Could be an issue with PHB types. ;) It shouldn't be too difficult to write a script to produce such a thing though. Nice project for a school, I would think. Note, pflogsumm appears to do a dual-pass of some kind, as totals are listed before the detail. Note, there are no log messages for SPF and/or domainkey rejections in the toaster, so these stats would be impossible to track. BTW, this lack of log message can be very frustrating for new toaster admins. I'd sure like to see it fixed. Of course, if you don't check SPF or domainkeys, it's not an issue. ;) -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL / SURBL
On Oct 26, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Erik Espinoza wrote: You wouldn't happen to be running CentOS 3? hm - i see a similar problem, and i am running CentOS 3. is this a known bug? is there a fix? -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL / SURBL
Try removing the perl-Net-DNS rpm that ships with CentOS 3. Erik On 10/26/06, Steve Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 26, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Erik Espinoza wrote: You wouldn't happen to be running CentOS 3? hm - i see a similar problem, and i am running CentOS 3. is this a known bug? is there a fix? -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] bayes getting corrupt (revisited)
Justice London wrote: What is the ownership of the bayes folder/files? vpopmail:vchkpw on all. 700 on directory, 600 on files. Justice London -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 4:30 PM To: qmailtoaster-list Subject: [qmailtoaster] bayes getting corrupt (revisited) Ok, so here's my situation. I have two apparently identical low-volume servers. One shows the corruption symptoms, the other doesn't (yet). Here is the local.cf (same on both): ok_locales all skip_rbl_checks 0 required_hits 5 report_safe 0 rewrite_header Subject [SPAM] use_pyzor 1 use_auto_whitelist 1 bayes_path /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes use_bayes 1 use_bayes_rules 1 bayes_auto_learn 1 bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 7.0 bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.1 bayes_auto_expire 1 The problem seems to manifest itself when tokens begin to become due to expire. # spamassassin -D bayes --lint shows that the problem server has never sync'd, while the one which hasn't failed (yet) shows a sync'd value. Does anyone know when, under normal operation, the bayes db is supposed to be sync'd? I would think that after an autolearn=ham or autolearn=spam that this would happen. On one server it appears to do so (and things are fine), but on one where it doesn't (for a long period of time), the expiration process appears to exhibit problems. Some of this observation may be coincidental, but I'm thinking that not syncing might be the root cause of this problem. I've gotta go for now, but will try to follow up on this thread as soon as I can. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] bayes getting corrupt (revisited)
Okay, I had an issue similar to that at one point due to ownership/perms issues. Looks good. Justice -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 12:27 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] bayes getting corrupt (revisited) Justice London wrote: What is the ownership of the bayes folder/files? vpopmail:vchkpw on all. 700 on directory, 600 on files. Justice London -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 4:30 PM To: qmailtoaster-list Subject: [qmailtoaster] bayes getting corrupt (revisited) Ok, so here's my situation. I have two apparently identical low-volume servers. One shows the corruption symptoms, the other doesn't (yet). Here is the local.cf (same on both): ok_locales all skip_rbl_checks 0 required_hits 5 report_safe 0 rewrite_header Subject [SPAM] use_pyzor 1 use_auto_whitelist 1 bayes_path /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes use_bayes 1 use_bayes_rules 1 bayes_auto_learn 1 bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 7.0 bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.1 bayes_auto_expire 1 The problem seems to manifest itself when tokens begin to become due to expire. # spamassassin -D bayes --lint shows that the problem server has never sync'd, while the one which hasn't failed (yet) shows a sync'd value. Does anyone know when, under normal operation, the bayes db is supposed to be sync'd? I would think that after an autolearn=ham or autolearn=spam that this would happen. On one server it appears to do so (and things are fine), but on one where it doesn't (for a long period of time), the expiration process appears to exhibit problems. Some of this observation may be coincidental, but I'm thinking that not syncing might be the root cause of this problem. I've gotta go for now, but will try to follow up on this thread as soon as I can. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL / SURBL
remove On 10/26/06, Steve Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 26, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Erik Espinoza wrote: Try removing the perl-Net-DNS rpm that ships with CentOS 3. removing, or upgrading to the latest version? -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster
I'm a volunteer to test dspam on one of my servers running centos4.4 and send feedback to the list. I fact this server act only as mx secundary to some clients but, I can use as primary MX to a specific domain and test on it. Eric, fell free to contact me. []'s Marco Cordeiro -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 2:59 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster Great. I was hoping we wouldn't need to wait for Kyle's VMs before we get going on this. Can we use CentOS4.4 and current toaster on a devel box? I'd also like to see 1 or 2 other volunteers. Before we jump right in, I'm thinking that we need to figure out how DS is going to hook into the process. We'll need to look closely at simscan (I'm already on that email list). It'd be nice if we could keep simscan, and simply turn SA/DS on/off using simcontrol file. Just a thought. Also, I read something in the DS FAQs about easily integrating DSpam w/ clamav. I don't know anything about that yet. Justice London wrote: Since I had to completely turn off bayes for now, I think this is a good idea. I'll help how I can. I have a few free systems sitting around I'll try testing, devel, etc. on if I have time. Justice London -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:41 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Citando [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi guys, i've read something about getting dspam on the toaster instead spamassassin. I don't know how dspam works but, shouldn't this be a very traumatic change? I think a nice approach about this will be options. You can use spamassassin or dspam ( can be used BOTH ?) AFAIK. This is the same as clamav, you can use clamav or TrendMicro (via trophie). This could let spamassassin and dspam fans be happy together :-P Just my 2 cents (euro-cents :-P) I think that BOTH is the right way. I'm still not very convinced about DSPAM. When I've the time I'm going to read the docs and setup a test server, but meantime I'm sticking to spamassassin. But I think the best is to integrate DSPAM support into simscan. I've read a post about it somewhere, maybe on this list???. After reading the DSpam FAQs, I'm eager to try this out. I'm particularly impressed with the DSpam's ability to adapt to per-user situations. I've always believed that adaptive learning is best applied at the user level, not at a domain or server level. I also like DSpam's aspects of (claimed) high performance and low administrative requirements. These philosophies fit well with the toaster. I think that SA and DSpam should not be used together though. Per the FAQs, If you are using blacklists, other spam filters, or any other form of training guides, you may be doing more harm than good. If the tool is less accurate than DSPAM is, then you will be training DSPAM to be just as inaccurate. As far as RBLs go, I'd be inclined to continue using a small number of loose RBLs in order to save resources. I'd like to see some test results before making a call on this though. So where do we go from here? I'd like to see a team of volunteers formed to work on a DSpam-toaster project. I'd like to participate in some fashion. Anyone else? P.S. I'm still going to attempt to fix my SA bayes DB problem in the meantime. It's urgency just dropped a bit though. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] ES -EN -- redireccionar correos a 3 cuentas distintas -- redirect mail 3 accounts ?
it is possible to crar an account and that same redirecione the post office to 3 different accounts?//es posible crar una cuenta y que la misma redirecione los correos a 3 cuentas distintas? Perdon por mi ingles pero utilizo google como traductor y la verdad que es dificil, la comunicacion asi.Gracias
Re: [qmailtoaster] ES -EN -- redireccionar correos a 3 cuentas distintas -- redirect mail 3 accounts ?
it is possible to crar an account and that same redirecione the post office to 3 different accounts? Yep, In qmail-admin use Redirect to field and separate each e-mail with a comma // es posible crar una cuenta y que la misma redirecione los correos a 3 cuentas distintas? Perdon por mi ingles pero utilizo google como traductor y la verdad que es dificil, la comunicacion asi. Si en qmailamin usa el campo redireccionar a y separa cada email a mandar por una coma Gracias - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL / SURBL
# rpm -e perl-Net-DNS On 10/26/06, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: remove On 10/26/06, Steve Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 26, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Erik Espinoza wrote: Try removing the perl-Net-DNS rpm that ships with CentOS 3. removing, or upgrading to the latest version? -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] bayes getting corrupt (revisited)
Eric Shubes wrote: Ok, so here's my situation. I have two apparently identical low-volume servers. One shows the corruption symptoms, the other doesn't (yet). Here is the local.cf (same on both): ok_locales all skip_rbl_checks 0 required_hits 5 report_safe 0 rewrite_header Subject [SPAM] use_pyzor 1 use_auto_whitelist 1 bayes_path /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes use_bayes 1 use_bayes_rules 1 bayes_auto_learn 1 bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 7.0 bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.1 bayes_auto_expire 1 The problem seems to manifest itself when tokens begin to become due to expire. # spamassassin -D bayes --lint shows that the problem server has never sync'd, while the one which hasn't failed (yet) shows a sync'd value. Does anyone know when, under normal operation, the bayes db is supposed to be sync'd? I would think that after an autolearn=ham or autolearn=spam that this would happen. On one server it appears to do so (and things are fine), but on one where it doesn't (for a long period of time), the expiration process appears to exhibit problems. Some of this observation may be coincidental, but I'm thinking that not syncing might be the root cause of this problem. I've gotta go for now, but will try to follow up on this thread as soon as I can. Ok, I found out what's happening from the SA list: The child is trying to run a Bayes expire, apparently on a large Bayes database that hasn't had a successful expiry run in some time. This attempt to process the Bayes database is probably taking over 300 seconds, and the child is being timed out and killed by something. As a result of being killed, it never finished the Bayes expire processing. So the next child tries to do the same thing, gets timed out and killed, the nex child tries to do the same thing... Run a manual Bayes expire run and it will probably clean up your problems. If this sort of problem starts to reoccur you might consider turning off bayes auto expire and setting up a cron run to do it once a day or so. (Or more often, depending on your mail volume.) Note (to myself), I changed timeoutsmtpd from 1200 (default 20 minutes) to 60 (1 minute) to keep sluggish connections from backing up. Perhaps that wasn't such a good idea. I think this problem happened before I did that though, but I can't be positive. I think that the toaster should have a permanent fix for this. I'm thinking that auto expire should be turned off, and a daily cron job created to handle expirations. The only other way to fix it I can think of would be to increase the timeout window with auto expire on, but I don't like that idea. 20 minutes seems too long of a period of inactivity for an smtp connection. There's also a risk that the sending server will terminate the connection before the expiration process completes. Suggestions? Gotta go away for a while - will check back when I can. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailadmin problems
There is a link to it from the main page. It is the troubleshooting itself. In the Table of Contents, click Troubleshooting, and then click the Troubleshooting heading, maybe this needs to be more clear? Francisco Paco Peralta wrote: It seems there are other pages in the wiki that are not accessible from the main page. Is there a way to get to those pages from some index. If I go to http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com I can not reach the Troubleshooting page you are talking about unless I type the address in there directly, so I must know that it exists. The same is true for a whole bunch of wiki pages. Am I missing something? Ryan Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, I always forget that the wiki is editable by everyone, I added to the troubleshooting part, actually created a page, here is the link for those too lazy to go find it :) http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Troubleshooting Eric "Shubes" wrote: Ryan Gibbons wrote: Igor Smitran wrote: Suddenly i can't see postmaster options in main menu after login. I can only see domain name and text "Main menu". No quick links, no ro0btos, no mailing lists, no add user option, nothing. I've tried to install qmailadmin again, to install vpopmail again, to reconfigure apache. Nothing helped. Can anyone help me? Thank you, Igor - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have had an issue with this in the past, I found that by default when toasteradmin creates the domain, it puts a 0 in the Quotas for the domain, go into the domain settings and change all these to blank, and then you should see the menus appear in qmailadmin. This is from my memory, so I could be leaving something out, if you are still having problems let me know and I will come up with a list of steps. This would make a great addition to the FAQs on the wiki. (hint hint) Francisco "Paco" Peralta
