Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-09-01 Thread Eric Broch
When you do a wget it should retain the privileges of the existing file. On 9/1/2020 4:34 AM, Eric Broch wrote: yes On 9/1/2020 1:39 AM, David Bray wrote: Hey cool thanks for the dir listing is the permissions critical here, noting that

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-09-01 Thread Eric Broch
yes On 9/1/2020 1:39 AM, David Bray wrote: Hey cool thanks for the dir listing is the permissions critical here, noting that https://raw.githubusercontent.com/qmtoaster/dspam/master/dspamdb.sh leaves the ownership as root.root and perms 644 David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Mon, 31 Aug

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-09-01 Thread David Bray
Hey cool thanks for the dir listing is the permissions critical here, noting that https://raw.githubusercontent.com/qmtoaster/dspam/master/dspamdb.sh leaves the ownership as root.root and perms 644 David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 23:29, Eric Broch wrote: > Here's my

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-08-31 Thread Eric Broch
And, you're not using DSpam On 8/31/2020 4:52 PM, Eric Broch wrote: You're good and are using Sieve it looks like. On 8/31/2020 4:50 PM, Leonardo wrote: All my domains have only .qmail-default at domain level (and none at user level): | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail ''

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-08-31 Thread Eric Broch
You're good and are using Sieve it looks like. On 8/31/2020 4:50 PM, Leonardo wrote: All my domains have only .qmail-default at domain level (and none at user level): | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox Except one only-tests domain has: |/var/qmail/bin/preline -f

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-08-31 Thread Leonardo
All my domains have only .qmail-default at domain level (and none at user level): | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox Except one only-tests domain has: |/var/qmail/bin/preline -f /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d $EXT@$USER -o postmaster_address=postmaster@domain I have a

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-08-31 Thread Eric Broch
In the PER USER configuration the '/home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.tld/.qmail-default' file doesn't change and remains: | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox On 8/31/2020 7:20 AM, Eric Broch wrote: So, here's what the directory directory looks like: # ls -la

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-08-31 Thread Eric Broch
So, here's what the directory directory looks like: # ls -la /home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.tld/user total 52 drwx--   4 vpopmail vchkpw  4096 Aug 16 13:39 . drwx--  11 vpopmail vchkpw  4096 Oct 31  2019 .. drwx-- 357 vpopmail vchkpw 12288 Aug 31 07:10 Maildir -rw---   1

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-08-31 Thread Eric Broch
When I do per user the file .qmail file resides in that person's home email directory '/home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.tld/user' (in the same directory as Maildir). This .qmail file contains the following: | preline /usr/bin/maildrop ./.mailfilter.dspam .mailfilter.dspamhere

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-08-30 Thread Remo Mattei
I have a little diff variant from Eric, If I do the top level like Eric I do have the same config, if I do per user I have the following in the .qmail-user |/usr/bin/dspam --deliver=innocent --user $EXT@$USER --debug --mode=teft --feature=noise,whitelist --stdout -p -m |

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-08-30 Thread David Bray
Thanks My understanding of the beast just increased Cheers David Bray 0418 745334 2 ∞ & < On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 11:29, Eric Broch wrote: > This is the contents of the .qmail-default (domain level) file that's > existed since the beginning and never changed (directory: >

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-08-30 Thread Eric Broch
This is the contents of the .qmail-default (domain level) file that's existed since the beginning and never changed (directory: /home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain) : | /usr/bin/dspam --user "$EXT@$HOST" --deliver=stdout | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox The .qmail file if

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-08-30 Thread remo
Dub mail if you have more than one filter. So if you do default and user .qmail you will do get 2 copies. I have used it since it came out started on centos 5 and still good for me. Remo > Il giorno 30 ago 2020, alle ore 18:06, David Bray ha > scritto: > >  > Ok - working backwards from

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-08-30 Thread David Bray
Ok - working backwards from memory here and when I read the install script I can see that the .qmail file is not created so (and this is getting off topic now) - there should only be a .qmail-default and not a .qmail - and it's likely that these came from an older install - so

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-08-30 Thread Eric Broch
Hmmm... I never had double delivery and mine's been installed for 5 years or more. The install script installs only one dot qmail file (.qmail-default), and only after a query to implement at domain level. You have the option to run dspam at domain or user level. Please show me where in the

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-08-30 Thread David Bray
I wondered this exact question and was going to ask this question I've wondered how it actually works I've disabled it if it works as documented at: - https://raw.githubusercontent.com/qmtoaster/dspam/ it creates the .qmail as a result |/var/qmail/bin/preline /usr/bin/maildrop -A

Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-08-30 Thread remo
I have used dspam from the early days so you could put this as an option on your playbook. Just my 2cents > Il giorno 30 ago 2020, alle ore 13:43, Angus McIntyre ha > scritto: > > I'm (still!) working on my Ansible role for installing qmailtoaster, but > I've switched to CentOS 8, based

[qmailtoaster] dspam -- yay or nay?

2020-08-30 Thread Angus McIntyre
I'm (still!) working on my Ansible role for installing qmailtoaster, but I've switched to CentOS 8, based on Eric's new script, and it seems much more straightforward and robust. One question I have is whether I should try to support dspam or not. It looks as if the project was abandoned in