,
e.g. for monitoring purpose or whatever
you have in mind, we need to implement a such interface on top of this
new one.
Thanks for all your valuable comment.
Regards,
Olivier
Le 03/03/2015 23:12, Lou Berger a écrit :
On 3/3/2015 4:50 PM, David Lamparter wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015
Vikram,
We posted a patch for the core bgp support a while back. It's on our
'to do list' to update it to be aligned with the current head.
Lou
On 3/3/2015 4:54 AM, Vikram Choudhary wrote:
Hi All,
Does any of the Quagga release supports BGP/MPLS L3VPN (i.e. RFC-4364) ?
Thanks
can share the same.
Thanks
Vikram
-Original Message-
From: Lou Berger [mailto:lber...@labn.net]
Sent: 04 March 2015 21:29
To: Vikram Choudhary
Cc: quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net; Dhruv Dhody
Subject: Re: [quagga-dev 12080] Query regarding BGP/MPLS L3VPN support in
Quagga
Vikram
Paul,
On 6/3/2015 12:40 PM, Paul Jakma wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Lou Berger wrote:
This is where you loose me. In any approach that allows multiple zebras
there will be a way to map vrf to zebra instance (and presumably
socket), and the client code will need to resolve/dispatch per-vrf
So what would you expect the logical-table config to look like when
supporting RFC4364 style BGP-VPNs?
(and yes, there's some other really interesting config issues here
related to interfaces and tunneling, but I think we can keep that
discussion separate.)
Lou
On 6/5/2015 10:51 AM, Alain
On 06/12/2015 12:06 PM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
Le 05/06/2015 09:01, Nicolas Dichtel a écrit :
[snip]
After the last three patches, I've one more ready in my queue to
rename vrf to domain because the term 'vrf' is too controversial.
Not sure: was there a consensus on the name?
domain?
On 06/12/2015 02:34 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
On 06/12/2015 12:06 PM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
Le 05/06/2015 09:01, Nicolas Dichtel a écrit :
[snip]
After the last three patches, I've one more ready in my queue to
rename vrf to domain because the term 'vrf' is too controversial.
Not sure
On 5/30/2015 9:45 AM, David Lamparter wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 02:32:36PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2015, David Lamparter wrote:
Upfront was half a year ago... and we have users that would like to
start meshing with this. [http://patchwork.quagga.net/patch/952/]
I
Paul,
On June 1, 2015 5:00:38 PM Paul Jakma p...@jakma.org wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, Lou Berger wrote:
One Zserv instance for all makes it much harder to do multiple-processes
later
I'm not sure I see this.
You have a Zserv protocol, which is an API. This API, with the proposed
Paul,
On 10/23/2015 11:53 AM, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Lou Berger wrote:
>
>> Let me know if you want me/us to do anything more than code review.
> I'm basically curious about the differences between the old and the new,
> and whether those differences also
Paul,
On 10/23/2015 5:39 AM, Paul Jakma wrote:
> Hi Lou,
>
> Just comparing the previous old version and one you reposted, quoted
> below. Question:
>
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Lou Berger wrote:
>
>
>> @@ -195,6 +201,19 @@ assegment_prepend_asns (struct assegmen
me/us to do anything more than code review.
Thank you,
Lou
>
> ---8<---8<---8<8<8<---
>
> commit 73a5841990c9128c4c5bf1bbd250d04d211ad446
> Author: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
> Date: Wed Apr 10 12:30:04 2013 -0700
>
> bgpd, lib: me
On 10/21/2015 11:56 AM, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Lou Berger wrote:
>
>> This patch corrects bgpd memory not being properly cleaned up on exit.
>> Errors were identified and verified as part of an effort to use valgrind
>> to ID any memory leaks.
>>
If interested, you can try
https://github.com/LabNConsulting/quagga-vnc/tree/0.99.24.1-mplsvpn+encap
which we're in the process of cleaning up (eg removing debug code, removing
required 'modified by' header, conforming with quagga spacing conventions)
and soon expect to (re)submit.
If you do
On 09/11/2015 02:35 PM, Alexis Rosen wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2015, at 8:25 AM, Michael H Lambert wrote:
>>> On 11 Sep 2015, at 06:34, Paul Jakma wrote:
>>>
>>> Yeah, be nice to have 1 way to delete the per-AFI/SAFI config, and another
>>> to disable the neighbour in
Sorry I miss typed in my original message
On 9/11/2015 4:10 PM, Alexis Rosen wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net> wrote:
>> On 09/11/2015 02:35 PM, Alexis Rosen wrote:
>>> On Sep 11, 2015, at 8:25 AM, Michael H Lambert <lamb...@psc.ed
es yet?
I'd like to see if we have any / how much overlap in code that is to be
upstream-ed...
Thanks,
Lou
> let's deep dive after season holidays.
>
> best regards,
>Vincent
>
> On 15/12/2015 23:33, Lou Berger wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>> Do you have any thoughts
Hi Paul,
Do you have any thoughts on how you'd like to have this discussion?
Some detailed responses below.
On 12/15/2015 10:34 AM, Paul Jakma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to figure out what the right architecture is to support VPN
> routing. I'm not terribly interested in them myself, but it
On 12/16/2015 9:41 AM, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, Lou Berger wrote:
>
>> Sure. Although some of what we're talking about is quite mature (VPNs
>> SAFI, encap attribute) and others are more recent (e.g., VXLAN tunnel
>> type.)
> I honestly have no i
ut.
I would prefer that we come up with a methodology to handle this for all
end blocks, instead of just for route-maps.
donald
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net> wrote:
The last route-map written to config should have an "exit" at the end to
return to th
> installed in zebra.".
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 6:57 AM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net
> <mailto:lber...@labn.net>> wrote:
>
> Right.
>
> Lou
>
> On 1/5/2016 8:04 AM, Vivek Venkatraman wrote:
> > Are the changes (fixes) here pri
On 1/5/2016 10:50 AM, Vivek Venkatraman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:44 AM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net
> <mailto:lber...@labn.net>> wrote:
>
> Vivek,
>
> > I think there will be quite a few things to discuss and agree upon
> > when
e up with a methodology to handle this
>> for all end blocks, instead of just for route-maps.
>>
>> donald
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net
>> <mailto:lber...@labn.net>> wrote:
>>
>> The last ro
re they any aspects of the above that
you want to cover as part of the patch set (vs PE i/o) review that
isn't covered in your patch specific emails?
Thanks again,
Lou
>
> Thanks,
> Vivek
>
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net
> <mailto:
Vivek,
On 1/5/2016 8:13 AM, Vivek Venkatraman wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net
> <mailto:lber...@labn.net>> wrote:
>
> This is part of the core VPN and Encap SAFI changes.
>
> This fixes some minor mixups p
nywhere (e.g., when
> injecting/configuring a VPNv4 prefix). So, how is this used?
>
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net
> <mailto:lber...@labn.net>> wrote:
>
> This is part of the core VPN and Encap SAFI changes.
>
> Signed-o
Right.
Lou
On 1/5/2016 8:04 AM, Vivek Venkatraman wrote:
> Are the changes (fixes) here primarily related to cleaning up memory
> when a BGP instance is deleted?
>
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net
> <mailto:lber...@labn.net>> wrote:
fair enough, LOG_NOTICE or LOG_INFO?
On 1/6/2016 8:57 AM, Donald Sharp wrote:
> Ok, different use case. Why the LOG_EMERG? I think this should be
> protected by a knob of some sort. Does every cli need to be saved no
> matter what?
>
> donald
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 a
Donald,
Thanks for the review. See below.
On 1/6/2016 8:31 AM, Donald Sharp wrote:
> Comments Inline
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net
> <mailto:lber...@labn.net>> wrote:
>
> This is part of the core VPN and Encap
eneralize/fix what was there. I think
it's at least useful for testing and perhaps other uses that may come up
in actual operation. We also weren't comfortable suggesting removing
existing function without a good reason.
Thanks again,
Lou
>
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Lou B
Vivek,
On 1/5/2016 8:02 AM, Vivek Venkatraman wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net
> <mailto:lber...@labn.net>> wrote:
>
> This is part of the core VPN and Encap SAFI changes.
>
> There wasn't much missing for VPN
Vivek,
to close this one off.
On 1/5/2016 8:18 AM, Vivek Venkatraman wrote:
>
>
> +#if 0 /* duplicates mpattr included in
> bgp_packet.c */
>if (p && !(afi == AFI_IP && safi == SAFI_UNICAST))
>
changed to:
if (p && afi == AFI_IP6 && safi ==
https://github.com/openstack/networking-bgpvpn
>
> let's deep dive after season holidays.
>
> best regards,
> Vincent
>
> On 15/12/2015 23:33, Lou Berger wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
> Do you have any thoughts on how you'd like to have th
This patch set corrects issues with IPv4 MPLS VPN (RF4364) SAFI support,
and adds support for IPv6 MPLS VPN (RFC4659), Encap SAFI and related
attribute and types (RFC5512, 5566). These changes are appropriate for
use of BGPd as a route reflector for these SAFIs. Import/export code
can be built
To facilitate debugging and operation.
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org>
---
lib/vty.c | 39 +--
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/vty.c
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org>
---
bgpd/bgp_network.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/bgpd/bgp_network.c b/bgpd/bgp_network.c
index 3c5e6c5..511a0fe 100644
--- a/bgpd/b
To facilitate debugging and operation.
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org>
---
lib/command.c | 35 +++
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/command.c b/lib/com
The last route-map written to config should have an "exit" at the end to
return to the main node from route-map processing.
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org>
---
lib/routemap.c | 2 ++
1 file changed,
[DL: the machineparse foo should probably be dropped]
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
---
bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.c | 2 +-
bgpd/bgp_route.c | 56 ++
bgpd/bgp_route.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 18 del
This is part of the core VPN and Encap SAFI changes.
This fixes some minor mixups particularly in MPLS-related SAFIs, as well
as doing some stylistic changes & adding comments.
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Reviewed-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.o
This is part of the core VPN and Encap SAFI changes.
There wasn't much missing for VPNv6 to begin with; just a few bits of
de- & encoding and a few lists to be updated.
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.o
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org>
---
bgpd/bgp_nexthop.c | 21
bgpd/bgp_nexthop.h | 2 ++
bgpd/bgp_route.c| 99 -
bgpd/bgp_route.h|
This is part of the core VPN and Encap SAFI changes.
This changes the existing _vpnv4 functions for MPLS-VPN into
SAFI-agnostic functions, renaming them from *_vpnv4 to *_safi.
Also adds route-map support while at it.
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Reviewed-by: David Lam
This is part of the core VPN and Encap SAFI changes.
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org>
---
bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.c | 81 --
bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.h | 2 ++
2 files
This is part of the core VPN and Encap SAFI changes.
Adds RFC5512 and a (per DL) non-compliant version of Encapsulation Attribute.
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Reviewed-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org>
---
bgpd/Makefile.am | 4 +-
bgpd/bgp_at
This is part of the core VPN and Encap SAFI changes.
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org>
---
bgpd/bgp_vty.c | 112 ++-
bgpd/bgpd.c | 15 +--
l
This is part of the core VPN and Encap SAFI changes.
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Reviewed-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org>
---
bgpd/Makefile.am | 6 +-
bgpd/bgp_attr.c| 332 ++-
bgpd/bgp_attr.h|
This is part of the core VPN and Encap SAFI changes.
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org>
---
bgpd/bgp_vty.c | 242 +++
bgpd/bgp_vty.h | 6 ++
What's form of the commands when there are no VRFs in use?
Lou
On December 23, 2015 2:28:50 PM Vipin Kumar wrote:
Thanks Nicolas.
So, I assume you are fine with changing zebra commands (such as this) to..
'show ip route vrf A.B.C.D/M'
from its previous
ork across BGP instances, to work on
> import/export of routes.
>
> For static routes import/export between VRFs, can be implemented in
> Zebra
I'm not sure this makes sense as the BGP has been the place where most
have implemented RT policy as it just falls out from RFC4364/4659
imp
Paul,
On 11/26/2015 6:12 AM, Paul Jakma wrote:
> If no one else is doing it, I'm fairly sure we're going to start writing
> that code, but this thing is 'big' and high-impact enough that it needs
> thrashing out in public first and getting consensus early to have a chance
> of success /
;
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net
> <mailto:lber...@labn.net>> wrote:
>
> Vipin,
> Good stuff. See below for responses in-line.
>
>
> So are you suggesting import / export is not tied to BGP? Right?
> RT
Vipin,
So this maps pretty well when talking vrf-lite, but before making this
change I think we should agree upon how tunnel based VRFs are
represented and configured over a core instance so we don't end up with
naming or concept clashes. If not full syntax, I think we should at
least have a
Have you looked at or considered YANG? It is certainly the hammer of the
day in this space...
Lou
On November 24, 2015 7:00:42 AM Paul Jakma wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2015, Paul Jakma wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2015, Renato Westphal wrote:
I think that it would be better to
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
---
lib/prefix.c | 16
lib/prefix.h | 1 +
lib/zebra.h | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/prefix.c b/lib/prefix.c
index 936e9fc..3e4ca16 100644
--- a/lib/prefix.c
+++ b/lib/pr
When libreadline is used, we mistakenly mix in strdup() done in
libreadline with Quagga's lib/memory bookkeeping/counting, leading to
counter underflows on MTYPE_TMP.
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org>
---
l
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org>
---
bgpd/bgp_network.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/bgpd/bgp_network.c b/bgpd/bgp_network.c
index 3c5e6c5..511a0fe 100644
--- a/bgpd/b
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
---
lib/vty.c | 38 --
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/vty.c b/lib/vty.c
index 480d34f..9f4d8fa 100644
--- a/lib/vty.c
+++ b/lib/vty.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ vty_out (struct vt
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Reviewed-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org>
---
bgpd/Makefile.am | 6 +-
bgpd/bgp_attr.c| 329 ++-
bgpd/bgp_attr.h| 16 +
bgpd/bgp_encap_t
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
---
bgpd/bgp_vty.c | 42 +++---
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bgpd/bgp_vty.c b/bgpd/bgp_vty.c
index 1248b19..c540a7b 100644
--- a/bgpd/bgp_vty.c
+++ b/bgpd/bgp_vty.c
@@
This changes the existing _vpnv4 functions for MPLS-VPN into
SAFI-agnostic functions, renaming them from *_vpnv4 to *_safi.
Also adds route-map support while at it.
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Reviewed-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org>
---
bgpd/b
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org>
---
bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.c | 81 --
bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
---
bgpd/bgp_nexthop.c | 2 ++
tests/bgp_mpath_test.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/bgpd/bgp_nexthop.c b/bgpd/bgp_nexthop.c
index 7dbaf3c..d3e5821 100644
--- a/bgpd/bgp_nexthop.c
+++ b/bgpd/bgp_nex
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
---
bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.c | 406 ++---
bgpd/bgp_route.c | 321 ++
2 files changed, 427 insertions(+), 300 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.c
There was no way to actually set ZEBRA_DEBUG_DETAIL, even though some
debug output was conditional to it. Add CLI command.
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org>
---
zebra/debug.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 inse
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org>
---
zebra/redistribute.c | 18 --
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/zebra/redistribute.c b/zebra/redistribute.c
index 5ec8219..57
The last route-map written to config should have an "exit" at the end to
return to the main node from route-map processing.
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org>
---
lib/routemap.c | 2 ++
1 file changed,
There wasn't much missing for VPNv6 to begin with; just a few bits of
de- & encoding and a few lists to be updated.
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org>
---
bgpd/bgp_attr.c| 25 +++
Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net>
---
bgpd/bgp_nexthop.c | 21 +++
bgpd/bgp_nexthop.h | 2 +
bgpd/bgp_route.c| 103 +++-
bgpd/bgp_route.h| 3 ++
bgpd/bgp_routemap.c | 3 ++
bgpd/bgp_zebra.c| 10 +
Thanks for the notes. Since you asked:
- I think having a documented release process and schedule is necessary
- I think it's worth trying the documented process
Lou
On 6/2/2016 12:43 PM, Donald Sharp wrote:
> Document is here:
>
>
On 6/3/2016 11:21 AM, Jafar Al-Gharaibeh wrote:
> On 6/3/2016 10:03 AM, Lou Berger wrote:
>> On 6/3/2016 9:35 AM, Olivier Dugeon wrote:
>>> Hi Lou Jafar,
>>>
>>> Well, it becomes hard to follow this new numbering schema.
>>>
>> Probably s
Philippe,
see below.
On 6/8/2016 1:55 PM, Philippe Guibert wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Lou,
>
>> This feature adds an L3 & L2 VPN application that makes use of the VPN
>> and Encap SAFIs. This code
Philippe,
On 6/9/2016 4:15 AM, Philippe Guibert wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Lou,
>>> * It seems the RD_TYPE_EOI type surfaced again (see
>>> http://patchwork.quagga.net/patch/1728/ ), whereas I
Once this is pushed I can also run our internal bgp VPN regression tests
(including with valgrind) on this.
Lou
On 6/6/2016 12:09 PM, Paul Jakma wrote:
> - I'll push
> somewhere later or tomorrow.
___
Quagga-dev mailing list
On 6/5/2016 10:34 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net> wrote:
>
>> What do you (anyone) think?
> I think we are thinking too much about it.
>
>
Michael,
If I'm not mistaken, you were around since quagga was set up as a
gnu project. Wha
Some. Take a look at
https://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-dev/2016-May/015364.html . Feel
free to ask for details.
Lou
On June 3, 2016 2:45:52 AM bochi wrote:
Hi all,
I saw that there was a thread taking about BGP EVPN support on Quagga Oct
last year.
Eak -- the branch doesn't compile with -std=c99 .
I think these changes need to be reworked with standard modern c
declarations.
Lou
On 6/14/2016 9:47 AM, Lou Berger wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Great to see this published. Is there a quagga convention WRT C99?
>
> I see the following
Paul,
On 6/14/2016 9:02 AM, Paul Jakma wrote:
> Note: I've had a good few conflicts on 'install_element' lines, due to
> various patches adding/removing commands with the restricted node and
> 'auto-install view commands into enable' patches. I didn't look too
> closely as to whether I
Paul,
Great to see this published. Is there a quagga convention WRT C99?
I see the following when compiling proposed/8
if.c:1151: error: ?for? loop initial declarations are only allowed in
C99 mode
if.c:1151: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 to compile your code
zclient.c:903: error:
Philippe,
On 6/15/2016 10:45 AM, Philippe Guibert wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net> wrote:
>
> Lou,
>
>> Philippe,
> [..]
>> Sure, as we said the RFP and VNC feature is aliened with the NVO3
>> architecture
Donald, All,
So what's the next step? Another meeting next week to review/close
on this?
Thanks,
Lou
On 5/26/2016 6:14 PM, Donald Sharp wrote:
>
> All -
>
> Lou and I have taken a first pass at the release document that was
> discussed in the meeting.
>
> This description was inspired by,
On 5/26/2016 1:00 PM, Christian Franke wrote:
> On 05/26/2016 05:55 PM, G. Paul Ziemba wrote:
>> p...@jakma.org (Paul Jakma) writes:
>>
>>> Cool.
>>> I was going to ask if skiplist was the most appropriate DS for timer,
>>> though regardless, surely a lot better than a simple list. ;)
>> I
Jakma wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2016, Lou Berger wrote:
>
>>
>> On 1/5/2016 9:10 AM, Donald Sharp wrote:
>>> I'm not sure that exit is the right way to go here, or at least I
>>> would like some sort of agreement from everyone on what is the right
>>> thi
Y = year because the version numbers are year based, e.g., 20160315
On 5/27/2016 12:02 PM, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2016, Lou Berger wrote:
>
>> YE = alternate name for LTE as that wasn't well received...
> And what does 'Y' mean?
>
> The aim with the roun
ion to which
he said "sure".
Lou
On 5/26/2016 6:18 AM, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2016, Lou Berger wrote:
>
>> + * Permission to include in quagga provide by William Pugh on March 31, 2016
>> + * The author makes no claim/restriction on use. It is provided &qu
Vincent explained it to me.
>
> - Martin
>
> Disclaimer: I’m only the person who wrote it down. This does not
mean that
> I agree or disagree on it. But I want this choice to be discussed
as well.
>
>
> On 18 Jun 2016, at 14:23, Lou Berger wrote:
>
>
Paul,
While the conclusion to work on ce may (or may not, I wasn't on the call
for this) be premature, why can't a branch just be added under the existing
repo if/when that's the consensus among the community?
Lou
On June 22, 2016 5:53:34 AM Paul Jakma wrote:
On Tue, 21
Hi Donald,
I'm sorry I couldn't stay for the rest of the meeting. I really think the
roles discussion is separable from the release cycle discussion and it
would be good to close the roles discussion first.
Lou
On June 21, 2016 11:01:45 AM Donald Sharp wrote:
Paul,
Independent of branches/release discussion, my view is that either
version of the roles documents - either Vincent's or the one posted for
yesterday's meeting - would really help to _just get it done_. (of
course, I am not maintainer nor do I expect to be one in the future.)
It would
ad the document and let us know how you would like to proceed.
>
> Additionally I'll move the CE part back to the Quagga Release Process
> docuemnt.
>
> thanks!
>
> donald
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net> wrote:
>> Paul,
>&
Nothing but old habits, so easy to change. I've been favoring clang (much
better warnings) which defaults to it in any case...
Cheers,
Lou
On June 16, 2016 5:49:00 AM Paul Jakma wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016, Paul Jakma wrote:
If it's trivial like declaring stuff in the
---
bgpd/bgp_encap.c | 45 -
bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.c | 8
bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.h | 5 +
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bgpd/bgp_encap.c b/bgpd/bgp_encap.c
index 1a09ba6..e69da04 100644
--- a/bgpd/bgp_encap.c
+++
just sent to list - rev should hopefully address the CI failure too.
On June 17, 2016 5:26:23 AM Philippe Guibert
<philippe.guib...@6wind.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net> wrote:
>
> Hello Lou,
>
>>
>
the references you asked for in the log.
*
https://github.com/LabNConsulting/quagga-vnc/tree/patches/R1.0.20160315%2Bvnc/v3
On 6/17/2016 10:10 AM, Lou Berger wrote:
>
> On 6/17/2016 9:15 AM, Philippe Guibert wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net> wrot
On 6/22/2016 6:17 PM, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Jafar Al-Gharaibeh wrote:
>
>> For example, assume I want to push the new feature that I have been working
>> on: MTR-OSPF (RFC4915). Having that in the CE (thing ;) ) for a few cycles
>> might help us understand its impact on
On 6/15/2016 11:38 AM, David Lamparter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:03:41AM -0400, Lou Berger wrote:
>> Eak -- the branch doesn't compile with -std=c99 .
> Standard for Quagga is currently "-std=gnu99" as seen in configure.ac
> line ~140; there seems to be a bu
Paul,
See below.
On 6/15/2016 5:53 AM, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, Lou Berger wrote:
>
>> +DEFUN (show_commandtree,
>> + show_commandtree_cmd,
>> + "show commandtree",
>> + NO_STR
>> + "Show command tre
---
bgpd/bgp_encap.c | 45 -
bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.c | 8
bgpd/bgp_mplsvpn.h | 4
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bgpd/bgp_encap.c b/bgpd/bgp_encap.c
index d21924c..bd150ce 100644
--- a/bgpd/bgp_encap.c
+++
. (this patch will be rolled into the larger vnc patch.)
Thanks,
Lou
On 6/9/2016 4:42 AM, Lou Berger wrote:
> Philippe,
>
> On 6/9/2016 4:15 AM, Philippe Guibert wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > H
On 6/23/2016 1:46 AM, Jafar Al-Gharaibeh wrote:
> On 6/22/2016 6:04 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
>> why not just use personal github for this? that said,there might be
>> value in having an easy way to see the features in development...
> I do use github for this, as many of us pr
1 - 100 of 232 matches
Mail list logo