Re: [qubes-users] Re: can we have debian-minimal?

2017-04-28 Thread Unman
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 07:23:46PM +0200, u+q...@bestemt.no wrote: > Dominique St-Pierre Boucher [2017-03-23 14:54 > +0100]: > > I was able to build a jessie minimal template but not a stretch one. > > So I decided to clone it and upgrade the template. I ran into a lot of >

Re: [qubes-users] Re: can we have debian-minimal?

2017-04-28 Thread u+qbsu
Dominique St-Pierre Boucher [2017-03-23 14:54 +0100]: > I was able to build a jessie minimal template but not a stretch one. > So I decided to clone it and upgrade the template. I ran into a lot of > issues with that. The way I was able to finally do it was to enable > the

Re: [qubes-users] Re: can we have debian-minimal?

2017-04-25 Thread Zrubi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/19/2017 07:49 PM, tnt_bom_...@keemail.me wrote: > its difficult to remove the packages inside debian-qubes , because > most of the time u will end up on crashing/destroying it. I just played a little and removed a lot of packages from the

Re: [qubes-users] Re: can we have debian-minimal?

2017-03-23 Thread Dominique St-Pierre Boucher
I was able to build a jessie minimal template but not a stretch one. So I decided to clone it and upgrade the template. I ran into a lot of issues with that. The way I was able to finally do it was to enable the qubes-testing repo for stretch before the updgrade and doing the upgrade from the

Re: [qubes-users] Re: can we have debian-minimal?

2017-03-23 Thread Vít Šesták
Well, you have simplified it too much. It seems to be basically equivalent to curl http://… | sudo bash. (AFAIK, there is no authentication when using git:// URL.) The signature verification mentioned on the page is there for a reason – you should not run the code without knowing it has not

Re: [qubes-users] Re: can we have debian-minimal?

2017-03-22 Thread cooloutac
Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to

Re: [qubes-users] Re: can we have debian-minimal?

2017-03-19 Thread Unman
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 12:24:52PM -0600, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 2017-03-19 11:38 AM, Dominique St-Pierre Boucher wrote: > > On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 5:51:39 AM UTC-4, tnt_b...@keemail.me wrote: > >> hi there, > >> > >> fedora minimal is great idea to have inside Qubes, i wonder why we dont

[qubes-users] Re: can we have debian-minimal?

2017-03-19 Thread Reg Tiangha
On 2017-03-19 2:26 PM, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 2017-03-19 2:08 PM, cooloutac wrote: >> On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 2:25:17 PM UTC-4, Reg Tiangha wrote: >>> On 2017-03-19 11:38 AM, Dominique St-Pierre Boucher wrote: On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 5:51:39 AM UTC-4, tnt_b...@keemail.me wrote:

[qubes-users] Re: can we have debian-minimal?

2017-03-19 Thread Reg Tiangha
On 2017-03-19 2:08 PM, cooloutac wrote: > On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 2:25:17 PM UTC-4, Reg Tiangha wrote: >> On 2017-03-19 11:38 AM, Dominique St-Pierre Boucher wrote: >>> On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 5:51:39 AM UTC-4, tnt_b...@keemail.me wrote: hi there, fedora minimal is great

[qubes-users] Re: can we have debian-minimal?

2017-03-19 Thread cooloutac
On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 2:25:17 PM UTC-4, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 2017-03-19 11:38 AM, Dominique St-Pierre Boucher wrote: > > On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 5:51:39 AM UTC-4, tnt_b...@keemail.me wrote: > >> hi there, > >> > >> fedora minimal is great idea to have inside Qubes, i wonder why we

Re: [qubes-users] Re: can we have debian-minimal?

2017-03-19 Thread haaber
> On 2017-03-19 11:38 AM, Dominique St-Pierre Boucher wrote: >> On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 5:51:39 AM UTC-4, tnt_b...@keemail.me wrote: >>> hi there, >>> >>> fedora minimal is great idea to have inside Qubes, i wonder why we dont >>> have debian minimal as well inside Qubes ? >>> > You can

[qubes-users] Re: can we have debian-minimal?

2017-03-19 Thread cooloutac
On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 2:25:17 PM UTC-4, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 2017-03-19 11:38 AM, Dominique St-Pierre Boucher wrote: > > On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 5:51:39 AM UTC-4, tnt_b...@keemail.me wrote: > >> hi there, > >> > >> fedora minimal is great idea to have inside Qubes, i wonder why we

[qubes-users] Re: can we have debian-minimal?

2017-03-19 Thread tnt_bom_bom
its difficult to remove the packages inside debian-qubes , because most of the time u will end up on crashing/destroying it. but i wonder if the developer of debian-qubes can make a minimal one , which is way better than the current one. > On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 5:51:39 AM UTC-4, >

[qubes-users] Re: can we have debian-minimal?

2017-03-19 Thread Reg Tiangha
On 2017-03-19 11:38 AM, Dominique St-Pierre Boucher wrote: > On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 5:51:39 AM UTC-4, tnt_b...@keemail.me wrote: >> hi there, >> >> fedora minimal is great idea to have inside Qubes, i wonder why we dont have >> debian minimal as well inside Qubes ? >> >> (debian-qubes has

[qubes-users] Re: can we have debian-minimal?

2017-03-19 Thread Dominique St-Pierre Boucher
On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 5:51:39 AM UTC-4, tnt_b...@keemail.me wrote: > hi there, > > fedora minimal is great idea to have inside Qubes, i wonder why we dont have > debian minimal as well inside Qubes ? > > (debian-qubes has many packages which r not necessary to be installed e.g >