Has anyone else done this before or does anyone know the best procedure?
Also, given that this isn't a transfer of ownership, I'm still the same
person with a different name, would that make this process easier?
Same process as we do not know whether it is the same person behind the
other
loaded the file to R-release, and I get
automatic emails every other day from Uwe Ligges telling me my package
has been checked and built.
Interesting, you shouild receive one mail for each upload.
Can yoiu tell me when you got an unexpected one? Can you forward it to me?
I do not see a package
be a problem on CRAN or winbuilder.
You have to have qpdf installed and on your PATH.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
The user should set the CRAN+BioC via setRepositories() and then run
install.packages() will install all dependencies automatically.
Of course, if you install from a local repository without the required
packages or from a USB drive, R cannot resolve dependencies.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On
On 17.03.2023 13:09, Ruff, Sergej wrote:
Thanks,
I thought about changing it to "Imports", but will it cause any issues when
CRAN runs checks on my package and limma isn´t available on CRAN?
No, BioC is a mainstream repository.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
-devel-windows-x86_64 machine (at the very
Yes.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
least, the CPU description of win-builder matches that from
<https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_flavors.html#r-devel-windows-x86_64>).
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org
browser.
This link is a harmless bit of fluff (click through if you want to
see), but I don't want it causing hiccups in my CRAN submission (i.e., I
could take it out if necessary but would prefer not to ...)
Suggestions?
Keep and submit.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
===
* checking
corresponding graphics hardware is not available on the
build/check machines, but if possible you shopudl support that users
with the required hardware can compile the package from sources on
Windows, too.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r
(which
takes about 70/95 seconds on most other platforms)
https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang/lme4-00check.html
Not shown anymore, I guess ome hicc up on the check machine.
Or in case you download data some internet access issue?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Doe
Can you try again?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 23.02.2023 08:20, 安拉維 AALA WILSON JR S98107020 wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am trying to submit a new package in CRAN. The results from devtools::check()
returned with no errors, warnings, nor notes. Upon submitting the package
tarball, i received the
If you need some details, perhaps simply ask Michael Lawrence.
He certainly knows better than most readers what the issues are, or at
least were when RGtk2 got archived.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 12.02.2023 17:37, David Sterratt wrote:
On Sat, 2023-02-11 at 18:11 +0300, Ivan Krylov wrote:
On Sat
Note that Gtk2 is end of life, Gtk4 was released 3 years ago already.
There are reasons why neither the former RGtk2 maintainer nor the CRAN
team decided to maintain RGtk2 further on.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 11.02.2023 16:11, Ivan Krylov wrote:
On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 11:19:42 +
David Sterratt
This was a temporary hicc up on the Windows machine, all check should
have been triggered again.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 31.01.2023 16:02, Mike Blazanin wrote:
Hi all, trying to troubleshoot my way through my first CRAN package
submission. I've addressed all the other issues so far (much t
g/profiling could reveal the true cause.
Yes, it may even be some OS update, or just coincidence that the system
was idling the last time your package got checked.
Note that CRAN systems are expected to be slower than, e.g., your
laptop, as the servers use multi core CPUs with rather low fre
.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 22.01.2023 19:55, Ben Bolker wrote:
Seems pretty mysterious to me! (No cryptic NOTEs anywhere in the
logs, other than the inevitable "Note_to_CRAN_maintainers")
I will be curious to see if anyone else finds something, but my guess
is a hiccup on the CRA
UTF-16BE".
I'd believe much more should have gone wrong then. Perhaps it was some
editor that really messed it up?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks,
Spencer
Duncan Murdoch
???
I have Bitdefender installed on this computer. A "Quick Scan"
produced noth
itor
not to create files with BOM.
You can also fix in R:
x <- readLines(..., encoding="UTF-8-BOM")
writeLines(x, ..)
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
ft why the label their version 10.x.y as Windows 11
(well, they labelled version 5.x.y as Windows 2000 etc., so nothing new
here).
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks for spotting and reporting this.
Tomas
best,
Mai Zhou
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
ools/rtools43/rtools.html>.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
7; found
I've tried updating the HTML Tidy on my mac as I read online that should
solve this issue, but nothing changed. Could you help me solve these issues?
Is it in the PATH, i.e. can R find it?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thank you in advance!
Best regards
[[alterna
On 20.12.2022 00:58, Sanjeev Sariya wrote:
Hi,
thank you for the reply.
Do you need this to be a file? Could it be a pre-parsed R object
instead?
Yes, and that can go into an .RData file.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
I need to provide an external data/file in the R package. This has come as
a
Well, the CRAN question is more a suggestion that refernces for a
package can be specified in the Descrioption field of the DESCRIPTION
file so that poeple directly see the references even befiore downloading
the package. This is a (strong) suggestion, not compulsory.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On
age passes
the checks, an auto generated message will go to the old maintainer
address. But for that to happen, the second note has to be fixed:
2. Problems with news in 'NEWS.md':
No news entries found.
See ?news which explains how NEWS.md files should be written.
Best,
Uwe Lig
likely. When I run on a Mac, I see a directory on the
Mac build machine in the error message.
Yep, have you reported this to the author of that package already? If
not, please do so.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Does it work if you run install.packages('Greymodels', type = 'source&
we call mainstream repositories.
In order to prevent what happened, choose a rather unique name - and
perhaps consider to submit that to CRAN, too.
We see "flashr" and similar names are also used in other projects, so
one more point for a new name.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Hth, Dir
se fix and resubmit.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
CRAN Repository Policy
Submission
[...]
Explain any change in the maintainer’s email address and if possible send
confirmation from the previous address (by a separate email to
cran-submissi...@r-project.org) or explain why it is not possible.
Cheers,
Simon
Dear package developers,
CRAN submissions will be closed for winter break from Dec 22, 2022 to
Jan 5, 2023 (GMT).
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
contact c...@r-project.org to ask for the archival.
Yes, please write to CRAN@... and also mention the name for the
replacement package in the same message.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman
rallel code.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
I can't reproduce the note on win-builder:
https://win-builder.r-project.org/ as it's running on Windows but the
note appears on debian tests. I'm not able to reproduce it on my local
machine either with Ubuntu 22.04. I'm wondering what the note is
can run it on
huge data, as your users don't want to wait for hours in order to see
the principles of the function call
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On submission of your package, the examples will be run with and without
\donttest{}. However, the periodic (daily?) checks that get run
Please let the Simon (Mac maintainer for CRAN) know.
For Windows, the revdeps get rebuild automatically.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 19.10.2022 09:39, Martin Maechler wrote:
Duncan Murdoch
on Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:17:33 -0400 writes:
> I see the same thing. This sounds like a problem
See my response to the list.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 18.10.2022 14:11, Jahajeeah, Havisha wrote:
Hello,
Grateful if you could please help with the following comments:
Please add small executable examples in your Rd-files to illustrate the
use of the exported function but also enable automatic
On 28.09.2022 17:33, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Dear developers,
currently CRAN incoming checks are offline due to network issues at my
university. I hope this will be resolved early tomorrow.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
This has been resolved last night (by a reboot of the central switch of
the
Dear developers,
currently CRAN incoming checks are offline due to network issues at my
university. I hope this will be resolved early tomorrow.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r
ed.
You apparently declared it as Type "Shiny application" rather than
"Package" in the DESCRIPTION field?
Simply omit the Type field or decalre it as Package.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
* DONE
Status: 1 ERROR
I am not sure how to fix the problems and I would appreciate your
latter, but the mechanism works on CRAN, so you do not ned to worry
about that.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks for your help,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 3:14 PM Uwe Ligges
<mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>> wrote:
On 14.09.2022 23:54, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 1
On 13.09.2022 13:14, Florian Schwendinger wrote:
Dear R-package-developers,
On 'r-oldrel-windows-ix86_x86_64' I get in 'check.log' the error message
"Error: package 'highs' is not installed for 'arch = i386'"
the statement that for arch = i386 the package is not installed is correct and
expe
... looks like a package
Converting parsed Rd's to LaTeX ...
Creating pdf output from LaTeX ...
Error in texi2dvi(file = file, pdf = TRUE, clean = clean, quiet = quiet, :
pdflatex is not available
Install some LaTeX distribution?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Error in texi2dvi(file = file, pdf =
On 01.09.2022 16:48, J C Nash wrote:
Hi,
I've a package where it has been suggested that one of the functions --
call
it "myfn()" -- should be called something else, say "thefn()". Of
course, I'll
need to keep the old name around for a while.
Web search has suggested simple assignment of
ckage="sn”) + click on “Package NEWS ?
Currently you cannot, as the code that translates to html does not
handle the dates. We will discuss this.
Best,
Uwe
Best wishes,
Adelchi
On 29 Aug 2022, at 12:36, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 29.08.2022 11:01, Adelchi Azzalini wrote:
Hi. In the la
ws(package="sn")
str(db)
db$Date
and all dates were read correctly.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
---
Adelchi Azzalini
http://azzalini.stat.unipd.it
R> sessionInfo()
R version 4.2.1 (2022-06-23)
Platform: aarch64-apple-darwin20 (64-bit)
Running under: macOS Monterey 12.5.1
Matrix products:
On 25.08.2022 00:12, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Simon,
What you attempt to answer is not the relevant question (as Ivan concurred in
private email). I can only invite you again to maybe venture to answer the
question I asked rather than belabor a point I didn't make (even if you fancy
lecturi
ently only subseta of provided
functions get executed in vignettes...
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks,
Joan
/
/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Putting the lengthy examples in \donttest is correct. However, it would
be great
On 15.07.2022 16:07, Tomas Kalibera wrote:
On 7/15/22 14:50, Georgi Boshnakov wrote:
Submitted package 'fGarch' has been stuck in CRAN 'pretest' for about
24 hours now. The same seems to hold for several other packages. Is
this something that can be expected normally?
The pretest service s
My suggestion is to check with a recent version of R-devel which should
produce god results, i.e. produces messages that need our attention.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 31.05.2022 16:17, John Fox wrote:
Dear Adelchi,
This problem has been reported before: see
<https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermai
where the LICENSE file contains the CRAN template for the MIT license only
Best,
Uwe Ligges
The syntax MIT + file LICENSE is because the MIT license is a template, and
I need to fill in the template parameters in the LICENSE file.
What's the right way to structure the LICENSE file
he meantime, packages that got
auto-rejected only for this reasons should have been processed. If yours
not, please simply resubmit.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
dated on CRAN?
For what it's worth, https://cran.r-project.org/package=uuid does
indicate that the Windows binary for r-release is not available, but
the link points to a non-existent ReadMe file.
Indeed, both the Readme and the binary vesion should be there and
apparent
it is not part of your package it may be related due to failing
MikTeX when building, e.g., the manual or vignettes?
If hat worked otherwise I'd ignore it unless it also happens on CRAN.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
See
https://builder.r-hub.io/status/dmdScheme_1.2.7.tar.gz-b5319e2e45f14b43b997198
Note that misspelled words are never a reason for auto rejection as thes
emay be false positives.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 18.12.2021 23:06, Lucas Godoy wrote:
Thank you for your help, Sebastian.
The main problems were a mispelled word in DESCRIPTION and the time of
compilation for the vignettes
})$", "\\1", dir("c:/WIndows/fonts")))
dat fon ini ttc ttf xml
1 192 1 16 127 1
So there are 127 *.ttf files installed, but systemfonts::system_fonts()
does not find any of these.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
This would be an empty character vector on my Alpine Linux serv
NAMESPACEs pROC and stats, both offering functions of
the same name. That means you should only import selectively from these
NAMESPACEs what you need.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
The 00install.out file does not inform me about where, in my R code,
those warnings were triggered. I have searched my code for
Dear package developers,
CRAN will close its incoming submission queue on Dec 21 and will open it
again on Jan 3.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
the future of scientific
computing in 2021 would still/again happen on platforms without support
for long doubles / extended precision.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Avi
On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 8:56 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 5 December 2021 at 17:23, Travers Ching wrote:
| I see that there
Dear all,
winbuilder service and CRAN incoming checks (submission is possible)
will be offlne tomorrow (Nov 1) from 10 am CET to not later than 6pm.
Some CRAN hardware in Dortmund will be physically migrated to a new
locatiom.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
(CRAN team
ub.com/obrl-soil/slga/blob/a770dac9f101995db92e2d42476af8705971d80c/R/get_data.R#L61
I just want to clarify whether the problem is an overly brief error
message, or my use of stop() in this context? What is the preferred
pattern for handling these kinds of errors?
Exit gracefully, i.e. without an ERROR.
Best,
ut they do strongly
indicate that the package author is making a mistake.
The only unclear statement is the 2.01, but compareVersion() does a
sensible thing. So I do not worry too much.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks
Colin
On September 6, 2021 4:02:08 AM PDT, Colin Gillespie
wrote:
Dear All
ry to
install packages from.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 31.08.2021 23:33, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
People shouldn't be able to install your package unless the "hard"
dependencies are available.
If EBImage isn't essential to your package, you should make it a "soft"
depen
luster explicitly and in the end stop exactly that cluster?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Alan
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/
But the example timing...:
Please reduce each example to less than 5 sec.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 17.08.2021 15:53, Aisouda Hoshiyar wrote:
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ‘Aisouda Hoshiyar ’
is just a change of the maintainer and already declared in my cran-comments.md
s fine.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 31. Jul 2021, at 11:55, Uwe Ligges <mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>> wrote:
On 31.07.2021 10:31, Dr. rer. nat. Michael Thrun wrote:
Dear R developers,
I have several packages on CRAN and usually I can resolve all issues
without bothering others
2) If we need to adjust a package currently on CRAN owing to platform
errors, should we keep the version the same or submit with a version bump?
Any changes in new submissions need a new version number.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks.
THK
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 2:06 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel
ove the website.
Does someone know, how to resolve this issue?
Well, the webpage reports Status 301 for permamently moved content. It
should just be a redirection. Then you can keep it as is.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Should I use another redirection option in the settings of my hosting provider?
Sho
A package can have one or more licneses, but they have to apply to the
whole package, otehrwise the componentes havbe to be distributed separately.
Also note that CRAN accepts FOSS licenses. This sounds like a case that
CRAN will not agree to distribute the (non FOSS) binaries.
Best,
Uwe
It was likely an interim version of Rcpp (which never made it to CRAN)
that was causing trouble.
The winbuilder queues are set up to test against most recent CRAN
submissions which caused the trouble in this case.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 07.07.2021 22:42, Murray Efford wrote:
Likewise: secr now
On 07.07.2021 17:21, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 07/07/2021 9:08 a.m., Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 07.07.2021 13:18, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 07/07/2021 5:29 a.m., David Enrique Payares García wrote:
Hello everybody,
I developed an R package that depends on packages hosted in GitHub.
In the
Can you pls try again now.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 06.07.2021 23:18, Murray Efford wrote:
I also get from Winbuilder:
** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading
ERROR: lazy loading failed for package 'secr'
even for the tar.gz of the version secr 4.4.4 that currently passes
PTION
Status: Internal Server Error
Message: 500
Many publishers (one worse than the other) seem to have very flakey
internet resources and web servers are poorly set up, hence simply
ignore this.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
The relevant part in the DESCRIPTION file which caused this note looks
'extrantsr'
As the message says: You likely have declared some import directives via
the NAMESPACE file. In that case you have to import from a package and
hence list it in the Imports field.
If the package is not available from a mainsteam repository and you want
to suggest it only,
a
Suggests: dependency on package B that is in good standing on CRAN but
is not available on a particular CRAN testing platform, as long as
package A only uses package B conditionally.
Yes.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thoughts/opinions/evidence?
cheers
Ben Bolker
---
From the current CRAN
What happens when you test it on winbuilder?
It is configured like the CRAN incoming checks and there should be all
relevant packages available.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 05.07.2021 11:16, Gianmarco Alberti wrote:
Hello,
Further to my earlier email, I think I have located a likely issue, and I
details.
Many thanks to all.
Lluís Revilla
On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 at 08:38, Uwe Ligges
wrote:
On 01.07.2021 23:52, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 01/07/2021 3:11 p.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 1 July 2021 at 20:00, Lluís Revilla wrote:
| I have a question related to changing maintainers.
| What h
ver.
... and if in doubt, ask the CRAN team and give them details.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Duncan Murdoch
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Both ways are fine with us, but the auto confirmation request will be
sent out in any case.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 01.07.2021 17:57, rmendelss gmail wrote:
Hi Uwe:
Is what you described the preferred way to change maintainers (I have just
taken over another package), or would you prefer
1. Correct the name of the new maintainer whose family name is probably
not "Developer". Apparently nobody spotted this in your initial submission.
2. After successful submission to CRAN, the old maintainer will receive
a confirmation request which you have to respond to.
Best,
Uwe Li
", so you have
insufficient permissions to write into the main library. EIther install
to another library or run the task with succifient permissions (sudo?).
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks, Matthew
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com/) Secure Email.
[[alternative HTML versi
imply try again tomorrow.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 16.06.2021 20:03, Kai Aragaki wrote:
Thank you both. My concern then is with the lack of output in the
examples and tests directory - where before there was (for each arch) a
pdf output of an image generated by an example (the output of the
ex
Reason is that we currently plan not to support 32-bit Windows as of
R-4.2.0, i.e. we stopped to build and check for 32-bit Windows in R-devel.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Am 16.06.2021 um 13:31 schrieb Duncan Murdoch:
On 15/06/2021 5:29 p.m., Kai Aragaki wrote:
Hello all -
I've been testi
y.
I see. Note the Makevars file for non Windows OS should be in the same
place.
Best,
Uwe
JN
On 2021-06-12 7:27 p.m., Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 12.06.2021 16:39, J C Nash wrote:
Two minor notes:
1) The Writing R Extensions manual, as far as I can determine, does not inform
package
devel
On 12.06.2021 16:39, J C Nash wrote:
Two minor notes:
1) The Writing R Extensions manual, as far as I can determine, does not inform
package
developers that Makevars.win needs to be in the src/ subdirectory. I followed
the example
of some other packages to choose where to put it.
I just s
as I know there is not CRAN-like repo
with gurobi. Following the CRAN policies you can exolain in the
Description field of the DESCRIPTION file how to get that package to
your users.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Dirk
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing
Perhaps simply ask the CRAN crew to run the checks again, but as you do
not say which package this is about etc, we can hardly help.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 16.05.2021 08:16, Vincent Nijs wrote:
Hi,
I submitted a minor update to a package and ran into the vignette
warning/error shown. FYI the
Pls try again, it shoudl work.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 17.05.2021 14:34, Daniel Sjoberg wrote:
Hello,
I maintain a package that depends on the gt package. Last week, the gt
package released a new version, v0.3.0; all the Windows binaries for the
new version have been built and are available (and
.0.1 with r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64.
Can I assume this is a transient problem and advise CRAN accordingly when I
update my own package?
Yes.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r
e saying that “The following
files are already in R ... Please remove them from your package.”
- or the package now depends on R >= 4.0.4
As the package is shipped with the already built vignette, this does not
induce the version requirement.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Does anyone know of a way out of
What happens if you simply try again?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 26.04.2021 20:32, Tim Schäfer wrote:
Dear R experts,
I am testing my R package 'fsbrain' using the Winbuilder service [1] before
submitting a new version to CRAN.
All checks pass under R versions 4.0.5 and 4.1.0 alph
I need to do to get rid of that note?
You cannot do anything, this note is fine and a CRAN team member can
install the package if needed.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: 'Barbara Lerner '
Suggests or Enhances not in mainstream repositorie
On 14.04.2021 00:43, Rafael CM wrote:
Dear all,
I am submitting the RTIGER package and I have the following warning:
checking LazyData ... WARNING
A full message would be needed
Best,
Uwe Ligges
I have saved the data with the optimal compression format. Could someone
help me?
Best
Or simply navigate to the install log which is avaiable from the links
you got.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 14.04.2021 03:47, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 14 April 2021 at 01:03, csmatyi wrote:
| Debian
|
| * using log directory ‘/srv/hornik/tmp/CRAN/hybridogram.Rcheck’
| * using R Under development
Actually you got
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64
Check: top-level files, Result: NOTE
Non-standard files/directories found at top level:
'News.md' 'README.Rmd' 'cran-comments.md'
which shold be fixed.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
recently, my
concerned is that th Solaris test machine may hav been blocked.
The list does not know. Even the CRAN team does not know the IP address.
Professor Ripley runs that machine, so you may ask him via
c...@r-project.org.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks,
-Roy
Reason is that BioC 3.13 does not offer a new rtracklayer binary which
the winbuilder machine typically uses.
As this also does not install from sources for me. So this seems hard to
set up.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 07.04.2021 12:18, Rafael CM wrote:
Dear all,
I am trying to submit a
13 is what we
should use to check with R-devel and that was recetnly still pretty
iunstable.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
package installation.
See this answer on Bioinformatics stackexchange:
https://bioinformatics.stackexchange.com/a/3375/51
Hope that helps!
-Robert
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 1:14 PM And
ly or need manual attention in case of the really very few
exceptions.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Best,
Patrick
Le 06/04/2021 à 17:33, Uwe Ligges a écrit :
Two Notes:
Found the following (possibly) invalid URLs:
URL: http://imagemagick.org/script/download.php (moved to
https://imagemagick.org/
low moved
content as appropriate.
* checking LazyData ... NOTE
'LazyData' is specified without a 'data' directory
Simply omit the field if you have no data.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 06.04.2021 16:27, Andrew Dhawan wrote:
Dear all,
I am a bit puzzled by this error for the sigQC
On 01.04.2021 07:55, Tim Hulsen wrote:
r-release-windows-ix86+x86_64
A new check, you declare LazyData in your DESCRIPTION file which is
meaningless. So please simply omit that line.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Op wo 31 mrt. 2021 om 14:31 schreef Duncan Murdoch
:
On 31/03/2021 8:28 a.m., Tim
Pls write your message to c...@r-project.org
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 30.03.2021 09:05, Binit Kumar wrote:
Hi Team,
I mentioned some comment before uploading the package for publishing i.e. "My
package RIBMDB has a dependency on CLI driver which has some IBM proprietary C code due
to whi
Dear package developers,
CRAN incoming submissions are currently not being processed due to
maintainance work on the CRAN check farm. This may take one more day.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
(CRAN team)
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https
, but not being
processed in this time. reason: maintainance at the electrical power
infrastructure in Dortmund.
Best,
Uwe Ligges for the CRAN team
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
hecks, but I guess you have
an outdated version of lattice (or borken installtion of lattice) in
another library of packages that is used for these checks?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
The error persists, even when I reinstall lattice.
What am I missing?
Best regards,
Thierry
sessioninfo::session_inf
101 - 200 of 594 matches
Mail list logo
