On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Jeff Casimir wrote:
> I'd like to see radiant follow some of the footsteps from merb and
> have two gems: radiant-core and radiant-more.
So one other idea I had on about this is to add the ability to the
extension registry for users to create lists of extensions.
On 30 Jun 2010, at 02:04, Jim Gay wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Jeff Casimir
> wrote:
>> I'd like to see radiant follow some of the footsteps from merb and
>> have two gems: radiant-core and radiant-more. The 'radiant' gem would
>>
>
> To me, radiant-more would be the part that ad
On 30 Jun 2010, at 02:39, john muhl wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Jim Gay wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Haselwanter Edmund
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 29.06.2010, at 19:47, Jim Gay wrote:
>>>
I'm glad you brought this up for discussion.
>>>
>>> It just felt right after
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:39 PM, john muhl wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Jim Gay wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Haselwanter Edmund
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 29.06.2010, at 19:47, Jim Gay wrote:
>>>
I'm glad you brought this up for discussion.
>>>
>>> It just felt right af
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Jeff Casimir wrote:
> I'd like to see radiant follow some of the footsteps from merb and
> have two gems: radiant-core and radiant-more. The 'radiant' gem would
that sounds like a fine idea; and has been discussed in the past but
it wasn't particularly feasible u
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Jim Gay wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Haselwanter Edmund
> wrote:
>>
>> On 29.06.2010, at 19:47, Jim Gay wrote:
>>
>>> I'm glad you brought this up for discussion.
>>
>> It just felt right after following the github discussion :-)
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Ju
> But you're right, with extensions as gems, this is much easier and no
> matter what decision is made about what goes into radiant-more, it
> will be very easy to make radiant-less, radiant-awesome,
> radiant-whatever and write your own custom gem.
>>
Per my IgniteRailsconf talk, I will now be
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Jeff Casimir wrote:
> I'd like to see radiant follow some of the footsteps from merb and
> have two gems: radiant-core and radiant-more. The 'radiant' gem would
> become alias to radiant-more which would be core plus a few of the
> most common extensions (SnS, som
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Haselwanter Edmund
wrote:
>
> On 29.06.2010, at 19:47, Jim Gay wrote:
>
>> I'm glad you brought this up for discussion.
>
> It just felt right after following the github discussion :-)
>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Edmund Haselwanter
>> wrote:
>>> A qu
I'd like to see radiant follow some of the footsteps from merb and
have two gems: radiant-core and radiant-more. The 'radiant' gem would
become alias to radiant-more which would be core plus a few of the
most common extensions (SnS, some kind of attachments, chronicle?,
etc). Now that extensions
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Marshal Linfoot wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Jim Gay wrote:
>>
>> I'm glad you brought this up for discussion.
>> ...
>> Check out the prototype http://github.com/radiant/radiant-prototype
>
> Very nice! Can't wait to see this in a release soon.
> I a
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Jim Gay wrote:
> I'm glad you brought this up for discussion.
> ...
> Check out the prototype http://github.com/radiant/radiant-prototype
Very nice! Can't wait to see this in a release soon.
I also want to say thank you to the developers/contributors to
the Rad
My thoughts below
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Haselwanter Edmund
wrote:
>
> >> and with this comes another question:
> >>
> >> Ok, I know that Radiant is "different". And I love it. I recently did
> >> a presentation in my web 2.0 community meeting about radiant. And one
> >> statement burne
On 29.06.2010, at 19:47, Jim Gay wrote:
> I'm glad you brought this up for discussion.
It just felt right after following the github discussion :-)
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Edmund Haselwanter
> wrote:
>> A question for clarification:
[ .. snippet .. ]
>> wouldn't it be wise to
I'm glad you brought this up for discussion.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Edmund Haselwanter
wrote:
> A question for clarification:
>
> I like to have options, but sometimes options are a bit confusing.
>
> On 29 Jun., 06:56, john muhl wrote:
>> Jim (saturnflyer) and i have been working (mo
A question for clarification:
I like to have options, but sometimes options are a bit confusing.
On 29 Jun., 06:56, john muhl wrote:
> Jim (saturnflyer) and i have been working (most of the important work
> is Jim's) on a branch of page_attachments that adds some new interface
> features to the
16 matches
Mail list logo
