Hi shanew, which ports should I allow through my firewall, in order to make
razor-check contact server correctly?
Thank you!
> Il 13 giugno 2017 alle 23.12 sha...@shanew.net ha scritto:
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, dontexit via Razor-users wrote:
>
> > I just tested my
Hi all,
I just tested my newsletter with https://www.mail-tester.com/
It seems that some negative score is related to razor:
-2.43 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100
-1.79 RAZOR2_CHECK
How can I understand those tests? How can I improve razor reputation?
Thank you
Hi all,
I just realized my spamassassin hasn't been using Razor for a
while - probably since I inadvertently upgraded glibc.
Doing a spamassassin with -lint shows:
[3167] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: razor_config
/etc/razor/razor-agent.conf
[3167] warn: config: failed to
Vipul (and list),
Can you possibly give direction on how to solve the fact that
emails that are empty other than having some attachment often
return positive results?
I find that the razor test for spam is fantastic and I'd like
using it for my server with a high spam score. The problem is
Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
___
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
n Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
___
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
The following patch should clear up this segfault problem. I've verified it
with my install.
It's strange, but 2.72 razor-agents seem to have incorporated the FreeBSD
ports "patch", however this one they screwed up. The code as provided will
trample a byte beyond the alloca
$ razor-check -v
Razor Agents 2.72, protocol version 3
$ uname -a
Linux 2.4.21 #1 Fri Jul 11 18:23:15 PDT 2003 i686 unknown
(Derived from Slackware 9.0)
$ perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.0 built for i386-linux
$ razor-check email.txt
Segmentation fault
CHECK - crashorama.
=R
> I've put up a release candidate for 2.61 at
> http://razor.sourceforge.net/beta/razor-agents-2.61-beta.tar.gz
>
> If some of you would try it out and confirm it works, I'll
> do a real release.
I have an existing high-volume SA-2.63 + Razor installation... am I corre
=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
___
Razor-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
638&op=click
___
Razor-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
It might be my imagination, but things seem to be back in order.
Can anyone confirm?
Michael Ley wrote:
Hi all,
i'm running razor with SA and everthing worked fine. Razor runs with the
defaults. Today i found out that since yesterday evening no mails are
found as "is known spam&quo
3438&op=click
_______
Razor-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
Hey All--
I'm new to razor so I'm still wrapping my head around the proggie. I do
have a question or two regarding the razor (cloudmark?) SPAM DB. I'm
using razor-report to report SPAM to the cloudmark DBs. I decided that
I wanted to see if the SPAM was actually in the DB
> I currently use a simple .procmailrc to call spamassassin (im not using
> spamd) - do I need spamd to integrate razor?
No, you don't need it to integrate razor.
It's vital for any kind of busy server, however. The startup time of
PERL/SA is
> 0.6 HTML_WEB_BUGS BODY: Image tag intended to identify you
> 1.3 NO_OBLIGATION BODY: There is no obligation
>
> Is this done through a procmail filter, SA, or razor?
This isn't a Razor question. Try a Spamassassin list.
procmail-invoked SpamAssassin can&#x
> ./razor-report -f /home/sites/www.pdcweb.net/spam.mbx
>
> But I get no feedback confirming that anything happened - is this the
> correct behavior?
If it's feedback you crave, then add a -d switch.
The default behaviour is no feedback
> But its ALREADY been flagged as spam by spamassassin. So what's
> the point?
For you acting alone, there IS no point. But for the group of people using
Razor, there is very much a good point in reporting it. Like with any such
mass-reporting system, it's only as effectiv
Quoting Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> razor-report $F && rm $F
>
> so that all my quarentined email would be reported and then deleted.
> Unfortunately, the server timeout doesn't stop the '&& rm $F' from
> happening. I was hoping it
Mail transaction failed. Partial message is available.
<>
ernames.
=R=
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
___
for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
___
Razor-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
m
folly.cloudmark.com
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
______
e.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Razor-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
> Umm.. .razor isn't supposed to be a file.. it's supposed to be a
> *directory*.
>
> you should have /home/spamd/.razor/razor-agent.conf as your configfile.
This reminds me of a pet peeve with razor. CONTRARY to documentation, it
does NOT look in /etc/razor if no ~/.razo
I don't know, but here are the current contents of my Razor server lists...
# cat servers.catalogue.lst
rancor.cloudmark.com
stress.cloudmark.com
truth.cloudmark.com
# cat servers.discovery.lst
66.151.150.11
# cat servers.nomination.lst
joy.cloudmark.com
folly.cloudmark.com
Make sure
> After
> watching over a week's worth of spam headers for the SA X-Spam headers I
> have not seen any Razor tests performed in a long time. How can I tell
The last razor-tagged email I've seen occurred on: Monday 03 Nov 2003 21:00 GMT
And I just testing razor-report -d and
> I'm not using SA in daemon mode.
That's fine.
> Is there some order to install SA and Razor, so that SA will work with
> Razor?
You should install Razor first, just to be sure that SA "finds it" during
the "build process" of SA.
Razor needs its
perl sub-directory has Time::HiRes 1.51, while my i386-linux
sub-directory has 1.20.
Is this a clue to problems?
> As for the "Can't locate object..." error, that does sound like a problem
> with Razor. Have you already run razor-admin --discover?
Oh yes. And --register.
raz
I've successfully deployed numerous SA+Razor2's on "modern" Perl 5.8.x
systems, but when I turned to a friend's system who is still running 5.6, I
am encountering strange problems with Razor 2.
You will note that my installation procedure is identical for all of the
syste
Just testing to see if anyone reads this list.
I am a fairly new Razor user, and have some questions regarding some "best
practices" of operation issues.
1) Do I need to make special precautions against multiple reporting of the
same spam? I am thinking of setting up user-subm
Folks,
I am a bit confused about Razor Integration with SpamAssassin.
I have installed Razor as per the documentation. SpamAssassin (spamc/spamd)
runs as a deamon as user "postfixfilter". SpamAssassin Config explicitly has
"use_razor2 1". I have registered for razor rep
Hi folks,
On my home server SpamAssassin runs for all users
thru spamc/spamd as user 'postfixfilter'. Latest version of Razor has been
installd (as root) and it appears to work great with SpamAssassin. Occasionally
it catches Spam found in the Razor's Database.
I now wa
33 matches
Mail list logo
