Radio
could be a MoTran beige front case,
bluish-grey covers?
df
- Original Message -
From:
Mathew
Quaife
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 12:47
PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]
Motorola
This one has the three small transistorized finals on the right back side.
As far as numbers on the unit, don't find anything that meets the model
numbers that's been mentioned. Might be easier to just locate one of the GE
Mastr II and work with that. Right now I have the regency up and running,
:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola Motrac Radio]
Can you send some specs for those solid state tubes?
Mathew Quaife wrote:
This one has the three small transistorized finals on the right back
side.
As far as numbers on the unit, don't find anything that meets the model
Just before the transistor, solid state tubes. They are small and round.
- Original Message -
From: Ken Arck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 8:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola Motrac Radio]
At 08:18 AM 3/23/2004
in a few weeks. Thanks for the input.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola Motrac Radio]
Mathew Quaife wrote:
This one has the three
/ didn't regency make scanners and CB's?
Mathew Quaife wrote:
Thanks for the input. Gonna stick with the Regency until something
better
comes along. It is working, so is all i can expect.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Ken Arck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder
I'm not gonna get into this relm of Tubes vs. Solid State, but to add that
Zenith used several of them, much of which was used in thier TV's for which
I service for over 10 years. Enough said. Thanks for looking, they did and
in some cases still do exist.
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola Motrac Radio]
You bet ... if it happens you need the diagrams of the Motran, I
probably have them here.
Best of luck on your connty assigned project.
Neil - WA6KLA
Mathew Quaife wrote:
Hi Niel, yes I think it is the Motran
Oh, trust me I got it! Thanks. It's a freebee Nothing lost.
- Original Message -
From: Ted Bleiman K9MDM - MDM Radio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 6:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola Motrac Radio]]
Just something with good sensitivity and the cor. It's really a low key
repeater.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Custer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR
Thanks Russ, will give them a call.
Mathew
russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try Maggiore Labs in West Chester PA.there phone number is 610-436-6051 they make a top notch reciver. Betterthen some of the older stuff for around the same price.Good luck and 73,Russ, W3CHTrustee W3PSMetro-Comm
Hi Ken, well it would be hard for me to make an offer, let me tell you what
I am attempting to do. I have two repeaters, one on 440 and one on 2
meters, and am using an RLC2 controller. I want to be able to remove the
controller from the 440 machine, which is a phone patch deal and tie it into
The voltage at the tap point is about 7 volts, when keyed it drops to about
.5 volts, just not enough to get it to key the controller. I looked for
other sources in the radio, nothing would drop to zero volts.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Ken Arck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi Ken, that is what I would have thought as well. When the squelch is
closed, it has about 7 volts on the point, when the squelch is open, it goes
low to about .5 volts. The radio that I am using is a Uniden AMU 080K
radio. I will have to work with it again this weekend when the RLC2 gets
Possible to get a copy, actually all I need to know is what needs to be
done, if anything to bring the SWR down to use it at 442.000/447.000.
Thanks.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: russ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 2:12 PM
to
the dipoles. I'm not convinced that any mods are necessary.
There are no tuning adjustments either.
Laryn K8TVZ
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Possible to get a copy, actually all I need to know is what needs
to be
done, if anything to bring
not convinced that any mods are necessary.
There are no tuning adjustments either.
Laryn K8TVZ
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Possible to get a copy, actually all I need to know is what needs
to be
done, if anything to bring
That is what I am thinking is going to
happen. I am (weather permitting) set them up this weekend and hook them
up and see just what they will do. Has to be better then the Diamond
antenna that was going to be used. From what I can tell, the seem to be
well constructed antenna's, and
Hi Ray, do they give the data sheet with this one, as well as the plug for it? Thanks
Mathew
Raymond Wolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Go to Ebay and search this item number. I bought one tone board and theprice is right.Item # 3088515466Ray K9RI-Original Message-From: w9mwq
Just to pass on some information, I bought one from ebay at $127.00, then seen two more go for about the same price. Did not include shipping, but not much above $10.00. Not an expert, just seend a few of them sell recently.
Mathew
Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOWERED PRICE. I had no idea
Would a close up pic of a DB304 work for your needs, or I have the DB420 there as well.
Mathew
bradley glen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HiI have been studying the db stacked array and thebayed array seems to use unbalanced dipoles as theradiators .I have tried to find a close up view of asingle
There is a company that makes a 1/2 wave antenna from Wilson. Not the CB antenna company. I sell several of them, and they work great. Generally made for fiberglas semi's, but works well on a home unit. Can get up to 30 feet of coax on them. If you need more info, let me know.
Mathew
"Jim B."
Antenna itself is $49.99, can be picked up at most truck stops. Then the adapters for the phone is usually around $9.99, and then a 20' cable is usually around $25.00, it comes with 10 feet on the antenna. I will have to get the model number in the morning.
Mathew
John Place [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the reply, greatly appreciated.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 10:37
PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]
T73RTN3190B Identify
Hi there
T73 Means
Thanks for the reply, greatly appreciated.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Brian Poellnitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater Builder List Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 10:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] T73RTN3190B Identify
According to my
Is this unit able to be converted into a repeater for use in the 2 meter
band? Also, does it take normal crystals?
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 11:33 PM
Subject: Re:
Yes you are right, I found the user that was causing the interference, not
much I can do about it. I am waiting on a new receiver, so hopefully that
will help cure some of the problems. Thanks for the input.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Well I narrowed down parts of the problem, the first being the wide as a 2x4
Regency receiver, which is going to be changed out, and the other is a local
ham using 100 watts to talk to this machine, when in it really only needs
about 7 watts to hit it full quieting with minimal antenna height. My
minimal power.
We had a similar situation and interference to our one 2 meter repeater on
the mountain and we had to remind the guy of the Laws of Radio Physics,
power, distance, and Part 97 !!
Ron
WW8RR
-Original Message-
From: Mathew Quaife [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
The duplexers are a set of TX/RX duplexers, six of them. When you say a 3db
pad, that is something that I am not sure of, is this basically the same
thing as a db pad used in CATV systems? All I know is that the duplexers
were set up as a Varinotch filter system.
Mathew
- Original Message
and completely open, while
concealing as much as possible. -States: The Bene Gesserit View
-Original Message-
From: Mathew Quaife [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 2:54 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexer Alignment
I do have a micor coming, just don't know much about it until it get's here.
At least I hope that it gets here, kinda shaky on the ebay deal, have not
heard from the seller as of yet.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent:
You are right Steve, however I know some receivers are better than others.
I just had some more interference, just as I have been passing back and
forth, this particular ham is 26 miles west of here, says he is running 10
watts into an antenna 20 feet up, and he sounds just as good on 146.325 as
helicals you could ad a pre-amp and convert the near hits to misses.
Mathew Quaife wrote:
Well I narrowed down parts of the problem, the first being the wide as a
2x4
Regency receiver, which is going to be changed out, and the other is a
local
ham using 100 watts to talk to this machine, when
-Builder] Help on Interference
Mathew Quaife wrote:
I do have a micor coming, just don't know much about it until it get's
here.
At least I hope that it gets here, kinda shaky on the ebay deal, have
not
heard from the seller as of yet.
Mathew
Good luck with it! repeater-builder.com
He did not tell me which radio he was using, just that it was a Kenwood, his
audio was quite wide as well compared to other users that was on the system
at the time. Getting him to beleive his transmitter is spurious would be
hard to do. If it continues after the changes and completion of the
I would agree on the regency being wide as an elephant, but not my Kenwood
TS-2000, on a horizontal antenna, getting the user 15 Khz away. That is why
I believe it's his transmitter, and the other excessive power. I had
another ham 7 miles away transmit on 146.310 with 10 watts and he never
If these are just mounts, and not the slide mounts that was back in the 70's
and 80's, there is a place in Michigan that has several models of them. A-1
Telecom. The company that is producing them is Pro-Trucker. Better built
than the ones Radioshack recently discontinued. If these are the
Ok, so then what about the transmitters, or is it the transmitters that have
to be equal? That is the part that I am missing, because the transmitted
audio into the voter comes in on 146 Mhz, and exits through a transmitter on
902 Mhz.
Mathew
The Doug Hall voter works on noise just above the
Rather than having the expense of landlines for the voter system, I want to
use receivers that is on 146.325 receive and have them transmit back to the
repeater via 902 MHZ, at least that is the way it was explained to me. I
have very little knowledge of voter systems, but am wanting to learn,
Exactly, so if my thinking is right then, I would need two receivers and one
transmitter for each site that I put up, if I understand this right. I was
told that the 902 Mhz band was ok to use as remote links, I hope that was
right. So then each site would have to have some type of controller to
On the order of this question, cna two units be used, one for transmit and
one for receive to make a repeater through a seperate controller.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 1:15 PM
Subject: Re:
I am located in Indiana, the call is W9MWQ and is good in QRZ.com. Thanks.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: David Schornak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Micor Key
where are you located or
Hi Don, greatly appreciated. I agree with you very much indeed. As I have
found out, my Regency receiver is a good example of a bad receiver. My goal
is to get the olr regency out of use and put one of the micors up and
running, so will see what happens.
Mathew
- Original Message -
Mathew
I am not familiar with that particular model antenna. I currently
use a DB224 antenna that I modified about 10 years ago for use at
145.49Mhz. I figured how much to lengthen the loops by using ratio and
proportion, I then cut the loops and added the necessary aluminum rod.
I had
not give you the best pattern either.
73's de Tom Manning, AAF4UG
Mathew Quaife wrote:
Mathew
I am not familiar with that particular model antenna. I currently
use a DB224 antenna that I modified about 10 years ago for use at
145.49Mhz. I figured how much to lengthen the loops
Hi dennis, Tom has got the money, so all is set. Thanks so very much.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 8:09 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] FS: Dulpexer and RBI-1
I have for sale a set of the Decibel
Neil, I read it. And agree, it's very informative. And at some point it
may become useful to me. If I did not already work 110 hours a week, and
had more time, I'd most likely pursue the radio repair that I left so long
ago. Right now, what my goal is, to get that long awaited repeater up and
Hi Dennis, just wanted to ask if you had tested this RBI-1 interface out
before selling it. Only reason I ask, is I hooked it up and am not getting
it to do anything, so I am not sure if the unit is functional or I am doing
something wrong. I turned on my Link 3 Port, which this is on an RLC2
Well the repeater is one that I built from a couple of regency repeaters,
which is going to be changed here in the near future. The duplexer is a TX
RX setup. Won't be able to get that much seperation, at most about 40 feet
is what I will be able to get, maybe 50. I can understand the
So then no real good way of doing it, is what i am gathering?
Would there be any advantage to putting the radio in an RF box for
shielding?
---The short answer? Only if you put the antenna(s) in a shielded box
too.
You're asking too much of physics by trying to run a remote base on the
it, I am
sure there is a way. I have filters I can use, but wanna try not to. See
what happens.
Mathew
Kevin is quite correct ... so you will do well to follow his
suggestions.
Is part of the been-there ... done that.
Neil McKie - WA6KLA
Kevin Custer wrote:
Mathew Quaife wrote
Ken is right, this problem is existing even into a dummy load, I have not
begun to expierment with the antenna issue yet. The lowest power setting on
the Kenwood is 5 watts, so that is what I have to work with.
Mathew
- Original Message -
At 01:09 PM 5/22/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Why?
In Hawaii, we did something similar. Our UHF repeater was at the 10,023
foot level (Mt. Haleakala, on Maui). We wanted coverage on the north shore
of the Big Island (Hawaii) and good coverage on the major parts of Maui.
As
such, we had one 5 element yagi facing south and one facing north, but
H trying to understand exactly what your idea is. Would the
beams be at the same level on the tower,or spaced at about a
wavelength or so apart down the tower? And pointed what directions???
Well the initial thought was to have them spaced a wavelenth apart, starting
at the top
My thoughts on this idea was to eliminate the need for the voting system,
save a few bucks, as this thing is coming out of my pocket, sad part is
momma has sewn the pockets shut, hi hi. But I think most of what is
being said is what I figured I would find, just thought maybe someone had a
good
You may not tape any conversation that you are not a part of. Federal Law.
The taping of illegal activity is not proof of action, but is probable cause
for investigation. Treason to the United States supersedes these laws, and
therefore would not be punishable, especially now more than ever.
Federal law prohibits the taping of any conversation without the knowledge
of one person in the conversation knowing it. So for me to tape a
conversation that I am not involved in, would be illegal. Look on the web
for Invasion of Privacy acts, as well as Audio Survellance, not spelled
right but
Thanks for the information. I looked at that one on Ebay, will most likely
do all that I need it to do.
Mathew
I like the Bird model 4275 which you can get from Tessco and others.
Also, if you use the Unidapt connector sets, RF Industries has a
coupler that works with that system.
Hi ted, thanks, I sent him an email, am waiting on him to get back with me
to see if he is able to program these for me. Appreciate it.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Ted Bleiman K9MDM - MDM Radio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004
Thanks, will look at both of the choices. Looks like it will be able to get
them up and running.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Al Wolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Digest Number 2541
Thanks Niel, this looks very interesting. Resurect the dead.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Programming for Motorola Syntor
Please click on
Hi Mike, have him goto Radioshack.com and go under manuals and look at the
detail replacment parts, he should find the xtal they use in their.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Mike WA6ILQ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 5:11 PM
Subject:
Here ya goIs all they tell ya
X1 11497989 CRYSTAL,TC-43 TYPE CX0551
X2 10592095 CRYSTAL,TC-43 48.045MHZCX0552
Hope it helps.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Mike WA6ILQ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Thanks Mike, if the same codes were not put into the weather radio, it
should not require the same codes to be sent is what I am thinking. I sent
a 1050 Hz tone from the service monitor, that did not open the receiver.
Somewhere in my boxes of junk I should have a plain old weather receiver.
Just
Depends on the module that you have installed in the unit. I have one
comming that is set for the 25 to 50 Mhz range. Then you have the high
band, ultra high band, and so one.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Laryn Lohman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent:
a broadband front end.
Ssb
-Original Message-
From: Mathew Quaife [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 9:02 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Cushman CE3
Depends on the module that you have installed in the unit. I have
Well that answers that, it will work on a regular weather radio, but will
not work on with the SAME. Well back to the drawing board. Guess I will
have to wait until the next storm rolls in.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Mike WA6ILQ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Thanks Jim, just that I work on Wednesdays, I'm just not winning here. If I
could get a schematic of this critter then I would be able to tell what I am
looking for. All I need to know is which way the diode lights go when the
tones go off. Actually if I could just fine one of the old
to program the SAME receivers
with so they will respond to ANY alert, but they still use the SAME data
- they just ignore the FIPS (area) code.
To guess your next question, I am not aware
of any SMs that generate SAME coding.
Joe M.
Mathew Quaife wrote:
Thanks Mike, if the same codes were
you ever wanted to know about SAME go here:
http://www.nws.noaa.gov/nwr/same.pdf
Henry, K4HAL
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What about a singal generator, think that would send them?
Mathew
On all the units that I have, they either
That looks like the ticket. A little on the pricy side, but seems it would
be a better control than relying on the system to shut it down. Thanks for
the info.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Jim, KC1RM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 07,
Hi Al, the signal is not the issue, I don't seem to be getting any problems
there. What I need is to know what side of the leds to connect, and then I
have to get them to a set of relays. I have to be honest here, it's been 15
years since I have done anything with electronics, and my memory
Yes that would work. I am going to try and trigger the SAME this weekend, I
got the files to work with that they use. I was just going to use the
voltages from the leds into a relay and send it on to the RLC controller.
Wish me luck, should be able to get it. If not, I'll try again.
Mathew
Would this be the same on the Syntor as well, and what would this componet
be.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Richard Velez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 7:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Syntor X
If you email me directly
Hopefully it is just somthing interfering and no damage has been done, Then
you would know your intermittant duty amp passed the light duty mode. Good
Luck.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: rtoplus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004
, 2004 7:00 AM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Syntor X
I don't believe so, Matthew... The Syntor X was quite a redesign, and a
number of components were physically moved in the circuitry from the
original to the X model.
Mark - N9WYS
-Original Message-
From: Mathew Quaife [mailto
,HEE
Mathew Quaife wrote:
Can anyone tell me, I have a CE-3 cushman, performs outbound, but will
not
recieve any signals of any kind, there is no audio output, any Ideas.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Hi Jed, I once read that the shortest lenght possible, but I think they were
talking from the duplexer to the radio. But if you have the old ones,
measure them and make them the same length. What makes you think they need
replaced? Unless fraid, would have to say they should be ok, well
Good question then Russ, what makes the 214/U a better cable than the
LMR400, I can understand the 9913, hollow center, but LMR400 is shielded
quite well. Just for my own knowledge here.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: russ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent:
At 12:08 AM 6/11/2004 -, you wrote:
Need some input on this, what others think. I am trying to pull all
the Regency stuff from the repeater, only thing left is the
transmitter. I want to use a Yaesu FT-10R as an exciter for the amp
to the repeater. What are some thoughts on this. I
I am told that the noise ratio is greater with the 1902 as it was with the
1302, is this true. Told about .5 db to 1.3 db. Any thoughts.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 9:29 AM
: Thursday, June 10, 2004 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexer cable question
Mathew Quaife wrote:
Good question then Russ, what makes the 214/U a better cable than the
LMR400, I can understand the 9913, hollow center, but LMR400 is shielded
quite well. Just for my own knowledge here
.
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message -
From: Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts
Ideas
At 12:08 AM 6/11/2004 -, you wrote:
Need
Thanks Russ, well I will have to change them then. Thanks for the help on
that. Clears it up.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: russ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 7:20 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] RG-214/U
Hello All,
Just a
and suffer until you do.
Been there - done that !!!
73,
Neil - WA6KLA
Mathew Quaife wrote:
It's the hundred bucks they want to convert the Xtals, well that
is what I am told they cost to get converted. I just want this
thing to be rock solid so that I don't have to do much
-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 8:08 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter - Thoughts
Ideas
$79.95 for a 2C (2PPM) ICOM. I have 2 at ICM now getting recrystalled.
Jamey
KD4SIY
-Original Message-
From: Mathew Quaife [mailto:[EMAIL
Thanks Niel, actually I need a VHF exciter. What I have is working, but
would rather have something a little better built than the regency.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 9:15 PM
Subject:
PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a Transmitter -Thoughts
Ideas
--- Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Niel, actually I need a VHF exciter. What I
have is working, but
would rather
Ok, couple of questions. Is RG400 a solid
center conductor, or is it stranded. The Cable that I have here was
supposed to be LMR400, but that is made by Times Microwave, and the cable that I
used on the repeater is made by Ultralink, Cushcradt, Manchester NH. Does
not really have any
Yes, they are in the 163 Mhz range. When I press the mic button the radio
keys up, just no power output.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Micor 4
Found them, not off frequency, just add the 5. Thanks.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: w9mwq [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 3:53 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Spirit MU21CV Radio Frequencies
I know this is a bit off thread, but
switch in
the control head is not connected to ground - anywhere.
Neil
Mathew Quaife wrote:
Yes, they are in the 163 Mhz range. When I press the mic button
the radio keys up, just no power output.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED
- anywhere.
Neil
Mathew Quaife wrote:
Yes, they are in the 163 Mhz range. When I press the mic button
the radio keys up, just no power output.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday
the
Channel Element and locate the one connection that goes to the edge
connector P-902 on the Exciter and P-904 on the Receiver.
See that the one wire is grounded.
Neil
Mathew Quaife wrote:
Xtal cases seem to be intact, was told they xtals were still in
there. Even so, I get no power
) at the
factory on all one frequency radios prior to shipment.
Neil
Mathew Quaife wrote:
If I understand what you are asking, pin one of each board is ground on
here. There is a ground wire on the power connector that is connected
to
ground. Is this what you are referring to.
Mathew
to someone close to you that has a working test
setup to check the rig. Or get a non scanning 4 channel cable and head
from
e-bay.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Mathew Quaife [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 11:58 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject
the
frequency 1 select on the center board (Control Board) at the
factory on all one frequency radios prior to shipment.
Neil
Mathew Quaife wrote:
If I understand what you are asking, pin one of each board is
ground on
here. There is a ground wire on the power
-
From: Mathew Quaife [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 1:27 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Micor 4 Channel Help Needed
Well from what I see, that is what I have, the head that has the volume
and
squelch also has the 4 channel
Thanks Charles, any idea what kind of price one might be looking at for the
harness? Know of any that were bought. We was just going to attempt to
build one with RG-11 coax. If it is cheap enough to buy one, just may do
that.
Mathew
- Original Message -
From: Charles Miller [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 486 matches
Mail list logo
