Hey Christian,
What you can do in this case is to set your main repository URL to be your
anonymous path (which Review Board will use for checkouts), and then set
Mirror Path to be your developer SVN URL. When looking up a URL, it will
check against both of those URLs, and should find the
First of all let me thank all developers and contributors for this
wonderful project. I have been using Reviewboard for the past couple
of months in my organization and found this extremely useful. This is
a great improvement over an internal tool that we had that helped in
generating pretty html
Hi Cristian,
Server version: Apache/2.2.10 (Linux/SUSE)
Server built: Dec 3 2008 13:33:50
After a few fits and starts, the install was pretty straightforward.
Almost by the book I think. At first I was trying to put reviewboard
in a subdirectory, but I backed off of that and ran rb-site
Here is my reviewboard.conf file. The only modification that I know
if is that its running on port 8080. Let me know if there is another
configuration file that would illuminating.
VirtualHost *:8080
ServerName ilmwiki0.cup.hp.com
DocumentRoot /srv/www/reviews/htdocs
#
The downloadable diff for the review is 1.6MB.
The review has 138 different files (7 pages).
Page 1 loads in ~1 minute in FireFox. The twenty files are on average
38 K. (max=118K, min=2K). Here all files have edit changes (no deleted
files.)
Page 3 loads in ~3 minutes in FireFox. The twenty
Hey David,
Thanks for the response. I'm willing to help out on this. Sadly don't know
where to start from. I looked at
all the other scmtools in the repository. I guess I need to come out with
another such interface for cmsynergy.
Are there any docs that I can refer to?
--aditya
On Tue, Mar 17,
Hi Raghu,
Thanks for the nice words about the project!
Screenshots themselves are stored in your site's
htdocs/media/uploaded/images/ directory. They're referenced in the database
but not stored there.
There's no way to archive review requests from the database. I honestly
don't know how we'd
Glad it works. I'm writing new docs that I hope to post before long (a
couple pages to go through and they should be ready) and they'll address
Mirror Path and talk about when it's useful.
Yeah, go ahead and submit a bug for that. Our handling should ideally be
less strict.
Christian
--
We went with this method because it was similar to our existing method
we used at VMware, and we wanted to provide a smooth transition. This
actually works out quite well for us still.
You can set 1 diff per page in the Diff Viewer settings in the admin
UI, but the file listing only shows the
Comment #3 on issue 933 by chipx86: Clicking expand triggers review comment
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=933
Issue 961 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred
Comment #2 on issue 965 by brad.taylor: Edit buttons on Review Request
screen are not accessible
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=965
Additionally, the edit buttons are not focusable, so I'll have to figure a
way to
make that happen also.
--
You received this message
Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Labels: Milestone-Release1.0 Component-Reviews
Comment #3 on issue 965 by chipx86: Edit buttons on Review Request screen
are not accessible
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=965
Can you submit this to our Review Board server?
--
Comment #4 on issue 965 by brad.taylor: Edit buttons on Review Request
screen are not accessible
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=965
Updated patch to make the button focusable (by using an a tag) and thus
clickable
via Firefox (when a user hits Enter, Firefox will
Comment #1 on issue 914 by ciaomary: API Broken Alpha2:
api/json/reviewrequests/rid/reviews/
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=914
The fix for my issue was found. I needed to pass in id=$rid with the
request.
This is not documented in the API doc however. I request that
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 967 by psc...@vmware.com: repository hostname lookups are not
really canonical
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=967
Currently, post-review relies on calls to various socket module functions
in order to
15 matches
Mail list logo