, June 8, 2015 at 3:00:31 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote:
Steve,
It's pretty hard for us to do support for post-review, since it's
completely obsolete (and 0.5.2 is pretty old). That said, can you give us
the output of running post-review with --debug in a case where this problem
is showing
The only real solution is to go in and fix up the database. The django
shell may be helpful in writing some code to do it.
-David
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:44 AM nolan Anderson
nolan.thomas.ander...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, that's correct -- if this is an issue, is there any easy solution?
--
That page includes instructions for how to fix it. You may need to restart
apache after running those commands.
-David
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:41 AM 李天美 emome...@gmail.com wrote:
I also meet this problem, and I don't know how to fix it.I need help
在 2013年8月21日星期三
Steve,
It's pretty hard for us to do support for post-review, since it's
completely obsolete (and 0.5.2 is pretty old). That said, can you give us
the output of running post-review with --debug in a case where this problem
is showing up?
BTW, why are you planning to upgrade to 0.6.3 instead of
Hi,
There were several bugs causing incorrect counters, but the last of them
was fixed in 2.0.15. If you upgrade, it should fix them for good.
-David
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:39 AM dang.tab dang.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I am running 2.0.14 on a Ubuntu 14.04 LTE host. The database is Postgresql
It looks like perhaps some diffsets have the basedir set to a URL instead
of a path prefix?
-David
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:36 PM nolan Anderson
nolan.thomas.ander...@gmail.com wrote:
We migrated our svn repos from one server to the other, and I have since
updated the repository paths on the
There's certainly no such integration today. I'm not at all familiar with
SonarQube, but if it has APIs you could probably build something using
Review Board's extensions framework.
-David
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:03 AM Narayan kumar Ch narayan@gmail.com
wrote:
As part of Developers' self
Can you share the details of your configuration? Are there any errors in
the server logs or the browser's JavaScript console?
-David
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 4:34 AM shilpageo shilpa.anan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using reviewboard 2.0.13 and ubuntu. After installing subvertpy
and
What do you mean? Many, many people run 2.0.15 in production.
-David
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 7:08 PM MoonWalker daniel.cabrera...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would love to use RB 2.0.15, but I prefer to wait until is production
ready. Any idea when this may happen?
cheers
--
Supercharge your
David,
We do have a prototype implementation of allowing people (including admins)
to change the ownership of a review request, but for now, changing it in
the Database section of the admin UI should work. You're right that
you'll likely need to fix the open counts, which can be done by running
Bruce,
We're making progress on getting RBTools to be Python 3.x ready, but it's
not there yet. Most of the time, when there are multiple versions of python
installed, there will also be multiple versions of easy_install, so you can
probably do `easy_install-2.7 RBTools` and it will work.
-David
Hi,
This bug has already been fixed in git and will ship in 0.7.3 (which is
coming soon).
-David
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:32 AM Jam kamaliang2...@gmail.com wrote:
Client OS: Windows7 64
Review board: 2.0.15
Server OS: Centos6.6 64
rtb.exe: 0.7.2
H:\practise\reviewboard\testrbt
The items shown in RBTools Setup shouldn't include the repository URL (it
has the Review Board server URL as configured in the General settings
page, and the name of the repository).
-David
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:27 AM Eric Johnson e...@tibco.com wrote:
Hopefully a quick question.
What
and then displayed?
Or is the entire file content saved in the database, which is fetched and
displayed?
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 1:32:33 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
That error is coming from the server (the server is trying to log
in--it's not downloading credentials
No, there is no way to do this. Most people create a new read-only user to
use for Review Board.
-David
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:29 AM Francois francois.chardavo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Our current setup involves a number of SVN/git repositories, where only a
sub-group of users have access to
it out again then (as long as I can renew my 30 day trial)
I want to say a big thank you for all the assistance, I appreciate it.
All the best.
Cormick.
On Tuesday, 19 May 2015 22:55:28 UTC+1, David Trowbridge wrote:
Hi,
Unfortunately, the TFS 2012 server doesn't include the REST API
Sure, anything is possible, but it's probably a lot of work.
-David
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:49 PM Snehasish Maity 91snehas...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi David,
Thnx for the info. But review board is open source. So is this possible by
doing any code changes?
Thnx,
Snehasish Maity
--
Eric,
Thanks so much for this! As you note, we usually don't hear from people
when it just works (which I hope is most of the time), so this is very much
appreciated!
-David
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:59 AM Eric Johnson e...@tibco.com wrote:
Usually you get support requests on this mailing
Hi,
Unfortunately, the TFS 2012 server doesn't include the REST API that we
use. This is something that we're looking into, but for now you'll have to
have TFS 2013 on the server.
-David
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:36 AM Cormick Nugent cormicknug...@gmail.com
wrote:
More on this.
When I run
This is not possible. Review Board is designed on the idea of relatively
open collaboration and discussion, rather than trying to lock down roles.
-David
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:33 AM Snehasish Maity 91snehas...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I am having a problem with setting user permission. I
I suggest looking at the init_logging method in rbtools/commands/__init__.py
-David
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 2:47 AM Steve seide.al...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a problem of my own creation, but hopefully someone can help me
out. I'm essentially wrapping the functionality provided by the rbt
Sri,
Those permissions are auto-created inside of Django and we generally don't
do anything special inside of the Review Board UI for them. Until now we've
taken the approach that users are either full admins or normal users.
The API does use some of these permissions to grant access to some
In Review Board 2.5, you'll be able to add new admin widgets via the
extension interfaces:
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/2.5/extending/extensions/hooks/admin-widget-hook/
I'll also take this opportunity to plug the Power Pack (
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/), which has some
?
--Steve
On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 at 5:02:49 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote:
--username is for authenticating to the review board server. --submit-as
is for impersonating another user (assuming the authenticated user has the
right permissions) after authentication.
The aforementioned
Have you tried restarting the web server (apache)?
-David
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:12 AM Papaswede papasw...@gmail.com wrote:
I've upgraded my ReviewBoard site and am now getting the errors in the
attached screenshot. The first and last errors don't make sense to me,
because
UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote:
Can you clarify your use case? These two things shouldn't be easy to
misuse.
-David
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:31 AM Steve seide...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks David. I think I've been using --username when I should be using
--submit-as. How does RB
a
comment?, Also I need to get some sort of feedback from the rbt tool to
find out if 1) new review 2) existent review 3) error
On Friday, May 1, 2015 at 8:00:51 AM UTC+10, David Trowbridge wrote:
Perhaps the -u flag will do what you want?
-David
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:58 PM MoonWalker daniel.c
With the built-in commands, no. With the python API that's part of rbt, yes.
-David
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:40 PM MoonWalker daniel.cabrera...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is it possible to post a comment to a given review by using rbt?
On Friday, May 1, 2015 at 8:36:53 AM UTC+10, David Trowbridge
30, 2015 at 3:53 PM MoonWalker daniel.cabrera...@gmail.com
wrote:
Any plans to expand the set of commands supported by rbt ?. Do you
recommend a workaround to achieve something similar of what I need?
On Friday, May 1, 2015 at 8:48:02 AM UTC+10, David Trowbridge wrote:
With the built
--username is for authenticating to the review board server. --submit-as is
for impersonating another user (assuming the authenticated user has the
right permissions) after authentication.
The aforementioned scenario (having a post-commit hook or CI task) to post
review requests on behalf of
Hi,
Internally, in the case of an unpushed branch, Review Board does store a
parent diff between the parent revision and the posted diff. However,
this is not exposed to the user. Typically what will happen in this case is
that the parent changes will have their own review requests, in which case
Would you be able to test with a more modern rbtools? 0.5.7 is pretty old.
-David
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:03 AM Nicolas Comet nicolas.co...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
When any of my colleague (including me) are trying to post with the rbt
post -d command, we get this stacktrace :
That error is coming from the server (the server is trying to log in--it's
not downloading credentials to the client). It can't use your credentials
from the client because it also needs to communicate with the repository
when people view the diff.
-David
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:04 PM unknown
Yeah, the raw file URL needs to have the revision in there somewhere. Since
you're using GitLab, you should just choose GitLab instead of None -
Custom Repository
-David
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:52 AM Stephen Gallagher
step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:49 AM James
How long depends on whether the moderators are asleep.
-David
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:11 AM GC varuag.chha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Today i tried posting a query for the first time. This was done around
three hours back but i'm yet to see it on the board. Subject line was Command
Line
How have you configured the repository on Review Board?
-David
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:50 PM James Knight james.d.kni...@live.com
wrote:
So I wasn't using RBTools but I figured I'd try it first to see a working
solution with rbt rather than using the web interface.
After installing and
What version of Review Board and RBTools are you running?
-David
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:11 PM Steve seide.al...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking further into this, it appears that when I run
rbt post -r 3 CL
commit_id for RR 3 gets updated with the new cl number, but changenum does
not. The
Would you mind filing a bug on our issue tracker?
Thanks,
-David
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:35 PM Steve seide.al...@gmail.com wrote:
Oops, sorry for forgetting that.
Review Board 2.0.15
RBTools 0.7.2
--steve
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 2:22:17 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote:
What
Satish,
We try pretty hard to make the extension framework backward- and
forward-compatible, but depending on how complex your extension is, it
might be tricky. Can you tell us a bit about what you're building?
-David
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:40 PM satish singh trivi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
P4Python is a library created by Perforce to interface with their system.
I'm not sure that understanding how P4Python works will help you in
implementing a different system.
You'll want to look at the SCMTool implementations within the Review Board
source tree. You can create your new SCMTool as
Parthiban,
It's possible that the SpiffyEmailMessage class and some of the utility
functions might be useful to you. Beyond that, everything else should just
be set up for you to use Django's built-in e-mail APIs.
-David
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:48 AM Parthiban parthi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Publicly accessible is used for access control (and will restrict whether
people can see review requests posted against that repository). The
check-box you want is Show this repository
-David
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:53 PM MoonWalker daniel.cabrera...@gmail.com
wrote:
hi,
We are in the
The URL will be your reviewboard URL plus /s/trial_reviewboard1/
-David
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 9:53 PM shilpageo shilpa.anan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have reviewboard site /trial/reviewboard/ . In which I have created
local site of name trial_reviewboard1. What is url of local site?
Instead of registering the new name as a new repository, just update the
existing repository inside the Review Board admin to point to the new
hostname. After that, everything should work fine.
-David
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:04 PM Steve seide.al...@gmail.com wrote:
Our company has decided to
Hi,
Review Board is a very complex application with significant backend code in
Python. Extracting a single feature and integrating it into a separate
application is not going to be feasible.
-David
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:14 PM Boopathy N boopat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Team,
We
Can you please include the full --debug output?
Thanks,
-David
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:41 AM 陈晓辉 sdqx...@gmail.com wrote:
Got API Error 224 (HTTP code 400): The specified diff file could not
be parsed.
Error data: {u'stat': u'fail', u'reason': ufatal: Not a git
repository: 'None'\n,
Have you configured your database to be utf8? By default, MySQL uses
ISO-Latin-1.
-David
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:26 PM Ovidiu-Florin BOGDAN ovidiu@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm trying to create a team with the name containing these characters:
ăâșțî
I get an error that the team name contains
release of RBT be?
joi, 12 martie 2015, 00:47:09 UTC+2, David Trowbridge a scris:
Thanks for the debug info. I'm currently working on this, and we'll get
it fixed in the next version of RBTools.
-David
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 6:02 AM Ovidiu-Florin BOGDAN ovidi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Fixed
Hi,
It's failing because your post-commit hook is not running with the cwd as a
repository working directory. You can fix this by adding --repository-url=
http://192.168.0.2:18080/svn/IT to your rbt post command-line.
-David
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 12:24 AM Randhir Singh
Terry,
This currently isn't possible. Can you file an enhancement request in our
bug tracker?
Thanks,
-David
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:33 AM Dunnigan, Terrence J
terrence.j.dunni...@boeing.com wrote:
Hi all,
When I view the server log (/admin/log/server/) all of the entries have a
GMT
Vjiay,
I answered you over on the reviewboard-dev mailing list, but the trick is
to use the ?expand parameter to navigate the tree of resources.
The webapi is designed as a tree--each review request contains links to a
bunch of reviews, and each review contains links to comments. Using ?expand
I'm not entirely sure what you mean load one site at a time.
Can you share your review board and apache configurations?
-David
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:18 PM shilpageo shilpa.anan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using Reviewboard 2.0.13, Apache 2.4, mod_wsgi and Windows. I
have created
Thanks for the debug info. I'm currently working on this, and we'll get it
fixed in the next version of RBTools.
-David
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 6:02 AM Ovidiu-Florin BOGDAN ovidiu@gmail.com
wrote:
Fixed. Once the character – ( using ISO-8859-15 encoding ) that looks
like == was removed
Johan,
It looks like there's actually a partially-completed upgrade on that
server, and it's just being exposed by trying to activate the extension.
Can you run `rb-site upgrade /path/to/site` ?
-David
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:45 AM Johan Borkhuis borkh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I tried
, this doesn't even make
sense to me. the page is blank and F12 show out in lower pane of image. I
don't see any 404 errors
Josephine
On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 3:28:55 PM UTC-5, David Trowbridge wrote:
If you look at the HTML of the page (or look at the 404 errors in the
browser debug tools
If you look at the HTML of the page (or look at the 404 errors in the
browser debug tools), what URLs are being used for media like
jquery-1.8.2.min.js?
-David
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:28 AM Josephine O'Para jo.ak@gmail.com
wrote:
Additional information.
Web page suggests some files
: true}
Thank you for the response. Let me know if I am missing something.
On Friday, February 27, 2015 at 3:51:21 PM UTC-8, David Trowbridge wrote:
Hi,
Can you share what the repository configuration looks like in the Review
Board admin?
-David
On Thu Feb 26 2015 at 7:43:00 PM Jonathan
Probably the first thing is to add some additional logging to
reviewboard/hostingsvcs/bitbucket.py, especially around the get_file_exists
method.
-David
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 6:42 PM Jonathan Anderson
jonat...@webessenceonline.com wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
Any tips on how to debug this
Hi,
So I'm by far not an expert on the evolutions, but that change looks like
it's likely to break things pretty badly (in particular, file-attachment
only review requests). Christian, any thoughts on what's causing the errors?
-David
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 7:40 AM Srinidhi B S
,
Panikera
On Thursday, February 26, 2015 at 1:17:00 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge
wrote:
The command you ran with --debug doesn't list the revisions you were
trying to post, so it ran down a different code path.
Please run rbt post --debug 45277:45275 and send the output of that.
-David
Hi,
This is a bug, and we'll get a fix in soon.
-David
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:51 PM Xy Sui oswi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just found that’s another change without compatibility after rbtools
upgrade.
In rbtools 0.5.x, the order to search one config in all .reviewboardrc
files is
After saving, is it in the list at /admin/db/scmtools/repository/ ?
-David
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:57 AM Hanna-John hanna.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
I add the details as in the documentation, save all is ok- no way to test
if it was added properly, and when I go to create review request, I can
Hi,
Can you share what the repository configuration looks like in the Review
Board admin?
-David
On Thu Feb 26 2015 at 7:43:00 PM Jonathan Anderson
jonat...@webessenceonline.com wrote:
Hello,
I am using bitbucket as my repo and it's configured in reviewboard as a
repo. Tried to google and
.
-David
On Wed Feb 25 2015 at 2:10:58 PM Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com
wrote:
On Feb 25, 2015, at 16:30, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote:
What does the web server configuration look like?
VirtualHost *:80
ServerName hepdsw-rb.bose.com
DocumentRoot /var
\post.py, line 654, in main
raise CommandError(There don't seem to be any diffs!)
rbtools.commands.CommandError: There don't seem to be any diffs!
Please suggest me on this, Thanks In Advance...
Regards,
Panikera
On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at 2:34:07 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge
What does the web server configuration look like?
-David
On Wed Feb 25 2015 at 1:17:53 PM Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com
wrote:
Does anyone have any idea what could be causing the problem described
below?
Alfred
On Feb 24, 2015, at 10:05, Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com
Callum,
We've been working on adding TFS support to the Power Pack for Review
Board. We expect to release this sometime today or tomorrow.
At the moment, this only supports TFVC, but we expect to add TF git very
soon.
-David
On Mon Feb 23 2015 at 1:32:02 AM Callum Bradbury
First of all, some questions:
- What version of RBTools do you have installed?
- What version control system is this? SVN?
Second, can you run again with --debug and send the output?
-David
On Mon Feb 23 2015 at 2:51:02 AM Panikera Raj panikera.raj...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I am using
What version of Review Board? Is this with SVN? How is the diff being
generated? How is the diff being uploaded?
-David
On Mon Feb 23 2015 at 2:11:37 AM shravanthi s shrav...@gmail.com wrote:
One of our users had issues updating a diff in one of the reviews as the
base directory path which
This is currently not supported, and not likely to be supported soon (due
to the way the database schema is designed). I'd suggest using two separate
review requests and cross-linking them using the Depends On field.
-David
On Mon Feb 23 2015 at 12:12:19 PM Anon lavina.j...@gmail.com wrote:
You may want to follow up with the administrator of the apache server, to
check if there are any errors there.
That said, my first question is: how did you generate your patch, and how
big is it?
-David
On Thu Feb 19 2015 at 11:40:27 AM Wei Zheng wzh...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I'm using
is:
git diff HEAD --no-prefix foo.patch
I did send an email to the administrator, waiting for his/her reply..
Thanks,
Wei
On Thursday, February 19, 2015 at 11:41:12 AM UTC-8, David Trowbridge
wrote:
You may want to follow up with the administrator of the apache server, to
check
Thanks for debugging. We'll get a fix in for the next 2.0.x release.
-David
On Thu Feb 19 2015 at 7:46:29 AM Stefan Seeger der.se...@gmail.com wrote:
I had another look into the issue,
the following fixes the wrong logging and creates a log with the real
problem in reviewboard.log
except
Thanks for the patch on reviews.reviewboard.org! I've landed it, and it
will ship in the next RBTools release.
-David
On Wed Feb 18 2015 at 8:25:28 AM Halvor Lund halvor.l...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having trouble posting review requests using the web API if the
summary or description contains
Terry,
Answers below. Just a note that we're also happy to answer Power Pack
questions at supp...@beanbaginc.com
2) Are there any plans to support MS Office file formats natively?
Instead of having to convert to PDF?
Yes! This is something we've been investigating for a while, and
Piotr,
The Plastic SCM support in Review Board was a contribution from Codice (the
makers of Plastic). I'd suggest raising this issue with them and asking
them to provide a patch for us.
-David
On Mon Feb 16 2015 at 1:00:09 PM Piotr Mis mis...@mis.krakow.pl wrote:
Hi
Recently in PlasticSCM
Would it be possible for you to test with the just-released 2.0.13? We've
improved several aspects of parsing git diffs.
-David
On Thu Feb 12 2015 at 4:11:53 PM Liam Reimers liam.reim...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm having this exact issue as well. Is there any additional information I
can post to
One more question-- is there a reason why you're going 1.7.7.1 - 1.7.8,
instead of just jumping straight to the latest 1.7.x (or even latest
2.0.x)? There have been a great many bugs fixed since 1.7.8, including, I
believe, some about key lengths with mysql utf-8 indexes.
-David
On Wed Feb 11
Like many other websites, Review Board just uses what your browser
requests. Your browser should allow you to configure which languages you
want to receive content in.
-David
On Fri Feb 06 2015 at 1:26:34 PM Giuseppe Gurgone ggurg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello there,
I was wondering if there is
are using CVS version control here.
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 04:30:40 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
It would help us to provide some advice if you told us what version
control system you're using. If you're using a traditional system like SVN
or Perforce, most people like to use git or hg
Hi,
This is currently not supported. We've done a fair amount of investigation
into what it would take to display old comments on new versions of the
diff, and it's a very difficult problem to do well. We'll continue thinking
about this, but for the time being, you'll just have to go back and
It would help us to provide some advice if you told us what version control
system you're using. If you're using a traditional system like SVN or
Perforce, most people like to use git or hg as a frontend to allow them to
keep separate things separate.
-David
On Mon Feb 02 2015 at 8:58:03 AM
Hi,
Can you run `rbt post --debug` and send the output here?
Thanks,
-David
On Sat Jan 31 2015 at 7:13:13 AM Panikera Raj panikera.raj...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I am new to this ReviewBoard tool.
We are integrated ReviewBoard with SVN. So I need to learn about this.
Please provide some
Hi,
Can you tell us what version of Review Board you're using?
Also, can you attach the output of 'rbt post --debug' and 'rbt diff'? (If
the latter is sensitive, let us know and we can figure something out).
-David
On Fri Jan 30 2015 at 6:16:36 PM Alexander Pivovarov apivova...@gmail.com
Hi Daniel,
Do you think you could add some code to print out the contents of 'log'
inside _convert_symbolic_revision before we try to construct the etree?
Thanks,
-David
On Fri Jan 30 2015 at 4:48:37 AM Daniel Laird daniel.j.la...@googlemail.com
wrote:
We have a shared Debian server and we
, 2015 at 9:35:25 AM UTC-8, David Trowbridge wrote:
Hi,
Can you tell us what version of Review Board you're using?
Also, can you attach the output of 'rbt post --debug' and 'rbt diff'? (If
the latter is sensitive, let us know and we can figure something out).
-David
On Fri Jan 30 2015
allowed to upload not prefixed patches 10 days
ago. e.g. https://reviews.apache.org/r/30003/
Did you guys fix smth last week?
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 2:27:19 PM UTC-8, David Trowbridge wrote:
OK, the issue is the noprefix line. I'll get a fix in for rbtools but in
the meantime, if you
email = apivova...@lendingclub.com
[branch]
autosetuprebase = always
[push]
default = simple
[pull]
rebase = true
[diff]
noprefix = true
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 1:05:27 PM UTC-8, David Trowbridge wrote:
Can you tell me what's in your .gitconfig?
-David
working copy because SVN revision 200 was
nothing for me now.
However, I can't find a way to create diffs for it.
David Trowbridge於 2015年1月28日星期三 UTC+8上午7時41分08秒寫道：
This is currently only possible if you create the diff yourself and post
using --diff-file name. Could you explain your use case
This has not been done yet.
-David
On Wed Jan 28 2015 at 8:35:59 PM Kevin Brotcke brot...@gmail.com wrote:
Did this enhancement ever get added or someone start working on it?
On Wednesday, February 1, 2012 at 4:44:56 AM UTC-5, Christian Hammond
wrote:
Depending on how you do it, yeah,
Rather than making modifications to the source, I'd recommend doing this
with a trivial extension. You can add anything to the top-level navigation
bar using this hook:
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/2.0/extending/extensions/hooks/navigation-bar-hook/
-David
On Wed Jan 28 2015 at
This is currently only possible if you create the diff yourself and post
using --diff-file name. Could you explain your use case for digging between
a non-HEAD revision and your working copy?
-David
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:04 PM Yu-Kai Tseng tanists...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
May I create a
Unfortunately there's nothing we can do about very old releases like this
(the dependencies are baked in). New releases are more specific in their
dependencies for exactly this reason.
-David
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:34 AM rahul emmatty rahulb1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
There seems to be a
It doesn't right now. Would you mind filing an enhancement request in the
issue tracker?
-David
On Thu Jan 15 2015 at 7:40:46 AM Justin Palmer justinpalme...@gmail.com
wrote:
Rally isn’t in the intitial batch
I'm a fan of JIRA, but my company uses Rally. Does or will Review Board
support
I don't know what you mean by RB server version 1.7.5 and its RBTools
version. There's not a tight coupling between Review Board and RBTools
releases. Please tell us which version you're using.
-David
On Tue Jan 13 2015 at 12:11:05 PM Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear All,
I
It looks like there's a problem with your mod_python.
mod_python is deprecated and unmaintained. The recommended way to deploy
Python applications with Apache (including Review Board) is mod_wsgi.
-David
On Mon Jan 12 2015 at 7:36:32 AM Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear All,
I
Somehow something got corrupted in your database. If you go to Admin
Database Local site profiles, you should see two entries for the user who
is encountering this. If you delete one, everything should work correctly.
-David
On Mon Jan 12 2015 at 9:37:57 AM xfwangche...@gmail.com wrote:
, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com
wrote:
It looks like there's a problem with your mod_python.
mod_python is deprecated and unmaintained. The recommended way to deploy
Python applications with Apache (including Review Board) is mod_wsgi.
-David
On Mon Jan 12 2015 at 7:36:32 AM Nilesh
Can you go into a little more detail about how you installed the Review
Board package itself?
-David
On Thu Jan 08 2015 at 4:59:15 PM Justin Palmer justinpalme...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've been wrestling with Review Board for a few days. I installed 2.0.11
and now 2.0.12 on CentOS (RHEL) 6.0 and
-1.6.8-py2.7.egg/django/db/backends/mysql/base.py:124:
Warning: TIME/TIMESTAMP/DATETIME columns of old format have been upgraded
to the new format. return self.cursor.execute(query, args)
Thanks, Ravi
On Sunday, December 28, 2014 1:43:57 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
On Thu, Dec 25
801 - 900 of 1570 matches
Mail list logo
