Just upgraded by following the instructions in the documentation. Now
when I try accessing the RB site, it says:
Manual server updates required
A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server.
After these changes are made, you should restart your server.
If you have any
Hi Sam,
The versions of Python absolutely must match. Installing something into one
version and trying to use another is almost like installing something on
one computer and trying to run it from a separate one.
Have you tried reloading Apache after upgrading the site?
Christian
--
Christian
Ya. I restarted memcached and apache.
Regarding the python mismatch. I'm not sure why when I installed RB 1.6.1
it was in /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.1-py2.4.egg
But after the upgrade, it defaulted to install
in
Here is the output when I run rb-site upgrade:
# rb-site upgrade /home/reviewboard
Rebuilding directory structure
Updating database. This may take a while.
Creating tables ...
Installing custom SQL ...
Installing indexes ...
No fixtures found.
Hi,
Till now my post-review tool working fine now when i try to post new review
request i am getting error message as below
Error creating review request: One or more fields had errors (HTTP 400, API
Error 105)
How to fix this, what could be possible issues and where to look into, does
i need to
I also checked __init__.py and the VERSION = (1, 6, 4, 1, 'final', 0, True)
So I'm not sure how the mismatch message is saying that I'm currently
running 1.6.1
On Thursday, March 8, 2012 5:18:31 PM UTC+8, Sam wrote:
Just upgraded by following the instructions in the documentation. Now
when
Hi,
In the review board, when user send review request he can review his own
changes, But i want this to be restrict this and want only reviewer to whom
review request is send can review the code, How to do this?
Please suggestion.
Regards,
Nilesh J
--
Want to help the Review Board project?
Okay. Just figured it out. For some reason, my easy_install was installing
things into the python2.6 dir when it should be installing to python2.4
since django and wsgi are both running on 2.4.
After I reinstalled setuptools and re-did the update for ReviewBoard,
things went back to normal and
Sure, I'll do that. Thanks! I know my team will be happy to see that
in a future release!
On Mar 7, 12:49 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Okay, that's easier ;)
Would you like to file a feature request so we can track that?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond -
Click on the Admin link in the upper right, or go to /admin
-David
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Vivek vivekt.vi...@gmail.com wrote:
I am new to reviewboard and have never managed any code review tool
before (only used tools like code collaborator). So, pardon me for my
ignorance.
I
Review Board has no facilities for enforcing these kinds of policies.
-David
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In the review board, when user send review request he can review his own
changes, But i want this to be restrict this and want only
I've never done this myself, but I think it's probably possible. SVN has a
number of hook points where you can run scripts, including a post-commit
hook. After a quick search I found this:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.6/svn.reposadmin.create.html#svn.reposadmin.create.hooks
On Thursday,
Adding sys.stderr.write(sys.version) to the reviewboard.wsgi outputs the
following to my error.log:
[Thu Mar 08 20:00:33 2012] [error] 2.6.5 (r265:79063, Apr 16 2010, 14:15:55)
While trying print sys.version I got the following error:
[Thu Mar 08 19:51:21 2012] [error] [client 79.110.95.2]
Well, I kept googling and playing and finally I am one step further:
sudo chmod 755 -R /usr/local/lib/
After doing this, I get the Review Board is taking a nap page. Still
broken, but different errors.
Can anybody explain what I did?
-J
Am Donnerstag, 8. März 2012 20:02:06 UTC+1 schrieb Jan
Erm, good question.
What version of what distro are you using?
Christian
On Mar 8, 2012, at 13:56, Jan Piotrowski piotrow...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I kept googling and playing and finally I am one step further:
sudo chmod 755 -R /usr/local/lib/
After doing this, I get the Review Board
Installing python libraries on CentOS or RHEL 5 via easy_install causes
totally messed up permissions.
On Mar 8, 2012 4:19 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@gmail.com wrote:
Erm, good question.
What version of what distro are you using?
Christian
On Mar 8, 2012, at 13:56, Jan Piotrowski
This should be a useful function especially for design documents.
It would be best to support not only .doc but also .xls format.
-- Original --
From: Brianphxgat...@gmail.com;
Date: Thu, Mar 8, 2012 11:02 PM
To:
Hi David,
But this is the issue, how can we do this do you have any patch which will
help me in this regard
Regards,
Nilesh J
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:16 PM, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.comwrote:
Review Board has no facilities for enforcing these kinds of policies.
-David
On Thu,
Every page on Review Board will have that link, next to My Account, if
you are logged in as an administrator.
If you don't see it, your account is not an admin account.
The /admin URL means http://yoursite/admin
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -
No, there's no patch. We specifically don't want to introduce this
functionality, as we don't believe there's any value to limiting who can
offer feedback on code, and there would be a lot of work required to make
it work the way you're asking.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond -
Not reviewboard.org. Your own IP/domain for your Review Board instance.
If you're using your Review Board username and password on your own
install, and it's not working, you're not trying with the administrator
account you created when you first installed.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond -
I am very likely hitting this error mentioned in the reviewboard admin
guide:
Some Apache installations (such as the default installs on Debian and
Ubuntu) by default define a global virtual host that shares /var/www
as the document root. This may lead to problems with your install. If
you
Hi review board users, I just upgraded from version 1.0.1 to 1.6.3.
Most things are going smoothly. However, when I try to view a diff :
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-
py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 151, in
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2522 by ppr...@liwjatan.at: Hide inaccessible review requests
from All review requests list
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2522
* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. *
*
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 2523 by phxgat...@gmail.com: Allow reviewers to attach files
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2523
It would be great if reviewers were allowed to upload files of their own.
An example would be:
I
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2524 by bill.x...@gmail.com: email is no response
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2524
* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. *
* If you need immediate support, please
26 matches
Mail list logo
