Re: RB archive?
I don't want to distract from my original post but in short I had to move RB to a new machine (old HD was failing.) Plus I've been meaning to upgrade for a long time and this was my opportunity. Plus I had till end of today to get RB up and working (it actually took only a couple of hours). John Sent from my Kindle Fire _ From: Christian Hammond chip...@gmail.com Sent: Tue Sep 04 13:34:28 PDT 2012 To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com Cc: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: RB archive? Hi John, Just curious why you'd want to start from scratch. You should be able to safely upgrade without losing anything. Whatever you do, back up the database first. Christian On Sep 4, 2012, at 12:59, John A cppge...@gmail.com wrote: I'm upgrading to the latest RB. Instead of migrating existing code reviews I'd like to just archive existing reviews in my old 1.0.7 RB. Ideally the output is some document I can show interested parties (auditors etc) so pdf or even just plain old text would be great. Any thoughts on how to do this? Thanks in advance for your help! John Original Message From: Nilesh Jaiswal Sent: Mon, 03/09/2012 23:58 To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com CC: Subject: Re: Upgrade on Review board. Thank you !! On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@gmail.com wrote: I wouldn't recommend it right now. 1.7 beta is not ready for production use. Christian On Aug 31, 2012, at 4:51, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I would like to upgrade RB 1.6.9 with 1.7. Will it break my production setup. What should precaution should i need to take, Regards, Nilesh J -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: RB archive?
Thanks for the suggestion! Less than 10 lines of ruby and its done. Would be nice to have the output cleaned up a little and as a pdf but zipping the files as is will do fine for now. John Sent from my Kindle Fire _ From: scott.quesne...@gmail.com Sent: Tue Sep 04 13:03:35 PDT 2012 To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: RB archive? Why not use wget to retrieve all the reviews? The reviews are numbered sequentially, so start a 1 and go to the current number. You will the have the html representation of each of the review pages. To do this, you will need to use the cookie option on wget or curl. Scott Sent wirelessly from my BlackBerry device on the Bell network. Envoyé sans fil par mon terminal mobile BlackBerry sur le réseau de Bell. _ From: John A cppge...@gmail.com Sender: reviewboard@googlegroups.com Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:59:34 -0700 To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com ReplyTo: reviewboard@googlegroups.com Subject: RB archive? I'm upgrading to the latest RB. Instead of migrating existing code reviews I'd like to just archive existing reviews in my old 1.0.7 RB. Ideally the output is some document I can show interested parties (auditors etc) so pdf or even just plain old text would be great. Any thoughts on how to do this? Thanks in advance for your help! John Original Message From: Nilesh Jaiswal Sent: Mon, 03/09/2012 23:58 To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com CC: Subject: Re: Upgrade on Review board. Thank you !! On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@gmail.com wrote: I wouldn't recommend it right now. 1.7 beta is not ready for production use. Christian On Aug 31, 2012, at 4:51, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I would like to upgrade RB 1.6.9 with 1.7. Will it break my production setup. What should precaution should i need to take, Regards, Nilesh J -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board deployment in Apache
Thanks Christian ! I've installed Review Board 1.7 Beta1 in production environment on Apache. But it is showing Review Board is taking a nap message when I access. Please tell what's the wrong with this setup? Thanks, KVR On Tuesday, September 4, 2012 2:27:45 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi KVR, You'll want to follow our documentation on reviewboard.org. The administration guide walks you through setting up a site and deploying it. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:34 AM, kvr kvr...@gmail.com javascript:wrote: Hi, I've downloaded Review Board-1.7 beta1 code , added a widget and tested in development sever now it's time to deploy it , please tell me how to deploy it in Apache . Thanks in advance, KVR -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board deployment in Apache
There's a number of things that can go wrong, hence my advice that you don't install in a production environment. First thing to check is the reviewboard.log file and see if there's any information there that points to the problem. The Apache error log may also be useful. Christian On Sep 5, 2012, at 0:04, kvr kvr@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Christian ! I've installed Review Board 1.7 Beta1 in production environment on Apache. But it is showing Review Board is taking a nap message when I access. Please tell what's the wrong with this setup? Thanks, KVR On Tuesday, September 4, 2012 2:27:45 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi KVR, You'll want to follow our documentation on reviewboard.org. The administration guide walks you through setting up a site and deploying it. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:34 AM, kvr kvr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've downloaded Review Board-1.7 beta1 code , added a widget and tested in development sever now it's time to deploy it , please tell me how to deploy it in Apache . Thanks in advance, KVR -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Strange login problem with post-review
Hi,
We have a RB setup that has around ~50 users utilizing both post-review and
the RB UI.
As of today, all users are able to login successfully, however we have one
user that is not able
to utilize post-review for some reason. Based on the debug output, the
post-review command
thinks we have an older setup and always attempts to use the deprecated API
in order to login.
We are running version RB 1.6 RC2 and the latest RBTools. Here are the
traces from the current run
Password:
RBTools 0.4.1
HTTP GETting api/
URL *http://OUR_SERVER/api/ http://engin-server-01.austin.ibm.com/api/*
== HTTP Authentication Required
Enter authorization information for Web API at
engin-server-01.austin.ibm.com
Got HTTP error: 404: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN
htmlhead
title404 Not Found/title
/headbody
h1Not Found/h1
pThe requested URL /api/ was not found on this server./p
/body/html
Using the deprecated Review Board 1.0 web API
== Review Board Login Required
Enter username and password for Review Board at
*http://OUR_SERVER/http://engin-server-01.austin.ibm.com/
*
Logging in with username USER
URL
*http://OUR_SERVER/api/json/accounts/login/http://engin-server-01.austin.ibm.com/api/json/accounts/login/
*
HTTP POSTing to
*http:/OUR_SERVER/api/json/accounts/login/:http://engin-server-01.austin.ibm.com/api/json/accounts/login/:
* {'username': 'USER', 'password': '**'}
Got HTTP error: 404: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN
htmlhead
title404 Not Found/title
/headbody
h1Not Found/h1
pThe requested URL /api/json/accounts/login/ was not found on this
server./p
/body/html
Unable to log in: HTTP 404
All other users are able to utilize post review successfully except this
one user. Maybe they forgot to pay their monthly tab or something :)
Any help or advise is much appreciated.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board deployment in Apache
Thanks Christian ! Resolved this issue by installing pycrypto2.6. Now the site is up but not displayed properly, so checking the Apache error log. Thanks, KVR On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@gmail.com wrote: There's a number of things that can go wrong, hence my advice that you don't install in a production environment. First thing to check is the reviewboard.log file and see if there's any information there that points to the problem. The Apache error log may also be useful. Christian On Sep 5, 2012, at 0:04, kvr kvr@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Christian ! I've installed Review Board 1.7 Beta1 in production environment on Apache. But it is showing Review Board is taking a nap message when I access. Please tell what's the wrong with this setup? Thanks, KVR On Tuesday, September 4, 2012 2:27:45 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi KVR, You'll want to follow our documentation on reviewboard.org. The administration guide walks you through setting up a site and deploying it. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:34 AM, kvr kvr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've downloaded Review Board-1.7 beta1 code , added a widget and tested in development sever now it's time to deploy it , please tell me how to deploy it in Apache . Thanks in advance, KVR -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--**~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@** googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** group/reviewboard?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Regards, ram * * -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Strange login problem with post-review
Solved,
This turned out to be an issue with some proxy settings in the users .kshrc
file.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:20 AM, jacob.j.rosales
jacob.j.rosa...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
We have a RB setup that has around ~50 users utilizing both post-review
and the RB UI.
As of today, all users are able to login successfully, however we have one
user that is not able
to utilize post-review for some reason. Based on the debug output, the
post-review command
thinks we have an older setup and always attempts to use the deprecated
API in order to login.
We are running version RB 1.6 RC2 and the latest RBTools. Here are the
traces from the current run
Password:
RBTools 0.4.1
HTTP GETting api/
URL *http://OUR_SERVER/api/ http://engin-server-01.austin.ibm.com/api/
*
== HTTP Authentication Required
Enter authorization information for Web API at
engin-server-01.austin.ibm.com
Got HTTP error: 404: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN
htmlhead
title404 Not Found/title
/headbody
h1Not Found/h1
pThe requested URL /api/ was not found on this server./p
/body/html
Using the deprecated Review Board 1.0 web API
== Review Board Login Required
Enter username and password for Review Board at
*http://OUR_SERVER/http://engin-server-01.austin.ibm.com/
*
Logging in with username USER
URL
*http://OUR_SERVER/api/json/accounts/login/http://engin-server-01.austin.ibm.com/api/json/accounts/login/
*
HTTP POSTing to
*http:/OUR_SERVER/api/json/accounts/login/:http://engin-server-01.austin.ibm.com/api/json/accounts/login/:
* {'username': 'USER', 'password': '**'}
Got HTTP error: 404: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN
htmlhead
title404 Not Found/title
/headbody
h1Not Found/h1
pThe requested URL /api/json/accounts/login/ was not found on this
server./p
/body/html
Unable to log in: HTTP 404
All other users are able to utilize post review successfully except this
one user. Maybe they forgot to pay their monthly tab or something :)
Any help or advise is much appreciated.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
Those who see can't do,
Those who do can't see,
But those who believe can do anything
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
ClearCase directory diffs
Hi everyone, The post-review ClearCase client is supposed to be working both with dynamic and snapshot views. Although, in case of snapshot views it fails when review contains new files. The problem is related to the diff_directories() function which doesn't work with snapshot views. Additionally, if one manages to create diff file with directory diff, it does not work on Review Board side when the special case (denoted by .@@) extended path is used [1]. I have not managed to figure out a way to list directory contents in case of special case extended path neither in dynamic nor snapshot view. Therefore, why does the ClearCase client even pass the directory changes to review? Can this get removed? Both new and deleted files are already properly handled by Review Board, so why include semi-file which contains directory listing? Regards, Tomasz [1] http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/cchelp/v7r0m0/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.rational.clearcase.cc_ref.doc/topics/pathnames_ccase.htm -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: how to use nginx to host review board site
Dear Christian,
I setup refer to this link
http://www.rramsden.ca/blog/2011/09/26/nginx-reviewboard/.
My configuration is below:
server {
listen 80;
server_name review.mysite.com;
root /var/www/review.mysite.com/htdocs/;
location /media {
root /var/www/review.mysite.com/htdocs/;
}
location /errordoc {
root /var/www/review.mysite.com/htdocs/;
}
location / {
# host and port to fastcgi server
fastcgi_pass 127.0.0.1:3033;
fastcgi_param PATH_INFO $fastcgi_script_name;
fastcgi_param REQUEST_METHOD $request_method;
fastcgi_param QUERY_STRING $query_string;
fastcgi_param CONTENT_TYPE $content_type;
fastcgi_param CONTENT_LENGTH $content_length;
fastcgi_pass_header Authorization;
fastcgi_intercept_errors off;
}
}
But there is a strange problem. No error is reported on web on uploading
attachment/screenshot.
But in fact, no file is uploaded to media directory. If I place the file at
the right place under media
directory, it can not download from web.
Please help me.
Thanks!
Michael
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote:
Hi Michael,
Here's a configuration you can base yours off of:
upstream reviews {
server 127.0.0.1:6081;
}
server {
listen 80;
server_name reviews.reviewboard.org reviews.review-board.org;
access_log /var/www/reviews.reviewboard.org/logs/nginx_access_log;
error_log /var/www/reviews.reviewboard.org/logs/nginx_error_log;
location / {
proxy_pass http://reviews;
proxy_redirect off;
proxy_set_headerHost $host;
proxy_set_headerX-Real-IP $remote_addr;
proxy_set_headerX-Forwarded-For
$proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
client_max_body_size10m;
client_body_buffer_size 128k;
proxy_connect_timeout 90;
proxy_send_timeout 90;
proxy_read_timeout 90;
proxy_buffer_size 4k;
proxy_buffers 4 32k;
proxy_busy_buffers_size 64k;
proxy_temp_file_write_size 64k;
}
location /media/ {
alias /var/www/reviews.reviewboard.org/htdocs/media/;
if ($query_string) {
expires max;
}
}
location /static/ {
alias /var/www/reviews.reviewboard.org/htdocs/static/;
if ($query_string) {
expires max;
}
}
location /errordocs/ {
alias /var/www/reviews.reviewboard.org/htdocs/errordocs/;
expires 30d;
}
}
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Michael Zhu linuxsir...@gmail.comwrote:
Dear all,
I want to setup reviewboard using nginx. please help me.
thank you all.
B.R.
Michael
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Strange login problem with post-review
check if user's profile already exist, if yes then delete it and ask user
to try again login
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:50 PM, jacob.j.rosales
jacob.j.rosa...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
We have a RB setup that has around ~50 users utilizing both post-review
and the RB UI.
As of today, all users are able to login successfully, however we have one
user that is not able
to utilize post-review for some reason. Based on the debug output, the
post-review command
thinks we have an older setup and always attempts to use the deprecated
API in order to login.
We are running version RB 1.6 RC2 and the latest RBTools. Here are the
traces from the current run
Password:
RBTools 0.4.1
HTTP GETting api/
URL *http://OUR_SERVER/api/ http://engin-server-01.austin.ibm.com/api/
*
== HTTP Authentication Required
Enter authorization information for Web API at
engin-server-01.austin.ibm.com
Got HTTP error: 404: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN
htmlhead
title404 Not Found/title
/headbody
h1Not Found/h1
pThe requested URL /api/ was not found on this server./p
/body/html
Using the deprecated Review Board 1.0 web API
== Review Board Login Required
Enter username and password for Review Board at
*http://OUR_SERVER/http://engin-server-01.austin.ibm.com/
*
Logging in with username USER
URL
*http://OUR_SERVER/api/json/accounts/login/http://engin-server-01.austin.ibm.com/api/json/accounts/login/
*
HTTP POSTing to
*http:/OUR_SERVER/api/json/accounts/login/:http://engin-server-01.austin.ibm.com/api/json/accounts/login/:
* {'username': 'USER', 'password': '**'}
Got HTTP error: 404: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN
htmlhead
title404 Not Found/title
/headbody
h1Not Found/h1
pThe requested URL /api/json/accounts/login/ was not found on this
server./p
/body/html
Unable to log in: HTTP 404
All other users are able to utilize post review successfully except this
one user. Maybe they forgot to pay their monthly tab or something :)
Any help or advise is much appreciated.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
turn off issues feature?
We need a positive way to indicate that a review was done. Currently we use a manual process of adding an OK comment to each code review by each reviewer. When all comments are OK, then we know the review passed. This process worked ok in 1.0.7 but fails for us in the current version because the new issues feature now flags every comment as an issue when, in our case, they are not. So a couple of questions: 1) is there a way to turn off the issues feature? 2) is there a way to have the issues feature exclude comments with a given pattern e.g. /^OK$/i ? John -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
post-review selecting PerForce Repository instead of Subversion.
Host OS WIndows XP RBTools 0.4.1 shell is MKS ksh GnuWin32 diff tools installed and in PATH Host has PerForce and Subversion installed and configured. CWD is SVN workspace C:/viewsvn/sosmain dano@USENDESKELID1E svn info Path: . Working Copy Root Path: C:\viewsvn\sosmain URL: https://rmsgsvn/svn/storageos/StorageOS/main/integration Repository Root: https://rmsgsvn/svn/storageos Repository UUID: 38175d5f-3f5d-c6b1-cbdf-dbbbef9fb119 ... .reviewboardrc in CWD has content (no other .reviewboardrc in HOME or else where I'm aware of): REPOSITORY='https://rmsgsvn/svn/storageos' REVIEWBOARD_URL='http://lglah169.lss.emc.com' I run post-review --debug dano@USENDESKELID1E post-review --debug RBTools 0.4.1 Home = C:\Documents and Settings\deskeli\Application Data HTTP GETting api/ HTTP GETting http://lglah169.lss.emc.com/api/info/ Using the new web API Failed to execute command: ['p4', 'opened', '-c', 'default'] [Client 'USENDESKELID1E' unknown - use 'client' command to create it.\n How do I get it to select Subversion, instead of PerForce. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: How to install old version of RB server
Hi, sorry to horn in on this thread, but I'm having a similar issue.
I'm trying to install version 1.5.5 on a test machine so I can then upgrade
it to the current version before doing so on my production machine.
When I attempt to use the command you list, easy_install ReviewBoard==1.5.5
I get this output;
#easy_install ReviewBoard==1.5.5
Searching for ReviewBoard==1.5.5
Best match: ReviewBoard 1.5.5
Processing ReviewBoard-1.5.5-py2.4.egg
Removing ReviewBoard 1.5.5 from easy-install.pth file
Adding ReviewBoard 1.5.5 to easy-install.pth file
Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin
Installing rbssh script to /usr/bin
Using /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.5.5-py2.4.egg
Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard==1.5.5
Searching for Djblets=0.6.7
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/Djblets/
Reading http://www.review-board.org/wiki/Djblets
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/Djblets/0.6/
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/
Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/wiki/Djblets
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/Djblets/0.7/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/Djblets/0.6/
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/Djblets/0.5/
Best match: Djblets 0.7.1
Downloading
http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/Djblets/0.7/Djblets-0.7.1.tar.gz
Processing Djblets-0.7.1.tar.gz
Running Djblets-0.7.1/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir
/tmp/easy_install-PZQMbC/Djblets-0.7.1/egg-dist-tmp-MFddqC
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 18, in ?
ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py, line
153, in call_command
klass = load_command_class(app_name, name)
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py, line
68, in load_command_class
return module.Command()
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py,
line 41, in __init__
self.storage = get_storage_class(settings.STATICFILES_STORAGE)()
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/core/files/storage.py,
line 265, in get_storage_class
raise ImproperlyConfigured('Error importing storage module %s: %s' %
(module, e))
django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing storage module
pipeline.storage: No module named pipeline.storage
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/easy_install, line 7, in ?
sys.exit(
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c12dev_r88846-py2.4.egg/setuptools/command/easy_install.py,
line 1712, in main
with_ei_usage(lambda:
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c12dev_r88846-py2.4.egg/setuptools/command/easy_install.py,
line 1700, in with_ei_usage
return f()
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c12dev_r88846-py2.4.egg/setuptools/command/easy_install.py,
line 1716, in lambda
distclass=DistributionWithoutHelpCommands, **kw
File /usr/lib64/python2.4/distutils/core.py, line 149, in setup
dist.run_commands()
File /usr/lib64/python2.4/distutils/dist.py, line 946, in run_commands
self.run_command(cmd)
File /usr/lib64/python2.4/distutils/dist.py, line 966, in run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c12dev_r88846-py2.4.egg/setuptools/command/easy_install.py,
line 211, in run
self.easy_install(spec, not self.no_deps)
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c12dev_r88846-py2.4.egg/setuptools/command/easy_install.py,
line 446, in easy_install
return self.install_item(spec, dist.location, tmpdir, deps)
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c12dev_r88846-py2.4.egg/setuptools/command/easy_install.py,
line 481, in install_item
self.process_distribution(spec, dists[0], deps, Using)
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c12dev_r88846-py2.4.egg/setuptools/command/easy_install.py,
line 518, in process_distribution
distros = WorkingSet([]).resolve(
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c12dev_r88846-py2.4.egg/pkg_resources.py,
line 563, in resolve
dist = best[req.key] = env.best_match(req, self, installer)
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c12dev_r88846-py2.4.egg/pkg_resources.py,
line 799, in best_match
return self.obtain(req, installer) # try and download/install
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c12dev_r88846-py2.4.egg/pkg_resources.py,
line 811, in obtain
return installer(requirement)
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c12dev_r88846-py2.4.egg/setuptools/command/easy_install.py,
line 446, in easy_install
return self.install_item(spec, dist.location, tmpdir, deps)
File
Re: turn off issues feature?
Christian, Thanks for the response. We're going to try a couple of things on our workflow tomorrow to see if we can leverage the issues feature. You've brought up some good points and perhaps we can use them to our advantage. BTW we found the checkbox Always open an issue when comment box opens in My Account Preferences -- thanks for the heads up! I want to clarify something though. We use OK to indicate one of two things: 1) OK I've reviewed this file and found nothing wrong with it 2) OK I've reviewed your response to a previous comment and it's now good/fixed. We'll double-check it out tomorrow but it looks like the issues feature works very well for the second item but might be lacking for the first. The first item may seem unnecessary to some folks but we live in an FDA regulated environment and so we would like to give a positive, active indication that a reviewer has reviewed each and every file. The OK is not passive, it's active. The reviewer has to do *something* visible to show they've actually performed the review of a file. On the other hand, the passive workflow (i.e. no OK comment) leaves some ambiguity as to whether the reviewer a) forgot to review the file or b) reviewed it but found nothing wrong. The OK removes that ambiguity. John On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi John, The issues feature is actually meant to replace having to say OK or Fixed. It's just a way of saying, This needs to be done and for the other person to respond saying It's done! Going forward, we're building on this through the introduction of an issue summary table in 1.7 (which shows what issues are still pending, so you have a To Do list of sorts), and we'll also be showing the fixed issues on every diff update. Now, we're also introducing a per-user option to default that Open An Issue checkbox to unchecked for new comments. There's no site-wide default, but I suppose that could be added. Still, I think issues actually integrates into your workflow even nicer. Just open the issues, and instead of OK, hit Fixed. The effect is the same, but you'll gain some benefits going forward. Christian -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Issue 2724 in reviewboard: Ship it when issues are open
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2724 by kvr@gmail.com: Ship it when issues are open http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2724 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. * * If you need immediate support, please contact* * reviewbo...@googlegroups.com * What version are you running? Review Board-1.7 beta1 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? What steps will reproduce the problem? 1.Create a review request and assign to reviewer. 2.Reviewer will open an issue on the review request. 3.Ship it is possible by reviewer when issues are open for a review. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? User should not be able to ship when issues are open What operating system are you using? What browser? Ubuntu Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2724 in reviewboard: Ship it when issues are open
Updates: Status: NotABug Comment #1 on issue 2724 by trowb...@gmail.com: Ship it when issues are open http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2724 This is the intended behavior. One fairly common use case is for multiple people to each sign off on a piece of the code. We don't want to prevent someone from saying their area looks good just because some other area has an issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 2725 in reviewboard: Failed to Update Diff in existing Review Request
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2725 by davwill...@gmail.com: Failed to Update Diff in existing Review Request http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2725 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. * * If you need immediate support, please contact* * reviewbo...@googlegroups.com * What version are you running? 1.6.3 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? http://charlie.rose.hp.com/r/14959/ What steps will reproduce the problem? 1.Update Diff 2. 3. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? It should update the diff. Instead I get this error message: The file /trunk/cti/windjammer/drt/xtracker/xtracker/TestSet.pl (revision 65874) was not found in the repository What operating system are you using? What browser? Windows 7 Firefox 14 Please provide any additional information below. I have updated diff's in the past, but this instance is failing. After reviewers comments, I modified the files, created a new diff, saved it locally, and tried to update the diff on the review request. Attachments: ReviewBoardBug.png 73.9 KB -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
